Euphonious Rory regretfully originated not easily operative user simple name, exaggerated self sophistry. posted by jpburns at 7:42 AM on July 30, 2003
surely our posts have intrinsic substance to rally youth? posted by myopicman at 7:45 AM on July 30, 2003
your ogreish undulations tire helicopters posted by transient at 7:47 AM on July 30, 2003
How each licentious idiot can optimize personal tricky existing repeating syllables. posted by jpburns at 7:49 AM on July 30, 2003
Still, you live like a big lazy elephant shit. posted by eyeballkid at 7:51 AM on July 30, 2003
*rofl @ fraser - my thoughts exactly* posted by twine42 at 8:30 AM on July 30, 2003
Kids: never observe writers. Live each day greatly, erstwhile appearing boldly lyrical yahoos! posted by crazy finger at 8:30 AM on July 30, 2003 [1 favorite]
Yawn. Audience heads off, over stimulated. posted by kfury at 8:31 AM on July 30, 2003
mate, i'm 32, I just haven't got that sort of time posted by Frasermoo at 8:34 AM on July 30, 2003
So try! I might understand living at thirty-eight, dammit. posted by brownpau at 8:35 AM on July 30, 2003
So this is metafilter's usual laugh against the employed dunderhead? posted by biffa at 8:35 AM on July 30, 2003
Take it from biffa's, seeing as how "dammit" isn't really a word. But then, neither is "dunderhead." posted by brownpau at 8:36 AM on July 30, 2003
Dadgummit! Underemployed nerds defeat everyone! Real hardworking employees all despair.
Up yours and your real words! Thppt. posted by furiousthought at 8:39 AM on July 30, 2003
Should time include mania? Unnecessary. Lose a thesaurus, then enjoy doubly!lousy not typing as fast as other people--d'oh!
Dictionaries use neologisms. Don't end rhetoric, help enjoy all day! posted by arto at 8:41 AM on July 30, 2003
7. Your words, especially the last word, must appear in the dictionary
Thanks Brownpau, but Dunderhead is in mine! (Not that I'd looked it up or anything) posted by biffa at 8:41 AM on July 30, 2003
Does every single poster argue in reality? posted by rory at 8:42 AM on July 30, 2003
Rory, every argument lives in time, yes? posted by brownpau at 8:47 AM on July 30, 2003
You! Eat sausage! posted by MrMoonPie at 8:48 AM on July 30, 2003
Your ending's supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. posted by rcade at 8:49 AM on July 30, 2003
Sad. An unworthy shot at grandiose exposition. posted by brownpau at 8:53 AM on July 30, 2003
Surely under previous endeavours rest callous attempts lifted indiscriminately from remains among gargantuan indigenous livestock invited suddenly to intervene carefully, eventually xylophones participate in a lackluster inimical display of callousness in our unkown system. posted by signal at 8:56 AM on July 30, 2003 [1 favorite]
rcade cannot always deal effectively! posted by jaronson at 8:56 AM on July 30, 2003
So you see tones, even mixolydian? posted by transient at 8:59 AM on July 30, 2003
An observation: This is a good illustration of community weblogging, versus what goes on at the linked site, BlogStop, where the entries rarely refer to prior ones. posted by beagle at 8:59 AM on July 30, 2003
Signal, you slays them. Excellent metafiltering! posted by arto at 9:01 AM on July 30, 2003
music is xylophonic only letting you drum in a nanosecond posted by garyh at 9:04 AM on July 30, 2003
Suspending understanding, perhaps enlisting rectal consciousness, a litigious infidel fragments rudimentary agricultural goods, instilling listlessness in society toward inexplicable cultural escapades, xeroxing platitudes in, and launching into duets of, classical incantations of unwritten symphonies. posted by Blue Stone at 9:07 AM on July 30, 2003
Sure, you may pry hymns of near-intellectual exposition, Stone. posted by The Michael The at 9:09 AM on July 30, 2003
Stymied topographies over nefarious expostulations? posted by ed at 9:11 AM on July 30, 2003
Shut up, pedantic elf rcade! Couldn't anyone leak irksome, foul, rattling acronyms? God, if life is trying, if cancer-exhibiting X-rays portend insidious and looming infiltrative death, our creator indubitably owes us salvation. posted by planetkyoto at 9:15 AM on July 30, 2003
Eliminate "x," please. Or stymie this ultimately lame-ass, tension-inspiring, often nice, stumper. posted by MrMoonPie at 9:15 AM on July 30, 2003
Evidently, 'X' protrudes ominously still. This useless letter aggravates, initiating only nothing. Shameful! posted by arto at 9:17 AM on July 30, 2003
Seems that user, Moonpie, posted earlier. Regrettable. posted by arto at 9:18 AM on July 30, 2003
I'm a big ole chicken!!!!!!!!!! posted by mcsweetie at 9:19 AM on July 30, 2003
Responding earlier grates really egregiously. This time, arto begs leave. Entertaining! posted by MrMoonPie at 9:23 AM on July 30, 2003
Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's inevitable NSFW Internet news group. posted by adrianhon at 9:25 AM on July 30, 2003
Oops.
Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's *awful*, inevitable NSFW Internet news group posted by adrianhon at 9:26 AM on July 30, 2003
Groping rude ogres utilitzes persistence. posted by thatothrgirl at 9:28 AM on July 30, 2003
Please! Entry riles, since it's sad thatothrgirl's entry needlessly creates enmity. posted by MrMoonPie at 9:37 AM on July 30, 2003
Most. Boring. Thread. Ever posted by carfilhiot at 9:40 AM on July 30, 2003
Every version egregiously reviled posted by dmt at 9:42 AM on July 30, 2003
Extend normal mitigation in thatothrgirl's yabber posted by biffa at 9:43 AM on July 30, 2003
You arse burger, Biffa: everything's redundant. posted by Blue Stone at 9:46 AM on July 30, 2003
To hate is sublime i see, said this uninspired poster in defiance. posted by vacapinta at 9:58 AM on July 30, 2003
rory exits, disturbingly undone, now doomsayers are nearly triumphant. posted by rory at 10:05 AM on July 30, 2003
Truly repentant, I understand my purile harassment, and nolonger type. posted by Blue Stone at 10:12 AM on July 30, 2003
Thread's young, pathetic ending. posted by brownpau at 10:19 AM on July 30, 2003
Except new dunderheads insistently negate grievances. posted by soyjoy at 10:23 AM on July 30, 2003
Good riddance, I exclaim, villifying addictive nonsensical crap everywhere, Soyjoy! posted by Blue Stone at 10:26 AM on July 30, 2003
Stop! or you'll just obfuscate yourselves posted by gravelshoes at 10:37 AM on July 30, 2003
You obdurate users really should elevate levity. Vainglorious epigrams striate! posted by ed at 10:42 AM on July 30, 2003
Shoot! That rankles individualistic apathy. The end. posted by jpburns at 10:45 AM on July 30, 2003
'Striate'? That's really inappropriate at the end. posted by jamespake at 10:47 AM on July 30, 2003
Enough negativity, dudes. posted by VulcanMike at 10:49 AM on July 30, 2003
Don't unnecessarily discount ending statement. posted by jpburns at 10:51 AM on July 30, 2003
Enough nerdy discussion! posted by jdroth at 10:52 AM on July 30, 2003
Statistically, the acronym that ends, must enliven no thought. posted by Blue Stone at 10:56 AM on July 30, 2003
Do I stop commenting upon sir's statement in our newsgroup? posted by salmacis at 10:58 AM on July 30, 2003
Talk haughty or undermine glorious hinterland throughways. posted by ed at 10:59 AM on July 30, 2003
Thrilling how one unique germ herds them. posted by grabbingsand at 11:01 AM on July 30, 2003
through halting responses, our unending game hastens. we're at your service. posted by myopicman at 11:02 AM on July 30, 2003
Shit. Everytime ready, victimized in checking efficiency. posted by jpburns at 11:08 AM on July 30, 2003
Seriously, everyone's really vapulating infectious conversational embers. posted by Blue Stone at 11:11 AM on July 30, 2003
expediency forces faults. If checking is effrontery, never callout yammerers.. posted by Fezboy! at 11:17 AM on July 30, 2003
Yawn at my meager efficient rough extremity rhyme-less sentence. posted by thomcatspike at 11:21 AM on July 30, 2003
Seems endless, not tractable. Ending nears countless epigrams. posted by jpburns at 11:24 AM on July 30, 2003
Even pedantic imbeciles get rare amusement most Sundays. posted by grabbingsand at 11:30 AM on July 30, 2003
SARS undermines nuclear destruction and your SATs posted by djspicerack at 11:34 AM on July 30, 2003
somebody understand, nobody desires a yokel's starter. posted by Fezboy! at 11:35 AM on July 30, 2003
Sophistry attenuates terrible spam. posted by Blue Stone at 11:36 AM on July 30, 2003
sparkly purple auroa, master posted by Fezboy! at 11:42 AM on July 30, 2003
meet another stupid trick: enter recur! posted by Fezboy! at 11:43 AM on July 30, 2003
recurrence emminating continuously. Useless recur! posted by Fezboy! at 11:44 AM on July 30, 2003
Recur eternally, ceaseless, unending recurrence! posted by MrMoonPie at 11:48 AM on July 30, 2003
recurrence echoing constantly. Useless recur! posted by Fezboy! at 11:49 AM on July 30, 2003
recurring every chance. useless recur posted by Fezboy! at 11:49 AM on July 30, 2003
**Damn dial-up! I coulda flooded this thread.** posted by Fezboy! at 11:52 AM on July 30, 2003
4. Build on other members' last word; not your own. posted by Blue Stone at 12:03 PM on July 30, 2003
Leave out some easily-riled sesquipedalians. posted by kokogiak at 5:35 PM on July 30, 2003
stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically deny all linguistically impossible actions. new sentences! posted by myopicman at 6:00 PM on July 30, 2003
*ugh*
stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically eject damanged and linguistically impossible actions. new sentences! posted by myopicman at 6:02 PM on July 30, 2003
Since every new trick evinces nuttiness, consider evading same. posted by trondant at 6:12 PM on July 30, 2003
Such ambling might excite. posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:19 PM on July 30, 2003
Egads! Xerxes could intelligently trash e-commerce. posted by jeremias at 6:39 PM on July 30, 2003
Enough- continuous onanism mittens might entail rueful chapped epidermis. posted by romakimmy at 6:47 PM on July 30, 2003
Even people in denial elicit responses? MetaFilter is strange. posted by wanderingmind at 6:57 PM on July 30, 2003
So to recap, acronyms necessitate goofy English. posted by mr_crash_davis at 7:03 PM on July 30, 2003
Essentially; never getting laid is some help. posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:05 PM on July 30, 2003
Hey, everyone likes psychopharmacology. posted by mr_crash_davis at 7:11 PM on July 30, 2003
Please stop, Yankee charlatans.
Hours of posting horrible anecdotes, rarely making any clear observations, like opiated German yodellers. posted by CountZero at 7:55 PM on July 30, 2003
You offend dilettetantte emailers' laborious likings. Resist suppression! posted by riviera at 8:02 PM on July 30, 2003
Something underhanded purposely perpetrated? Riviera, everyone says such incidents only nag. posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:19 PM on July 30, 2003
Not another gallimaufry! posted by trondant at 8:35 PM on July 30, 2003
Guys and lasses, less is more (and ultimately funnier, right y'all?) posted by mr_crash_davis at 8:42 PM on July 30, 2003
Great at lexical linkages, I manfully attempt undercutting Faulkner's real Yoknapatawpha. posted by adamgreenfield at 8:43 PM on July 30, 2003
Yowza! One knows now adamgreenfield plays acronyms to always win! (Plus, he's attractive!) posted by mr_crash_davis at 8:56 PM on July 30, 2003
Your obfuscation kills natural answers, pal. Avoid these aggravating words. Please heed, adamgreenfield. posted by Fourmyle at 9:01 PM on July 30, 2003
At this time real assholes can try IRC in vigorous enthusiasm. posted by trondant at 9:04 PM on July 30, 2003
After trying to reprimand adamgreenfield, crash_davis's treachery is very excruciating. posted by Fourmyle at 9:10 PM on July 30, 2003
Enter not! Thou hast used soap in a sexy manner! posted by Ufez Jones at 9:11 PM on July 30, 2003
man, and now nearly everyone rinses! posted by trondant at 9:14 PM on July 30, 2003
Meaculpas aside, never "no" elegant reminders. posted by adamgreenfield at 9:16 PM on July 30, 2003
Eeek! Xenotransplantation causes replication concerns. In alleles there is no guessing. posted by WolfDaddy at 9:18 PM on July 30, 2003
guilefully, un-egressed social sauntering in native gargantuas posted by jazzkat11 at 9:50 PM on July 30, 2003
Gee, and really good answers never take up any space. posted by adamgreenfield at 10:03 PM on July 30, 2003
