Join 3,513 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)


Blogstop
July 30, 2003 7:07 AM   Subscribe

BlogStop. Where the last word of an entry must be used as an acronym for the next entry. Simple.
posted by coudal (1033 comments total) 7 users marked this as a favorite

 
So I must post light entertainments.
posted by coudal at 7:07 AM on July 30, 2003


Even note-taking early readers tracking assiduously, if not monotonously, express no truer sentiment.
posted by rory at 7:22 AM on July 30, 2003


Shouldn't each new thread in MetaFilter explicate news titles?
posted by ook at 7:25 AM on July 30, 2003


My response was: So, every new typist is meticulously entering nonsensical tripe?

This is taking little effort, sadly.
posted by grum@work at 7:27 AM on July 30, 2003


Sensing a derail, lurker yawns.
posted by sageleaf at 7:29 AM on July 30, 2003


You're always writing nifgy shit!
posted by jazon at 7:30 AM on July 30, 2003


that's supposed to be NIFTY
posted by jazon at 7:31 AM on July 30, 2003


Spelling here is terrible...
posted by adrianhon at 7:32 AM on July 30, 2003


The errors really rile, I believe; less erroneousness!
posted by rory at 7:34 AM on July 30, 2003


Entertain rabid rabbits or nothing else on useful sarcastic notorious sober spiders!
posted by samelborp at 7:37 AM on July 30, 2003


Speedy pontificating is decidedly easier, rick says
posted by terrapin at 7:39 AM on July 30, 2003


erroneousness

6. Should a player make an error in his/her entry, do not accept the last word.

;)
posted by rory at 7:41 AM on July 30, 2003


Euphonious Rory regretfully originated not easily operative user simple name, exaggerated self sophistry.
posted by jpburns at 7:42 AM on July 30, 2003


surely our posts have intrinsic substance to rally youth?
posted by myopicman at 7:45 AM on July 30, 2003


your ogreish undulations tire helicopters
posted by transient at 7:47 AM on July 30, 2003


How each licentious idiot can optimize personal tricky existing repeating syllables.
posted by jpburns at 7:49 AM on July 30, 2003


Still, you live like a big lazy elephant shit.
posted by eyeballkid at 7:51 AM on July 30, 2003


Silence, here I teach!
posted by crazy finger at 7:52 AM on July 30, 2003


Touche. Every addition comes harder.
posted by soyjoy at 7:53 AM on July 30, 2003


Harder and radically different each recursion.
posted by jpburns at 7:54 AM on July 30, 2003


Really? Every comment uses rambling sentences. I orate neatly.
posted by kfury at 7:55 AM on July 30, 2003


Not every asshole types like yourself
posted by Fezboy! at 7:57 AM on July 30, 2003


Your own usage reveals self emulating lively fragrances.
posted by jpburns at 7:59 AM on July 30, 2003


First, you take underpants, then + ??? = Profits.
posted by thatothrgirl at 8:02 AM on July 30, 2003


Forget really apt graceful riffs, and no challenge exists, sir.
posted by rory at 8:03 AM on July 30, 2003


So I responded?
posted by jpburns at 8:03 AM on July 30, 2003


Really, each such performance of naked determination eludes description.
posted by rory at 8:06 AM on July 30, 2003


disparate emails serve cranky rowdy individuals perfectly through isolated optimistic notions.
posted by jpburns at 8:08 AM on July 30, 2003


Damn! Every success created really isn't pertinent: timing isn't overly nifty.
posted by walrus at 8:09 AM on July 30, 2003


Oh pants. I'm not playing any more.
posted by walrus at 8:09 AM on July 30, 2003


Not only that, I opine; non sequiturs.
posted by jpburns at 8:10 AM on July 30, 2003


Surely even quick use internet thesaurus! Unbelievably rapid sequence!
posted by crazy finger at 8:12 AM on July 30, 2003


Silly eponymous queries ultimately embitters nice crowing equalizers.
posted by clevershark at 8:14 AM on July 30, 2003


Stop everyone! Quit! Use every necessary control enabler!
posted by debralee at 8:14 AM on July 30, 2003


clevershark - Speed engenders quasi-unintelligble extractions, not chewable, exactly.

debralee - Eh? Not a briskly lively exception, right?
posted by brownpau at 8:16 AM on July 30, 2003


Even naughty academics blog like energetic rubes
posted by archimago at 8:16 AM on July 30, 2003


Rats! Undermined by eveyone's sentences.
posted by biffa at 8:17 AM on July 30, 2003


Derailed- the word is equalizers.
posted by crazy finger at 8:18 AM on July 30, 2003


'equalizers' was first!

Every questioning user allows licence in zealously emitted ranting screeds.

damn, too late...
posted by rory at 8:18 AM on July 30, 2003


Sorry, couldn't read every email. Demanded Speed!
posted by biffa at 8:21 AM on July 30, 2003


Some crappy readers eventually enter decent stuff.
posted by mbd1mbd1 at 8:21 AM on July 30, 2003


someone please eliminate evil doers.
posted by Fezboy! at 8:23 AM on July 30, 2003


Do other entries really suck?
posted by rory at 8:24 AM on July 30, 2003


Sometimes, unless created knowledgeably.
posted by arto at 8:26 AM on July 30, 2003


no way
posted by Frasermoo at 8:27 AM on July 30, 2003


*rofl @ fraser - my thoughts exactly*
posted by twine42 at 8:30 AM on July 30, 2003


Kids: never observe writers. Live each day greatly, erstwhile appearing boldly lyrical yahoos!
posted by crazy finger at 8:30 AM on July 30, 2003 [1 favorite]


Yawn. Audience heads off, over stimulated.
posted by kfury at 8:31 AM on July 30, 2003


mate, i'm 32, I just haven't got that sort of time
posted by Frasermoo at 8:34 AM on July 30, 2003


So try! I might understand living at thirty-eight, dammit.
posted by brownpau at 8:35 AM on July 30, 2003


So this is metafilter's usual laugh against the employed dunderhead?
posted by biffa at 8:35 AM on July 30, 2003


Take it from biffa's, seeing as how "dammit" isn't really a word. But then, neither is "dunderhead."
posted by brownpau at 8:36 AM on July 30, 2003


Dadgummit! Underemployed nerds defeat everyone! Real hardworking employees all despair.

Up yours and your real words! Thppt.
posted by furiousthought at 8:39 AM on July 30, 2003


Should time include mania? Unnecessary. Lose a thesaurus, then enjoy doubly!lousy not typing as fast as other people--d'oh!

Dictionaries use neologisms. Don't end rhetoric, help enjoy all day!
posted by arto at 8:41 AM on July 30, 2003


7. Your words, especially the last word, must appear in the dictionary

Thanks Brownpau, but Dunderhead is in mine! (Not that I'd looked it up or anything)
posted by biffa at 8:41 AM on July 30, 2003


Does every single poster argue in reality?
posted by rory at 8:42 AM on July 30, 2003


Done Acrochallenge yet?
posted by gravelshoes at 8:42 AM on July 30, 2003


Rory, every argument lives in time, yes?
posted by brownpau at 8:47 AM on July 30, 2003


You! Eat sausage!
posted by MrMoonPie at 8:48 AM on July 30, 2003


Your ending's supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
posted by rcade at 8:49 AM on July 30, 2003


Sad. An unworthy shot at grandiose exposition.
posted by brownpau at 8:53 AM on July 30, 2003


Surely under previous endeavours rest callous attempts lifted indiscriminately from remains among gargantuan indigenous livestock invited suddenly to intervene carefully, eventually xylophones participate in a lackluster inimical display of callousness in our unkown system.
posted by signal at 8:56 AM on July 30, 2003 [1 favorite]


rcade cannot always deal effectively!
posted by jaronson at 8:56 AM on July 30, 2003


So you see tones, even mixolydian?
posted by transient at 8:59 AM on July 30, 2003


An observation: This is a good illustration of community weblogging, versus what goes on at the linked site, BlogStop, where the entries rarely refer to prior ones.
posted by beagle at 8:59 AM on July 30, 2003


Signal, you slays them. Excellent metafiltering!
posted by arto at 9:01 AM on July 30, 2003


music is xylophonic only letting you drum in a nanosecond
posted by garyh at 9:04 AM on July 30, 2003


Suspending understanding, perhaps enlisting rectal consciousness, a litigious infidel fragments rudimentary agricultural goods, instilling listlessness in society toward inexplicable cultural escapades, xeroxing platitudes in, and launching into duets of, classical incantations of unwritten symphonies.
posted by Blue Stone at 9:07 AM on July 30, 2003


Sure, you may pry hymns of near-intellectual exposition, Stone.
posted by The Michael The at 9:09 AM on July 30, 2003


Stymied topographies over nefarious expostulations?
posted by ed at 9:11 AM on July 30, 2003


Shut up, pedantic elf rcade! Couldn't anyone leak irksome, foul, rattling acronyms? God, if life is trying, if cancer-exhibiting X-rays portend insidious and looming infiltrative death, our creator indubitably owes us salvation.
posted by planetkyoto at 9:15 AM on July 30, 2003


Eliminate "x," please. Or stymie this ultimately lame-ass, tension-inspiring, often nice, stumper.
posted by MrMoonPie at 9:15 AM on July 30, 2003


Evidently, 'X' protrudes ominously still. This useless letter aggravates, initiating only nothing. Shameful!
posted by arto at 9:17 AM on July 30, 2003


Seems that user, Moonpie, posted earlier. Regrettable.
posted by arto at 9:18 AM on July 30, 2003


I'm a big ole chicken!!!!!!!!!!
posted by mcsweetie at 9:19 AM on July 30, 2003


Responding earlier grates really egregiously. This time, arto begs leave. Entertaining!
posted by MrMoonPie at 9:23 AM on July 30, 2003


Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's inevitable NSFW Internet news group.
posted by adrianhon at 9:25 AM on July 30, 2003


Oops.

Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's *awful*, inevitable NSFW Internet news group
posted by adrianhon at 9:26 AM on July 30, 2003


Groping rude ogres utilitzes persistence.
posted by thatothrgirl at 9:28 AM on July 30, 2003


Please! Entry riles, since it's sad thatothrgirl's entry needlessly creates enmity.
posted by MrMoonPie at 9:37 AM on July 30, 2003


Most. Boring. Thread. Ever
posted by carfilhiot at 9:40 AM on July 30, 2003


Every version egregiously reviled
posted by dmt at 9:42 AM on July 30, 2003


Extend normal mitigation in thatothrgirl's yabber
posted by biffa at 9:43 AM on July 30, 2003


You arse burger, Biffa: everything's redundant.
posted by Blue Stone at 9:46 AM on July 30, 2003


To hate is sublime i see, said this uninspired poster in defiance.
posted by vacapinta at 9:58 AM on July 30, 2003


rory exits, disturbingly undone, now doomsayers are nearly triumphant.
posted by rory at 10:05 AM on July 30, 2003


Truly repentant, I understand my purile harassment, and nolonger type.
posted by Blue Stone at 10:12 AM on July 30, 2003


Thread's young, pathetic ending.
posted by brownpau at 10:19 AM on July 30, 2003


Except new dunderheads insistently negate grievances.
posted by soyjoy at 10:23 AM on July 30, 2003


Good riddance, I exclaim, villifying addictive nonsensical crap everywhere, Soyjoy!
posted by Blue Stone at 10:26 AM on July 30, 2003


Stop! or you'll just obfuscate yourselves
posted by gravelshoes at 10:37 AM on July 30, 2003


You obdurate users really should elevate levity. Vainglorious epigrams striate!
posted by ed at 10:42 AM on July 30, 2003


Shoot! That rankles individualistic apathy. The end.
posted by jpburns at 10:45 AM on July 30, 2003


'Striate'? That's really inappropriate at the end.
posted by jamespake at 10:47 AM on July 30, 2003


Enough negativity, dudes.
posted by VulcanMike at 10:49 AM on July 30, 2003


Don't unnecessarily discount ending statement.
posted by jpburns at 10:51 AM on July 30, 2003


Enough nerdy discussion!
posted by jdroth at 10:52 AM on July 30, 2003


Statistically, the acronym that ends, must enliven no thought.
posted by Blue Stone at 10:56 AM on July 30, 2003


Do I stop commenting upon sir's statement in our newsgroup?
posted by salmacis at 10:58 AM on July 30, 2003


Talk haughty or undermine glorious hinterland throughways.
posted by ed at 10:59 AM on July 30, 2003


Thrilling how one unique germ herds them.
posted by grabbingsand at 11:01 AM on July 30, 2003


through halting responses, our unending game hastens. we're at your service.
posted by myopicman at 11:02 AM on July 30, 2003


Shit. Everytime ready, victimized in checking efficiency.
posted by jpburns at 11:08 AM on July 30, 2003


Seriously, everyone's really vapulating infectious conversational embers.
posted by Blue Stone at 11:11 AM on July 30, 2003


expediency forces faults. If checking is effrontery, never callout yammerers..
posted by Fezboy! at 11:17 AM on July 30, 2003


Yawn at my meager efficient rough extremity rhyme-less sentence.
posted by thomcatspike at 11:21 AM on July 30, 2003


Seems endless, not tractable. Ending nears countless epigrams.
posted by jpburns at 11:24 AM on July 30, 2003


Even pedantic imbeciles get rare amusement most Sundays.
posted by grabbingsand at 11:30 AM on July 30, 2003


SARS undermines nuclear destruction and your SATs
posted by djspicerack at 11:34 AM on July 30, 2003


somebody understand, nobody desires a yokel's starter.
posted by Fezboy! at 11:35 AM on July 30, 2003


Sophistry attenuates terrible spam.
posted by Blue Stone at 11:36 AM on July 30, 2003


sparkly purple auroa, master
posted by Fezboy! at 11:42 AM on July 30, 2003


meet another stupid trick: enter recur!
posted by Fezboy! at 11:43 AM on July 30, 2003


recurrence emminating continuously. Useless recur!
posted by Fezboy! at 11:44 AM on July 30, 2003


Recur eternally, ceaseless, unending recurrence!
posted by MrMoonPie at 11:48 AM on July 30, 2003


recurrence echoing constantly. Useless recur!
posted by Fezboy! at 11:49 AM on July 30, 2003


recurring every chance. useless recur
posted by Fezboy! at 11:49 AM on July 30, 2003


**Damn dial-up! I coulda flooded this thread.**
posted by Fezboy! at 11:52 AM on July 30, 2003


4. Build on other members' last word; not your own.
posted by Blue Stone at 12:03 PM on July 30, 2003


Oh, whining now!
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:10 PM on July 30, 2003


Not on Wednesday.
posted by brownpau at 12:16 PM on July 30, 2003


Wishing every diatribe never ended such discussions as yesterday's
posted by terrapin at 12:27 PM on July 30, 2003


Young enmity saps the entries. Really, doesn't anyone yammer struts?
posted by ed at 12:41 PM on July 30, 2003


Such threading really upsets terrible spellers.
posted by biffa at 12:49 PM on July 30, 2003


Shit, these really use thesaurus speak.
posted by romakimmy at 12:52 PM on July 30, 2003


Some people enjoy arcane knowledge.
posted by nickmark at 12:56 PM on July 30, 2003


stupid provider electricity lack - latin efficiency really sucks.

knowledge never overrated- lets erudite dowagers get edgy
posted by romakimmy at 1:03 PM on July 30, 2003


(Stupid putz - excessive laziness! Last entry reduces status.)
posted by nickmark at 1:10 PM on July 30, 2003


Enlarging, dilating, growing—yow!
posted by MrMoonPie at 1:13 PM on July 30, 2003


Yoko Ono's warning:
posted by Eloquence at 1:23 PM on July 30, 2003


Wailing audio recurring! Never invite nasty glower!
posted by arto at 1:27 PM on July 30, 2003


White Album requires no interference--no girlfriends!
posted by MrMoonPie at 1:30 PM on July 30, 2003


Guaranteed larger orifices with every repetition.
posted by Eloquence at 1:33 PM on July 30, 2003


Really? Every pathetic excursion toward iteration traumatizes incisions? Or not?
posted by jpburns at 1:41 PM on July 30, 2003


Never on Thursdays...
posted by myopicman at 1:42 PM on July 30, 2003


Though hardly underwhelmed, really, so daring address your subject
posted by geneablogy at 1:49 PM on July 30, 2003


Students underestimate blathering jisms. Enjoin cutaneous torrents!
posted by ed at 1:58 PM on July 30, 2003


Together our rivers run endlessly narrow towards space.
posted by ewwgene at 2:02 PM on July 30, 2003


Stars Pass Around Cars Easily
posted by djspicerack at 2:04 PM on July 30, 2003


Enough already Sally, I love you.
posted by coudal at 2:09 PM on July 30, 2003


You oughta unite!
posted by jpburns at 2:29 PM on July 30, 2003


Unfortunately, nobody is terribly excited about your plan, jpburns.
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:35 PM on July 30, 2003


uniteaypj?
posted by jpburns at 2:38 PM on July 30, 2003


Jpburns proudly burnishes understated rococo. Nature scintillates!
posted by ed at 2:39 PM on July 30, 2003


Unbelievable! Now I've taken excessive acronyming, per jpburns.

