http://www.metafilter.com/2652// Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 2652 Sat, 29 Jul 2000 19:30:10 -0800 Sat, 29 Jul 2000 19:30:10 -0800 en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://www.metafilter.com/2652/ <a href="http://www.wvjolt.wvu.edu/Latest%20Issue/lim.htm">I've been converted</a> - Earlier today, I was arguing with some coworkers to the effect that napster was protected and should be free and clear. Between the document at the above link and the information in the <a href="http://riaa.com/napster_legal.cfm">RIAA</a> injunction brief, it looks like I might have been wrong. Why can't these guys use more discretion in their <a href="http://riaa.com/PDF/napster_brief.pdf">e-mails</a>? They might have been OK if they'd kept their mouths shut. post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2652 Sat, 29 Jul 2000 03:37:24 -0800 syzygy napster riaa emails filesharing brokenlink http://www.metafilter.com/2652/#14624 God I HATE Adobe Acrobat! comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.2652-14624 Sat, 29 Jul 2000 19:30:10 -0800 ZachsMind