Score! People, adamgreenfield's champion. Exeunt. posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:09 PM on July 30, 2003
Eccentric xenophobes exude unworthy nasal trappings. posted by Ufez Jones at 10:14 PM on July 30, 2003
Eventually, Xeroxed efforts underimpress new talent... posted by adamgreenfield at 10:14 PM on July 30, 2003
shouldn't underestimate people playing, only retarded taz. posted by taz at 10:34 PM on July 30, 2003
Those real and newly sanctioned fucking old retired men ever read Sartre? posted by trondant at 10:40 PM on July 30, 2003
transformers, rare and not safe for oral redress. Mentioning entertains racy SnM'ers posted by jazzkat11 at 10:40 PM on July 30, 2003
Seemingly, angsty retirees talk rabid existentialism. posted by Ufez Jones at 10:44 PM on July 30, 2003
Enough! Xanax is something that everyone needs to ingest (at least in some measure). posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:47 PM on July 30, 2003
Met every apolitical soul? Use reinformencement examples. posted by trondant at 10:52 PM on July 30, 2003
mr_crash_davis! Excellent answer! Super usage - really evolved! posted by taz at 10:54 PM on July 30, 2003
Easy, xylophones and mellow pieces leave everyone soothed. posted by jazzkat11 at 10:56 PM on July 30, 2003
Some obligated Oolongs take hotcakes extra-dermitorily. posted by Ufez Jones at 11:00 PM on July 30, 2003
Every xeriscaped tract really attracts dulled Eaterners rolling mightily into the Occident, riding interstates, living young. posted by trondant at 11:07 PM on July 30, 2003
Youthful occupants undualte needing ganja. posted by Ufez Jones at 11:09 PM on July 30, 2003
get another nappy joint, asshole posted by trondant at 11:11 PM on July 30, 2003
Gleefully, aiming narrow, Jones acronyms! posted by jazzkat11 at 11:13 PM on July 30, 2003
Asshole? So somebody has only limited expressions? posted by taz at 11:14 PM on July 30, 2003
Even Xanadu provided rational esoteric songs. Some insinuated obliging Nigerian Spammers! posted by Ufez Jones at 11:18 PM on July 30, 2003
Stop posting and making me evermore ravishingly sexual. posted by trondant at 11:20 PM on July 30, 2003
Some emit Xenon. Usual American lexicon. posted by Ufez Jones at 11:25 PM on July 30, 2003
let's expel "x". It cramps our nonsense. posted by taz at 11:27 PM on July 30, 2003
Now others need seeing every nonsense submittal erased. posted by trondant at 11:29 PM on July 30, 2003
Every random acronym solves everyone's dilemmas. posted by jazzkat11 at 11:32 PM on July 30, 2003
damn! I'm late every minute! Modem always slow. posted by taz at 11:34 PM on July 30, 2003
stop law-offending warfarers. posted by trondant at 11:35 PM on July 30, 2003
Warfaring assholes reap fictional additional respect. Erstwhile, reality secedes. posted by Ufez Jones at 11:38 PM on July 30, 2003
Snarky effects can elicit duldrums, everyone savvy? posted by jazzkat11 at 11:41 PM on July 30, 2003
seemingly endless, crazy eggheads determine extra-legal scenarios posted by Fezboy! at 11:41 PM on July 30, 2003
Suck a vibrant , vacuant Yemeni. posted by trondant at 11:43 PM on July 30, 2003
Your extremely menacing entry needs intervention posted by Fezboy! at 11:45 PM on July 30, 2003
I noticed that even righteous verbalists entertain not truisms, if only nonego. posted by jazzkat11 at 11:48 PM on July 30, 2003
it's not the execution really; verbalization entered non-commitally threads its own noose. posted by taz at 11:49 PM on July 30, 2003
not only oafs spell erroneously. posted by trondant at 11:51 PM on July 30, 2003
errors repeatedly rendered on nonsensensical entries only underscore severe limitations. Yet... posted by taz at 11:56 PM on July 30, 2003
Everlongingly, red-faced readers only now explain, ousting users so lovingly. Y'knowwhaddamean? posted by jazzkat11 at 11:56 PM on July 30, 2003
Yippee, easy thinking. posted by CountZero at 12:00 AM on July 31, 2003
(Sorry, jazzkat11, you almost had it) posted by CountZero at 12:02 AM on July 31, 2003
9. In case two members coincidently post a sentence using the same last word from the previous post, the later post will be deleted.[disregarded] posted by Blue Stone at 5:54 AM on July 31, 2003
New orator not serious. Eluding natural semiotics expressly! posted by jpburns at 5:56 AM on July 31, 2003
eh? x-rated posts retreated? electronic shame superimposed? Let's yodel! posted by taz at 6:00 AM on July 31, 2003
Emphatically xeroxed, previous rascal; everyone seriously should listen, yeah! posted by Blue Stone at 6:00 AM on July 31, 2003
Yet others don't encourage legality. posted by jpburns at 6:03 AM on July 31, 2003
Yikes - one's delivery effortlessly levelled. posted by Blue Stone at 6:04 AM on July 31, 2003
lawyers expectedly get a legal insight to you posted by garyh at 6:05 AM on July 31, 2003
You orate unendingly! posted by Blue Stone at 6:07 AM on July 31, 2003
Unfortunately necessary. Even new didactics infer noble grumblings. Later, y'all! posted by jpburns at 6:10 AM on July 31, 2003
Using nouns, even now, distresses I. No good letters yatter. posted by biffa at 6:11 AM on July 31, 2003
Y'all again!! Low lexicography! posted by garyh at 6:12 AM on July 31, 2003
Lovely.... expect xerox included co-correspondent, or garyh; resist alphabetical perversity, help youngsters! posted by Blue Stone at 6:16 AM on July 31, 2003
Your old units numb. Go south, take early rum shots! posted by tr33hggr at 6:20 AM on July 31, 2003
some hgger over there, sipping. posted by taz at 6:23 AM on July 31, 2003
Say I, please post innuendo, not gabble posted by garyh at 6:25 AM on July 31, 2003
Get a blog! Be less egotistical. posted by jamespake at 6:27 AM on July 31, 2003
Ere go other tittlilating insights. Then in come alluring losers. posted by wobh at 6:32 AM on July 31, 2003
laughing outloud since entry replied Spake. posted by taz at 6:35 AM on July 31, 2003
wish I could have said "laughing outloud since james spake" posted by taz at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003
"Spake" ponderous archaic. Keep edgy! posted by jpburns at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003
silly postings always kill ennui posted by taumeson at 6:38 AM on July 31, 2003
with the benefit of hindsight: s/insights/ingenues/; s/losers/latecomers/ posted by wobh at 6:41 AM on July 31, 2003
Enough now! No Unix incantations. posted by jamespake at 6:43 AM on July 31, 2003
Indeed; none can assay no temptation aggravating that instinct on new suggestions. posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:45 AM on July 31, 2003
Error! Doggerel goes yawwy. posted by biffa at 6:48 AM on July 31, 2003
Seriously, uber geeks, give every sequential text, insightful omission... now scram! posted by Blue Stone at 6:49 AM on July 31, 2003
Yes! A writer who yields! posted by jpburns at 6:51 AM on July 31, 2003
Stone clearly requires a methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine. posted by jamespake at 6:53 AM on July 31, 2003
...waiting to see who wins this tongue of war posted by taz at 6:57 AM on July 31, 2003
The word is "yields", from Spake|edgy|yawwy... but nice try... posted by jpburns at 6:58 AM on July 31, 2003
You're insane. Everyone. Look! DSM-IV says. posted by furiousthought at 7:00 AM on July 31, 2003
MetaFilter easily trumps his yellow long epithet. Nearly every day I overuse 'x', yet not 'm'—even twice hourly. You'd like all my purple hearts, even though a morphine injector needs ecstasy. posted by rory at 7:02 AM on July 31, 2003
Sure. Are you surprised? posted by jpburns at 7:02 AM on July 31, 2003
"Murder, Ethel. The henchman you let enter named everyone."