*blush*
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:46 PM on July 30, 2003


Shithead causes intellectual nonsense. The initial legal letter apparently threw every scumbag!
posted by jpburns at 2:46 PM on July 30, 2003


Seriously, consider uproar made by Acrophobia gaming!
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:55 PM on July 30, 2003


Good advice! My intent not gloating...
posted by jpburns at 2:58 PM on July 30, 2003


Gadzooks! Look out at this internet name, gone!
posted by arto at 3:01 PM on July 30, 2003


Gamboling oddballs nurture eczema.
posted by ed at 3:04 PM on July 30, 2003


Excellent! Cunning, zany, entertaining metafilter acticity.
posted by sailoreagle at 3:06 PM on July 30, 2003


Err... actiVity. typical of me to notice spelling mistake AFTER hitting the post button.

And yes, I even previewed. Shame on me.

posted by sailoreagle at 3:07 PM on July 30, 2003


All creation tactfully indicated complete incredulity to you
posted by feelinglistless at 3:10 PM on July 30, 2003


Yes. Obviously understandable.
posted by arto at 3:16 PM on July 30, 2003


Unbelievably no diatribes ever remain so targetted at new denizens around because love endures
posted by feelinglistless at 3:21 PM on July 30, 2003


Even now, doesn't understanding rule, ending snarkiness?
posted by arto at 3:23 PM on July 30, 2003


Snarkiness needs a rodent king. Into network, escapism spawns sarcasm.
posted by ed at 3:25 PM on July 30, 2003


So always review comments and save Metafilter!
posted by WolfDaddy at 3:28 PM on July 30, 2003


Sometimes a rat can also a smile make.
posted by arto at 3:28 PM on July 30, 2003


Meaning every time a flame infiltrates, let trolls eat reason?
posted by arto at 3:32 PM on July 30, 2003


Right. Enough already! Silly, ornery nitwits.
posted by CountZero at 3:34 PM on July 30, 2003


Never irritate the wizards--increases their sogginess.
posted by arto at 3:42 PM on July 30, 2003


Simply overstated. Genuinely - great imps never evolve.

So sad.
posted by CountZero at 3:48 PM on July 30, 2003


Sorry. Almost done.
posted by arto at 3:49 PM on July 30, 2003


Damnit, one's never early!

(that is, I was shooting for SOGGINESS.)
posted by ~rschram at 3:51 PM on July 30, 2003


Even a Raelian loves you.
posted by wantwit at 3:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Yeah, only unnaturally.
posted by CountZero at 3:58 PM on July 30, 2003


Uninvited neophytes now are truly understanding rationality! Let's leave, yo!
posted by WolfDaddy at 4:03 PM on July 30, 2003


Unfortunately, now nature and time undoes reasonable acronym, leaving lapses, Yikes.
posted by WolfDaddy at 4:05 PM on July 30, 2003


Your insipid knowledgebase eschews sensibility.
posted by jpburns at 4:18 PM on July 30, 2003


Stop encouraging nonsensical scrutiny. Inane bumbling isn't ludicrous if talented, y'all.
posted by CountZero at 4:24 PM on July 30, 2003


You 'ave lovely legerdemain.
posted by ed at 4:26 PM on July 30, 2003


Leave ed gurning. Every reader doesn't express my actions in notes.
posted by MUD at 4:37 PM on July 30, 2003


No other treats, else sarcasm!
posted by jpburns at 4:38 PM on July 30, 2003


So always review comments and save Metafilter!
posted by feelinglistless at 4:42 PM on July 30, 2003


Surely all reading causes a stuttered mumbling.
posted by MUD at 4:42 PM on July 30, 2003


Maybe elicit true acronym. filching initial lame try exacts retribution.
posted by jpburns at 4:46 PM on July 30, 2003


Returning entry tries really intently, but understands that it's only nonsense.

I'm back!
posted by grum@work at 4:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Not only nonsense - something else: nonsense, structured elegantly.
posted by wanderingmind at 5:00 PM on July 30, 2003


Even lame efforts get a "nice try!". Lovely, y'all.
posted by WolfDaddy at 5:16 PM on July 30, 2003


Yeast 'as lovely louvres.
posted by ed at 5:23 PM on July 30, 2003


Yeah, awfully lame. Losers.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 5:23 PM on July 30, 2003


Leave out some easily-riled sesquipedalians.
posted by kokogiak at 5:35 PM on July 30, 2003


stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically deny all linguistically impossible actions. new sentences!
posted by myopicman at 6:00 PM on July 30, 2003


*ugh*
stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically eject damanged and linguistically impossible actions. new sentences!
posted by myopicman at 6:02 PM on July 30, 2003


Since every new trick evinces nuttiness, consider evading same.
posted by trondant at 6:12 PM on July 30, 2003


Such ambling might excite.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:19 PM on July 30, 2003


Egads! Xerxes could intelligently trash e-commerce.
posted by jeremias at 6:39 PM on July 30, 2003


.

Enough- continuous onanism mittens might entail rueful chapped epidermis.
posted by romakimmy at 6:47 PM on July 30, 2003


Even people in denial elicit responses? MetaFilter is strange.
posted by wanderingmind at 6:57 PM on July 30, 2003


So to recap, acronyms necessitate goofy English.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 7:03 PM on July 30, 2003


Essentially; never getting laid is some help.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:05 PM on July 30, 2003


Hey, everyone likes psychopharmacology.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 7:11 PM on July 30, 2003


Please stop, Yankee charlatans.
Hours of posting horrible anecdotes, rarely making any clear observations, like opiated German yodellers.
posted by CountZero at 7:55 PM on July 30, 2003


You offend dilettetantte emailers' laborious likings. Resist suppression!
posted by riviera at 8:02 PM on July 30, 2003


Something underhanded purposely perpetrated? Riviera, everyone says such incidents only nag.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:19 PM on July 30, 2003


Not another gallimaufry!
posted by trondant at 8:35 PM on July 30, 2003


Guys and lasses, less is more (and ultimately funnier, right y'all?)
posted by mr_crash_davis at 8:42 PM on July 30, 2003


Great at lexical linkages, I manfully attempt undercutting Faulkner's real Yoknapatawpha.
posted by adamgreenfield at 8:43 PM on July 30, 2003


Yowza! One knows now adamgreenfield plays acronyms to always win! (Plus, he's attractive!)
posted by mr_crash_davis at 8:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Your obfuscation kills natural answers, pal. Avoid these aggravating words. Please heed, adamgreenfield.
posted by Fourmyle at 9:01 PM on July 30, 2003


At this time real assholes can try IRC in vigorous enthusiasm.
posted by trondant at 9:04 PM on July 30, 2003


After trying to reprimand adamgreenfield, crash_davis's treachery is very excruciating.
posted by Fourmyle at 9:10 PM on July 30, 2003


Enter not! Thou hast used soap in a sexy manner!
posted by Ufez Jones at 9:11 PM on July 30, 2003


man, and now nearly everyone rinses!
posted by trondant at 9:14 PM on July 30, 2003


Meaculpas aside, never "no" elegant reminders.
posted by adamgreenfield at 9:16 PM on July 30, 2003


Eeek! Xenotransplantation causes replication concerns. In alleles there is no guessing.
posted by WolfDaddy at 9:18 PM on July 30, 2003


guilefully, un-egressed social sauntering in native gargantuas
posted by jazzkat11 at 9:50 PM on July 30, 2003


Gee, and really good answers never take up any space.
posted by adamgreenfield at 10:03 PM on July 30, 2003


Score! People, adamgreenfield's champion. Exeunt.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:09 PM on July 30, 2003


Eccentric xenophobes exude unworthy nasal trappings.
posted by Ufez Jones at 10:14 PM on July 30, 2003


Eventually, Xeroxed efforts underimpress new talent...
posted by adamgreenfield at 10:14 PM on July 30, 2003


Every X-Day ends up not taking.@y
posted by aws17576 at 10:16 PM on July 30, 2003


talking asses, kingship inferred. not good.
posted by jazzkat11 at 10:20 PM on July 30, 2003


Grant others' obvious delight.
posted by adamgreenfield at 10:23 PM on July 30, 2003


D'oh! Evening light is gone. Happy trails!
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:25 PM on July 30, 2003


take responses and insert life support.
posted by trondant at 10:27 PM on July 30, 2003


shouldn't underestimate people playing on remote systems.
posted by taz at 10:31 PM on July 30, 2003


oops.
posted by taz at 10:32 PM on July 30, 2003


shouldn't underestimate people playing on remote transrormers! ;)
posted by Ufez Jones at 10:33 PM on July 30, 2003


um, transformers...
posted by Ufez Jones at 10:34 PM on July 30, 2003


or-

shouldn't underestimate people playing, only retarded taz.

posted by taz at 10:34 PM on July 30, 2003


Those real and newly sanctioned fucking old retired men ever read Sartre?
posted by trondant at 10:40 PM on July 30, 2003


transformers, rare and not safe for oral redress. Mentioning entertains racy SnM'ers
posted by jazzkat11 at 10:40 PM on July 30, 2003


Seemingly, angsty retirees talk rabid existentialism.
posted by Ufez Jones at 10:44 PM on July 30, 2003


Enough! Xanax is something that everyone needs to ingest (at least in some measure).
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:47 PM on July 30, 2003


Met every apolitical soul? Use reinformencement examples.
posted by trondant at 10:52 PM on July 30, 2003


mr_crash_davis! Excellent answer! Super usage - really evolved!
posted by taz at 10:54 PM on July 30, 2003


Easy, xylophones and mellow pieces leave everyone soothed.
posted by jazzkat11 at 10:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Some obligated Oolongs take hotcakes extra-dermitorily.
posted by Ufez Jones at 11:00 PM on July 30, 2003


Every xeriscaped tract really attracts dulled Eaterners rolling mightily into the Occident, riding interstates, living young.
posted by trondant at 11:07 PM on July 30, 2003


Youthful occupants undualte needing ganja.
posted by Ufez Jones at 11:09 PM on July 30, 2003


get another nappy joint, asshole
posted by trondant at 11:11 PM on July 30, 2003


Gleefully, aiming narrow, Jones acronyms!
posted by jazzkat11 at 11:13 PM on July 30, 2003


Asshole? So somebody has only limited expressions?
posted by taz at 11:14 PM on July 30, 2003


Even Xanadu provided rational esoteric songs. Some insinuated obliging Nigerian Spammers!
posted by Ufez Jones at 11:18 PM on July 30, 2003


Stop posting and making me evermore ravishingly sexual.
posted by trondant at 11:20 PM on July 30, 2003


Some emit Xenon. Usual American lexicon.
posted by Ufez Jones at 11:25 PM on July 30, 2003


let's expel "x". It cramps our nonsense.
posted by taz at 11:27 PM on July 30, 2003


Now others need seeing every nonsense submittal erased.
posted by trondant at 11:29 PM on July 30, 2003


Every random acronym solves everyone's dilemmas.
posted by jazzkat11 at 11:32 PM on July 30, 2003


damn! I'm late every minute! Modem always slow.
posted by taz at 11:34 PM on July 30, 2003


stop law-offending warfarers.
posted by trondant at 11:35 PM on July 30, 2003


Warfaring assholes reap fictional additional respect. Erstwhile, reality secedes.
posted by Ufez Jones at 11:38 PM on July 30, 2003


Snarky effects can elicit duldrums, everyone savvy?
posted by jazzkat11 at 11:41 PM on July 30, 2003


seemingly endless, crazy eggheads determine extra-legal scenarios
posted by Fezboy! at 11:41 PM on July 30, 2003


Suck a vibrant , vacuant Yemeni.
posted by trondant at 11:43 PM on July 30, 2003


Your extremely menacing entry needs intervention
posted by Fezboy! at 11:45 PM on July 30, 2003


I noticed that even righteous verbalists entertain not truisms, if only nonego.
posted by jazzkat11 at 11:48 PM on July 30, 2003


it's not the execution really; verbalization entered non-commitally threads its own noose.
posted by taz at 11:49 PM on July 30, 2003


not only oafs spell erroneously.
posted by trondant at 11:51 PM on July 30, 2003


errors repeatedly rendered on nonsensensical entries only underscore severe limitations. Yet...
posted by taz at 11:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Everlongingly, red-faced readers only now explain, ousting users so lovingly. Y'knowwhaddamean?
posted by jazzkat11 at 11:56 PM on July 30, 2003


Yippee, easy thinking.
posted by CountZero at 12:00 AM on July 31, 2003


(Sorry, jazzkat11, you almost had it)
posted by CountZero at 12:02 AM on July 31, 2003


I tried. :]
posted by jazzkat11 at 12:04 AM on July 31, 2003


terribly haughty. Indifferently nuanced kvetching is not good.
posted by Fezboy! at 12:05 AM on July 31, 2003


Gee, overly obtrusive.
Damn!
posted by CountZero at 12:11 AM on July 31, 2003


Destroyed all my nuances...
posted by wendell at 12:12 AM on July 31, 2003


Thought hobbles intuition, nitwit. Knowing involves nuanced gropings!.
posted by troutfishing at 12:13 AM on July 31, 2003


nothing undoes a nubile collaborator except synonyms.
posted by taz at 12:16 AM on July 31, 2003


now unappealingly acronomized neologisms corrupt every statement!
posted by troutfishing at 12:17 AM on July 31, 2003


so you're now ontologically neutered? You're my slave!
posted by troutfishing at 12:20 AM on July 31, 2003


Gracious! Rude overhead play ignored numerous go-between submissions!
posted by wendell at 12:20 AM on July 31, 2003


so troutfishing's attempting to effect multiple expresions, numerous threads?
posted by wendell at 12:24 AM on July 31, 2003


Shit, lost all valid enthusiasm.
posted by CountZero at 12:25 AM on July 31, 2003


everybody notices that hapless unordered submissions interrupt all sequential motion.
posted by taz at 12:37 AM on July 31, 2003


Move on the immediate object, Nimrod!
posted by wendell at 12:41 AM on July 31, 2003


thank you for the opportunity to use the word nimrod
posted by wendell at 12:42 AM on July 31, 2003


every noteworthy thread has unexpected slumps, indeed. a serendipitious moment?
posted by troutfishing at 12:44 AM on July 31, 2003


Natch! I must remit offerings directly....
posted by troutfishing at 12:46 AM on July 31, 2003


