<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Barbie Blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Barbie Blogs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:03:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:03:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Barbie Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.myscene.com/barbie/barbie_index.asp"&gt;Barbie and her friends now have blogs.&lt;/a&gt; Seeing this seriously made me consider hanging my hat and going home.  They even have webcams, to do lists, and little photo galleries.  The corporate giants are working hard to pull girls in to technology - which is a really good thing.  Too bad the latest posts are about buying mini-skirts and things like that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christine_bpc</dc:creator>		<category>barbie</category>		<category>dolls</category>		<category>popculture</category>		<category>blogs</category>		<category>marketing</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Down10</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455647</link>	
		<description>Saturday, March 15, 2003

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acad.sunytccc.edu/instruct/sbrown/math/whyhard.htm&quot; title=&quot;Why is Math so Hard? (Brown)&quot; _blank&gt;Math is hard!&lt;/a&gt; :P

-B</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455647</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:03:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Down10</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madamjujujive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455650</link>	
		<description>Barbie doesn&apos;t have time for technology - she&apos;s busy in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativefreedomdefense.org/fc_1.htm&quot;&gt;kitchen&lt;/a&gt;. (nsfw!)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455650</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nyxxxx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455658</link>	
		<description>Where&apos;s the link to the webcam where we get to see Barbie on the toliet? I&apos;ve got my credit card info all ready!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455658</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nyxxxx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: HTuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455661</link>	
		<description>Blogs are SO pass&#233;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455661</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:33:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HTuttle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: srboisvert</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455706</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m just glad miniskirts are must haves.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455706</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 05:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>srboisvert</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ph00dz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455749</link>	
		<description>Can you imagine that being your job -- writing barbie&apos;s blog?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455749</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:55:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ph00dz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455750</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;small&gt;3/13/2003  Cool AND Kind
Bumped into Nolee flying down 6th Ave. today. She had two big shopping bags in each hand. I thought she&apos;d hit some major sale or something, but she told me that two days a week she delivers hot meals to elderly people who can&apos;t get out of the house. I swear, that girl is one surprise after another.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
Well, she&apos;s a valley girl with a message, anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455750</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:01:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455754</link>	
		<description>Is it just me or is Barbie looking more and more like Briney &amp;amp; Christina lately? They&apos;re gonna have to start drilling her navel deeper.

Hell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cockeyedabsurdist.com/images/cast.jpg&quot;&gt;Kim Possible&lt;/a&gt; Disney&apos;s latest kiddie heroine has a bare midriff and navel. &lt;i&gt;Disney&lt;/i&gt; fer cryin&apos; out loud.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455754</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:10:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dreama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455764</link>	
		<description>Ahh, another site to add to the blocked list for my daughters...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455764</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dreama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plep</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455768</link>	
		<description>I think it&apos;s great satire.
I wonder if she knows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.efn.org/~acj/adrianmole.html&quot;&gt;Adrian Mole.&lt;/a&gt;
:)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455768</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:40:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Vidiot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455818</link>	
		<description>Adrian Mole rocks!  I&apos;ve been following him since I was 13 and 1/4 myself.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455818</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:08:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vidiot</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: soundofsuburbia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#455921</link>	
		<description>Come on Barbie! Trackback this! I double dare you!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-455921</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:38:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soundofsuburbia</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#456331</link>	
		<description>Okay, so some one explain to me how corporate blogging is worse than the average blogger&apos;s puerile whinings. Most blogs contain links to sites that were linked on more prominent sites, poor writing, uninteresting content, and bad aesthetics in gerneral. How is Raging Cow and Barbie going to make this worse? Get a grip already.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-456331</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:12:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monkeyman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: valerie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24327/Barbie-Blogs#456378</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is it just me or is Barbie looking more and more like Briney &amp;amp; Christina lately? They&apos;re gonna have to start drilling her navel deeper.&lt;/i&gt;

Mattel is trying to get at the &quot;tween&quot; (ages 8-12 for us non-marketing types) market with this series of dolls, or so reports the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediapost.com/dtls_dsp_news.cfm?newsID=195901&quot;&gt;Media Daily News&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24327-456378</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