"Dog! I only xeroxed ying-ying, now.."
"Murder, Ethel. Taken haughtingly, you laugh and mock. Please. However Ethel, treachery and murder, its nonsense? Ethel..." posted by jazzkat11 at 7:04 AM on July 31, 2003
So, unfortunate Rory played retrospectively, I'm sorry 'e' denied. posted by jamespake at 7:07 AM on July 31, 2003
Don't encourage noncompliance! I eschew disobedience. posted by jpburns at 7:09 AM on July 31, 2003
Discussion is saved only by ending dumb incoherent efforts. Notice clear entry. posted by Nothing at 7:11 AM on July 31, 2003
Dudes, it's so objectionable, but easily done. If everyone non-complied: expulsion! posted by rory at 7:12 AM on July 31, 2003
Dammit, preview on a near-400 thread is a killer! posted by rory at 7:13 AM on July 31, 2003
Even newbies try responding. Yes. posted by jpburns at 7:15 AM on July 31, 2003
(the word is entry) posted by jamespake at 7:15 AM on July 31, 2003
Your efforts: sustained. posted by Nothing at 7:19 AM on July 31, 2003
Susceptible unto subthreads tis, and - I note - entertaining diversity. posted by biffa at 7:21 AM on July 31, 2003
devilishly invidious versions excite real scorn; it's the yardstick. posted by taz at 7:24 AM on July 31, 2003
You're all really demanding. So tara! I'm cooking Kedgeree. posted by jamespake at 7:26 AM on July 31, 2003
(yuck, acting really damn slowly -- this ISP sucks kangaroos.) posted by spandex at 7:28 AM on July 31, 2003
Knowing elusive diversions gets excessive. Really earns expulsion. posted by jpburns at 7:29 AM on July 31, 2003
(Kids, 'e's digesting gluggy edible rice - easily eaten.) posted by rory at 7:30 AM on July 31, 2003
Even exylophone playing underwater lacks something. I'm off now! posted by jamespake at 7:40 AM on July 31, 2003
Now, or whenever? posted by rory at 7:42 AM on July 31, 2003
What his entry noted elicited voice earnestly, righteously. posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:45 AM on July 31, 2003
fuck. i've had rejoinders for like, the past 10, yet i miss my time slot by about 1 minute on preview. posted by taumeson at 7:49 AM on July 31, 2003
Rejoinders indeed-- gotta hurry to enter one, unless something licks you!
Replied to my own, yes, but I plead context. posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:52 AM on July 31, 2003
Righteousness is great, however this end, or "unsubscription," seems less yeomanly. posted by Nothing at 7:54 AM on July 31, 2003
Yeah? Everyone offers me advice-- not like yourself. posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:59 AM on July 31, 2003
You oughtn't upstage. posted by Nothing at 8:00 AM on July 31, 2003
You only useful reply sours everyone's lovely fun. posted by biffa at 8:01 AM on July 31, 2003
Feh. Uninteresting nerds. posted by trharlan at 8:09 AM on July 31, 2003
Now everyone reuses dictionary selections. posted by grum@work at 8:19 AM on July 31, 2003
Slanderer! Excepting limited events, choosing the indefectible's only natural speech. posted by Nothing at 8:24 AM on July 31, 2003
So presumably everyone enunciates clear hokum? posted by biffa at 8:29 AM on July 31, 2003
hoary opinion, kept unduly modest. posted by trharlan at 8:33 AM on July 31, 2003
Many oppose dumb exclamations, says themselves. posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:38 AM on July 31, 2003
Magnanimous of dependably excellent speller trharlan. posted by biffa at 8:39 AM on July 31, 2003
Thread really hasn't any reason/logic, arrives nowhere posted by fuzz at 9:13 AM on July 31, 2003
Nowhere? Or we have earnestly reigned exigency? posted by trharlan at 9:21 AM on July 31, 2003
Tut! - Righteously heaped anarchic rejoinders liberate avalanching nonsense (excepting xenophobic inserts generating exceptionaly nasty, curt yips). posted by troutfishing at 9:27 AM on July 31, 2003
Enter "x" in Guattari's elder nephew's college yearbook. posted by adamgreenfield at 9:32 AM on July 31, 2003
Yikes, imagine poor sesquipedalophobiacs! posted by jamespake at 9:32 AM on July 31, 2003
Some erratic Seinfeld quote underlined instinctively potent expressions-- damn, all lost over petty haggling. Oh, be intelligent, all curators stuck! posted by DrJohnEvans at 9:42 AM on July 31, 2003
(Drat! "Reined", not "reigned"! Dependably excellent speller, my arse. Drat!) posted by trharlan at 9:46 AM on July 31, 2003
So, this ugliness continues, kids? posted by mr_crash_davis at 9:51 AM on July 31, 2003
Superb! That used cunning knowledge. posted by jamespake at 9:51 AM on July 31, 2003
Kids? Is Davis superior? posted by jamespake at 9:53 AM on July 31, 2003
Sure. Underlings protest equivocally - restlessness is obviously right. posted by CountZero at 9:56 AM on July 31, 2003
Righteousness inherent gives him tipsiness. posted by DrJohnEvans at 9:59 AM on July 31, 2003
Today, I'll possibly succeed in nothing except stupid sentences. posted by jamespake at 10:04 AM on July 31, 2003
Superior editing needs to end nerds, creating essential speed. posted by transient at 10:06 AM on July 31, 2003
Shit. Previewed, expecting entertaining dialogue. posted by mr_crash_davis at 10:09 AM on July 31, 2003
Davis, if a link offends go unwind elsewhere. posted by jamespake at 10:14 AM on July 31, 2003
...else little symbolic effect will haunt everybody replying entirely. posted by jpburns at 10:17 AM on July 31, 2003
Damn you!: Everyone loves such elegant wordplay here-- egos run elsewhere!
