Happy Valerntine's Day!

February 10, 2003 1:57 PM

Early Happy Valentine's wishesfrom the Bush Administration; warm wishes in these troubled times.
posted by xmutex (25 comments total)

I feel violated, but still am glad the one's updated their page. It's been awhile. The mouseover text is hilarious, as always.
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:02 PM on February 10, 2003

Speaking of violated, is Dick doing what I think he's doing to Jerry?
posted by PinkStainlessTail at 2:07 PM on February 10, 2003

My God. That site is horribly beautiful.
posted by crunchland at 2:09 PM on February 10, 2003

heheheheheh...
posted by Shane at 2:12 PM on February 10, 2003

my eyes......jesus that's an ugly site....stupid too.
posted by mkelley at 2:13 PM on February 10, 2003

That is quite possibly the most inexpensive way I have ever been convinced to never do drugs, ever.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 2:21 PM on February 10, 2003

I'm not sure what was the most disturbing thing about that, but the front runner right now is the cheesy midi version of the Celine Dijon, Titanic song!
posted by Pollomacho at 2:26 PM on February 10, 2003

Not a callout, but past Mefi response can be found here
posted by jeremias at 2:32 PM on February 10, 2003

Now I'm schizophrenic! Thanks a lot.
posted by Mayor Curley at 2:40 PM on February 10, 2003

So it's now ok for hipster web desginers in The Marxist Republic of San Francisco to make post-modern visual jokes involving the horrible deaths of people in the World Trade Center? That's good to know.

Even if I agreed with the sentiments behind such a thing (or, indeed if I could figure out what the sentiments are), I wouldn't like it. It's the lowest form of political (Is it political?) satire, and expresses only cynicism, nihilism, and mean-spiritedness. Not to mention being fucking ugly as sin.

But hey! We're post-modern! We don't need no steenkin' beauty!
posted by sir walsingham at 2:44 PM on February 10, 2003

WHAT.
THE.
FUCK.
ANYONE?!
posted by Orange Goblin at 3:00 PM on February 10, 2003

Yeah, this is ill-informed and ugly. And that's really all you can say about it.
posted by Yelling At Nothing at 3:02 PM on February 10, 2003

I have to agree; just as... sad... as it was last time around.
posted by jammer at 3:03 PM on February 10, 2003

I agree with everything sir walsingham says, but non-sarcastically. love it. It has a certain Anarco-dada-Japano-mescaline je-ne-sais-quoi to it. Like a still-life animutation. Although I think they're probably getting their bandwidth clocks cleaned, so to speak. Compression, people!
posted by condour75 at 3:12 PM on February 10, 2003

You guys must've croaked the server, it's pretty catch as catch can now. I never got the complete page to load and gave up after a bit.
posted by Dean_Paxton at 3:24 PM on February 10, 2003

Jesus had nothing to do with that.

Now I know what websites in Hell look like.
posted by konolia at 3:25 PM on February 10, 2003

So it's now ok for hipster web desginers in The Marxist Republic of San Francisco to make post-modern visual jokes involving the horrible deaths of people in the World Trade Center?

yes.
it probably also mocks millions that died under mao, but that's long ago and they're not americans, so i don't blame you for ignoring them (just in case you wondered if it was ok to do that). please also note that under the bleeding patriotic hearts trying to make others feel bad convention of 1967 i have now won this game and you owe me a pony
posted by andrew cooke at 3:31 PM on February 10, 2003

i think his stuff is inspired.
posted by donkeyschlong at 3:31 PM on February 10, 2003

"It has a certain Anarco-dada-Japano-mescaline je-ne-sais-quoi to it."

Yes.

"i think his stuff is inspired."

Yes. Yes.

"please also note that under the bleeding patriotic hearts trying to make others feel bad convention of 1967 i have now won this game and you owe me a pony"

Yes. Yes. Yes.

With regards to 60X1.com, [This Is Good]. Beauty is relative, but if you don't appreciate it on an aesthetic or ideological level, you should recognise the amount of time and meticulous effort that went into producing this.

Two thumbs up from me.
posted by armoured-ant at 4:01 PM on February 10, 2003

[this is shiny]
posted by holloway at 4:12 PM on February 10, 2003

...they're probably getting their bandwidth clocks cleaned...
Prophetic indeed - "The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later."
posted by dg at 4:35 PM on February 10, 2003

he likes it!
posted by Satapher at 4:53 PM on February 10, 2003

my eyes!
posted by ronv at 5:16 PM on February 10, 2003

Smeagol likes its. Smeagol pleases.
posted by angry modem at 9:41 PM on February 10, 2003

Wow. My eyes.

Here's a less retina-obliterating Valetine's Day present from the Bush administration.
posted by DyRE at 6:59 PM on February 11, 2003