Another handy list from the article: the Bush 100, an examination of the finances and professional affiliations of Bush appointees in their prior lives.
Along with the economy, the environment, sane budgetary planning, and a tinker's damn for what the rest of the world thinks.
Having vented that, I don't think most people would suggest that Democrats are by any means pure in this respect. The revolving door between government and business is a problem regardless of party.
So, wendell, is your point that "See, Democrats are as bad as Republicans"? ;) posted by pmurray63 at 2:31 PM on June 18, 2003
No, not as bad (not even in this specific area, compare and contrast the Clinton 100 and Bush 100), but not good enough.
I recall the first thing I ever heard about Bill Clinton was a quote about how he and his newly-formed DLC organization was going to make the Democratic Party more "business-friendly", and I thought "there's a real crook. He'll go far."
We might get a better view of the current Demo field of candidates if we check the lobbyist list against lists of "big name party supporters". And, as I pointed out on the FrontPage, if a Demo does get elected, it's a "watch out" list for future high-level nominees.
And it gives you something to point to if a Righty calls the Center for Public Integrity "just an Anti-Republican club". posted by wendell at 3:30 PM on June 18, 2003
« Older
The Museum of Anti-Alcohol Posters...
| Are you John Green?...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Thanks wendell!
posted by madamjujujive at 1:33 PM on June 18, 2003