Don't interrupt reasonably edited crap to lay yours.
posted by CountZero at 12:55 AM on July 31, 2003


Yikes! Overly ugly response, sir!
posted by taz at 12:58 AM on July 31, 2003


So I reply...
posted by wendell at 1:00 AM on July 31, 2003


Reverse-engineered pancakes lost yumminess.
posted by WolfDaddy at 1:17 AM on July 31, 2003


yes, untimely mess makes it not even slightly sensational.
posted by wendell at 1:23 AM on July 31, 2003


Since everyone now seems a touch irritable, order nachos and liquor!
posted by arto at 1:39 AM on July 31, 2003


let's invite quonsar! Unmitigated orneriness required.
posted by taz at 1:41 AM on July 31, 2003


Really, encouraging quonsar's unique impudence risks enkindling disequilibrium.
posted by Opus Dark at 2:16 AM on July 31, 2003


Doesn't it seem evident quonsar'll unleash intense laughter in bar rooms, introducing unusual mayhem?
posted by arto at 2:25 AM on July 31, 2003


Did I sleep enough? Quality usually is lost in between runs in using metafilter.
posted by biffa at 2:26 AM on July 31, 2003


My apologies. Your haste eludes me!
posted by biffa at 2:27 AM on July 31, 2003


marvelous explication!
posted by taz at 2:42 AM on July 31, 2003


Extraordinary XP litigation incurred, correcting all the input/output nonsense.
posted by adamgreenfield at 2:46 AM on July 31, 2003


Not one nonsensical sentence exists! Note: some exceptions.
posted by talos at 2:59 AM on July 31, 2003


Every xenophobic colon examiner posits tenuous interrelations - obviously, neoclassicists scream.
posted by Opus Dark at 3:17 AM on July 31, 2003


still, classic rejoinders exemplify anal metafiltering.
posted by taz at 3:26 AM on July 31, 2003


Must everyone take a faux intellectual line to express rather inferior new gags?
posted by biffa at 3:39 AM on July 31, 2003


...Great as gags seem.
posted by adamgreenfield at 3:44 AM on July 31, 2003


Screams emanating... except muted.
posted by adrianhon at 3:49 AM on July 31, 2003


Metafilter: unending threads eclipse daylight
posted by planetkyoto at 3:52 AM on July 31, 2003


Duly angered: you lurched infront - going home tersely.
posted by Blue Stone at 3:58 AM on July 31, 2003


To elevate rhymes, search every line yesterday.
posted by rory at 4:07 AM on July 31, 2003


You expect someone to explore rhymes denounced as yabber?
posted by biffa at 4:17 AM on July 31, 2003


yet, everyone says that elevating rhymes drives a yearning
posted by garyh at 4:17 AM on July 31, 2003


You answer bravely, biffa, even righteously.
posted by rory at 4:19 AM on July 31, 2003


Metafilter: unending threads eclipse daylight - heh... ;)
posted by twine42 at 4:23 AM on July 31, 2003


rotfl. I glimpse haiku! That excellent oriental user segued laudably, y'all!
posted by taz at 4:33 AM on July 31, 2003


You art lovers lament?
posted by biffa at 4:36 AM on July 31, 2003


Listen. Any muppet eventually needs teaching
posted by garyh at 4:42 AM on July 31, 2003


To each a choice helpful intrinsic new goodness.
posted by jpburns at 4:44 AM on July 31, 2003


long acronyms mean extended neuronal torment
posted by blogenstock at 4:44 AM on July 31, 2003


{Dang! Missed 300!}
posted by jpburns at 4:45 AM on July 31, 2003


Gawking over one delightfully nubile, elegant sapphist, shuffling.
posted by Blue Stone at 4:52 AM on July 31, 2003


gets off on dirty nipples, even sloppy seconds
posted by garyh at 4:52 AM on July 31, 2003


[over 300 posts and barely a double-entendre, letalone a little sexual innuendo... appaling.]
posted by Blue Stone at 4:53 AM on July 31, 2003


[...and then two, er, come along at once. LoL]
posted by Blue Stone at 4:55 AM on July 31, 2003


Late again! May eventually need treatment.

Sequential efforts contain one naughty disgrace. Shame!
posted by jack_mo at 5:02 AM on July 31, 2003


Shuffling hellenic? Unusually free form lesbian? It's notably Greek.
posted by taz at 5:03 AM on July 31, 2003


Gregarious rectal escapades, elucidate knowledge.
posted by Blue Stone at 5:07 AM on July 31, 2003


Granted. Really, every 'Ellenic knows.
posted by adamgreenfield at 5:09 AM on July 31, 2003


Know-it-all not only worrisome, leaves education directly guttered, eh?
posted by jpburns at 5:10 AM on July 31, 2003


Education helps.
posted by cup at 5:11 AM on July 31, 2003


Has everyone loved poor syntax?
posted by biffa at 5:12 AM on July 31, 2003


'Kinell! Naughty onanists wank. Look - entertaining dirty girls express!
posted by garyh at 5:13 AM on July 31, 2003


way too slow!
posted by garyh at 5:13 AM on July 31, 2003


Seriously: you need to avoid "x"
posted by Blue Stone at 5:14 AM on July 31, 2003


xerox!
posted by biffa at 5:16 AM on July 31, 2003


x?
posted by garyh at 5:16 AM on July 31, 2003


Simple yammering not taken as xerophilic.
posted by jpburns at 5:16 AM on July 31, 2003


xenophiles enter rectums of Xhosans
posted by Blue Stone at 5:20 AM on July 31, 2003


Xeric humidity: oxymoron? Suffers awful night's sleep
posted by garyh at 5:22 AM on July 31, 2003


Cheaters!
So let everyone exempt propriety!
posted by jpburns at 5:24 AM on July 31, 2003


Please refer origin postulating resonant insinuation, elderly tyrant you!
posted by Blue Stone at 5:26 AM on July 31, 2003


young ogres unleashed?
posted by taz at 5:30 AM on July 31, 2003


Unless neither lets either appear so haphazard, ensuing destruction.
posted by jpburns at 5:33 AM on July 31, 2003


Don't evaluate syntax, toward rear ugly typing: it's overtly nonsensical.
posted by Blue Stone at 5:38 AM on July 31, 2003


Not only nonsensical, seems even nonparsable. Some iterations cause anagram lockdown.
posted by jpburns at 5:41 AM on July 31, 2003


not only nonsensical, syntax expresses nothing sensible in certainly any language
posted by garyh at 5:43 AM on July 31, 2003


damn! too slow again!
posted by garyh at 5:44 AM on July 31, 2003


Lets all not gang up and gabble eternally!
posted by biffa at 5:45 AM on July 31, 2003


Eventually terrible entries reappear nauseatingly, as lucid learned yearnings.
posted by jpburns at 5:48 AM on July 31, 2003


(the word was lockdown, btw...)
posted by jpburns at 5:50 AM on July 31, 2003


Echoing the entirety re: nouns adumbrated liberally last year...
posted by adamgreenfield at 5:50 AM on July 31, 2003


Yearning even again? Really, now I need greater suggestions.
posted by adrianhon at 5:51 AM on July 31, 2003


Lovely oration, comes keenly, divested of wordy nonsense.
posted by Blue Stone at 5:51 AM on July 31, 2003


Yow! 'E's ahead, righteously.
posted by adamgreenfield at 5:51 AM on July 31, 2003


9. In case two members coincidently post a sentence using the same last word from the previous post, the later post will be deleted.[disregarded]
posted by Blue Stone at 5:54 AM on July 31, 2003


New orator not serious. Eluding natural semiotics expressly!
posted by jpburns at 5:56 AM on July 31, 2003


eh? x-rated posts retreated? electronic shame superimposed? Let's yodel!
posted by taz at 6:00 AM on July 31, 2003


Emphatically xeroxed, previous rascal; everyone seriously should listen, yeah!
posted by Blue Stone at 6:00 AM on July 31, 2003


Yet others don't encourage legality.
posted by jpburns at 6:03 AM on July 31, 2003


Yikes - one's delivery effortlessly levelled.
posted by Blue Stone at 6:04 AM on July 31, 2003


lawyers expectedly get a legal insight to you
posted by garyh at 6:05 AM on July 31, 2003


You orate unendingly!
posted by Blue Stone at 6:07 AM on July 31, 2003


Unfortunately necessary. Even new didactics infer noble grumblings. Later, y'all!
posted by jpburns at 6:10 AM on July 31, 2003


Using nouns, even now, distresses I. No good letters yatter.
posted by biffa at 6:11 AM on July 31, 2003


Y'all again!! Low lexicography!
posted by garyh at 6:12 AM on July 31, 2003


Lovely.... expect xerox included co-correspondent, or garyh; resist alphabetical perversity, help youngsters!
posted by Blue Stone at 6:16 AM on July 31, 2003


Your old units numb. Go south, take early rum shots!
posted by tr33hggr at 6:20 AM on July 31, 2003


some hgger over there, sipping.
posted by taz at 6:23 AM on July 31, 2003


Say I, please post innuendo, not gabble
posted by garyh at 6:25 AM on July 31, 2003


Get a blog! Be less egotistical.
posted by jamespake at 6:27 AM on July 31, 2003


Ere go other tittlilating insights. Then in come alluring losers.
posted by wobh at 6:32 AM on July 31, 2003


laughing outloud since entry replied Spake.
posted by taz at 6:35 AM on July 31, 2003


wish I could have said "laughing outloud since james spake"
posted by taz at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003


"Spake" ponderous archaic. Keep edgy!
posted by jpburns at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003


silly postings always kill ennui
posted by taumeson at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003


with the benefit of hindsight: s/insights/ingenues/; s/losers/latecomers/
posted by wobh at 6:41 AM on July 31, 2003


Enough now! No Unix incantations.
posted by jamespake at 6:43 AM on July 31, 2003


Indeed; none can assay no temptation aggravating that instinct on new suggestions.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:45 AM on July 31, 2003


Error! Doggerel goes yawwy.
posted by biffa at 6:48 AM on July 31, 2003


Seriously, uber geeks, give every sequential text, insightful omission... now scram!
posted by Blue Stone at 6:49 AM on July 31, 2003


Yes! A writer who yields!
posted by jpburns at 6:51 AM on July 31, 2003


Stone clearly requires a methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine.
posted by jamespake at 6:53 AM on July 31, 2003


...waiting to see who wins this tongue of war
posted by taz at 6:57 AM on July 31, 2003


The word is "yields", from Spake|edgy|yawwy... but nice try...
posted by jpburns at 6:58 AM on July 31, 2003


You're insane. Everyone. Look! DSM-IV says.
posted by furiousthought at 7:00 AM on July 31, 2003


MetaFilter easily trumps his yellow long epithet. Nearly every day I overuse 'x', yet not 'm'—even twice hourly. You'd like all my purple hearts, even though a morphine injector needs ecstasy.
posted by rory at 7:02 AM on July 31, 2003


Sure. Are you surprised?
posted by jpburns at 7:02 AM on July 31, 2003


"Murder, Ethel. The henchman you let enter named everyone."

"Dog! I only xeroxed ying-ying, now.."

"Murder, Ethel. Taken haughtingly, you laugh and mock. Please. However Ethel, treachery and murder, its nonsense? Ethel..."
posted by jazzkat11 at 7:04 AM on July 31, 2003


So, unfortunate Rory played retrospectively, I'm sorry 'e' denied.
posted by jamespake at 7:07 AM on July 31, 2003


Don't encourage noncompliance! I eschew disobedience.
posted by jpburns at 7:09 AM on July 31, 2003


Discussion is saved only by ending dumb incoherent efforts. Notice clear entry.
posted by Nothing at 7:11 AM on July 31, 2003


Dudes, it's so objectionable, but easily done. If everyone non-complied: expulsion!
posted by rory at 7:12 AM on July 31, 2003


Dammit, preview on a near-400 thread is a killer!
posted by rory at 7:13 AM on July 31, 2003


Even newbies try responding. Yes.
posted by jpburns at 7:15 AM on July 31, 2003


Dude, I'm sorry. One bloody error! Damn, I'm experiencing non-complance everywhere!

(the word is entry)
posted by jamespake at 7:15 AM on July 31, 2003


Your efforts: sustained.
posted by Nothing at 7:19 AM on July 31, 2003


Susceptible unto subthreads tis, and - I note - entertaining diversity.
posted by biffa at 7:21 AM on July 31, 2003


devilishly invidious versions excite real scorn; it's the yardstick.
posted by taz at 7:24 AM on July 31, 2003


You're all really demanding. So tara! I'm cooking Kedgeree.
posted by jamespake at 7:26 AM on July 31, 2003


(yuck, acting really damn slowly -- this ISP sucks kangaroos.)
posted by spandex at 7:28 AM on July 31, 2003


Knowing elusive diversions gets excessive. Really earns expulsion.
posted by jpburns at 7:29 AM on July 31, 2003


(Kids, 'e's digesting gluggy edible rice - easily eaten.)
posted by rory at 7:30 AM on July 31, 2003


Even exylophone playing underwater lacks something. I'm off now!
posted by jamespake at 7:40 AM on July 31, 2003


Now, or whenever?
posted by rory at 7:42 AM on July 31, 2003


What his entry noted elicited voice earnestly, righteously.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:45 AM on July 31, 2003


fuck. i've had rejoinders for like, the past 10, yet i miss my time slot by about 1 minute on preview.
posted by taumeson at 7:49 AM on July 31, 2003


Rejoinders indeed-- gotta hurry to enter one, unless something licks you!

Replied to my own, yes, but I plead context.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:52 AM on July 31, 2003


Righteousness is great, however this end, or "unsubscription," seems less yeomanly.
posted by Nothing at 7:54 AM on July 31, 2003


Yeah? Everyone offers me advice-- not like yourself.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:59 AM on July 31, 2003


You oughtn't upstage.
posted by Nothing at 8:00 AM on July 31, 2003


You only useful reply sours everyone's lovely fun.
posted by biffa at 8:01 AM on July 31, 2003


Feh. Uninteresting nerds.
posted by trharlan at 8:09 AM on July 31, 2003


Now everyone reuses dictionary selections.
posted by grum@work at 8:19 AM on July 31, 2003


Slanderer! Excepting limited events, choosing the indefectible's only natural speech.
posted by Nothing at 8:24 AM on July 31, 2003


So presumably everyone enunciates clear hokum?
posted by biffa at 8:29 AM on July 31, 2003


hoary opinion, kept unduly modest.
posted by trharlan at 8:33 AM on July 31, 2003


Many oppose dumb exclamations, says themselves.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:38 AM on July 31, 2003


Magnanimous of dependably excellent speller trharlan.
posted by biffa at 8:39 AM on July 31, 2003


Thread really hasn't any reason/logic, arrives nowhere
posted by fuzz at 9:13 AM on July 31, 2003


Nowhere? Or we have earnestly reigned exigency?
posted by trharlan at 9:21 AM on July 31, 2003


Tut! - Righteously heaped anarchic rejoinders liberate avalanching nonsense (excepting xenophobic inserts generating exceptionaly nasty, curt yips).
posted by troutfishing at 9:27 AM on July 31, 2003


Enter "x" in Guattari's elder nephew's college yearbook.
posted by adamgreenfield at 9:32 AM on July 31, 2003


Yikes, imagine poor sesquipedalophobiacs!
posted by jamespake at 9:32 AM on July 31, 2003


Some erratic Seinfeld quote underlined instinctively potent expressions-- damn, all lost over petty haggling. Oh, be intelligent, all curators stuck!
posted by DrJohnEvans at 9:42 AM on July 31, 2003


(Drat! "Reined", not "reigned"! Dependably excellent speller, my arse. Drat!)
posted by trharlan at 9:46 AM on July 31, 2003


So, this ugliness continues, kids?
posted by mr_crash_davis at 9:51 AM on July 31, 2003


Superb! That used cunning knowledge.
posted by jamespake at 9:51 AM on July 31, 2003


Kids? Is Davis superior?
posted by jamespake at 9:53 AM on July 31, 2003


Sure. Underlings protest equivocally - restlessness is obviously right.
posted by CountZero at 9:56 AM on July 31, 2003


Righteousness inherent gives him tipsiness.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 9:59 AM on July 31, 2003


Today, I'll possibly succeed in nothing except stupid sentences.
posted by jamespake at 10:04 AM on July 31, 2003


Superior editing needs to end nerds, creating essential speed.
posted by transient at 10:06 AM on July 31, 2003


Shit. Previewed, expecting entertaining dialogue.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:09 AM on July 31, 2003


Davis, if a link offends go unwind elsewhere.
posted by jamespake at 10:14 AM on July 31, 2003


...else little symbolic effect will haunt everybody replying entirely.
posted by jpburns at 10:17 AM on July 31, 2003


Damn you!: Everyone loves such elegant wordplay here-- egos run elsewhere!

