<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: cough cough</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post cough cough</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:24:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>cough cough</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/12463.cfm"&gt;The evil weed.&lt;/a&gt; Here&apos;s a cheery little test for you old folks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 03:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnny7</dc:creator>		<category>smoking</category>		<category>lungcancer</category>		<category>riskassessment</category>		<category>test</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jdaura</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459188</link>	
		<description>uhm, okay, if I&apos;m 75 years old, and have been smoking 20 cigarettes for 50 years I have an 8% chance of getting lung cancer. 

The risk vs reward isn&apos;t to bad there. What else do I have an 8% chance of happening to me, I wonder.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459188</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jdaura</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: twine42</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459190</link>	
		<description>75, 50 years of smoking 60 a day, working in the asbestos rich environment, I&apos;ve got a 14% risk of cancer, going up to 18% if I keep smoking.

That has to be fucked up.

Oh, and you can&apos;t estimate your risks if you are below 50, smoke less that 20 a day, or smoked for less that 25 years.

High tech tool. And flash too. Bastard thing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459190</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:29:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>twine42</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: twine42</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459193</link>	
		<description>You have an 8% chance of getting type2 Diabetes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459193</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:33:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>twine42</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459206</link>	
		<description>i am 50, i only smoked about 15 a day until i quit two years ago, and now you say i could have smoked 3 times that for another 25 years against an 8% chance of cancer...?

[visions of marlboro man dance in quonsar&apos;s head]

nah, fuck it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459206</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 05:25:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hairyeyeball</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459213</link>	
		<description>Good old Dubya, the Marlboro Man himself, is blocking an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2445428,00.html&quot;&gt;international treaty&lt;/a&gt; on tobacco advertising, by the way. Marlboros are $8 a pack in NYC, less than $0.50 in Brazil and China. Seek new markets! Fuggit, I got to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quitnet.com/&quot;&gt;quit&lt;/a&gt;. My &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medbroadcast.com/health_topics/smoking/index.shtml?fagerstrom_test.html&quot;&gt;Fagerstrom index&lt;/a&gt; is 70. What&apos;s yours?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459213</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 05:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hairyeyeball</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slithy_Tove</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459218</link>	
		<description>These risks may seem low. However... the problem is, lung cancer is not the only way you can die because you smoked cigarettes. It&apos;s just what everyone thinks first. Smokers may not die of lung cancer because they die of another smoking-related illness first, like emphysema or heart disease.

And and although 8% or 14% may not seem high, for the person it happens to, that&apos;s small consolation. As is the fact that it may happen at age 45 or 50, cutting out a good bit of your life.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459218</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 05:54:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slithy_Tove</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: toothgnip</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459256</link>	
		<description>Damned thing is ageist. I guess I&apos;ll need to keep smoking until I&apos;m 50 to find out my risk.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459256</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:14:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>toothgnip</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459260</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[visions of marlboro man dance in quonsar&apos;s head]&lt;/i&gt;

Didn&apos;t the original Marlboro Man die of cancer? Or AIDs? Or both . . ?

&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Smokers may not die of lung cancer because they die of another smoking-related illness first, like emphysema or heart disease.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, emphysema and its complications (congestive heart failure, lungs-fulla-fluid, etc) were what finally got my tough-as-nails grandmother (slowly and painfully). I think emphysema is much more likely and insidious, as the lungs inevitably become weak and inefficient, in turn causing problems for the heart, etc etc... &lt;/small&gt;

&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;Don&apos;t hate me, geez. I remember what happened the last time I opened my mouth in a thread full of smokers. It was worse than the last PETA debacle. *runs away*&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459260</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:19:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TimeFactor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24491/cough-cough#459356</link>	
		<description>Shane, it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/marlboro.htm&quot;&gt;lung cancer.&lt;/a&gt; Twice.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24491-459356</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:10:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TimeFactor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
