<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 20839</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 20839</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:52:36 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:52:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 20839</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregus.com/content/4/26656.html"&gt;The DMCA&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t the only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dumblaws.com/&quot;&gt;Dumb Law&lt;/a&gt;.  So may &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawguru.com/weird/part01.html&quot;&gt;Strange&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawguru.com/weird/part02.html&quot;&gt;Laws&lt;/a&gt;, even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dribbleglass.com/subpages/strange/sexlaws.htm&quot;&gt;Sex Laws&lt;/a&gt;. There&apos;s many fun &lt;a href=&quot;http://sneakykitchen.com/Humor/old_laws.htm&quot;&gt;Obsolete Laws&lt;/a&gt; still on the books. 
The list &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalspider.com/funnylaw/default.asp&quot;&gt;Goes&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.terrajoke.com/terra_jokes/funny_laws/default_laws.htm&quot;&gt;On&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cains.com/cains/funnies/laws.html&quot;&gt;On&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Not sure what laws to follow, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.llrx.com/&quot;&gt;A Law Librarian&lt;/a&gt;, or, better yet,   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vvchristianchurch.org/Sermons/lev19.htm&quot;&gt;WWJD&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>		<category>law</category>		<category>laws</category>		<category>dumb</category>		<category>silly</category>		<category>obsolete</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: insomnyuk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367047</link>	
		<description>Oooh, a debate about Levitical Law on MetaFilter.  My mouth is watering.  Maybe Leviticus 19:19 could be construed as a warning against cloning animals and vegetables?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367047</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:52:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>insomnyuk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rushmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367092</link>	
		<description>Sufficient proof for anyone, surely, that human beings are an inherently--and defiantly--irrational species.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367092</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:50:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: originalname37</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367237</link>	
		<description>Having a large number of obsolete laws on the books increases the chance that, if the state wants to arrest you for any reason (legitimate or not), it will be able to find an excuse.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367237</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:03:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>originalname37</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quarantine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367620</link>	
		<description>I wish just one of these stupid law pages would link to or precisely cite the original sources.  I am suspicious that many of these &quot;laws&quot; are simply copied from previous lists and may have originally been made up for humorous effect.  I also suspect that some laws may be misconstrued.  Anyone have a well-researched list of obsolete laws?  (No offense intended, Blake.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367620</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:27:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quarantine</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quarantine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367628</link>	
		<description>That&apos;s meant to be parsed &quot;(stupid law) pages&quot;, not &quot;stupid (law pages)&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367628</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:31:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quarantine</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: apollo3000</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20839/#367838</link>	
		<description>I think it imperative that we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/almostaghost/S/sexxlaws.html&quot;&gt;defy the logic of these sex laws.&lt;/a&gt;

Carnivores in the Kowloon night, breathing freon by the candlelight...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20839-367838</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:36:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apollo3000</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