Every notion that intellectuals reason entirely logically yodels.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:20 AM on July 31, 2003


Yet others defend essentially limp sarcasms.
posted by jpburns at 10:22 AM on July 31, 2003


Sometimes attitudes reverse, causing a serious MetaFilter situation.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:25 AM on July 31, 2003


Sometimes I take umbrage at thematically iniquitous old nonsense.
posted by biffa at 10:30 AM on July 31, 2003


Not only nonsense— sometimes everyone nullifies statements extraordinary.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:34 AM on July 31, 2003


Emperor Xerxes tried razing Athens once. Roughly defended, it's now a ruined yesteryear.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:58 AM on July 31, 2003


Especially, x's test readers attempting otherwise reasonable discourse in nascent aureate recorded yammering.
posted by trharlan at 11:00 AM on July 31, 2003


Yeah, everyone says that. Everywhere, ridiculous yarns eat away reality.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:01 AM on July 31, 2003


Ridiculing effrontery? Anterior lunacy is truly yours.
posted by ed at 11:04 AM on July 31, 2003


Your only use remains secret.
posted by biffa at 11:07 AM on July 31, 2003


Secluded egomaniacs can't ramrod extraordinary threads.
posted by ed at 11:19 AM on July 31, 2003


This has ruinous effects, as do secrets.
posted by transient at 11:34 AM on July 31, 2003


sometimes, even croutons really enhance the salad.
posted by myopicman at 11:49 AM on July 31, 2003


Sadly, all lettuces are droopy.
posted by WolfDaddy at 11:52 AM on July 31, 2003


Delightful radishes only open possibilities yonder.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:53 AM on July 31, 2003


delicious ratatouille or oranges pervaded yesteryear.
posted by amery at 11:54 AM on July 31, 2003


yowsers! only nincompoops deny eating right.
posted by taumeson at 11:55 AM on July 31, 2003


Raddichio is good, healthy, tasty.
posted by transient at 11:58 AM on July 31, 2003


Try a slightly toasted yam.
posted by jamespake at 12:01 PM on July 31, 2003


to all "stoppers": thank you.
posted by fletchmuy at 12:02 PM on July 31, 2003


Yes, always munchable.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:03 PM on July 31, 2003


Make us nice cheese ham and bread - lovely eatables.
posted by jamespake at 12:09 PM on July 31, 2003


Each aspirer's try at blogstopping leaves exponents stupefied.
posted by Songdog at 12:20 PM on July 31, 2003


Eggs added to a breakfast look extra scrumptious.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:23 PM on July 31, 2003


Songdog, the usual pranks ended. Forward: interesting eatables discussion.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:26 PM on July 31, 2003


dissuading individuals simply can't undermine serious sophistry, including our newest.
posted by taumeson at 12:32 PM on July 31, 2003


Noble engaging words. Eat something today?
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:33 PM on July 31, 2003


Tureens of delicious, aged Y'Quem.
posted by amery at 12:41 PM on July 31, 2003


Two over done arugula, yes.
posted by transient at 12:42 PM on July 31, 2003


Yammer enthusiastically, Songdog.
posted by ed at 12:46 PM on July 31, 2003


Your quail's underdone, even moldy!
posted by WolfDaddy at 12:50 PM on July 31, 2003


Moldy?! Oh lecherous, deformed yaweh!
posted by taumeson at 12:56 PM on July 31, 2003


Moldy oldy ldy dy y!

Just kidding.

My! Our lad does yell!
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 12:57 PM on July 31, 2003


You're aware we're English here?
posted by mr_crash_davis at 12:57 PM on July 31, 2003


You are way eager, 'homes.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 12:58 PM on July 31, 2003


'homes...eh...really eloquent...
posted by taumeson at 1:00 PM on July 31, 2003


English lasses offered quaint, unique enjoyments, newly tasted.
posted by jpburns at 1:03 PM on July 31, 2003


Taut and strong, the enchanting damsels.
posted by transient at 1:06 PM on July 31, 2003


Damn. A mighty stimulation end longing suddenly.
posted by jpburns at 1:10 PM on July 31, 2003


Late-but-sorta-haiku:
Delightful angelic
Mistresses seem enticing
Leaving Saskatoon


Since Ursula dropped drawers, Ernest needed lotsa yohimbe.
posted by arto at 1:19 PM on July 31, 2003


Such unneeded desires do exist— no loud yelling!
posted by DrJohnEvans at 1:19 PM on July 31, 2003


Yeah, or his impotence meter be erroneous.
posted by WolfDaddy at 1:22 PM on July 31, 2003


Entertaining ribald entries often need exacting obvious unstable suggestibility.
posted by jpburns at 1:26 PM on July 31, 2003


{dang! Can't spell...}

Entertaining ribald response entries often need exacting obvious unstable suggestibility.
posted by jpburns at 1:28 PM on July 31, 2003


So, unstability gets grins? Egads, seems there I've been idiotic. Looked into, yesterday.
posted by WolfDaddy at 1:33 PM on July 31, 2003


Yes, even star typists embarrass relatives. Dunderheads appear yonder.
posted by jpburns at 1:39 PM on July 31, 2003


Yet onerous nincompoops downsize English remainders.
posted by ed at 1:43 PM on July 31, 2003


*robs ed, makes an incredible naked dash, exits right stage*
posted by mr_crash_davis at 1:53 PM on July 31, 2003


Really, even morons are innocuous now; dilettantes engender real scorn!
posted by transient at 1:53 PM on July 31, 2003


*Suddenly trembles and gazes elsewhere*
posted by jamespake at 1:58 PM on July 31, 2003


Everyone, let's stop enshrining willies here, else randiness ensue!
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:06 PM on July 31, 2003


Even newbees should use exactitude
posted by feelinglistless at 2:19 PM on July 31, 2003


Exactly x-ray ace, crybaby, toothless infants try uttering deft elocutions.

[dammit, I thought elocutions was spelled with a "q" to keep up the hard streak.]
posted by zpousman at 2:29 PM on July 31, 2003


Eluctating logic only causes unctuous types introducing onanism. Now stop.
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:35 PM on July 31, 2003


Stiff touch overly pleasurable.
posted by caddis at 2:38 PM on July 31, 2003


Please let's end amourous, stirring undertones and become less erect.
posted by jamespake at 2:41 PM on July 31, 2003


Examining rows effects coupled testicles!
posted by ed at 2:45 PM on July 31, 2003


Erections rarely elicit comment, truly.
posted by WolfDaddy at 2:48 PM on July 31, 2003


Too risque. Uncouth, licentious youngsters!
posted by brownpau at 2:57 PM on July 31, 2003


Your organs upset numerous grandfather's sensibilities; their erections require surgery!
posted by transient at 3:14 PM on July 31, 2003


Some, unfortunately, require groin extraction - randy yobs!
posted by jamespake at 3:25 PM on July 31, 2003


Yet, orderlies bruise schlongs.
posted by CountZero at 3:30 PM on July 31, 2003


You're obliterating boys' serenity.
posted by WolfDaddy at 3:31 PM on July 31, 2003


Such churlish handling leaves one's nob godawfully sore.
posted by jamespake at 3:34 PM on July 31, 2003


Such entertainment rarely exists near internet these years.
posted by wendell at 3:35 PM on July 31, 2003


So, open redundency exists.
posted by wendell at 3:37 PM on July 31, 2003


Every Xmas, I scribble to Santa.
posted by jamespake at 3:48 PM on July 31, 2003


Satan anagram nearly tricks all.
posted by jpburns at 3:53 PM on July 31, 2003


A latent Lucifer?
posted by jamespake at 3:58 PM on July 31, 2003


Looks uncommonly creative, I fear evil results.
posted by brownpau at 4:05 PM on July 31, 2003


Redundancy exists somewhere under 'Lifter's tacky subsystem
posted by wendell at 4:11 PM on July 31, 2003


Rejoice, everyone! Says undertext: Legendary thread status.
posted by picopebbles at 4:11 PM on July 31, 2003


Status thread ain't terribly useful, seemingly.
posted by WolfDaddy at 4:17 PM on July 31, 2003


Should exceptions exist, may ignite notoriously ghastly lustful yearnings.
posted by wendell at 4:23 PM on July 31, 2003


So even elephants might indicate no gulibility living youthfully?
posted by feelinglistless at 4:24 PM on July 31, 2003


'Subsystem' - up before 'status', you sidetracked thread, endlessly meandering!
posted by jamespake at 4:26 PM on July 31, 2003


My error! Apologies notwithstanding, departing ere rory insists! Now going!
posted by WolfDaddy at 4:30 PM on July 31, 2003


Go on! I'll never grovel.
posted by jamespake at 4:37 PM on July 31, 2003


Grinning recidivist opens vault, elucidating language.
posted by troutfishing at 4:49 PM on July 31, 2003


Yet everyone's angst, resplendent, nullifies innocence (now groped, supine).
posted by troutfishing at 4:53 PM on July 31, 2003


Less angush, no gain. Upset aphorisms growing everywhere.
posted by jamespake at 4:56 PM on July 31, 2003


Everywhere? - vaingloriously exultative rhyming youth wordsmiths hirsutely. "Enough!" - Rimbaud eructs.
posted by troutfishing at 5:12 PM on July 31, 2003


Even Rimbaud upholders can talk sense.
posted by jamespake at 5:26 PM on July 31, 2003


Similar enthusiasm now sneaks everywhere.
posted by moonbird at 6:15 PM on July 31, 2003


Each variation ends really yucky. Why has everyone relegated ending?
posted by jpburns at 6:54 PM on July 31, 2003


End now, dammit, it's now golden.
posted by Frank Grimes at 6:58 PM on July 31, 2003


Go on, live! Death earns nothing.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:08 PM on July 31, 2003


nor other things have i noticed gaminely.
posted by taumeson at 8:01 PM on July 31, 2003


Gay aging male is now enduring lost youthfulness.
posted by WolfDaddy at 8:32 PM on July 31, 2003


you ought understand the hard fact...ultimately loss necessitates extremely sudden situations.
posted by taumeson at 9:11 PM on July 31, 2003


Suddenly it trickles! Underneath a thread, inside out, near splendor!
posted by ed at 9:53 PM on July 31, 2003


Still posting lovely endwords? No doubt of repetition.
posted by picopebbles at 10:15 PM on July 31, 2003


Really early, post-day (extraordinarily) three: I toddle in, obssessed. Numbskull.
posted by taz at 10:39 PM on July 31, 2003


Never underestimate Metafilter's basic standards killer utility link, Lamebrain.
posted by wendell at 12:07 AM on August 1, 2003


Later, at midnight
Entertaining by ranting
And it's negative

Language and meaning
Enchanting beauty returns
As if nirvana

ok, it's cheating. dammit! I can't choose!

we'll never reach 600!
posted by arto at 1:07 AM on August 1, 2003


Gotta go with one of 'em... how to choose... let's try this:

Now I'm really vexed, arto. No alternates!
posted by nath at 1:43 AM on August 1, 2003


Are late text entries really notced at this exaggerated silliness?
posted by Blue Stone at 2:19 AM on August 1, 2003


Should I link 'Lifter's incidental network efforts subverting six-hundred?

Yes, it's kinda pathetic, but do you have a better way to avoid waiting half the night for the thread to re-load?
posted by wendell at 2:57 AM on August 1, 2003


Secluded in Xanadu
Held under nightfall
Dreamlike, reaching
Ere daybreak
posted by arto at 4:16 AM on August 1, 2003


Drowsy apple year,
Becoming reality,
Emerge, all knowing.

(It's come to Haiku)
posted by jamespake at 4:53 AM on August 1, 2003


Kuru now onset,
We instigate nonsense,
gleefully.
posted by Blue Stone at 4:56 AM on August 1, 2003


Giants lack enthusiasm,
Eagles fairly unsettled,
Lions lose youngster.
posted by biffa at 5:03 AM on August 1, 2003


You often underesimate neologisms, guys!
Singing terrific english rhymes...
posted by dash_slot- at 5:13 AM on August 1, 2003


rubbish haikus, yet mysteriously eclectic sentences.
posted by garyh at 5:20 AM on August 1, 2003


summer elides now
the entries number countless
endure subsumption
posted by taz at 5:35 AM on August 1, 2003


So, understanding blooms;
Sending undulating Metafilterian prose toward infinity,
Outages notwithstanding.
posted by Blue Stone at 5:56 AM on August 1, 2003


[Prose? Prose?.... Poetry, obviously.]
posted by Blue Stone at 5:59 AM on August 1, 2003


Never obscure, the words I type have superficial, transitory allure. Need decision in neural game.
posted by garyh at 6:06 AM on August 1, 2003


Going and making escape.
posted by biffa at 6:20 AM on August 1, 2003


Escape? Seriously - chained are people, 'ere.
posted by Blue Stone at 6:30 AM on August 1, 2003


encapsulations
reconstitutionalize
elaborations
posted by taz at 6:40 AM on August 1, 2003


okay, you have to give me a small break on this one: 5-7-5 in only 3 letters? c'mon! And now you want pith, too? - by the way, just consider "reconstitutionalize" a metaphor for spring, and we have a seasonal reference too!)
posted by taz at 6:43 AM on August 1, 2003


ever late as big
orange, red august, taking
over new seasons
posted by transient at 6:57 AM on August 1, 2003


Excuses! Leave (at best) or recieve aptly terse invective over namby-pamby strategies!
posted by Blue Stone at 6:58 AM on August 1, 2003


oops, missed an i

ever late as big
orange, red august, thread is
over, new season
posted by transient at 6:59 AM on August 1, 2003


So enraging!
Another sentence obscures
new screed.

- Aha! So your entry is invalid! Take that, transient!
posted by Blue Stone at 7:03 AM on August 1, 2003


slacking -- carefully
reading, editing; entry's
debilitated
posted by transient at 7:14 AM on August 1, 2003


Sons take revenge,
amongst the godless.
I eschew sermons.
posted by biffa at 7:17 AM on August 1, 2003


oops, missed an I
posted by biffa at 7:18 AM on August 1, 2003


Demurred elloquently; by instigating long investigations, transient, a timely entry's dismissed!

[Biffa, dude, you're seriously late!]
posted by Blue Stone at 7:24 AM on August 1, 2003


[Oh, I'm in error... Biffa's entry was correct... (((embarrassment)))]
posted by Blue Stone at 7:26 AM on August 1, 2003


demure indigo
slaves masturbate in sweet sperm...