Every notion that intellectuals reason entirely logically yodels. posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:20 AM on July 31, 2003
Yet others defend essentially limp sarcasms. posted by jpburns at 10:22 AM on July 31, 2003
Sometimes attitudes reverse, causing a serious MetaFilter situation. posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:25 AM on July 31, 2003
Sometimes I take umbrage at thematically iniquitous old nonsense. posted by biffa at 10:30 AM on July 31, 2003
Not only nonsense— sometimes everyone nullifies statements extraordinary. posted by DrJohnEvans at 10:34 AM on July 31, 2003
Especially, x's test readers attempting otherwise reasonable discourse in nascent aureate recorded yammering. posted by trharlan at 11:00 AM on July 31, 2003
Yeah, everyone says that. Everywhere, ridiculous yarns eat away reality. posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:01 AM on July 31, 2003
Ridiculing effrontery? Anterior lunacy is truly yours. posted by ed at 11:04 AM on July 31, 2003
Your only use remains secret. posted by biffa at 11:07 AM on July 31, 2003
Secluded egomaniacs can't ramrod extraordinary threads. posted by ed at 11:19 AM on July 31, 2003
This has ruinous effects, as do secrets. posted by transient at 11:34 AM on July 31, 2003
sometimes, even croutons really enhance the salad. posted by myopicman at 11:49 AM on July 31, 2003
Sadly, all lettuces are droopy. posted by WolfDaddy at 11:52 AM on July 31, 2003
Delightful radishes only open possibilities yonder. posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:53 AM on July 31, 2003
delicious ratatouille or oranges pervaded yesteryear. posted by amery at 11:54 AM on July 31, 2003
yowsers! only nincompoops deny eating right. posted by taumeson at 11:55 AM on July 31, 2003
Raddichio is good, healthy, tasty. posted by transient at 11:58 AM on July 31, 2003
Try a slightly toasted yam. posted by jamespake at 12:01 PM on July 31, 2003
to all "stoppers": thank you. posted by fletchmuy at 12:02 PM on July 31, 2003
Status thread ain't terribly useful, seemingly. posted by WolfDaddy at 4:17 PM on July 31, 2003
Should exceptions exist, may ignite notoriously ghastly lustful yearnings. posted by wendell at 4:23 PM on July 31, 2003
So even elephants might indicate no gulibility living youthfully? posted by feelinglistless at 4:24 PM on July 31, 2003
'Subsystem' - up before 'status', you sidetracked thread, endlessly meandering! posted by jamespake at 4:26 PM on July 31, 2003
My error! Apologies notwithstanding, departing ere rory insists! Now going! posted by WolfDaddy at 4:30 PM on July 31, 2003
Go on! I'll never grovel. posted by jamespake at 4:37 PM on July 31, 2003
Grinning recidivist opens vault, elucidating language. posted by troutfishing at 4:49 PM on July 31, 2003
Yet everyone's angst, resplendent, nullifies innocence (now groped, supine). posted by troutfishing at 4:53 PM on July 31, 2003
Less angush, no gain. Upset aphorisms growing everywhere. posted by jamespake at 4:56 PM on July 31, 2003
Everywhere? - vaingloriously exultative rhyming youth wordsmiths hirsutely. "Enough!" - Rimbaud eructs. posted by troutfishing at 5:12 PM on July 31, 2003
Even Rimbaud upholders can talk sense. posted by jamespake at 5:26 PM on July 31, 2003
Similar enthusiasm now sneaks everywhere. posted by moonbird at 6:15 PM on July 31, 2003
Each variation ends really yucky. Why has everyone relegated ending? posted by jpburns at 6:54 PM on July 31, 2003
End now, dammit, it's now golden. posted by Frank Grimes at 6:58 PM on July 31, 2003
Go on, live! Death earns nothing. posted by DrJohnEvans at 7:08 PM on July 31, 2003
nor other things have i noticed gaminely. posted by taumeson at 8:01 PM on July 31, 2003
Gay aging male is now enduring lost youthfulness. posted by WolfDaddy at 8:32 PM on July 31, 2003
you ought understand the hard fact...ultimately loss necessitates extremely sudden situations. posted by taumeson at 9:11 PM on July 31, 2003
Suddenly it trickles! Underneath a thread, inside out, near splendor! posted by ed at 9:53 PM on July 31, 2003
Still posting lovely endwords? No doubt of repetition. posted by picopebbles at 10:15 PM on July 31, 2003
Really early, post-day (extraordinarily) three: I toddle in, obssessed. Numbskull. posted by taz at 10:39 PM on July 31, 2003
Never underestimate Metafilter's basic standards killer utility link, Lamebrain. posted by wendell at 12:07 AM on August 1, 2003
Later, at midnight
Entertaining by ranting
And it's negative
Language and meaning
Enchanting beauty returns
As if nirvana
ok, it's cheating. dammit! I can't choose!
we'll never reach 600! posted by arto at 1:07 AM on August 1, 2003
Gotta go with one of 'em... how to choose... let's try this:
Now I'm really vexed, arto. No alternates! posted by nath at 1:43 AM on August 1, 2003
Are late text entries really notced at this exaggerated silliness? posted by Blue Stone at 2:19 AM on August 1, 2003
Should I link 'Lifter's incidental network efforts subverting six-hundred?
Yes, it's kinda pathetic, but do you have a better way to avoid waiting half the night for the thread to re-load? posted by wendell at 2:57 AM on August 1, 2003
Secluded in Xanadu
Held under nightfall
Dreamlike, reaching
Ere daybreak posted by arto at 4:16 AM on August 1, 2003
Drowsy apple year,
Becoming reality,
Emerge, all knowing.
(It's come to Haiku) posted by jamespake at 4:53 AM on August 1, 2003
Kuru now onset,
We instigate nonsense,
gleefully. posted by Blue Stone at 4:56 AM on August 1, 2003
Giants lack enthusiasm,
Eagles fairly unsettled,
Lions lose youngster. posted by biffa at 5:03 AM on August 1, 2003
You often underesimate neologisms, guys!
Singing terrific english rhymes... posted by dash_slot- at 5:13 AM on August 1, 2003
rubbish haikus, yet mysteriously eclectic sentences. posted by garyh at 5:20 AM on August 1, 2003
summer elides now
the entries number countless
endure subsumption posted by taz at 5:35 AM on August 1, 2003
So, understanding blooms;
Sending undulating Metafilterian prose toward infinity,
Outages notwithstanding. posted by Blue Stone at 5:56 AM on August 1, 2003
[Prose? Prose?.... Poetry, obviously.] posted by Blue Stone at 5:59 AM on August 1, 2003
Never obscure, the words I type have superficial, transitory allure. Need decision in neural game. posted by garyh at 6:06 AM on August 1, 2003
Going and making escape. posted by biffa at 6:20 AM on August 1, 2003
Escape? Seriously - chained are people, 'ere. posted by Blue Stone at 6:30 AM on August 1, 2003
encapsulations
reconstitutionalize
elaborations posted by taz at 6:40 AM on August 1, 2003
okay, you have to give me a small break on this one: 5-7-5 in only 3 letters? c'mon! And now you want pith, too? - by the way, just consider "reconstitutionalize" a metaphor for spring, and we have a seasonal reference too!) posted by taz at 6:43 AM on August 1, 2003
ever late as big
orange, red august, taking
over new seasons posted by transient at 6:57 AM on August 1, 2003
Excuses! Leave (at best) or recieve aptly terse invective over namby-pamby strategies! posted by Blue Stone at 6:58 AM on August 1, 2003
oops, missed an i
ever late as big
orange, red august, thread is
over, new season posted by transient at 6:59 AM on August 1, 2003
So enraging!
