<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Federal Reserve Note Parachutes</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26482/Federal-Reserve-Note-Parachutes/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Federal Reserve Note Parachutes</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve Note Parachutes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26482/Federal-Reserve-Note-Parachutes</link>	
		<description>A change-of-pace from Bush-Bashing: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/home.asp&quot;&gt;The Center for Public Integrity&lt;/a&gt; (considered a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/23414&quot;&gt;reliable&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26146#498039&quot;&gt;source&lt;/a&gt; by some &apos;round here), tells us &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=516&amp;L1=10&amp;L2=10&amp;L3=0&amp;L4=0&amp;L5=0&quot;&gt;&quot;Where Are They Now? The New Jobs of the Top 100 Clinton Administration Officials&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.
Good to refer to if a Demo actually beats Bush in &apos;04 and wants to recycle some talent...
&lt;small&gt;From a &lt;a href=&quot;http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml?display=day&amp;todayDate=06/17/2003&quot;&gt;radio interview with Center founder Charles Lewis&lt;/a&gt; who commented that the report &apos;got lost&apos; during the Iraq War. No kidding.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.26482</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:37:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>		<category>clintonadministraton</category>		<category>formerofficials</category>		<category>centerforpublicintegrity</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madamjujujive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26482/Federal-Reserve-Note-Parachutes#506027</link>	
		<description>Another handy list from the article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.public-i.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=15&amp;L1=10&amp;L2=10&amp;L3=0&amp;L4=0&amp;L5=0&quot;&gt;the Bush 100&lt;/a&gt;, an examination of the finances and professional affiliations of Bush appointees in their prior lives. 

Thanks wendell!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.26482-506027</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pmurray63</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26482/Federal-Reserve-Note-Parachutes#506062</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the report &apos;got lost&apos; during the Iraq War&lt;/i&gt;

Along with the economy, the environment, sane budgetary planning, and a tinker&apos;s damn for what the rest of the world thinks.

Having vented that, I don&apos;t think most people would suggest that Democrats are by any means pure in this respect. The revolving door between government and business is a problem regardless of party.

So, wendell, is your point that &quot;See, Democrats are as bad as Republicans&quot;? ;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.26482-506062</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:31:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pmurray63</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26482/Federal-Reserve-Note-Parachutes#506089</link>	
		<description>No, not as bad (not even in this specific area, compare and contrast the Clinton 100 and Bush 100), but not good enough.
I recall the first thing I ever heard about Bill Clinton was a quote about how he and his newly-formed DLC organization was going to make the Democratic Party more &quot;business-friendly&quot;, and I thought &quot;there&apos;s a real crook. He&apos;ll go far.&quot;
We might get a better view of the current Demo field of candidates if we check the lobbyist list against lists of &quot;big name party supporters&quot;. And, as I pointed out on the FrontPage, if a Demo does get elected, it&apos;s a &quot;watch out&quot; list for future high-level nominees.
And it gives you something to point to if a Righty calls the Center for Public Integrity &quot;just an Anti-Republican club&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.26482-506089</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:30:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