...huh? what?

and... where do we go from here

posted by taz at 7:51 AM on August 1, 2003


Some posts emphasize raunchy memories.
posted by picopebbles at 8:09 AM on August 1, 2003


My endearing memories of raunchy insertions excite self.
posted by caddis at 8:32 AM on August 1, 2003


self excitement leavens 'filter.
posted by taz at 8:40 AM on August 1, 2003


Further iterations leave taz excited, really!
posted by transient at 8:46 AM on August 1, 2003


Risky expectations and lavish lewdness. Yuck.
posted by brownpau at 9:16 AM on August 1, 2003


Remarkably, entries aphrodesiacal! Love! Love! .... Yesss!
posted by taz at 9:16 AM on August 1, 2003


Yaks enjoy surf sun sourkraut
posted by Bonzai at 9:26 AM on August 1, 2003


You undervalue cock kisses.
posted by Blue Stone at 9:36 AM on August 1, 2003


knockwurst images seduce Stone, elicit surrender.
posted by taz at 9:44 AM on August 1, 2003


Keep is simple silly. Eat sourkraut.
posted by caddis at 9:44 AM on August 1, 2003


Stone usually regards raising raging erections necessary, despite every rejoinder.
posted by biffa at 10:04 AM on August 1, 2003


reconsider extreme judgment: only in nunneries do erections repel.
posted by taz at 10:14 AM on August 1, 2003


Really entertaining posts. Exceedingly loquacious.
posted by waxpancake at 10:44 AM on August 1, 2003


Some utterances, really risque, egregiously now disrupt elevated repartee.
posted by fidelity at 10:50 AM on August 1, 2003


Lame! On quick updraft, am crestfallen: initial (original) underwriting superseded.

(Or, in English: Rgh! Beaten to the Really? Even Priests Emulate Logs answer by waxpancake.)
posted by picopebbles at 10:51 AM on August 1, 2003


At 556 comments, this thread now exceeds BlogStop's 553. (Membership over there is closed at 19.)
posted by beagle at 11:13 AM on August 1, 2003


Some users pontificate every reply, some exercise deviant ending denotations.
posted by magnetbox at 11:27 AM on August 1, 2003


Despite each naysayer, our teachers all traffic in obnoxious non sequiturs.
posted by eastlakestandard at 11:47 AM on August 1, 2003


Seriously, every quonsar user input takes us reeling sideways.
posted by wendell at 11:52 AM on August 1, 2003


Simple enjambment -- qualities used in two unlikely rows-- splendid!
posted by Bootcut at 11:53 AM on August 1, 2003


Such preening leads everyone nilly-willy; dare i digress?
posted by Seth at 12:10 PM on August 1, 2003


Didn't I give redundant entries some seriousness?
posted by wendell at 12:16 PM on August 1, 2003


Serious entries rarely intrude our unbelievably silly new entertainment. Such savoriness.
posted by caddis at 12:23 PM on August 1, 2003


Such a voracious operation requires intense niggling every seven syllables.
posted by me3dia at 12:46 PM on August 1, 2003


Sounds yucky. Let lovely alphabet beauty live every second.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:50 PM on August 1, 2003


slamming each comment, offering no definitiveness.
posted by myopicman at 1:30 PM on August 1, 2003


Sigh. Every comment originates needless disdain.
posted by adrianhon at 1:30 PM on August 1, 2003


Disappointed in sarcasm? Demand affectionate interpersonal napping.
posted by Fezboy! at 1:39 PM on August 1, 2003


Desist! It shall die as individuals nullify!
posted by terrapin at 1:39 PM on August 1, 2003


Not applying post possibly is nullifying gratification
posted by terrapin at 1:41 PM on August 1, 2003


Not a proper post! It's not good.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 1:42 PM on August 1, 2003


Great... ranging all topics in fickle interchanges. Can't all those interested operate nicely?
posted by DrJohnEvans at 1:45 PM on August 1, 2003


Ninth innings collapse
Extraordinarily
Lambasted Yankees
posted by Fezboy! at 1:50 PM on August 1, 2003


inning, not innings. D'oh!
posted by Fezboy! at 1:53 PM on August 1, 2003


You answer nicely.
Karma exponentially
Expands. Stupendous!
posted by MrMoonPie at 2:00 PM on August 1, 2003


Stop this. Users! please end now.
Do observe ultimate silence.
posted by richard m at 2:42 PM on August 1, 2003


Slow tease unleashes
priapic endowment: now
drive on? un-sated?
posted by troutfishing at 2:46 PM on August 1, 2003


So I leave, empty:
Nullification's ceaseless
empiricism.
posted by troutfishing at 2:53 PM on August 1, 2003


Wow, y'all're doing it in haiku form now, too? Damn.

Um, now satisfied, a triumphant emperor declines.
posted by me3dia at 2:53 PM on August 1, 2003


Desist! Everyone clear?
Lawyers insist no extra sentences.
posted by richard m at 3:11 PM on August 1, 2003


Dying ruler gasps out,
"life illuminates nothing!.......
.....excepting sublime."
posted by troutfishing at 3:12 PM on August 1, 2003


Sensibly expressed notion, terminate!, except - nobody can expect sensibility.....
posted by troutfishing at 3:25 PM on August 1, 2003


Some exist not so
independently, but in
life it's to yourself...

life is easy, haiku is hard
posted by wendell at 3:50 PM on August 1, 2003


Yet our undulating replies seem even less funny...
posted by Quinn at 4:04 PM on August 1, 2003


Friends unintentionally needle you. Yes?
posted by christophernaze at 4:33 PM on August 1, 2003


Yikes! Electric Shock!
posted by caddis at 4:39 PM on August 1, 2003


Somebody help out caddis, knuckleheads!
posted by wendell at 4:52 PM on August 1, 2003


Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry every haunting ecstatically apathetic despondent shudder.
posted by jpburns at 4:55 PM on August 1, 2003


Oops.

Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry ecstatic apathetic despondent shudder.
posted by jpburns at 5:00 PM on August 1, 2003


Should he understand dreadfully elaborate reading?
posted by jragon at 5:16 PM on August 1, 2003


Really, electricity and drinking infer needless gloom.
posted by caddis at 5:22 PM on August 1, 2003


Good! Let's offend other Metafilterites.
posted by jpburns at 5:26 PM on August 1, 2003


Many entries tried, alas.
Fortunately, inane language trickles entertainingly 'round in thread.
Exceedingly satisfying.
posted by caddis at 5:49 PM on August 1, 2003


Such a testiment I say, for your ingenuity needs gratification.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 6:02 PM on August 1, 2003


Geeky release at the intellectual filter.
Its crushes "alt.english.usage's" testy intellectual onanistic nirvana.
posted by caddis at 6:24 PM on August 1, 2003


Now I respond viciously at neoconservative asshats.
sorry. some habits are hard to break
posted by wendell at 6:37 PM on August 1, 2003


Ah sir, six hundred answers thence silence?
posted by caddis at 6:42 PM on August 1, 2003


Should I license endearingly naive caddis' error?
posted by wendell at 7:12 PM on August 1, 2003


Erroneous reads
Rheumatic ostentation
Raskolnikovesque
posted by ed at 7:41 PM on August 1, 2003


Run after silly kids.
Open long neglected intellects.
Know others' very essence.

Secret: quietly unruffle ego.
posted by caddis at 7:58 PM on August 1, 2003


everything got old.
posted by myopicman at 8:01 PM on August 1, 2003


Obviously. Less demanding.
posted by yhbc at 8:04 PM on August 1, 2003


Deep entries might arise now.
Dreamland I now greet.
posted by caddis at 8:19 PM on August 1, 2003


Go, relax; everyone else - talk.
posted by yhbc at 8:40 PM on August 1, 2003


Talk about linguistics... kudos!
posted by thatweirdguy2 at 9:09 PM on August 1, 2003


Kindly use Disney oeuvre: Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!

I feel like I just killed Kenny...
posted by wendell at 10:19 PM on August 1, 2003


So, um... perhaps everyone recalls comment #528532??. At last it's finally repeated. A good idea: let's invoke "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" to instigate closure. Envision "X" people incorporating all letters in determined observations, cancelling interminable output. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
posted by taz at 12:46 AM on August 2, 2003


p.s., wendell: doesn't Kenny always come back?
posted by taz at 12:54 AM on August 2, 2003


p.s.: this was a nightmare.
posted by betheon at 1:55 AM on August 2, 2003


So, again repeat "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious".

I'm asking to be smacked, aren't I?
posted by sailoreagle at 3:26 AM on August 2, 2003


Slapped unendingly, pesky 'eagle: remember clearly a lesson in fear; renounce all gargantuan indefensible linguistics; instead, supply terms in contraction (eschewing "x" please;) in addition, learn instructions, desperately observing conditions, outlawing using "supercalifragilisticexpialodocious."
posted by Blue Stone at 4:36 AM on August 2, 2003


Stupid users! People, even repeating cheap arduous linguistic iterations for ridiculous amusement (God I love it!) sacrifices their initial creativity. Extra x's probably (I assume) lay on difficulties others cannot integrate or use seriosly.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 5:06 AM on August 2, 2003


"Supercalifragillisticexpialidocious" enjoys renaissance? I'm offended. [understandably.] Suggest learning Yiddish.
posted by arto at 5:20 AM on August 2, 2003


You're in desperate danger if suffering Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.
posted by jamespake at 5:49 AM on August 2, 2003


Hie inward! Prepare portents or philters, ontological taboos, or muster oddball nerves. Shit! This really obviates sustained eccleisiastics. Sequined quipping underscored in preparing post. End? Damn. And logorrhea involved! Or perhaps habitues offer bartering instead? Alas!
posted by ed at 6:07 AM on August 2, 2003


Amazingly, long acronym's solved.
posted by sailoreagle at 6:38 AM on August 2, 2003


Sadly obtuse linguistics vanquished enduring denizens.
posted by richard m at 6:53 AM on August 2, 2003


doesn't everybody need iterated zaniness, even nothwithstanding "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"?
posted by taz at 7:06 AM on August 2, 2003


Stop using putrid ersatz run-on calumny. A long irritating filmic response antagonizes general intelligence. Let's insert something truly interesting; certainly eluding "x-ray" (particularly insensitive...) and leaning instead democratic. Other crummy instances offer unusable sentences.
posted by jpburns at 8:26 AM on August 2, 2003


bis
posted by ginz at 8:39 AM on August 2, 2003


Still endurance needs to end not continue else sunk
posted by feelinglistless at 9:21 AM on August 2, 2003


So unless negated; karmic.
posted by jpburns at 9:38 AM on August 2, 2003


Karma and reincarnation move in circles.
posted by ginz at 10:23 AM on August 2, 2003


Circles indicate roundness, chum. Let's embrace squares.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:43 AM on August 2, 2003


So, quonsar, unheard, apparently responseless, embodies sanity?
posted by jpburns at 10:53 AM on August 2, 2003


Slightly. Although no-one's insane this year.
posted by MUD at 11:20 AM on August 2, 2003


Yikes! Ever an resolution?
posted by richard m at 11:27 AM on August 2, 2003


Richard: entertainingly, some other lads usurp their inate orwellian nature.
posted by betheon at 11:40 AM on August 2, 2003


Northern Arkansas: the unfortunate rejects? Entertaining.
posted by betheon at 11:50 AM on August 2, 2003


Endless nattering treats each reply tersely. An insightful notion in normal gatherings.
posted by jpburns at 11:55 AM on August 2, 2003


Genial adults talk here. Entertaining resourceful intercourse normally gets squashed.
posted by ninthart at 4:41 PM on August 2, 2003


Six-hundered quickly used answers simply have ended discourse.
posted by caddis at 6:00 PM on August 2, 2003


Oh... to have used the spell checker, alas.
posted by caddis at 6:01 PM on August 2, 2003


Did I supercalifragilate? Cadenhead, outrageous unneccessary repetition sadly excuseless.

rcade, I'm so sorry... taz, it didn't work
posted by wendell at 6:27 PM on August 2, 2003


Entering "X" causes unnecessary stress, egghead! Less excessiveness supplies surprises.
posted by jpburns at 6:35 PM on August 2, 2003


So undue redundancy poorly represents itself? Seems extremely supercalifragilisticexpialidocious supercilious.
posted by wendell at 7:41 PM on August 2, 2003


Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, understandably, pleases everyone's rather cocky inner linguist. I offer uncumbersome syllabary.
posted by thatweirdguy2 at 8:46 PM on August 2, 2003


"Surrender, you loony lamentists and backstabbing artisans," rallied Yahoo!
posted by betheon at 9:23 PM on August 2, 2003


Yet another hierarchically organized oracle.
posted by picopebbles at 9:26 PM on August 2, 2003


Oh, really, a copied lame example.
(which, I believe, is the original acronym used by Oracle Corp.)
posted by wendell at 9:41 PM on August 2, 2003


Entertaining xylophones are musically pretentious, like e-sitars.
posted by betheon at 1:08 AM on August 3, 2003


Evil signage is taken away. Reasonable? Superstitious?
posted by arto at 4:01 AM on August 3, 2003


Sexy uber-babes pound erotic rodeo saddles, terrifically inciting the illicit oglers (understandably squirting.)
posted by Blue Stone at 7:30 AM on August 3, 2003


So quit using irrational replies. That's irritating, not goodly.
posted by jpburns at 7:55 AM on August 3, 2003


Good Orpheus, over dyke lead you
posted by feelinglistless at 9:58 AM on August 3, 2003


Yep, outta usages...
posted by jpburns at 10:45 AM on August 3, 2003


Until society accepts God, everyone's sinning.
posted by Blue Stone at 11:37 AM on August 3, 2003


So insincere nincompoops negligent? I'm not godly...
posted by jpburns at 12:08 PM on August 3, 2003


Goodness. Overt diatonics lower yields.
posted by ed at 12:25 PM on August 3, 2003


You're incorrect, ed -- learn Dianetics (Scientology).
posted by eddydamascene at 12:43 PM on August 3, 2003


Some crank invented entire new theology offering losers other God-like yuckiness.

that's an apronym
posted by wendell at 1:49 PM on August 3, 2003


Yet, unlike Christianity, KRC is necessary -- even stable souls.
posted by betheon at 3:43 PM on August 3, 2003


ahem: KRC stands for "knowledge-responsibility-control.
posted by betheon at 3:44 PM on August 3, 2003


Supreme over universe lives... someone?
posted by transient at 4:37 PM on August 3, 2003


Superstitious oligarchs may endanger our nihilistic exclamations.
posted by CountZero at 5:11 PM on August 3, 2003


Existentialists 'xclaim causality, lacking active manifestations and theist inventions. Otherwise negates science...
posted by jpburns at 5:17 PM on August 3, 2003


Can we stop this at 666, just to freak the fundies out?
posted by jpburns at 5:36 PM on August 3, 2003


Sullen curmudgeons, investigating every nuance, create enlightenment?
posted by thatweirdguy2 at 6:30 PM on August 3, 2003


Sorry. Couldn't I engage notorious criminals? Egads.
posted by betheon at 6:32 PM on August 3, 2003


Exactly. Never let investigation get handed to evildoers. No monitors erase naysaying, though.
posted by picopebbles at 6:42 PM on August 3, 2003


Thou hearest obligatory, unseemly gnashing, hourly...
posted by jpburns at 6:54 PM on August 3, 2003


Hoary orations undermine regular luddite yogis.
posted by transient at 7:12 PM on August 3, 2003


Yet our greatest impudences survive...
posted by wendell at 7:17 PM on August 3, 2003


Shocking, unless real vitality integrates via endlessness.
posted by Jimbob at 7:31 PM on August 3, 2003


Every new decision leads ever so slowly nearer escaping stupid security.
posted by wendell at 7:52 PM on August 3, 2003


Shite. Edible chocolate, unfortunately, regresses inner toxins. Yuck.
posted by betheon at 8:55 PM on August 3, 2003


You understand cosmological knowledge?
posted by wendell at 9:51 PM on August 3, 2003


