n a six-page written decision released February 14, the court essentially ruled the journalist never stated a valid whistle-blower claim because, they ruled, it is technically not against any law, rule, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a television broadcast.
« Older "I imagine this is the last we will hear of this."... | Pianist Looks for Justice Afte... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Postroad at 10:50 AM on February 22, 2003