<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Sister Arts</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Sister Arts</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:54:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Sister Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.english.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/utpict.html"&gt;Ut pictura poesis&lt;/a&gt; (that is, &quot;as is painting, so is poetry&quot;).  The Web has helped solve at least one scholarly conundrum: what&apos;s the best way to present the work of those artists who took the theory of &quot;the sister arts&quot; to its logical conclusion? Try, for example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iath.virginia.edu/rossetti/index.html&quot;&gt;The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti&lt;/a&gt;, hosted by the University of Virginia.  Or, if Pre-Raphaelites are not quite your thing, there&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blakearchive.org/&quot;&gt;William Blake Archive&lt;/a&gt;, which offers multiple versions of the illuminated books.  And don&apos;t forget the man behind the wallpaper, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morrissociety.org/&quot;&gt;William Morris&lt;/a&gt;.  While &lt;a href=&quot;http://65.107.211.206/authors/wmt/works.html&quot;&gt;William Makepeace Thackeray&lt;/a&gt; was a rather less successful artist--his ambitions in that line didn&apos;t quite pan out--nevertheless his illustrations to &lt;i&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/i&gt; (scroll down) are crucial to the novel (which doesn&apos;t stop many publishers from leaving them out...).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:09:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thomas j wise</dc:creator>		<category>poemimages</category>		<category>poeticimages</category>		<category>illustratingpoems</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474275</link>	
		<description>Very brave and interesting, tjw! I don&apos;t know whether the implications (and suggestions) of your post can be adequately discussed here, though.  I&apos;ve had this argument many times, deep into many insoluble and unending nights.  Poetry increasingly preys on painting, to be sure, but I don&apos;t think it embraces the shared identity as deeply as Horace proposed.  

&lt;i&gt;Today, painters and poets seldom study the Horatian simile and the expanded &quot;texts&quot; of the Italian, French, and English treatises on the humanistic theory of painting, and few artists care whether painting ever had a superior, an elder, or any sister.&lt;/i&gt;

This is certainly not true of Portugal or Britain, in my experience.  In fact, it&apos;s part of the problem!

FWIW, I think poetry is one thing and painting another. And (if nobody minds my saying so) I&apos;m definitely prejudiced in favour of the poets.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474275</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hippugeek</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474285</link>	
		<description>Thanks, tjw--I&apos;m in the midst of a class on this very topic (&quot;Poetry in the Visual Culture&quot;), and I look forward to looking through all this.

(Twenty minutes later:) Okay, I&apos;ve been fruitlessly looking for a decent online version of John Ashbery&apos;s &quot;And &lt;i&gt;Ut Pictura Poesis&lt;/i&gt; Is Her Name&quot; for long enough.  Perhaps if any of you kind people comes across one, you would be kind enough to link to it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474285</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hippugeek</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hairyeyeball</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474288</link>	
		<description>Oh god, there are others like me. May I also suggest the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Italian_Studies/dweb/dec_ov/dec_ov.shtml&quot;&gt;Decameron Web&lt;/a&gt;, a facing-page Italian-English hypertext edition of that story about people telling stories while the world goes to hell in a handbasket. Timely.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474288</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:26:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hairyeyeball</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: digaman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474292</link>	
		<description>Nice post.  Back in the early days of HotWired.com (if anyone remembers it -- only &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotwired.lycos.com/&quot;&gt;a shell of its former self&lt;/a&gt; now, alas), one of our noblest experiments was teaming up poet Allen Ginsberg and painter Francesco Clemente for a multimedia web thang called &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotwired.lycos.com/workshop/95/49/index1a.html&quot;&gt;Pastel Sentences&lt;/a&gt;.  This piece was one of HotWired arts editor John Alderman&apos;s many great ideas.  

Clemente painted, Ginsberg wrote little fragments inspired by the work, and we presented the images, text, and Ginsberg&apos;s inimitable voice.  Neither the paintings nor the poems were career high points, but it was fun, and a delicious use of the Web.

For the record, I was also the guy who showed Ginsberg the Web.  The occasion was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.levity.com/digaland/ginsberg96.html&quot;&gt;my interview with him for HotWired&lt;/a&gt;, which ended up being the final interview with him in his great book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060930829/qid=1050463602&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Spontaneous Mind&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

As I recount at the top of the interview linked above:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Following our conversation, I showed Allen the World Wide Web for the first time. I&apos;d been telling him about the self-publishing &lt;/i&gt;samizdat&lt;i&gt; aspect of the Web, knowing that he&apos;d made a point of donating his work to small, labor-of-love zines even after he was the best known poet in America.  I took Allen immediately to Levi Asher&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://litkicks.com/&quot;&gt;Literary Kicks&lt;/a&gt; site, to the page on his work there, clicking through Jack Kerouac&apos;s and Neal Cassady&apos;s names to demonstrate hypertext to him.  He didn&apos;t say much, and then I took him to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.altavista.com/&quot;&gt;a search engine&lt;/a&gt;, where a search on the phrase &quot;allen ginsberg&quot; called out 2,000 hits - probably the maximum. He looked at all the pages built in his name.  &quot;Thank God I don&apos;t know how to work this,&quot; Allen sighed. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ginsberg &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,2981,00.html&quot;&gt;died&lt;/a&gt; just four months after that.

I miss him.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474292</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: vacapinta</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474309</link>	
		<description>And here I was tickled that I could choose to be accompanied by Dore, Botticelli or Dali as I perused the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.divinecomedy.org/&quot;&gt;Divine Comedy&lt;/a&gt;

Much of the good stuff I have found on the web in the past has been motivated by the idea that someone, somehow should have done this and perhaps they have. I once spent an hour or so looking for a modern graphical representation of Dante&apos;s descent only to get a few dissappointing clickable image maps.

In the same vein, Goya&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://museum.research.missouri.edu/loscaprichos.htm&quot;&gt;Caprichos &lt;/a&gt;manages to be a powerful series of comments and indictments told in the language of painting. This is a language that I believe was more highly developed in the past though glimpses of this are in the 20th century among the woodcuts of Masereel and for Surrealist poetry in Ernst&apos;s magnificent  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0486232522/ref=ase_categoricalgeome/103-6321965-0063014&quot;&gt;Une Semaine de Bonte&lt;/a&gt;

Thank you for this, tjw. My only wish is that you would post more often...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474309</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:26:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vacapinta</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: snez</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474377</link>	
		<description>Thank you thomas j. wise, you provided the perfect nightcap.  

&lt;i&gt;My only wish is that you would post more often...&lt;/i&gt;

My only wish is that you and vacapinta would post more often.

&lt;small&gt;hippugeek: will &lt;a href=&quot;http://216.239.57.100/search?q=cache:Mmk35uSgKFwC:www.colby.edu/~isadoff/cap/Ashbery_poems.doc+%22And+Ut+Pictura+Poesis+Is+Her+Name%22&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; do?&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474377</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:19:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snez</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: walrus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474386</link>	
		<description>There is so much about this post that I&apos;m in love with. Thanks thomas j.

I&apos;ve tried to explore some of the edges between the linguistic and visual arts before. I find some sympathy, certainly, but more in the way that we conceptualise around the object of our art, than any similarity in the physical exercise. I find words to be inadequate to depiction. Interpretation breaks the true connection between mind and eye. However, it&apos;s easier to grasp the abstract in words than with a brush. 

Obviously there are shades of grey in between, where a painting may be open to interpretation, or convey an abstract concept, or a poem may uniquely place a consistent image in the appreciative mind. The two can be mixed also, but only with a double edge: the juxtaposition of text and image nearly always jars and distracts, at least for me.

Also, I&apos;m not a painter, but I love the challenge of words. I hate it almost as much. It&apos;s a glorious, bittersweet spiral, and I hope to be twisted by it for as long as I may.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474386</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:19:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>walrus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mark13</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25143/Sister-Arts#474528</link>	
		<description>If you are into Symbolists like Blake and Rossetti, I wholeheartedly recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://artmagick.com/&quot;&gt;ArtMagick&lt;a&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.25143-474528</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:16:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark13</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
