<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 2215</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2215//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 2215</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 07:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 07:46:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 2215</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2215/</link>	
		<description>Let web designers have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/&quot;&gt;Jakob Nielsen&lt;/a&gt; for usability guidance, we Flash designers have our own budding guru of usable Flash on the web at Flazoom.com. The guy behind Flazoom follows up his Cancer piece with some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flazoom.com/news/user_06202000.shtml&quot;&gt;good guidelines for Flash on the web&lt;/a&gt;. 

The best link in the article goes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.halliburton.com/BRS/BRSSRV/BRSSRV_engineering.asp&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, where he asks you to find both uses of Flash on the page. I totally missed the first one, even when I knew what to look for. His use of Flash that just blew me away - hardly any animation, just usefullness.

I&apos;ll stop cheering now...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2215</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 20:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>		<category>jakobnielsen</category>		<category>nielsen</category>		<category>webdesign</category>		<category>flash</category>		<category>usability</category>		<category>design</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aladfar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2215/#10613</link>	
		<description>I found the Flash - but only by cheating and right clicking on things.

This is of course what Flash was supposed to be.  Fast loading, clean and useful.  How unfortunate that it has been corrupted into obscenely large &quot;intro movies&quot;.

I&apos;ve been reading up on designing for wireless devices - doing so requires a VERY minimalist design philosophy.  I&apos;ve enjpyed working with those constraints.

Alas, folks are already figuring out ways to present Flash content through handheld devices.

Sigh . . . </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2215-10613</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 07:46:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aladfar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: baylink</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2215/#10623</link>	
		<description>I found it ironic that he&apos;s going all off about how it&apos;s *my* computer... and then I notice the horizontal scroll bar at the bottom of the page...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2215-10623</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
