<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 2287</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 2287</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:57:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 2287</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/000627/ny_vault_c.html"&gt;According to a halfway-serious survey, one-third of business e-mailers go &lt;font color=&quot;#ffffff&quot; size=+3&gt;:-(&lt;/font&gt; when they see &lt;font color=&quot;#ffffff&quot; size=+3&gt;:-)&lt;/font&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;They didn&apos;t ask whether it was better with the nose &lt;font size=+3&gt;:-)&lt;/font&gt; or without &lt;font size=+3&gt;:)&lt;/font&gt; or in semi-profile &lt;font size=+3&gt;:^)&lt;/font&gt;, or if if the toungue should be represented by the lower-case-b &lt;font size=+3&gt;:-b&lt;/font&gt; or upper-case-P &lt;font size=+3&gt;:-P&lt;/font&gt;, and what about when you put a smiley inside parentheses (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uncorked.org/medley/&quot;&gt;Here&apos;s a survey on THAT topic&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Nominee for Most Trivial Topic on MetaFilter in June!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:48:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>		<category>email</category>		<category>emoticons</category>		<category>business</category>		<category>etiquette</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: harmful</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11149</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d go ballistic too if I had to read an e-mail this badly formatted. I&apos;m using IE5/Win, and the large fonts are overwriting the text on the prev line. Of course, I initially assumed it was a standard-issue IE rendering crash.

Then again, I&apos;m one of the people who was way into USENET at the beginning of the September that Never Ended, and got sick of smileys pretty bloody quickly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11149</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>harmful</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11152</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m using IE5/Win, and I was surprised how extreme (font size=+3) I had to go to make the dreaded smileys ANY larger than the rest of the text on my screen.  Maybe it was something in my personal Metafilter specs. D&apos;oh.  My bad. Bygones. Nevermind.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11152</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:04:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cCranium</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11168</link>	
		<description>well, regardless of the formatting, I want to stand up and defend my smilie usage, darn it!

I&apos;m an avid smilier, it&apos;s been a part of my online communication since like, &apos;92 when I started BBSing.  It&apos;s a tool I use to facilitate communication, and I use it avidly.  (I also close parenthesis with it all the time, regardless of the other survey&apos;s findings :-)

At the same time, during business communication?  Never!  I use smilies like I use slang - where appropriate.  Although I probably COULD, I&apos;m not gonna call up the president of the company, force speakerphone and shout &quot;WHAZZUUUUP??!&quot; (and not just because the dead horse has been thoroughly beaten, either!).

I use smilies to facilitate conversation, but the stuff I have to talk about in my business email would be hampered, rather than helped, by smilies.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11168</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:21:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cCranium</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: corpse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11178</link>	
		<description>i hate smiles.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11178</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:02:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>corpse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: FAB4GIRL</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11181</link>	
		<description>I liked that post! Reminds me of someone who smiles a lot!
;-) &lt;---I wink too much. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11181</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:16:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FAB4GIRL</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11185</link>	
		<description>I do use the wink ;-) ... the blecch tongue :-P ... and the mixed feelings :-S emoticons. Not too many pure smileys (except sometimes tossed into the end of a paren block like this :).

I don&apos;t see anything wrong with it in casual e-mail, certainly not in chat. I&apos;m definitely with cC here: there is a time and a place. A business e-mail is NOT the place. That&apos;s not to say that a REPLY to a business e-mail can&apos;t be the place, but you certainly want to pick your recipients carefully. Your boss -- maybe.

&quot;You want me to pull the router now or should I wait until after everybody&apos;s gone home? :)&quot;

Your boss&apos;s boss ... never! Department memo -- never! Warning to users ... possibly, if you&apos;re attempting to be cuddly and accessible. (But who in this business ever is, heh).

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11185</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:47:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EricBrooksDotCom</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11190</link>	
		<description>&lt;STYLE&gt; .humor  {font-size : 12pt; font-family : Comic Sans MS, Tekton, sans-serif; }&lt;/STYLE&gt;
Wendell, I actually had to examine the source codes  to see how you made those emoticons overlap the words like that.  That was so cool....

Any way, back on topic... I have to use emoticons to convey what I&apos;m trying to say, because no one knows when I&apos;m serious or not.  I also find I have to *emphasise* words to get my point across....

Prolific&apos;s Caroline and Steven Champeon taught me the evils of HTML mail two years ago. :0)

&lt;DIV align=&quot;center&quot; class=&quot;humor&quot;&gt;Otherwise I&apos;d write everything in &quot;Comic Sans&quot; to get my point across&lt;/DIV&gt;

I hope this doesn&apos;t make everone write in &quot;Comic Sans&quot; through the rest of the thread... 8^*
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11190</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EricBrooksDotCom</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZachsMind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11193</link>	
		<description>I think everyone else in the world does smileys wrong. =) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11193</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:56:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: centrs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11194</link>	
		<description>kottke did an emoticon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kottke.org/notes/0005.html#000503&quot; target=&quot;external&quot;&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt; back at the beginning of the month...

(link opens in new window because i like it that way) :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11194</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>centrs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sudama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11206</link>	
		<description>this is my new favorite &apos;smiley&apos;:  8|</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11206</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:23:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sudama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11211</link>	
		<description>Reminds me a little of an &quot;aardman smiley&quot;:
&lt;big&gt;8cE&lt;/big&gt;
(unfortunately the upeer-case-E teeth look awful in any serif font)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11211</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:21:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sapphireblue</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2287/#11213</link>	
		<description>the sarcasticon rules :&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2287-11213</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:55:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sapphireblue</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