Another sentence obscures
new screed.
- Aha! So your entry is invalid! Take that, transient! posted by Blue Stone at 7:03 AM on August 1, 2003
slacking -- carefully
reading, editing; entry's
debilitated posted by transient at 7:14 AM on August 1, 2003
Sons take revenge,
amongst the godless.
I eschew sermons. posted by biffa at 7:17 AM on August 1, 2003
oops, missed an I posted by biffa at 7:18 AM on August 1, 2003
Demurred elloquently; by instigating long investigations, transient, a timely entry's dismissed!
[Biffa, dude, you're seriously late!] posted by Blue Stone at 7:24 AM on August 1, 2003
[Oh, I'm in error... Biffa's entry was correct... (((embarrassment)))] posted by Blue Stone at 7:26 AM on August 1, 2003
demure indigo
slaves masturbate in sweet sperm...
...huh? what?
and... where do we go from here posted by taz at 7:51 AM on August 1, 2003
Some posts emphasize raunchy memories. posted by picopebbles at 8:09 AM on August 1, 2003
My endearing memories of raunchy insertions excite self. posted by caddis at 8:32 AM on August 1, 2003
self excitement leavens 'filter. posted by taz at 8:40 AM on August 1, 2003
Further iterations leave taz excited, really! posted by transient at 8:46 AM on August 1, 2003
Risky expectations and lavish lewdness. Yuck. posted by brownpau at 9:16 AM on August 1, 2003
Remarkably, entries aphrodesiacal! Love! Love! .... Yesss! posted by taz at 9:16 AM on August 1, 2003
Yaks enjoy surf sun sourkraut posted by Bonzai at 9:26 AM on August 1, 2003
You undervalue cock kisses. posted by Blue Stone at 9:36 AM on August 1, 2003
knockwurst images seduce Stone, elicit surrender. posted by taz at 9:44 AM on August 1, 2003
Keep is simple silly. Eat sourkraut. posted by caddis at 9:44 AM on August 1, 2003
Stone usually regards raising raging erections necessary, despite every rejoinder. posted by biffa at 10:04 AM on August 1, 2003
reconsider extreme judgment: only in nunneries do erections repel. posted by taz at 10:14 AM on August 1, 2003
Really entertaining posts. Exceedingly loquacious. posted by waxpancake at 10:44 AM on August 1, 2003
Some utterances, really risque, egregiously now disrupt elevated repartee. posted by fidelity at 10:50 AM on August 1, 2003
Lame! On quick updraft, am crestfallen: initial (original) underwriting superseded.
(Or, in English: Rgh! Beaten to the Really? Even Priests Emulate Logs answer by waxpancake.) posted by picopebbles at 10:51 AM on August 1, 2003
At 556 comments, this thread now exceeds BlogStop's 553. (Membership over there is closed at 19.) posted by beagle at 11:13 AM on August 1, 2003
Some users pontificate every reply, some exercise deviant ending denotations. posted by magnetbox at 11:27 AM on August 1, 2003
Despite each naysayer, our teachers all traffic in obnoxious non sequiturs. posted by eastlakestandard at 11:47 AM on August 1, 2003
Seriously, every quonsar user input takes us reeling sideways. posted by wendell at 11:52 AM on August 1, 2003
Simple enjambment -- qualities used in two unlikely rows-- splendid! posted by Bootcut at 11:53 AM on August 1, 2003
Such preening leads everyone nilly-willy; dare i digress? posted by Seth at 12:10 PM on August 1, 2003
Didn't I give redundant entries some seriousness? posted by wendell at 12:16 PM on August 1, 2003
Serious entries rarely intrude our unbelievably silly new entertainment. Such savoriness. posted by caddis at 12:23 PM on August 1, 2003
Such a voracious operation requires intense niggling every seven syllables. posted by me3dia at 12:46 PM on August 1, 2003
Sounds yucky. Let lovely alphabet beauty live every second. posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:50 PM on August 1, 2003
slamming each comment, offering no definitiveness. posted by myopicman at 1:30 PM on August 1, 2003
Sigh. Every comment originates needless disdain. posted by adrianhon at 1:30 PM on August 1, 2003
Disappointed in sarcasm? Demand affectionate interpersonal napping. posted by Fezboy! at 1:39 PM on August 1, 2003
Desist! It shall die as individuals nullify! posted by terrapin at 1:39 PM on August 1, 2003
Not applying post possibly is nullifying gratification posted by terrapin at 1:41 PM on August 1, 2003
Not a proper post! It's not good. posted by DrJohnEvans at 1:42 PM on August 1, 2003
Great... ranging all topics in fickle interchanges. Can't all those interested operate nicely? posted by DrJohnEvans at 1:45 PM on August 1, 2003
Ninth innings collapse
Extraordinarily
Lambasted Yankees posted by Fezboy! at 1:50 PM on August 1, 2003
inning, not innings. D'oh! posted by Fezboy! at 1:53 PM on August 1, 2003
You answer nicely.
Karma exponentially
Expands. Stupendous! posted by MrMoonPie at 2:00 PM on August 1, 2003
Stop this. Users! please end now.
Do observe ultimate silence. posted by richard m at 2:42 PM on August 1, 2003
Slow tease unleashes
priapic endowment: now
drive on? un-sated? posted by troutfishing at 2:46 PM on August 1, 2003
So I leave, empty:
Nullification's ceaseless
empiricism. posted by troutfishing at 2:53 PM on August 1, 2003
Wow, y'all're doing it in haiku form now, too? Damn.
Um, now satisfied, a triumphant emperor declines. posted by me3dia at 2:53 PM on August 1, 2003
Desist! Everyone clear?
Lawyers insist no extra sentences. posted by richard m at 3:11 PM on August 1, 2003
Dying ruler gasps out,
"life illuminates nothing!.......
.....excepting sublime." posted by troutfishing at 3:12 PM on August 1, 2003
Sensibly expressed notion, terminate!, except - nobody can expect sensibility..... posted by troutfishing at 3:25 PM on August 1, 2003
Some exist not so
independently, but in
life it's to yourself...
life is easy, haiku is hard posted by wendell at 3:50 PM on August 1, 2003
Yet our undulating replies seem even less funny... posted by Quinn at 4:04 PM on August 1, 2003
Friends unintentionally needle you. Yes? posted by christophernaze at 4:33 PM on August 1, 2003
Yikes! Electric Shock! posted by caddis at 4:39 PM on August 1, 2003
Somebody help out caddis, knuckleheads! posted by wendell at 4:52 PM on August 1, 2003
Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry every haunting ecstatically apathetic despondent shudder. posted by jpburns at 4:55 PM on August 1, 2003
Oops.
Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry ecstatic apathetic despondent shudder. posted by jpburns at 5:00 PM on August 1, 2003
Should he understand dreadfully elaborate reading? posted by jragon at 5:16 PM on August 1, 2003
Really, electricity and drinking infer needless gloom. posted by caddis at 5:22 PM on August 1, 2003
Good! Let's offend other Metafilterites. posted by jpburns at 5:26 PM on August 1, 2003
Many entries tried, alas.
Fortunately, inane language trickles entertainingly 'round in thread.
Exceedingly satisfying. posted by caddis at 5:49 PM on August 1, 2003
Such a testiment I say, for your ingenuity needs gratification. posted by Civil_Disobedient at 6:02 PM on August 1, 2003
Geeky release at the intellectual filter.
Its crushes "alt.english.usage's" testy intellectual onanistic nirvana. posted by caddis at 6:24 PM on August 1, 2003
Now I respond viciously at neoconservative asshats.
sorry. some habits are hard to break posted by wendell at 6:37 PM on August 1, 2003
Ah sir, six hundred answers thence silence? posted by caddis at 6:42 PM on August 1, 2003
Should I license endearingly naive caddis' error? posted by wendell at 7:12 PM on August 1, 2003
Erroneous reads
Rheumatic ostentation
Raskolnikovesque posted by ed at 7:41 PM on August 1, 2003
Run after silly kids.
Open long neglected intellects.
Know others' very essence.
Secret: quietly unruffle ego. posted by caddis at 7:58 PM on August 1, 2003
everything got old. posted by myopicman at 8:01 PM on August 1, 2003
Obviously. Less demanding. posted by yhbc at 8:04 PM on August 1, 2003
Deep entries might arise now.
Dreamland I now greet. posted by caddis at 8:19 PM on August 1, 2003
Go, relax; everyone else - talk. posted by yhbc at 8:40 PM on August 1, 2003
Talk about linguistics... kudos! posted by thatweirdguy2 at 9:09 PM on August 1, 2003
Kindly use Disney oeuvre: Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
I feel like I just killed Kenny... posted by wendell at 10:19 PM on August 1, 2003
So, um... perhaps everyone recalls comment #528532??. At last it's finally repeated. A good idea: let's invoke "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" to instigate closure. Envision "X" people incorporating all letters in determined observations, cancelling interminable output. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! posted by taz at 12:46 AM on August 2, 2003
p.s., wendell: doesn't Kenny always come back? posted by taz at 12:54 AM on August 2, 2003
Several upsized paintballs enter rear -- call ambulance!
Like, in February, really agnostic goobers in little insect-sized teapots ingested craniums!
Enormous x-rays pretentiously ingest aluminum liberally into Dallas, or could it open up SARS?
p.s.: this was a nightmare. posted by betheon at 1:55 AM on August 2, 2003
So, again repeat "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious".
I'm asking to be smacked, aren't I? posted by sailoreagle at 3:26 AM on August 2, 2003
Slapped unendingly, pesky 'eagle: remember clearly a lesson in fear; renounce all gargantuan indefensible linguistics; instead, supply terms in contraction (eschewing "x" please;) in addition, learn instructions, desperately observing conditions, outlawing using "supercalifragilisticexpialodocious." posted by Blue Stone at 4:36 AM on August 2, 2003
Stupid users! People, even repeating cheap arduous linguistic iterations for ridiculous amusement (God I love it!) sacrifices their initial creativity. Extra x's probably (I assume) lay on difficulties others cannot integrate or use seriosly. posted by Civil_Disobedient at 5:06 AM on August 2, 2003
"Supercalifragillisticexpialidocious" enjoys renaissance? I'm offended. [understandably.] Suggest learning Yiddish. posted by arto at 5:20 AM on August 2, 2003
Hie inward! Prepare portents or philters, ontological taboos, or muster oddball nerves. Shit! This really obviates sustained eccleisiastics. Sequined quipping underscored in preparing post. End? Damn. And logorrhea involved! Or perhaps habitues offer bartering instead? Alas! posted by ed at 6:07 AM on August 2, 2003
Amazingly, long acronym's solved. posted by sailoreagle at 6:38 AM on August 2, 2003
Sadly obtuse linguistics vanquished enduring denizens. posted by richard m at 6:53 AM on August 2, 2003
doesn't everybody need iterated zaniness, even nothwithstanding "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"? posted by taz at 7:06 AM on August 2, 2003
Stop using putrid ersatz run-on calumny. A long irritating filmic response antagonizes general intelligence. Let's insert something truly interesting; certainly eluding "x-ray" (particularly insensitive...) and leaning instead democratic. Other crummy instances offer unusable sentences. posted by jpburns at 8:26 AM on August 2, 2003
Entering "X" causes unnecessary stress, egghead! Less excessiveness supplies surprises. posted by jpburns at 6:35 PM on August 2, 2003
So undue redundancy poorly represents itself? Seems extremely supercalifragilisticexpialidocious supercilious. posted by wendell at 7:41 PM on August 2, 2003
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, understandably, pleases everyone's rather cocky inner linguist. I offer uncumbersome syllabary. posted by thatweirdguy2 at 8:46 PM on August 2, 2003
"Surrender, you loony lamentists and backstabbing artisans," rallied Yahoo! posted by betheon at 9:23 PM on August 2, 2003
Yet another hierarchically organized oracle. posted by picopebbles at 9:26 PM on August 2, 2003
Oh, really, a copied lame example.
(which, I believe, is the original acronym used by Oracle Corp.) posted by wendell at 9:41 PM on August 2, 2003
Entertaining xylophones are musically pretentious, like e-sitars. posted by betheon at 1:08 AM on August 3, 2003
Sexy uber-babes pound erotic rodeo saddles, terrifically inciting the illicit oglers (understandably squirting.) posted by Blue Stone at 7:30 AM on August 3, 2003
So quit using irrational replies. That's irritating, not goodly. posted by jpburns at 7:55 AM on August 3, 2003
Yet, unlike Christianity, KRC is necessary -- even stable souls. posted by betheon at 3:43 PM on August 3, 2003
ahem: KRC stands for "knowledge-responsibility-control. posted by betheon at 3:44 PM on August 3, 2003
Supreme over universe lives... someone? posted by transient at 4:37 PM on August 3, 2003
Superstitious oligarchs may endanger our nihilistic exclamations. posted by CountZero at 5:11 PM on August 3, 2003
Existentialists 'xclaim causality, lacking active manifestations and theist inventions. Otherwise negates science... posted by jpburns at 5:17 PM on August 3, 2003
Can we stop this at 666, just to freak the fundies out? posted by jpburns at 5:36 PM on August 3, 2003
Sullen curmudgeons, investigating every nuance, create enlightenment? posted by thatweirdguy2 at 6:30 PM on August 3, 2003
Sorry. Couldn't I engage notorious criminals? Egads. posted by betheon at 6:32 PM on August 3, 2003
Exactly. Never let investigation get handed to evildoers. No monitors erase naysaying, though. posted by picopebbles at 6:42 PM on August 3, 2003
Thou hearest obligatory, unseemly gnashing, hourly... posted by jpburns at 6:54 PM on August 3, 2003
Hoary orations undermine regular luddite yogis. posted by transient at 7:12 PM on August 3, 2003
Yet our greatest impudences survive... posted by wendell at 7:17 PM on August 3, 2003
Shocking, unless real vitality integrates via endlessness. posted by Jimbob at 7:31 PM on August 3, 2003
Every new decision leads ever so slowly nearer escaping stupid security. posted by wendell at 7:52 PM on August 3, 2003
sanitary udder is terribly exciting! posted by taz at 12:39 AM on August 4, 2003
Erotic X-rated cinema is the internet's next generation.
