<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: William Gibson&apos;s new weblog</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post William Gibson&apos;s new weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:31:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:31:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>William Gibson&apos;s new weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/blog/blog.asp"&gt;William Gibson&apos;s weblog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Gibson, the man who popularized cyberpunk and who, through his invention of the word &quot;cyberspace,&quot; may have been the first to assign the sense of space to network interactions (but who also gained a measure of early net.notoriety by shunning even email for years), began publishing a weblog a few days ago.  Early topics include his thinking on &quot;piracy,&quot; the physical perfection of form found in books, inspirations for his work, and the relationship of one well-regarded writer to grammar nazis.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:24:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>		<category>weblog</category>		<category>williamgibson</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414426</link>	
		<description>via &lt;a href=&quot;http://boingboing.net/2003_01_01_archive.html#90150797&quot;&gt;Boing Boing&lt;/a&gt;

He&apos;s a much better novelist/short story writer than he is a blogger -- there&apos;s not that many entries yet but Gibson writes about general-interest and personal stuff in a not very interesting way -- at least if you&apos;ve already read a few interviews and you&apos;re familiar with his work. 

speaking of famous people&apos;s blogs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.avary.com/rogeravary/journal/journal.php&quot;&gt;director Roger Avary &lt;/a&gt;(Pulp Fiction co-screenwriter) at least sometimes links to interesting stuff</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414426</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:31:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: NortonDC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414428</link>	
		<description>No, it&apos;s via Warren Ellis&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diepunyhumans.com&quot;&gt;Die Puny Humans&lt;/a&gt;.  I don&apos;t frequent boing boing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414428</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:39:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414430</link>	
		<description>so, indirectly, this is the guy who is responsible for atrocities like &quot;blogosphere&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20021227-053135-8881r&quot;&gt;&quot;hispanosphere&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wnet/mediamatters/303/media_players/video_blogs_hi.html&quot;&gt;owillisphere&lt;/a&gt;? kill the sumbitch!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414430</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stavrosthewonderchicken</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414443</link>	
		<description>*jumps all over quonsar and pummels him mercilessly, all the while struggling to genuflect in La Gibson&apos;s general direction*</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414443</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: 111</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414450</link>	
		<description>&quot;You could have sex relatively comfortably on a platform of books, but not on a platform of PDA&apos;s. &quot;

Good  point. The problem with Gibson is that, although he tries hard to appear noncommittal etc,  he&apos;s too vain and too much of a namedropper-- traits that generally make for a poor blogger. The way he starts his posts with &quot;someone writes to ask about&quot; etc etc is slightly annoying as well.
He&apos;s our middlebrow sf writer du jour, so I guess his blog may have a certain significance. It&apos;s up to him. 

ps:I don&apos;t buy his &quot;hey, my grammatical errors are intentional&quot; argument either. 
(This link has been featured in LinkMachinego too, btw.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414450</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:35:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>111</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: iconomy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414455</link>	
		<description>I thought it was great. Thanks for the link, NortonDC.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414455</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:47:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: iconomy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414461</link>	
		<description>Qualifying: Great, as in &quot;a great time was had while reading it&quot;. Not great, as in &quot;epic proportions&quot;. It wasn&apos;t &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; great ;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414461</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:53:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414474</link>	
		<description>since he has a new novel coming out this all seems a little bit icky.  how many months after it&apos;s released will he still be posting?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414474</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 07:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414486</link>	
		<description>You&apos;re all a bunch of cynics.

I think once he gets some more content, it should be an interesting visit into the mind of a writer, regardless of what you think of his qualifications.

I mean, he may not be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wilwheaton.net/&quot;&gt;Wil Wheaton&lt;/a&gt;, but give him a chance.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414486</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 07:25:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UncleFes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414575</link>	
		<description>Just to clarify, Gibson did not invent either the term &quot;cyberpunk&quot; or &quot;cyberspace.&quot; The latter he lifted from mathematician &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Wiener_Norbert.html&quot;&gt;Norbert Weiner&lt;/a&gt;, who is considered the founder of the field of cybernetics; the former was first used in 1980 in a short story of the same name by author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infinityplus.co.uk/stories/cpunk.htm&quot;&gt;Bruce Bethke&lt;/a&gt;, and later used by editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catch22.com/SF/ARB/SFD/Dozois,Gardner.php3&quot;&gt;Gardner Dozois &lt;/a&gt;to describe the work of Gibson, Bruce Sterline, Greg Bear, Rudy Rucker, Pat Cadigan, and some other authors.

&lt;i&gt;since he has a new novel coming out this all seems a little bit icky. how many months after it&apos;s released will he still be posting?&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm. Gibson has gone on the record in interviews several times describing himself as a &quot;technophobe.&quot; He typed Neuromancer on an IBM Selectric. He by his own admission uses computers rarely and dislikes them for his work. I would guess this blog is a sop to his publisher. His last books were excellent and showed a real maturity and thematic and literary growth, but were not as well received as the &quot;Sprawl&quot; series. Like Grunge music, Cyberpunk SF represented/crystalized the thought of a certain group at a certain place at a certain time, but is now as antiquated and (subsequently) irrelevant as, say, Pearl Jam&apos;s latest album.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414575</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:04:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UncleFes</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: IshmaelGraves</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414615</link>	
		<description>Hmm.

