<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Techno-Cool Cars</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Techno-Cool Cars</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:50:59 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:50:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Techno-Cool Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/feb03/tcar.html"&gt;Techno-cool cars&lt;/a&gt; include a fingerprint access system that locks out thieves and a heartbeat detector that sniffs out left-behind infants and pets. In the worst case&#8212;when a sensor detects a hostile life form, Star-Trek style, hiding in the car&#8212;the driver can hit a button that alerts the police. The truly paranoid, with access to a freewheeling aftermarket, might prefer to fit the button to an ejection seat. &lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/&quot;&gt;WebMonkey&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:17:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonson</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443695</link>	
		<description>If I had $80,000 to spend on a car, that Cadillac XLR would be mine.  Not for the electrorhealogy thingy, but just cause it looks so damn cool.  Also, no keys, it unlocks and starts with the mere approach of my pants, much like a well paid escort.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443695</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:50:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: riffola</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443701</link>	
		<description>Very cool post. I am always interested in what&apos;s new from the automotive industry, I somehow missed this. Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443701</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:01:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mr_crash_davis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443704</link>	
		<description>I want one that has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/africa/9812/11/flame.thrower.car/&quot;&gt;this option&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443704</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:02:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_crash_davis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eddydamascene</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443754</link>	
		<description>Interesting how the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/feb03/tcarf7.html&quot;&gt;brake-by-wire &lt;/a&gt;Benz has a back-up hydraulic system. I think it will be a few years before people get comfortable with the direction the car industry is going.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443754</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:07:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eddydamascene</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jfuller</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443766</link>	
		<description>jonson :

&amp;gt;  it unlocks and starts with the mere approach of my pants, much like a well paid escort.

eddydamascene:

&amp;gt; I think it will be a few years before people get comfortable with the direction the car industry 
&amp;gt; is going.


Anybody who really lusts after this kind of thing should run, not walk, and review the first scene of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Robocop&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443766</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:27:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: spazzm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443777</link>	
		<description>I agree with eddydamascene regarding the Mercedes.
The interesting thing is that people still trust mechanical contraptions more than the elegance of electrical signal transfer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443777</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:11:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spazzm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eddydamascene</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443787</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Anybody who really lusts after this kind of thing should run, not walk, and review the first scene of Robocop.&lt;/i&gt;

Was that where ED209 kills someone over a syntax error?

&lt;i&gt;The interesting thing is that people still trust mechanical contraptions more than the elegance of electrical signal transfer.&lt;/i&gt;

As I understand it braking and steering control in modern cars relies quite a bit already on embedded electronics, but I think giving up that last bit of illusion of direct control will be hard, even if the solution is elegant. Verifying these systems is no joke, either.

Here&apos;s another interesting feature I found: IBM of two years ago was looking into developing a &quot;driver workload&quot; equation, which may be used to prohibit drivers from accepting cell calls based on certain factors such as vehicle speed and heart rate. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010622S0041&quot;&gt;EE Times&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443787</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eddydamascene</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: asterisk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443807</link>	
		<description>I find it interesting how car manufacturers used to take innovations made on the race track and integrate them into consumer vehicles.  Now it seems that innovations in making the vehicle more &quot;consumer friendly&quot; as it were and taking away all of the road feel. It all sounds like driving in a few years will be blah.

Of course this coming from a college kid who drives a thirty year old British car.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443807</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>asterisk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pinto</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#443818</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m suspended on electrorheological goo</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-443818</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:31:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pinto</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: riffola</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#444096</link>	
		<description>Formula 1 is still the testing grounds for technology that will show up in your cars some day. Engine design, traction control, safety measures, tire tech, etc all seeps back into the consumer end.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-444096</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:58:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23860/TechnoCool-Cars#444693</link>	
		<description>True, riffola, but asterisk is also correct in that new cars are simply boring to drive - generally the advancements coming from F1 today make cars safer, more fuel efficient etc, but not more enjoyable to drive.  The newer the car, the less fun it is to drive it seems.  I have come to the conclusion that so few people actually enjoy driving nowadays that the market is simply not there.  Fortunately, there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/03/frames.htm&quot; title=&quot;&apos;no doors, no screen, no roof&apos; - the way cars were meant to be. Now, where is that lottery ticket?&quot;&gt;someone&lt;/a&gt; who still build cars that are meant to be driven for fun.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.23860-444693</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