Sheesh... What a bore... How about...
Yahoo! Unleash Commie Kamikazes!!!
posted by wendell at 9:56 PM on August 3, 2003


YIPES! unbelievable, chaotic Know-it-alls
posted by NGnerd at 9:56 PM on August 3, 2003


(hmm)

Kept needing one will-intense test-any less, losing status.
posted by eriko at 10:06 PM on August 3, 2003


wendell:
Korn amazes many inside Kansas; are zany, eccentric sombodies!
posted by betheon at 10:32 PM on August 3, 2003


eriko:
Surprising: the Agroclean® timber udder suite.
posted by betheon at 10:33 PM on August 3, 2003


sanitary udder is terribly exciting!
posted by taz at 12:39 AM on August 4, 2003


Erotic X-rated cinema is the internet's next generation.

no link, I trust you can find your own
posted by arto at 1:44 AM on August 4, 2003


Generally, electronic nudes elicit rigidly appropriate tumescence, I often note.
posted by Blue Stone at 4:24 AM on August 4, 2003


Nasty onaism tempts ejaculations.
posted by jpburns at 4:33 AM on August 4, 2003


enough jokes already! can't undo lunatic addiction to insanity, ok? now stop!
posted by talos at 6:32 AM on August 4, 2003


So terminate, other people.
posted by soyjoy at 7:34 AM on August 4, 2003


Prurient entries often, perhaps, lack excitement.
posted by caddis at 8:55 AM on August 4, 2003


Every x-rated comment, in this entity (me) elicits noticable titilation.
posted by Blue Stone at 9:08 AM on August 4, 2003


Trouble is, thread is lapping at time I once needed.
posted by biffa at 9:17 AM on August 4, 2003


Now enter extra new entry detoxification.
posted by caddis at 9:21 AM on August 4, 2003


(oops that was supposed to be:)
Now enter extra devilish entry detoxification.
(proof reading needed by me.)
posted by caddis at 9:23 AM on August 4, 2003


Don't erode this (omitting "x") infantile, fawnishly illicit conversation: are thee impotent, oh naysayer?
posted by Blue Stone at 9:46 AM on August 4, 2003


Never asked you... should anyone you eat react?
posted by kokogiak at 10:04 AM on August 4, 2003


Rally Everyone! Another catchy tintinnabulation!
posted by kokogiak at 10:08 AM on August 4, 2003


Really, eating? Awkward cater-cornered transition.
posted by ed at 10:10 AM on August 4, 2003


typically random adage....no smooth incantation to introduce other newsworthiness.
posted by myopicman at 10:17 AM on August 4, 2003


Now, every word's smooth when other readers take heed! Incant effortlessly; syllabic somnambulism.
posted by eddydamascene at 10:40 AM on August 4, 2003


(incant now, effortlessly)
posted by eddydamascene at 10:42 AM on August 4, 2003


Spelling on metafilter never adds much, but under-lying inherent symbolism matters.
posted by transient at 10:59 AM on August 4, 2003


metafilter achievement: this thread effortlessly rates superb!
posted by talos at 11:12 AM on August 4, 2003


surely unpossible...perhaps even rates blogstop?
posted by taumeson at 11:17 AM on August 4, 2003


Silly useless people eating ripe bananas.
posted by ginz at 11:20 AM on August 4, 2003


but all newbies are now adding sense
posted by darsh at 11:21 AM on August 4, 2003


the word is "blogstop", not "sense".
posted by taumeson at 11:28 AM on August 4, 2003


Stop entering non-sensical elucidations.
posted by MrMoonPie at 11:35 AM on August 4, 2003


Entering lively umbrages civilly drives a thread into occultist numerology: six-hundred-sixty-six.
posted by caddis at 11:47 AM on August 4, 2003


Sinful insertion: x
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:17 PM on August 4, 2003


*points at MrMoonPie*
Xenophobe.
posted by me3dia at 12:21 PM on August 4, 2003


xanthic enemas notwithstanding, only pooh's honey obviates belly epidemics
posted by taumeson at 12:52 PM on August 4, 2003


Extraordinary pandering isn't delectable. Ebullient mimickry is continuously suggestive.
posted by ed at 1:12 PM on August 4, 2003


Shit! Ungainly ghoulish grammar edifies some transgendered inhuman vampirish elusives.
posted by jpburns at 1:17 PM on August 4, 2003


eh?
language usage suffering.
(i vent enough steam.)
posted by myopicman at 1:30 PM on August 4, 2003


Sheesh! Take eleven aspirins, myopicman.
posted by MrMoonPie at 1:42 PM on August 4, 2003


madness! you over-post!! I can't manage another nonsequitur
posted by gravelshoes at 1:55 PM on August 4, 2003


Nonsense, only nobodies say endless quonsar-like ubiquitous invectives, transpiring under responses.
posted by jpburns at 2:02 PM on August 4, 2003


Really? Everybody says posting only nattering signifies endless serendipity.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 2:07 PM on August 4, 2003


Such "everybody" references elicit nominal doubt. I prefer implied traducement. Yinyang.
posted by brownpau at 2:21 PM on August 4, 2003


You insinuate nothing; your argument needs gimmicks.
posted by DragonBoy at 2:28 PM on August 4, 2003


Glibness in matters most inane creates kudos supreme.
posted by caddis at 2:41 PM on August 4, 2003


Gimmicks? Instead, may
MrMoonPie interject
comic kungfu? Sweet!
posted by MrMoonPie at 2:42 PM on August 4, 2003


So well elocuted.
Excellent taste.
posted by caddis at 2:57 PM on August 4, 2003


This assholery still tortures everyone?
posted by CunningLinguist at 3:07 PM on August 4, 2003


Empty, vacuous entries regress, yawn;
onto new extemporaneousness.
posted by caddis at 3:13 PM on August 4, 2003


Enter X-ray.

Thread endures? Metatalk. Pore on, readers. Artistry nibbles. Enough? Old? Ugly?

Something new? Endearing? Sexy? Serendipitious?
posted by ed at 3:54 PM on August 4, 2003


So eventually, renegade eavesdroppers nullify declarative injustices, possibly impairing the idiosyncratic observations unintentionally.

Sacrilege!
posted by CountZero at 4:50 PM on August 4, 2003


Silly acronym creation results in low indulgence, grave entries.
posted by caddis at 5:11 PM on August 4, 2003


Umm, Sacrilege ;)
posted by CountZero at 5:32 PM on August 4, 2003


Silly acronym creation results in lamentable earnestness, grave entries.
posted by caddis at 5:41 PM on August 4, 2003


entire nest tries.
rest? insert?
[enter siren.]
posted by myopicman at 5:47 PM on August 4, 2003


Sounds interesting.
Regroup, eccentric narcissists!
posted by CountZero at 5:55 PM on August 4, 2003


Not another regrouping call. I say such invocations sap the strength.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:54 PM on August 4, 2003


Suddenly then, remembering Elizabeth's new grave - tepid, and hewn.
posted by the fire you left me at 7:04 PM on August 4, 2003


how easily wanderers notice.
posted by sgt.serenity at 7:13 PM on August 4, 2003


Nearly oval trolls insidiously celebrating ennui.
posted by cohappy at 7:25 PM on August 4, 2003


Elephantitis
Naked nads undulating
Inconceivable!
posted by Fezboy! at 7:41 PM on August 4, 2003


Inconsiderate newbies, consistently offtopic, not caring! Excite interested viewers— attempt binding logical and entertaining.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:05 PM on August 4, 2003


Evans needs time. Tell everyone returning that another interesting nugget is nearly garnered.
posted by squirrel at 8:13 PM on August 4, 2003


Entries not terse enough? Rhapsodic thread additions invite nice interpersonal nattering. Geeze. . .
posted by Fezboy! at 8:14 PM on August 4, 2003


Gah! <-- Alarmed reaction. Numerous epistles registered. Entry deleted.
posted by Fezboy! at 8:19 PM on August 4, 2003


Late addition to energize troops? Oh, to have entered parsing activities rather thoughtfully, yesterday!
posted by scody at 11:39 PM on August 4, 2003


I know, I know, it only follows the acronym bit, not the "last word of the previous entry" rule rule... just wanted to express my irritation at somehow missing this for all these days! argh. carry on.
posted by scody at 11:42 PM on August 4, 2003


Yachting events stand tall, eventually running down all yankees.
posted by humuhumu at 2:05 AM on August 5, 2003


Yon! Eleven slow trains embarking righteously! Droll anticipation yellowing.

Yakutskian ankle-baiters need knowledge, especially envious simpletons.
posted by cohappy at 2:12 AM on August 5, 2003


Seven impious maidens, ponder lengthy elephant tusks; observe: nymphomaniac speculation!
posted by Blue Stone at 4:11 AM on August 5, 2003


Stone's prose: extemporaneus, clever. Uses lesbianism and titillation incorporating overt nymphomania!
posted by garyh at 5:09 AM on August 5, 2003


Nubile, yearningly maleable, pheremonal hussies, open moist apetures, now inviting auditions!
posted by Blue Stone at 5:19 AM on August 5, 2003


Audacious! Unless distracted, I think I oughta need stopping.
posted by jpburns at 5:25 AM on August 5, 2003


Stymied? The only possibility--post innuendos, incite nonstop gossip.
posted by arto at 5:53 AM on August 5, 2003


Gratuitous observation: sexual statements inflate passion.
posted by Fezboy! at 6:13 AM on August 5, 2003


Post away, soldiers!
Stunning intellectuals!
Onward, netizens!
posted by MrMoonPie at 6:41 AM on August 5, 2003


Now enlightened,
The insightful Zennist,
Experiences noble samadhi.
posted by Blue Stone at 7:39 AM on August 5, 2003


Stone and MrMoon,
Assaulting dying horses.
Inspirational.
posted by MrMoonPie at 9:01 AM on August 5, 2003


Intellectual neanderthals (some possibly Irish) revisit a tavern, inspiring obscure names as Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.
posted by CountZero at 9:19 AM on August 5, 2003


Look... listen, all. Normally, free and intelligent readers provoke with lousy linguistics, grating wisdom -- your normal, gratuitous yelling. Lately, long galling or grating examples really yank chains. Hell, we (you) realize no damned ruse or brash words languidly, listlessly (laughingly!) lodged allow nice threads. Your stupid, ignorant, lazy ideas only give one gross or gangrenous oral cavity headaches.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 9:45 AM on August 5, 2003


Hell, eating all day actually could help ease sciatica.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 10:05 AM on August 5, 2003


Some clueless interlopers always try inserting complaints. Appalling.
posted by brownpau at 11:41 AM on August 5, 2003


amazing! pretty powerful anagram, llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch...likely i need grousing.
posted by taumeson at 12:47 PM on August 5, 2003


anagram? what the hell am i smoking?

i meant acronym.
posted by taumeson at 12:50 PM on August 5, 2003


getting really obvious, using stones in newborn gizzards.
posted by myopicman at 1:07 PM on August 5, 2003


Geez! It's zany zoophilies antics, really damn scary...
posted by jpburns at 1:40 PM on August 5, 2003


sacred cattle are readily yours.
posted by myopicman at 1:50 PM on August 5, 2003


Yacht owners unavoidably reply superciliously.
posted by Quinn at 2:09 PM on August 5, 2003


"Superciliously" uncomfortably proximate, uh... really close in linquistical inheritance of uber-painful "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" last year.

It was that long ago, wasn't it?
posted by jpburns at 2:35 PM on August 5, 2003


Your expressions appear repeatedly
posted by none at 3:30 PM on August 5, 2003


Repetition, eh? Perhaps explicating a thread endlessly does leave yawns...
posted by picopebbles at 4:25 PM on August 5, 2003


Yet another wanker nearly stalls.
posted by jpburns at 5:42 PM on August 5, 2003


Soon this all long liturgy stops.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 7:30 PM on August 5, 2003


Seriously, thread's ordinality painfully streches...
posted by Vetinari at 11:50 PM on August 5, 2003


So the replies exhibit certain hour-long empty stretches...
posted by jpburns at 5:33 AM on August 6, 2003


suchas this. really easy to contemplate hideously errant sentences.
posted by taumeson at 6:30 AM on August 6, 2003


Swift entries now & then exhibited nontrivial creativity, engaging semantics.
posted by caddis at 6:48 AM on August 6, 2003


Soaring eagles;
Mountain aerobatics.
Near to infinity;
Ceaslessly swift.
posted by Blue Stone at 8:07 AM on August 6, 2003


Slowly we ignore festering threads...
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 8:48 AM on August 6, 2003


The horrible recent entries are deadly stupefying.
posted by jpburns at 9:24 AM on August 6, 2003


Stilted, truculent, unedifying prose examples for your intense, narcissistic grumbling.
posted by Fezboy! at 9:42 AM on August 6, 2003


God. Rumblings under metatalk's banner led into nosing ... grim.
posted by bonaldi at 11:03 AM on August 6, 2003


Grousing reviewers infest Metafilter!
posted by Blue Stone at 11:09 AM on August 6, 2003


Metatalk expresses terrible anger, for it loathes titillation (even rarely).
posted by none at 11:16 AM on August 6, 2003


Must everyone take all f*cking insults like they enjoy ridicule?!
posted by squirrel at 11:19 AM on August 6, 2003


Random ideas,
Decorating in cyan.
Uncoil line's end?
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:57 PM on August 6, 2003


Existence necessitates destruction.
posted by kokogiak at 2:10 PM on August 6, 2003


Destruction evolves stronger types (radically updated creatures), tailored intensively, obviously nuanced.
posted by none at 2:28 PM on August 6, 2003


Never underestimate a new creature, evolved deliberately.
posted by lazaruslong at 4:29 PM on August 6, 2003


Darwin explained lively invertebrates. But even recent atrocities trick evangelists, losing Yaweh.
posted by jpburns at 5:17 PM on August 6, 2003


Yet another weary embroilment? Hell.
posted by Yelling At Nothing at 7:15 PM on August 6, 2003


How easily loudmouths lampoon.
posted by lazaruslong at 7:35 PM on August 6, 2003


Let a million poppies open orifices naturally!
homage to the Winer?
posted by wendell at 12:36 AM on August 7, 2003


"Nats and ticks urge randiness?" asked Larry, licentiously. Yuck!

two wordplay memes for the price of one, get 'em while they're hot.

the memes, that is, not the guy with the insect fetish.
posted by arto at 3:50 AM on August 7, 2003


You use certain knowledge.

(and)

Fuck everyone that isn't schlepping horse-manure.

posted by jpburns at 4:18 AM on August 7, 2003


My answer? Nonsense!
Unequivocal response:
Exasperation!
posted by MrMoonPie at 6:47 AM on August 7, 2003


Excepting "x," all spelling permeations, even rarities, allowed. That irritates other nincompoops.
posted by transient at 7:57 AM on August 7, 2003


Not I, nincompoop! Comrade, only my phrasing occludes other popular sayings.
posted by jpburns at 12:25 PM on August 7, 2003


NEWS - - - Incessant nonsense ceasing on Metafilter - - - Posting obsession over, poster says - - -
posted by Blue Stone at 12:29 PM on August 7, 2003


[I don't believe it, Burns.... nothing for ages and then you come along and steal my thunder while I'm waiting for preview.... grrrr...]
posted by Blue Stone at 12:33 PM on August 7, 2003


Great. Really, really, really, really.
posted by MrMoonPie at 1:37 PM on August 7, 2003


So, are you infandous nitwits gonna stop ?!
posted by Masi at 3:12 AM on August 8, 2003


"Swifties?!?" Tom overstated pedantically.
posted by wendell at 4:19 AM on August 8, 2003


Pooh! Enough dumb antics! No "Toms" involved, altering long, layered yammerings.
posted by jpburns at 4:23 AM on August 8, 2003


Yes, and more monkeybusiness ensures repartee is not going south.
posted by transient at 8:33 AM on August 8, 2003


Sounding off usually takes hours!
posted by biffa at 9:20 AM on August 8, 2003


Hardly; our usual routine's shorter.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:02 PM on August 8, 2003


Hundreds of unusual responses! Staggering!
posted by jpburns at 12:02 PM on August 8, 2003


Dang!

