Comments on: U.S. BUNKERS:

U.S. BUNKERS:

aladfar — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:05:11 -0800

U.S. BUNKERS: Life assurance, not life insurance. If you lack faith in duct tape and plastic sheeting, perhaps this is the solution for you.

By: Steve_at_Linnwood

Steve_at_Linnwood — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:14:15 -0800

Oh.. I can't decide between the desert camouflage or the US flag paint scheme...

By: birdherder

birdherder — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:28:27 -0800

Personal bunkers should not be an option on peoples lists, they should be mandatory like in Switzerland... what do the swiss know?

By: Mark Doner

Mark Doner — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:30:17 -0800

"uses: ... Booby Trapped Trojan Horse"

um, yeah...

By: Pollomacho

Pollomacho — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:06:42 -0800

Um, couldn't you have just talked about this yesterday?

By: KnitWit

KnitWit — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:32:00 -0800

Um, couldn't you have just talked about this yesterday? No, because Dave Barry only talked about it today.

By: rotifer

rotifer — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:32:40 -0800

Their syntax gives me a headache.

By: Shane

Shane — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:45:07 -0800

Did Roger Dean and the Monolithic Dome people get in on this design?

By: vbfg

vbfg — Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:21:03 -0800

Having posted a copy of this from here to elsewhere I got this response: I must admit to a slight titter, a couple of years back, when the anti-nuclear, civil defence bunker in Hull had to be closed down due to vandalism. I love that. Protects local government from anything the Sovs could throw at it up to but not including a thirteen year old boy with a magic marker.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:37:15 -0800

The problem with bunkers is that they are static. They don't have legs: they can't just get up and walk away from a too-powerfull threat. That's why I'm buying up a small surplus submarine and equipping it with wings. You've got to cover all the bases.