<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: None dare call it blogging.</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post None dare call it blogging.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:18:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>None dare call it blogging.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2003/s822028.htm"&gt;Superseding the mainstream media, or &quot;quirky parasites&quot;?&lt;/a&gt; Less of interest here than the IraqFilter context itself - which amounts to the question &quot;Is blogging to Gulf II what TV was to Vietnam and cable was to Gulf I?&quot; - is an established medium caught in the act of visibly sizing up this comer, this new kid on the block, this parvenu we know as &quot;blogging.&quot; 

Is it a valid new medium of reportage, fit to take its place alongside print and broadcast? Or is it merely parasitic, interstitial, even marginal? Inquiring minds want to know. (Note O&apos;Donnell&apos;s hedges and his final &amp;amp; bizarrely misplaced condescension: &quot;Maybe Allbritton will start a trend - bloggers no longer dependent on the mainstream for their material.&quot; WTF?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 20:50:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adamgreenfield</dc:creator>		<category>iraq</category>		<category>media</category>		<category>television</category>		<category>blogging</category>		<category>blog</category>		<category>blogs</category>		<category>weblog</category>		<category>weblogs</category>		<category>news</category>		<category>reporting</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jazzkat11</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465510</link>	
		<description>..isn&apos;t it that the above previously mentioned mediums were at one point considered to be &quot;merely parasitic, interstitial, even marginal&quot; themselves?

*Also of note, the drudgereport.com, now the bloated blogware &apos;axis of evil&apos; of all &apos;accredited&apos; news outlets, has a daily readership larger than that of the washington post.. Blogs as &apos;valid&apos;? Too early to call. Blogs as &apos;having arrived&apos;? That may be the easier call..</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465510</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jazzkat11</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465525</link>	
		<description>Also also of note: The transcript got Kevin SITES name wrong.

Look at me! I&apos;m fact-checking their ass! It&apos;s a blogging paradise world!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465525</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rusty</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stavrosthewonderchicken</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465526</link>	
		<description>I was gonna fact-check rusty&apos;s ass, there, but I got distracted by some p0rn.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465526</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:30:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: soyjoy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465530</link>	
		<description>stavros - I know just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;q=Rusty%27s+ass&quot;&gt;what you mean.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465530</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:34:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: soyjoy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465533</link>	
		<description>Seriously, though, don&apos;tcha love how they mix in Salam Pax&apos;s stuff as though it&apos;s going on now, or yesterday, or, um, a week ago? As though the blog had been updated at all since day 5 of the war? Now that&apos;s quality professional journalism, folks. Don&apos;t try this at home.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465533</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:40:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: SweetIceT</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465557</link>	
		<description>I cannot believe they didn&apos;t mention the &lt;a href=&quot;http://agonist.org&quot;&gt;agonist&lt;/a&gt; which has become sort of a phenomonon. I have been addicted to it since the war began as have many others. He&apos;s recently been tapped by some major news sources.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465557</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:49:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SweetIceT</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homunculus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465566</link>	
		<description>Yes, but more importantly, has Kelley really been &lt;b&gt;moved&lt;/b&gt; by everything that&apos;s happened?  &lt;a href=http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/04/01/&gt;Do you believe he &lt;b&gt;cares&lt;/b&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465566</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y6y6y6</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465665</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Is blogging to Gulf II what TV was to Vietnam and cable was to Gulf I?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well, let&apos;s take an investigative approach to this premise.

&lt;small&gt;Kottke.org - &quot;I am bad with names. I&apos;ve forgotten all but three of the names of my new co-workers...I have only so many slots in my short term memory. Many weeks of &quot;hey...you there...&quot; to follow.&quot;

a.wholelottanothing.org - &quot;So to recap, I take a photo with my phone, push about 7 buttons to send it off to a secret email account on one server. A cronjob on a different server checks the account every 10 minutes, then processes the messages and sends the......&quot;

plasticbag.org - &quot;My co-worker Dorian&apos;s stunningly cute and gorgeous little baby boy has started doing little early-morning exercises. Aw...&quot;

textism.com - &quot;Key thing here is to sweat out some of the sugars from, but under no circumstances brown, the onions. Keep the flame low and stir frequently with a wooden spoon, ideally the kind that&apos;s sort of squared off at the end&quot;&lt;/small&gt;

I think blogging is to Gulf War II as apples are to oranges.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465665</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y6y6y6</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GrahamVM</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465671</link>	
		<description>Actually saw this on the TV. Much of a muchness...

Besides, it was mainly about Australian webloggers. The Agonist, as far as I can tell, isn&apos;t Australian.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465671</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:42:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GrahamVM</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465673</link>	
		<description>Blogging is significant to other bloggers and that&apos;s about it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465673</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monkeyman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: adamgreenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465697</link>	
		<description>I have two quibbles with that, monkeyman: one, nonsense. Two, even if it&apos;s true, what happens when everyone becomes a blogger?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465697</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 06:28:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adamgreenfield</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GrahamVM</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24792/None-dare-call-it-blogging#465701</link>	
		<description>That&apos;s pretty much it, really. Once you get into reading blogs there&apos;s a good chance you&apos;ll start one yourself.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.24792-465701</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 06:30:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GrahamVM</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
