<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: CIA Santa</title>
      <link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaFilter post CIA Santa</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:55:30 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:55:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>CIA Santa</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa</link>	
    <description>(Happy Monday Morning!) </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:49:56 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>( .)(. )</dc:creator>
	
	<category>CIA</category>
	
	<category>terrorism</category>
	
	<category>911</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: johnnyboy</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511494</link>	
    <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmcgrane.utvinternet.com/mondays/pills.htm&quot;&gt;happy mondays morning&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511494</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:55:30 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>johnnyboy</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Witty</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511548</link>	
    <description>I&apos;m not sure how I&apos;m supposed to respond to this post.  The article is pretty much a &apos;non-event&apos;, in my opinion.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511548</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Witty</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dabitch</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511555</link>	
    <description>&apos;Group of the Martyr Ebenezer Scrooge&apos; - gawd thats funny. 

that it&apos;s still (mostly) classified is however, very un-funny.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511555</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dabitch</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Slithy_Tove</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511564</link>	
    <description>dabitch: why? I&apos;d consider the fact that it was classified a meta-joke, a satire of the whole &apos;classified&apos; concept by those most familiar with it.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511564</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:01:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Slithy_Tove</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dabitch</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511574</link>	
    <description>It makes me think that other classified information could be de-classified (and isn&apos;t). is that a meta-joke?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511574</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:21:46 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dabitch</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Witty</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511593</link>	
    <description>&lt;em&gt;It makes me think that other classified information could be de-classified (and isn&apos;t).&lt;/em&gt;

Probably is... most certainly I&apos;d say.  But so what?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511593</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Witty</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dabitch</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511595</link>	
    <description>oh, I dunno, perhaps I&apos;m the only one who wants to know what that &lt;a href=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/128832_sept1130.html&gt;sept 11 report&lt;/a&gt; has to say. Keeping [current] sensitive information classified is one thing, but jokes is quite another and may give rise to unnecessary speculation. Just a thought.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511595</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:43:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dabitch</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Witty</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511613</link>	
    <description>Perhaps.  This story seems to be making this whole thing rather simple.  I just doubt that it is.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511613</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:12:17 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Witty</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: aeschenkarnos</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26716/CIA-Santa#511997</link>	
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;This shows that the system is not about protecting real security issues,&quot; said Thomas Blanton, director of the U.S.-based National Security Archive, which made the Santa records public. &quot;The bulk of what government keeps secret is to avoid embarrassment.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well, yeah.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.26716-511997</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>aeschenkarnos</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
