Comments on: Comments on 20833

Post number 20833

suprfli — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:43:44 -0800

It was bound to happen. Danger Porn is a site made exclusively for the Danger Sidekick and the browsing of porn.

By: Stan Chin

Stan Chin — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:52:58 -0800

I always figured the only reason the Danger Sidekick had mobile internet and came with that little camera was for instant updating of "Upskirt" fetish sites. Or maybe I've just stumbled onto a gold mine.

By: Steve_at_Linnwood

Steve_at_Linnwood — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:53:35 -0800

Ahh better living through modern technology...

By: PWA_BadBoy

PWA_BadBoy — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:07:02 -0800

They're not actually taken with the Sidekick cam are they? The pictures seem too high quality to come from the tiny little camera on the Sidekick

By: skallas

skallas — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:10:24 -0800

These aren't photos from the sidekick they're for the sidekick. My SK camera is color and produces some pretty tiny output. I haven't, err, tested this site yet, but I'm assuming the format they chose renders nicely through danger's proxy servers and onto the SK screen.

By: dangerman

dangerman — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:10:25 -0800

Porn!

By: suprfli

suprfli — Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:17:13 -0800

skallas: let us know how the err, test goes.

By: dhartung

dhartung — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:14:51 -0800

Remind me to look over the shoulder of someone using one of these. Or, wait, no -- remind me not to.

By: salmacis

salmacis — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:29:23 -0800

Since I'm a) at work, and thus have no intention of clicking on the link, and b) using linux, can someone please explain what the hell the Danger Sidekick is and what the hell the link is about?

By: perplexed

perplexed — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:45:08 -0800

My first visit to MF on my hiptop and this is the link. What are the odds? (probably pretty good these days...)

By: The God Complex

The God Complex — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 01:05:49 -0800

Is it waterproof? I've always wanted easily-transportable pr0n in the comfort of my home shower. I'm tired of laminating my favorite playmates and having everyone at the store look at me funny.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:25:51 -0800

The Danger HipTop (also known as T-Mobile Sidekick) is a cheesy little all-in-one wireless device with nothing going for it but first-to-market advantage. Wretched UI, low production values, stoopit name. More here. (Self-link)

By: planetkyoto

planetkyoto — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 03:26:34 -0800

Cell phones have had cameras for a couple of years now here in Japan, and it's becoming a problem because guys can hold them under women's skirts on escalators and take pictures without being noticed.

By: mischief

mischief — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 04:17:51 -0800

guys can hold them under women's skirts Once again, perversion is the root cause for technology advancement. Cool!

By: ralawrence

ralawrence — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 04:25:38 -0800

I find it highly ironic that the one of the people that complains about the rendering of pages on the Sidekick/HipTop can't actually write valid XHTML. 50 errors, how clean.

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 04:38:05 -0800

beautiful pics.

By: CoolHandPuke

CoolHandPuke — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 05:55:12 -0800

Since I'm a) at work, and thus have no intention of clicking on the link - Salmacis Suprfli, even though the post says PORN in it, you should put the good 'ol NSFW (Not Safe For Work) text with it as well.

By: anildash

anildash — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:54:19 -0800

Uh, Richard? I can write valid markup, I just didn't. It's not a jihad.

By: Daze

Daze — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:58:45 -0800

Thanks adamg for the explanation. I thought maybe Danger Sidekick was a rare vision disorder that caused people to see everything sideways.

By: stevenf

stevenf — Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:26:20 -0800

I couldn't disagree more with adamgreenfield's SideKick review. I think it's a fantastic device. My (positive) review here: http://www.panic.com/~stevenf/mt/archives/000077.php#000077 (Sorry, yes, another self-link)

By: ralawrence

ralawrence — Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:10:23 -0800

Uh, Richard? I can write valid markup, I just didn't. It's not a jihad. Sure you can. How about cleaning up your pages then?

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:23:01 -0800

Sorry you disagree so strongly, stevenf. If it makes you feel any better, I always loved Audion. ; . )

By: stevenf

stevenf — Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:33:40 -0800

No hard feelings, Adam. :) Everyone's entitled to their opinion.

By: anildash

anildash — Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:18:48 -0800

Sure you can. How about cleaning up your pages then? I'll get right on that. Meanwhile, you go make your mom's bed. I left it unmade this morning.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:30:16 -0800

Now, now...