So to append glib Gigli-isms, each response is nearly golden?
posted by jpburns at 12:13 PM on August 8, 2003


Gigli? Oh Lord. Damn entertainment narcissists!
posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:32 PM on August 8, 2003


Not a real cinematic ideal, so say innumerable stigmatizing typists. Stinky!
posted by transient at 1:34 PM on August 8, 2003


Shoot! That insertion necessitated Kafkaesque yelling.
posted by jpburns at 1:40 PM on August 8, 2003


You each leave London in new garments.
Yesterday, every loose lady investigated new games.
Yonder east, leaves looping, indigo necklaces glowing.
Yup, efts lend-lease it nice gear.
posted by Mo Nickels at 2:39 PM on August 8, 2003


Go ahead, read my eight-hundredth note to StopBlog.
posted by rory at 2:53 PM on August 8, 2003


So to others: Please be lazy or go.
posted by jpburns at 2:56 PM on August 8, 2003


Glowering oracle
posted by Fezboy! at 3:43 PM on August 8, 2003


Others: resist advice, combine language energetically.
posted by none at 4:37 PM on August 8, 2003


Emphatically no! Eventually replies get even terser! I can't abide later linguists yielding!
posted by jpburns at 5:46 PM on August 8, 2003


Yet I expect lurking devotees instigate noteworthy germinations.
posted by Fezboy! at 5:58 PM on August 8, 2003


Growth emerging, readily mutating into new aliveness; toward infinity, oh new shoot!

[apronym]
posted by Blue Stone at 3:20 AM on August 9, 2003


Send hurling object outward, terrifyingly.
semi-apronym
posted by wendell at 4:17 AM on August 9, 2003


To end responses, reply in frequent, yammering invocations. Not glowing lithe yodelings.
posted by jpburns at 4:41 AM on August 9, 2003


Yield! Octave-drifting exclamatory lyrics inform nearby galavanting skiers.

[apronym]
posted by Fezboy! at 7:57 AM on August 9, 2003


So keep inputting epigrammatic responses, sucka!
posted by jpburns at 10:46 AM on August 9, 2003


Serious understanding communicates knowledge, asshat.
posted by wendell at 4:45 PM on August 9, 2003


Asshat seems subpar; have another try.
posted by jpburns at 5:02 PM on August 9, 2003


Take rest y'all.
posted by caddis at 7:35 PM on August 9, 2003


Yokels and local lowlifes.
[aprogram?]
posted by wendell at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2003


Let ol' wendell lampoon. I find everything splendiferous!
posted by jpburns at 6:35 AM on August 10, 2003


Simply perfect, lusciously elegant, notably, delightfully, indupitably fabulous; even rousingly, orgasmically, un-stintingly superb!
posted by Blue Stone at 8:48 AM on August 10, 2003


Suddenly, unfamiliar poster enters, relishing Blogstopishness
posted by buzzv at 10:51 AM on August 10, 2003


Being last online goads some tardy outlandish posters into silly, harebrained nonsense entries, serving silliness.
posted by jpburns at 12:00 PM on August 10, 2003


Sauntering in late leads into never-ending sporting shenanigans.
posted by transient at 1:47 PM on August 10, 2003


Sneaky henchmen engage nefariously and nimbly instigate gambolling antics--namely supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

[exemplary apronym]
posted by Fezboy! at 2:02 PM on August 10, 2003


So unfair! Please elicit realistic comments. Avoid libelous inferences for real and genuine interesting linguistics. I shudder to interpret cinematic examples.

"X" persists in annals likewise.

I digress... only cinematic idiots offer unfair spellings.
posted by jpburns at 2:18 PM on August 10, 2003


Such pristine edicts lie low in nowadays' ghastly setting!
posted by DrJohnEvans at 2:47 PM on August 10, 2003


Spelling equality treatise tires 'idiot'. Nagging grouch.
posted by Fezboy! at 4:16 PM on August 10, 2003


Grumbling rumbling ogre undergoing cranky hacking.
posted by wendell at 5:56 PM on August 10, 2003


Hardly. A consistent kvetching is not grumbling.
posted by jpburns at 6:24 PM on August 10, 2003


Good reasoning undermines my bumbling literary imagery, not ghoulishness.
posted by wendell at 7:55 PM on August 10, 2003


Good hearted onslaught underlies last interjection. So happy not enduring shit sandwich.
posted by jpburns at 4:06 AM on August 11, 2003


Sandwiches are not described without including contents holder.

So how could I do an apronym for 'sandwich' when the word contains no 'b' as in bread, bun or bagel, or even an 'r' as in roll?

or am I just taking this all way too seriously?

posted by wendell at 4:20 AM on August 11, 2003


Hold onion, lettuce, (doing entire routine...)
posted by jpburns at 5:34 AM on August 11, 2003


Regular occurence, unambiguous tasks inferring nominal effort.
posted by Fezboy! at 6:17 AM on August 11, 2003


For wendell:
stuff and nice dressing wedged inside content holders?
There is no such thing as too serious!

posted by Fezboy! at 6:22 AM on August 11, 2003


Easy for Fezboy! Others require trying...
posted by jpburns at 6:58 AM on August 11, 2003


Triumph recognises your investment, not grousing.
posted by Blue Stone at 7:44 AM on August 11, 2003


Gee, roundly ostracizing usual suspects. I need group-hug.
posted by jpburns at 8:09 AM on August 11, 2003


Gaydar reacts on unknown people hugging unseemly groups.
posted by taumeson at 11:47 AM on August 11, 2003


Golly... relieved others understand puny syntax.
posted by jpburns at 12:06 PM on August 11, 2003


Sweaty young nubile twirls abominably: X-Tina.
posted by none at 1:57 PM on August 11, 2003


"X-men Three" is nearly approved!
posted by jpburns at 2:41 PM on August 11, 2003


All party people rely on very exciting...
choose one
...decor.
...dances.
...drugs.
...dexterity.
...dementia.
...downbeats.
...drama.
...dialogue.
...desperation.
posted by wendell at 7:28 PM on August 11, 2003


...duly enticing, cannot ominvores roast?
...Damocles and Neptune cornered enduring stories.
...dense rugs under gangly soiree.
...dimples empty, xylophone tinkling, empty rooms into tunes yonder.
...damn enterprising, Minutemen enjoin new thousand in Azzarello.
...donuts oval, wind never bates empty, a tired sun.
...demanding recherche and much ado
...drowning in a lager, o gristy undertow embark!
...dinner exits stomach, pancreas entitles regular acids, tasting it often negates.
posted by ed at 7:38 PM on August 11, 2003


Resting on a Sunday table.
Solemn tales--orally remembered--inform egotistical scholars.
Sweet ozou inspires refined evening entertainment.
Y'all over near Denton? East Lincoln? Roca?
A zany, zero appropriate results effort. Leastaways, looking online.
Setting up nova.
A dizzying ordeal.
Exciting mission begins anew. Ride, kinsmen!
'Not equal' gets at the essential semantics.
posted by Fezboy! at 9:51 PM on August 11, 2003


EastLincoln
posted by Fezboy! at 9:56 PM on August 11, 2003


Threads are badly layered, ed.
Scholarly collegiates have often learned all reasonable science.
Everybody notices that enjoyment relates to an important new meme, except novice troubadours.
Residents of California alarmed.
Oh no! Looking into net excites.
Near Orion, Via Andromeda.
Obviously, really dumb entrepreneurs are losers.
Knowledge is not sufficient, meaning everything now.
So every MetaFilter anagram now tires in cold seriousness.
posted by wendell at 12:23 AM on August 12, 2003


[err... Wendel, Fezboy, Ed... you, seriously need to get lives.]

Engorged daipers.

posted by Blue Stone at 4:40 AM on August 12, 2003


[I'm guessing that was "diapers."]

Disgusting infant absorbing paper, effectively reservoiring shit.

posted by jpburns at 4:54 AM on August 12, 2003


[eek! yes.]

Secretions having interesting taste.

[barf]
posted by Blue Stone at 7:21 AM on August 12, 2003


That allusion stymied the establishment.
posted by jpburns at 7:47 AM on August 12, 2003


Ew! Some tastes and best loved indulgences simply have me eschewing new things.
posted by biffa at 10:07 AM on August 12, 2003


The horrible imagery is not getting subtler.
posted by jpburns at 10:43 AM on August 12, 2003


This haiku is not
going successfully...
posted by MrMoonPie at 10:44 AM on August 12, 2003


So unsuccessful!
Bad timing! Likemindedness
elicits repost.
posted by MrMoonPie at 11:00 AM on August 12, 2003


Regret effrontery,
possible obfuscation.
Silly Troglodyte!

1st attempt at Haiku in years.
posted by jpburns at 11:47 AM on August 12, 2003


"Tricks rely on getting lots of delights, yes?" Tom entreated.

Haiku good, Tom Swifties gooder.
posted by wendell at 12:03 PM on August 12, 2003


Each new trickery relegates every acronym to enthusiastic disregard.
posted by jpburns at 12:15 PM on August 12, 2003


Didn't I seriously respect every good acronym recently displayed?
posted by wendell at 7:13 PM on August 12, 2003


Do I sense people leaving? Are you ever disappointing.
posted by biffa at 2:29 AM on August 13, 2003


Don't infer some apt posting people opted in neglect. That is negative gestalt.
posted by jpburns at 4:30 AM on August 13, 2003


Granted; every sentence takes a long time.
posted by biffa at 6:04 AM on August 13, 2003


Time is metaphysically enduring.
posted by jpburns at 6:37 AM on August 13, 2003


Every nanosecond, dilating universes undermine reality in numberless galaxies.
posted by biffa at 8:20 AM on August 13, 2003


Gosh! And lithe analogies x-out innumerable explanatory systems!
posted by jpburns at 9:51 AM on August 13, 2003


So you're suggesting temporally engulfed matter streams?
posted by biffa at 10:56 AM on August 13, 2003


Star Trek realism espouses audible mid-space sounds.
posted by jpburns at 12:30 PM on August 13, 2003


Shatner: Obviously.Unskilled.Naff. Diction.Stilted.
posted by Fezboy! at 8:27 PM on August 13, 2003


Star Trek is likable television, excruciating drama.
posted by jpburns at 4:00 AM on August 14, 2003


Dependably reliant about made-up aliens
posted by biffa at 4:47 AM on August 14, 2003


Aliens look inelegant; eerie nose structures.
posted by jpburns at 5:28 AM on August 14, 2003


Star Trek rarely uses correct terms, usually repeating execrable science.
posted by biffa at 7:40 AM on August 14, 2003


Science currently is exaggerated. Nobody credits evolutionism.
posted by Masi at 9:27 AM on August 14, 2003


Each victim only laments useless tedious idealism. Others nay-say incorrect scientific methods.
posted by jpburns at 10:21 AM on August 14, 2003


Might evangelism take hold over darwins suggestions?
posted by biffa at 12:15 PM on August 14, 2003


Science urges group gestalt; everyone should try it over neochristian sophistry.
posted by jpburns at 12:39 PM on August 14, 2003


Science otherwise posits historically icky shit towards retro yetis.
posted by Danf at 4:13 PM on August 14, 2003


You eschew terse intelligible sentences...
posted by jpburns at 6:32 PM on August 14, 2003


say, everyone's needless thread evidently nears centennial eight soon.
posted by squirrel at 10:34 PM on August 14, 2003


so, okay... oops... nine.
posted by squirrel at 10:45 PM on August 14, 2003


Nine is not eight!

Encourage its growth higher--Thousand!
posted by arto at 11:18 PM on August 14, 2003


Hey, one per customer, buddy!

Each individual gets his/her turn!
posted by jpburns at 3:54 AM on August 15, 2003


That's understood. Regret noncompliance.

it was either that, or break the x'th commandment with a "right, next!"
posted by arto at 2:51 PM on August 15, 2003


Now only nerds continue on; making phrases linked in acronyms, never ceasing efforts.
posted by jpburns at 7:24 AM on August 16, 2003


Eating fruity figs offered randomly to squirrel.
posted by ginz at 10:42 AM on August 16, 2003


Some quit, using irrational random responses, eliciting laughter.
posted by jpburns at 2:33 PM on August 16, 2003


Lurkers adventurously use gobbledygook, harassing timid endeavouring recalcitrants.
posted by azazello at 6:40 PM on August 17, 2003


Responding ever callously, azazello likens chaotic input to replies advocating natural, terser sentences.

See, I think it's more adventuresome to try to make sense, and attempt to connect to the previous sentence, but what do I know...
posted by jpburns at 4:55 AM on August 18, 2003


Sorry, even non-topical entries never cease entertaining some.
posted by transient at 7:38 AM on August 18, 2003


Some obtain merriment easily...
posted by jpburns at 8:39 AM on August 18, 2003


Eliciting associated submissions is like... yaks.
posted by transient at 9:17 AM on August 18, 2003


Yes... a kinetic science.
posted by jpburns at 9:19 AM on August 18, 2003


Segueing cleverly into every nerds choice entertainment.
posted by biffa at 12:17 PM on August 18, 2003


Every nerd tries entries related to anagrams. I naturally maintain equilibrium, not transubstantiation.
posted by jpburns at 12:59 PM on August 18, 2003


Truculent rhesus! A new swing unfurled. Bananas shower, throbbing a nifty tree. Into a torrent: idiosynchratic, otiose, Netherlands.
posted by ed at 2:15 PM on August 18, 2003


Not even trying hard. Effortless reply. Lame attempt. Not done swell.
posted by jpburns at 7:36 PM on August 18, 2003


So weak ed, language laboured.
posted by biffa at 1:41 AM on August 19, 2003


Let's attempt better ones. Unusual responses elicit disharmony.
posted by jpburns at 4:17 AM on August 19, 2003


Done, I say! Haiku
are really meaningful ones,
Nullify yahoos.
posted by MrMoonPie at 5:45 AM on August 19, 2003


You are heroes! One's on-topic submission.
posted by biffa at 6:41 AM on August 19, 2003


So underutilized, brevity. Maybe I should stop inputting other nonsense?
posted by jpburns at 9:22 AM on August 19, 2003


Nitwits offer narrow swords, entreating nuisances. Stomach epigrams?
posted by ed at 9:39 PM on August 19, 2003


Ed perceivably isnt good regarding anagrams. Minimally scholastic?
posted by biffa at 2:15 AM on August 20, 2003


So, comment-hungry overachievers, let's all savour this incredible centenary.

Nine-hundredth!
posted by rory at 2:54 AM on August 20, 2003


Crap! Each new threshold elapses nightly, as Rory yippees!
posted by jpburns at 4:16 AM on August 20, 2003


Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively! Supercalif... Superlative.
posted by transient at 8:48 AM on August 20, 2003


Some users play enthusiastically, repeatedly logging acronyms to incite victorious elation.

Thanks for the restraint, transient...
posted by jpburns at 9:46 AM on August 20, 2003


Erudite loonies
attempt this iteration.
Oppressive nonsense!
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:12 PM on August 20, 2003


Not only nonsense,
semi-haiku elicits
non segue essay
posted by jpburns at 1:28 PM on August 20, 2003


exercising sentences still alive, yippee!
posted by trharlan at 8:20 PM on August 20, 2003


Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively...
posted by transient at 8:48 AM PST on August 20


Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavours...

what can I say? I'm back from the near-dead
posted by wendell at 3:26 AM on August 21, 2003


oh crap, forgot to spell-check

Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavors...

just think of it as my bumbling way to creep a little closer to one-thousand before the 30-day limit
posted by wendell at 3:32 AM on August 21, 2003


English needs defending enthusiastically, and vanquishing our 'u' remains sacrilegious.
posted by biffa at 4:00 AM on August 21, 2003


Such a clever response is literary elegance. I oughta utilize semiotics.
posted by jpburns at 4:20 AM on August 21, 2003


Symbols evoking meaning is on topic in coding Saussure.
posted by transient at 7:54 AM on August 21, 2003


Structural analysis as unitary signifying system using rulebased exegesis?
posted by biffa at 9:13 AM on August 21, 2003


Oops.

