Comments on: Comments on 2479

Post number 2479

phooey — Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:27:05 -0800

Weblogs get some more press ... and it's positive this time!

By: jason

jason — Sat, 15 Jul 2000 22:40:55 -0800

Boring. Another rerun. I think I'm getting sick of articles about weblogs, no matter what kind of stance they take. (Though personally, I'm happy to see Blorg get some press.)

By: dagnyscott

dagnyscott — Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:09:52 -0800

yeah... of course Jorn Barger doesn't need any more press, his ego is big enough as it is (I'm sorry, Jorn, no site is "the only site you need")

By: Mr. skullhead

Mr. skullhead — Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:30:34 -0800

[sniffle] I wasn't mentioned! [sniffle] Interesting that when a positive weblog article come out it's savaged only slightly less than a negative one. Just which way do you people want it? I thought it was a pretty good introduction. Don't forget that most people reading this article have never heard the term 'weblog' before.

By: zarah

zarah — Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:20:01 -0800

very nice article, but thank goodness i'd already discovered weblogs before reading it. with those site examples i'd have instantly lost interest!

By: jason

jason — Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:15:13 -0800

Yeah, Mr. S, good point. I am admittedly jaded from doing this for a while. Honestly, I don't know which way I want it. (bad joke alert:) I guess that makes me "questioning." What I guess I would like to see is a article on weblogs, either positive or negative, that isn't like all the other articles, positive or negative, that have come before it. Just as other folks are getting bored with the same old formulaic weblog, I'm getting bored with the same old formulaic weblog articles.