I still like Gibson, although this is not an exceptional blog.  However, it&apos;s not &lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt;, either.  And I don&apos;t think Gibson is as much a technophobe as all that, either.  He&apos;s written a few things for Wired, and been written about there, which seem to me to imply that he has a great respect for technology that is not limited to the cutting edge but includes vintage clockworks and so on.

Gibson was the precursor to Stephenson and the Matrix and all the post-Singularity sf we&apos;ve got floating around now (i.e., some of Cory Doctorow&apos;s stuff).  Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing is certainly debatable, but the fact is that Gibson&apos;s early work &#8212; including &lt;i&gt;Neuromancer&lt;/i&gt;, including damn near every story in &lt;i&gt;Burning Chrome&lt;/i&gt; &#8212; is still a phenomenal read and helped the computer/online community to be able to see itself as a cohesive and valid subculture.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414615</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IshmaelGraves</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414631</link>	
		<description>Stavros:  I don&apos;t think Gibson&apos;s gonna like your genuflecting at his wife.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414631</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:52:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: NortonDC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414636</link>	
		<description>&lt;b&gt;UncleFes&lt;/b&gt; - I find no evidence that Weiner used the word &quot;cyberspace&quot; before Gibson.  I&apos;d very much appreciate any evidence you can point to.

As far as I can tell, the word &quot;cyberspace&quot; &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; Gibson&apos;s invention.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414636</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:58:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Songdog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414669</link>	
		<description>UncleFes, Gibson himself &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/source/source.asp&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; (near the bottom):&lt;blockquote&gt; Google me and you can learn that I do it all on a manual typewriter, something that hasn&apos;t been true since 1985, but which makes such an easy hook for a lazy journalist that I expect to be reading it for the rest of my life. I only used a typewriter because that was what everyone used in 1977, and it was manual because that was what I happened to have been able to get, for free. I did avoid the Internet, but only until the advent of the Web turned it into such a magnificent opportunity to waste time that I could no longer resist. Today I probably spend as much time there as I do anywhere...&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414669</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 10:15:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Songdog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: acutetype</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414757</link>	
		<description>Yeah Uncle Fez, give it up -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quinion.com/words/articles/cyber.htm&quot;&gt;Gibson coined the term &lt;/a&gt;in &apos;80 in a short story. And you didn&apos;t even mention Vernor Vinge&apos;s TrueNames which really began it all! But he didn&apos;t  s p e l l   i t   o u t . . . .

Hat tip to Gardner though, I&apos;d believe that about &quot;cyberpunk.&quot; 

Gibson, Sterling, Bear, Rucker, Vinge, Banks (kinda), Shirley, Shiner, Stephenson, Maddox, Cadigan, Melville, Gunn, Womack, Hamilton (kinda). Shane Dix/Sean Williams! Alister Reynolds. Ken Macleod. Eric Nylund! Alexander Besher! Tad Williams....

I love sci-fi.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414757</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:51:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acutetype</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UncleFes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414767</link>	
		<description>NortonDC &amp;amp; acutetype: My understanding is that Weiner first used the term in his book &quot;Cybernetics&quot; but I could be in error on that, I don&apos;t have the book in front of me. Songdog, I&apos;ve read previously (an article in Wired several years back, another in an anthology of SF writers, I&apos;d have to check my thesis bib) the item about the typewriter. But if he says it hasn&apos;t been true since 1985, and Neuromancer was published in 1984, then maybe we&apos;re both correct. Gibson has something of an interst in playing down the Ludd-y ethos he previous seemed to perpetrate, in light of his Patron Saint of Cyberpunk status.

imo, Sterling was always the real patron saint of cyberpunk, and still is, a visionary thinker and seminal technocrat. Gibson is a prose stylist - and DAMN good one, but not the visionary that he seems to often get credit for.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414767</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:58:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UncleFes</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UncleFes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414778</link>	
		<description>*checks acutetypes link*

I&apos;ll be damned. I stand corrected! *bows*

I always saw Vinge as more a traditional thematicist than a cyberpunk, although he certainly incorporated some cp elements. Sort of like Iain Bank&apos;s Culture stuff - space opera with postmodern sensibilities, where cp was distilled dystopiac postmodernism.

*adopts snooty grad school mein, moons crowd*</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414778</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UncleFes</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: troutfishing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414812</link>	
		<description>At the wedding, instead of rice, they&apos;ll be throwing microchips</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414812</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414818</link>	
		<description>Motorola or Intel?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414818</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Opus Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#414862</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s fun to watch bloggers wag their tails every time a meatspace-certified celebrity fails to confect a transcendent blog.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-414862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2003 14:10:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Opus Dark</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: acutetype</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22744/William-Gibsons-new-weblog#415348</link>	
		<description>No prob Uncle -- not like ANY source is definitive these days, but I do admire William. 

AND I COMPLETELY AGREE that William is just an incredible stylist but that yes, Bruce can really get your brain tingling! For all my admiration though, if put to name my top three favs, Vinge knocks off Sterling. And yep, Banks is right there in front of Vinge.... Gibson, Banks, Vinge ... then Sterling and Bear...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.22744-415348</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2003 16:10:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acutetype</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