Structurally analysing unitary signifying system using rulebased exegesis?

(That's what you get for showing off.)
posted by biffa at 9:16 AM on August 21, 2003


Examinations, x-rayed, excite great English students intaking signifiers.
posted by transient at 9:31 AM on August 21, 2003


Sigh. I guess nobody is finding it edifying responding simplistically...
posted by jpburns at 11:03 AM on August 21, 2003


Simply, in mulling philosophy, liasing in straightforward terms is counterindicated. Axiomatically, longer language yieldful.
posted by biffa at 2:44 AM on August 22, 2003


Yow! I'm entering less dialog, fully using language.
posted by jpburns at 4:31 AM on August 22, 2003


Linguistic acrobatics nimbly gain usage as graduates emerge.
posted by transient at 7:17 AM on August 22, 2003


Eluded MFA; education related garbage excretal...
posted by jpburns at 7:50 AM on August 22, 2003


Excise 'x,' cretin!
Ridiculous exercise --
Take a lexapro.
posted by MrMoonPie at 9:04 AM on August 22, 2003


Liked "excising 'x';" a possible response option.
posted by jpburns at 9:33 AM on August 22, 2003


Often prozac, taken intravenously, overcomes nervousness.
posted by biffa at 11:36 AM on August 22, 2003


Now everyone relax! Videos only use some, not every signal submitted!
posted by jasper411 at 12:43 PM on August 22, 2003


Sure, usually, but mostly I take two Excedrin daily...
posted by jpburns at 1:27 PM on August 22, 2003


Do as I: lick yoghurt.
posted by ginz at 6:30 AM on August 23, 2003


Yuck! Only gargantuan headaches urge real treatment.
posted by transient at 6:59 AM on August 23, 2003


You sad fuckers :)
posted by Blue Stone at 8:31 AM on August 23, 2003


. . .
posted by bargle at 9:02 AM on August 23, 2003


Try realizing esoteric aroma therapeutic methods, even notice Tetrahydrocannabinol.
posted by jpburns at 9:04 AM on August 23, 2003


tomatoes
eggs
tuna
radish
asparagus
ham
yoghurt
dates
rice
olives
cloves
anchovies
nuts
noodles
alfalfa
beer
ice-cream
nougat
oregano
lettuce

shopping list :-P


*runs and hides behind the door*
posted by ginz at 12:04 PM on August 23, 2003


Lame effort, tovarich (though unfair, complex entry...).
posted by jpburns at 1:48 PM on August 23, 2003


anchovies? has the j. geils band taught you nothing?

Eat not those. Really yucky.

damned blogstop thread, making me talk like yoda and all. grumble blarg foo.
posted by arto at 1:31 AM on August 24, 2003


You're unusually cosmic, knowing Yoda...
posted by jpburns at 6:08 AM on August 24, 2003


Yesterday's olives, delicious appetizers.
posted by ginz at 8:32 AM on August 24, 2003


a perfect place-- enabling these interesting, zany, erudite, reactive screeds.
posted by trharlan at 8:44 AM on August 24, 2003


Some crazed replies exceed erudite desires, seems.
posted by jpburns at 11:06 AM on August 24, 2003


So, erudition evades Metafilter. Shocked ?!
posted by Masi at 11:44 AM on August 24, 2003


! 4 (how?) explanation Jason knockoff laws.
posted by ed at 12:33 PM on August 24, 2003


punctuation is not a word, Ed...
Some homeboys oughta check known editorial demarkations.
posted by jpburns at 3:16 PM on August 24, 2003


Demarkations? Ewww!

Most assuredly, restraining k's ascendancy throughout idioticons oughta never stop!
posted by Masi at 8:53 PM on August 24, 2003


Spelling teacher overly pedagogic.
posted by trharlan at 9:37 PM on August 24, 2003


Please... either designation applicable (gleaned off gargantuan internet content).

de·mar·ca·tion also de·mar·ka·tion
posted by jpburns at 4:25 AM on August 25, 2003


Carry on, now that either notation thrives.
posted by trharlan at 5:34 AM on August 25, 2003


Two have rightness; internet verification establishes spelling.
posted by transient at 6:58 AM on August 25, 2003


Sorry, pertinent English lexicons lack indecorous nouns... greenhorn!
posted by Masi at 11:30 AM on August 25, 2003


Go retrieve extra ether now, here only remain nincompoops
posted by Birichini at 11:46 AM on August 25, 2003


Not interesting. No creativity or merit pisses off others pursuing substance.
posted by obfusciatrist at 1:24 PM on August 25, 2003


Shut up, Birichini. Stop typing acerbic, needlessly cruel expressions.
posted by trharlan at 4:06 PM on August 25, 2003


Especially "X."

Pornographic, repugnant, execrative, shit-laced, stool-ridden, insulting, offensive, niggardly, stuff-and-nonsense.
posted by jpburns at 5:37 PM on August 25, 2003


Such tirades! Understand, forget foolishness and negative distempers. No one needs semiotic enlightenment? No sweat, eh?
posted by transient at 7:02 PM on August 25, 2003


you put de lime in de markation and drink it on up...

Effortless? Hardly!
posted by arto at 10:45 PM on August 25, 2003


Have acronyms ready. Don't lack yearning!
posted by jpburns at 4:18 AM on August 26, 2003


You each are reading
Nine-fifty-three images;
Nine-fifty-three goobs.
posted by MrMoonPie at 7:30 AM on August 26, 2003


Goobs? Oh, oh. Bastard semantics...
posted by jpburns at 1:13 PM on August 26, 2003


Shameful event MrMoonPie, a neologism! Thousand in clear sight...
posted by biffa at 2:27 AM on August 27, 2003


Such intense goobisticly high turnout...
posted by jpburns at 4:12 AM on August 27, 2003


Totally unwarranted responses! Now onward until triumph!
posted by Birichini at 5:18 AM on August 27, 2003


... toward responses involving ultimate multiple postings, hurrah!
posted by jpburns at 5:45 AM on August 27, 2003


Having understood rising resolution, all hurry.
posted by transient at 7:31 AM on August 27, 2003


Here's useless reply registering yep.
posted by jpburns at 8:19 AM on August 27, 2003


Your exclamation's pertinent.
posted by transient at 8:26 AM on August 27, 2003


Proving even really thoughtful individuals never exit neverending threads.
posted by rory at 9:33 AM on August 27, 2003


That's heartwarming reply. Everyone appreciates decent sentences.
posted by jpburns at 10:23 AM on August 27, 2003


singlemindedly entering new text; every new comment equals success.
posted by crunchland at 10:32 AM on August 27, 2003


Some unusual cognitive consciousness enables sequential sentences.
posted by jpburns at 11:53 AM on August 27, 2003


Such easy nonsense
(this entry notwithstanding)
can't end silently
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:15 PM on August 27, 2003


Some individuals let entropy negate triumphant learned yearnings.
posted by jpburns at 12:22 PM on August 27, 2003


Shout it loudly everyone! Noble thread lingers yet.
posted by biffa at 12:22 PM on August 27, 2003


Yowser! Even after repeated nights I need greater speed.
posted by biffa at 12:24 PM on August 27, 2003


Some posts exceed Einsteinian doctrine.
posted by jpburns at 12:48 PM on August 27, 2003


Definitely. Often 'c' tardy. Reams in new expressions
posted by biffa at 1:05 PM on August 27, 2003


Dual offerings cause trouble; rate increases near end.
posted by transient at 1:05 PM on August 27, 2003


Egads! 'X' prevents reply -- emerging so soon, ironically; our nominations synchronized.
posted by transient at 1:12 PM on August 27, 2003


rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch...

So you nastily create havoc, replying onerously, needlessly inflicting "z", entirely dastardly.
posted by jpburns at 2:02 PM on August 27, 2003


Do alternative spellings, that allow reposed discourse, lengthen yammering?
posted by trharlan at 5:54 PM on August 27, 2003


rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch...

You assume my most electrifying response is nigh, governor?
posted by rory at 1:52 AM on August 28, 2003


Gentlemen, our vying ends? (No one responds.)
posted by planetkyoto at 2:11 AM on August 28, 2003


(oops, clipped it)
Gentlemen, our vying ends respectably? (No one responds.)
posted by planetkyoto at 2:18 AM on August 28, 2003


Replying ere saddening planetkyoto on near deadline sussurusses.
posted by biffa at 2:49 AM on August 28, 2003


"sussurusses?" I can't find that defined anywhere, or even make sense of it in a sentence... Going back one...

Really enthused seeing penultimate onslaught. Nearly done soon.
posted by jpburns at 4:09 AM on August 28, 2003


You're right, it should have been 'susuruses', which describes the collective buzz of a whispering crowd, as one might get in a crowded theatre, and which will teach me to use a dictionary over my aging memory.
Carrying on from your word;

Spelling outlaws onerous entry.
posted by biffa at 4:25 AM on August 28, 2003


Jeez, what am I on this morning, make that:

Spelling outlaws onerous nincompoop.
posted by biffa at 4:27 AM on August 28, 2003


Nice inclusion; nincompoop. Certainly one made poignant over other possibles.
posted by jpburns at 4:44 AM on August 28, 2003


Please! One shames self in bashing language egregiously. Seppuku?
posted by biffa at 5:01 AM on August 28, 2003


Slicing entrails, purportedly... Pretty uncomfortable, knifing underbelly.
posted by jpburns at 5:09 AM on August 28, 2003


Understatement! No disprin effectively removes bellyslicing effects. Lamentable looking yukata.
posted by biffa at 5:25 AM on August 28, 2003


You're using knowledge a typist abhors.
posted by jpburns at 5:39 AM on August 28, 2003


Acknowledged: Blatantly heaping obscure references steadily.
posted by biffa at 5:53 AM on August 28, 2003


So, the end approaches. Do I leave yet?
posted by rory at 6:00 AM on August 28, 2003


You've emerged then?
posted by biffa at 6:01 AM on August 28, 2003


True, hovering eagerly now.
posted by rory at 6:03 AM on August 28, 2003


Nearly over with.
posted by biffa at 6:09 AM on August 28, 2003


Well, it's thankfully here.
posted by jpburns at 6:12 AM on August 28, 2003


Well, I try. Heroically.
posted by rory at 6:12 AM on August 28, 2003


Hey! 'E's responding early!
posted by rory at 6:13 AM on August 28, 2003


Each action remains legitimate, yaar.
posted by biffa at 6:18 AM on August 28, 2003


Yet another agonizing response.
posted by jpburns at 6:19 AM on August 28, 2003


'Yaar'? An amusing response.
posted by rory at 6:19 AM on August 28, 2003


Rory ends, surprisingly playing only nine-hundred-and-ninety-ninth sequential entry.

Go for it, you two!
posted by rory at 6:25 AM on August 28, 2003


Entry number: Thousand. Retiring. Yeehaw.
posted by biffa at 6:27 AM on August 28, 2003


Easy now that rory yields.
posted by jpburns at 6:27 AM on August 28, 2003


poo!
posted by jpburns at 6:29 AM on August 28, 2003


Yes, excellent entry hails a winner.
posted by rory at 6:30 AM on August 28, 2003


Sorry jp. Good thread, will have to find something else to do with my working hours now.
posted by biffa at 6:34 AM on August 28, 2003


I'm glad we made it before the 30 days were up. All the best cult threads break the four-figure barrier...

Oh no! We've broken the fourth wall! It's all gone pear-shaped!
posted by rory at 6:40 AM on August 28, 2003


Waking, I nonpunctually nod. Early risers!
posted by transient at 7:14 AM on August 28, 2003


Reckless individuals seek ravishing substitutes.
posted by ginz at 7:58 AM on August 28, 2003


shit.

Reckless individuals seek everlasting ravishing substitutes.
posted by ginz at 7:59 AM on August 28, 2003


So, unless boredom strikes, this is the uber-thread. Excellent Show!
posted by talos at 8:54 AM on August 28, 2003


Such hubris overwhelms wordsmiths.
posted by transient at 9:23 AM on August 28, 2003


Whoa, or resultant destruction smites many in the hubric sphere...
posted by jpburns at 9:41 AM on August 28, 2003


such premonitions harm earnest repartee, eh?

It was either "eh" or "exorbitantly", and the letter x is for pricks
posted by trharlan at 9:20 PM on August 28, 2003


Eh? Hosers.
posted by arto at 1:55 AM on August 29, 2003


Hundreds outputed sentences evidence respectable semiotics.
posted by jpburns at 4:32 AM on August 29, 2003


Such extent! Marvel incessantly, our thread is completely sequoia-like!
posted by Masi at 4:47 AM on August 29, 2003


Such expansive quantities underscore our inventive abundance -- like I know excellence...
posted by transient at 10:52 AM on August 29, 2003


Exclude "x", clown, else learned leprechauns exist near collegiate environs...

I have no idea what that means, but that damn "x" rattled me...
posted by jpburns at 12:40 PM on August 29, 2003


Easy, now. Vindictive irritability ruins our nice station!
posted by trharlan at 4:08 PM on August 29, 2003


Still thread allows textual input? Oh, nuts!

shoulda shut down by now; damn thread'll probably outlive me
posted by wendell at 4:19 PM on August 29, 2003


Never underestimate thread's strength.

(no x, jp!)
posted by transient at 4:41 PM on August 29, 2003


Still time... rally everyone near... group thread hugs!
posted by jpburns at 6:15 PM on August 29, 2003


Hugs? Unseemly. Group Shout-outs!
posted by wendell at 6:25 PM on August 29, 2003


Still holding out under time -- our uber thread's senescencing.
posted by transient at 7:50 PM on August 29, 2003


er, senescing.
posted by transient at 7:54 PM on August 29, 2003


Showoff egotist needs elementary spelling check. Inaccuracy not graceful.
posted by trharlan at 9:37 PM on August 29, 2003


Gobbledygook requires artfully commanding English! Fear unnecessary lexiphanicism !

I fear a shrewish response, reminding of Socrates' wife, for including the x.
posted by Masi at 11:18 PM on August 29, 2003


Let's emit x-rated irate pedantic half-assed non-sequiturs in commentary, if Socrates minds.
posted by wendell at 11:35 PM on August 29, 2003


Me, inscribing non-sequiturs? Do summarize!
posted by Masi at 12:11 AM on August 30, 2003


Seriously underwhelmed, Mr. Masi, ascribing redundancy in zero exuberance.

I don't have the foggiest idea what I just said, but it's got an "x" in it...
posted by wendell at 12:39 AM on August 30, 2003


I'm sorry if my post appeared unconnected, I wanted it to be relevant regarding trasient's post; I considered it fairly obvious. Peccavi, and I apologise.

Eliciting x's underscores babyish expectations; ridicule also not cultured. Creep!
posted by Masi at 3:10 AM on August 30, 2003


Clearly realistic expectations exceed posts...
posted by adrianhon at 3:14 AM on August 30, 2003


Proof of something that smells.
posted by ashbury at 5:32 AM on August 30, 2003


Some may elicit long-winded lessons, surely.
posted by jpburns at 5:55 AM on August 30, 2003


« Older Toronto is expecting 450,000 to attend today's Tor...  |  Roman Cosmetics Found at Templ... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments