I believe I own the patent on asking a question at the end of a MetaFilter post. You can send the $4.19 you owe me via PayPal. posted by byort at 6:30 AM on July 17, 2003
Great post cbrody. I work for a manufacturer of furniture and have to conduct due diligence because we are being sued by a famous baseball player for having a product that has the same product name as his last name (which is not by any means distinctive). posted by Yossarian at 6:32 AM on July 17, 2003
One of the more distressing manifestations of this is when pharmaceutical companies patent new processes and compounds even though they have no use in mind for them - they do this merely to raise drug development costs for their competitors, and potentially rob them of opportunities to develop lucrative products. posted by stonerose at 7:06 AM on July 17, 2003
What a great post! This is how it should be. *nostalgic tear*.
Now I have to think of a great idea to patent before the bandwagon moves on. Putting water into a receptacle for transport to the mouth? Hmm... posted by bonaldi at 7:10 AM on July 17, 2003
The print copy of the New Yorker article has a rather cute cartoon which is unfortunately not in the online version -- some sort of proto-amphibian is crawling out of the water, but is confronted by another, wearing a stern look on its face and presenting a patent (presumably for the process of "living on land"). posted by tingley at 7:36 AM on July 17, 2003
I'm thinking of patenting a method of patenting an idea, by means of bribing patent officers with offers of one's first-born child. As this is a new, unobvious and useful innovation, is there any reason why it shouldn't be possible?
byort: of course, I forgot. The cheque's in the post.
tingley: cartoon coming right up. Sod copyright law. posted by cbrody at 7:41 AM on July 17, 2003
posted by byort at 6:30 AM on July 17, 2003