How to lose a never-ending war against nothing
May 13, 2003 12:03 PM
Subscribe
Graham Alleges a 9/11 'Coverup'Long a favorite issue of alternative (and tinfoil-hat-oriented) media, now this is getting picked up by a
prominent Democrat. It would appear that
Graham is the only moderate Democratic
candidate to even approach topics that reflect negatively on the Bush administration. Certainly, when even the
US military speculates that yesterday's
attacks in Saudi Arabia were started by Al Qeada, and people in
Chicago and
Seattle are reminded of the reality of ongoing threats, it is reasonable to ask if the "War on Terror" is indeed being won. Is Graham someone with the power and place in the spotlight to make that a serious issue for voters?
posted by Ignatius J. Reilly (11 comments total)
« Older
Build your own safety sign....
| US Treasury unveils new $20:...
Newer »
If this info was released would the average citizen have believed it, I doubt it. Look at the war in Iraq, most are only looking for the WMD or $$, forgetting the humanity in it all.
I think the cover up was when we did nothing years ago when terroristic acts were not acted upon overseas. They use to attack our soldiers. Their targets use to be military based so why are terrorist attacking civilians now? Is it because we ignored the soldier, but not a civilian. Added too, heard in the Islamic fundamentals of war, a man in uniform is a target, not a civilian.
posted by thomcatspike at 12:29 PM on May 13, 2003