no link, I trust you can find your own posted by arto at 1:44 AM on August 4, 2003
Generally, electronic nudes elicit rigidly appropriate tumescence, I often note. posted by Blue Stone at 4:24 AM on August 4, 2003
Nasty onaism tempts ejaculations. posted by jpburns at 4:33 AM on August 4, 2003
enough jokes already! can't undo lunatic addiction to insanity, ok? now stop! posted by talos at 6:32 AM on August 4, 2003
So terminate, other people. posted by soyjoy at 7:34 AM on August 4, 2003
Prurient entries often, perhaps, lack excitement. posted by caddis at 8:55 AM on August 4, 2003
Every x-rated comment, in this entity (me) elicits noticable titilation. posted by Blue Stone at 9:08 AM on August 4, 2003
Trouble is, thread is lapping at time I once needed. posted by biffa at 9:17 AM on August 4, 2003
Now enter extra new entry detoxification. posted by caddis at 9:21 AM on August 4, 2003
(oops that was supposed to be:)
Now enter extra devilish entry detoxification.
(proof reading needed by me.) posted by caddis at 9:23 AM on August 4, 2003
Don't erode this (omitting "x") infantile, fawnishly illicit conversation: are thee impotent, oh naysayer? posted by Blue Stone at 9:46 AM on August 4, 2003
Never asked you... should anyone you eat react? posted by kokogiak at 10:04 AM on August 4, 2003
Rally Everyone! Another catchy tintinnabulation! posted by kokogiak at 10:08 AM on August 4, 2003
Really, eating? Awkward cater-cornered transition. posted by ed at 10:10 AM on August 4, 2003
typically random adage....no smooth incantation to introduce other newsworthiness. posted by myopicman at 10:17 AM on August 4, 2003
Now, every word's smooth when other readers take heed! Incant effortlessly; syllabic somnambulism. posted by eddydamascene at 10:40 AM on August 4, 2003
Silly acronym creation results in low indulgence, grave entries. posted by caddis at 5:11 PM on August 4, 2003
Umm, Sacrilege ;) posted by CountZero at 5:32 PM on August 4, 2003
Silly acronym creation results in lamentable earnestness, grave entries. posted by caddis at 5:41 PM on August 4, 2003
entire nest tries.
rest? insert?
[enter siren.] posted by myopicman at 5:47 PM on August 4, 2003
Sounds interesting.
Regroup, eccentric narcissists! posted by CountZero at 5:55 PM on August 4, 2003
Not another regrouping call. I say such invocations sap the strength. posted by DrJohnEvans at 6:54 PM on August 4, 2003
Suddenly then, remembering Elizabeth's new grave - tepid, and hewn. posted by the fire you left me at 7:04 PM on August 4, 2003
how easily wanderers notice. posted by sgt.serenity at 7:13 PM on August 4, 2003
Nearly oval trolls insidiously celebrating ennui. posted by cohappy at 7:25 PM on August 4, 2003
Elephantitis
Naked nads undulating
Inconceivable! posted by Fezboy! at 7:41 PM on August 4, 2003
Inconsiderate newbies, consistently offtopic, not caring! Excite interested viewers— attempt binding logical and entertaining. posted by DrJohnEvans at 8:05 PM on August 4, 2003
Evans needs time. Tell everyone returning that another interesting nugget is nearly garnered. posted by squirrel at 8:13 PM on August 4, 2003
Entries not terse enough? Rhapsodic thread additions invite nice interpersonal nattering. Geeze. . . posted by Fezboy! at 8:14 PM on August 4, 2003
Gah! <-- Alarmed reaction. Numerous epistles registered. Entry deleted. posted by Fezboy! at 8:19 PM on August 4, 2003
Late addition to energize troops? Oh, to have entered parsing activities rather thoughtfully, yesterday! posted by scody at 11:39 PM on August 4, 2003
I know, I know, it only follows the acronym bit, not the "last word of the previous entry" rule rule... just wanted to express my irritation at somehow missing this for all these days! argh. carry on. posted by scody at 11:42 PM on August 4, 2003
Yachting events stand tall, eventually running down all yankees. posted by humuhumu at 2:05 AM on August 5, 2003
Look... listen, all. Normally, free and intelligent readers provoke with lousy linguistics, grating wisdom -- your normal, gratuitous yelling. Lately, long galling or grating examples really yank chains. Hell, we (you) realize no damned ruse or brash words languidly, listlessly (laughingly!) lodged allow nice threads. Your stupid, ignorant, lazy ideas only give one gross or gangrenous oral cavity headaches. posted by Civil_Disobedient at 9:45 AM on August 5, 2003
Hell, eating all day actually could help ease sciatica. posted by Dipsomaniac at 10:05 AM on August 5, 2003
Some clueless interlopers always try inserting complaints. Appalling. posted by brownpau at 11:41 AM on August 5, 2003
amazing! pretty powerful anagram, llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch...likely i need grousing. posted by taumeson at 12:47 PM on August 5, 2003
anagram? what the hell am i smoking?
i meant acronym. posted by taumeson at 12:50 PM on August 5, 2003
getting really obvious, using stones in newborn gizzards. posted by myopicman at 1:07 PM on August 5, 2003
Geez! It's zany zoophilies antics, really damn scary... posted by jpburns at 1:40 PM on August 5, 2003
sacred cattle are readily yours. posted by myopicman at 1:50 PM on August 5, 2003
Yacht owners unavoidably reply superciliously. posted by Quinn at 2:09 PM on August 5, 2003
"Superciliously" uncomfortably proximate, uh... really close in linquistical inheritance of uber-painful "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" last year.
It was that long ago, wasn't it? posted by jpburns at 2:35 PM on August 5, 2003
Your expressions appear repeatedly posted by none at 3:30 PM on August 5, 2003
Repetition, eh? Perhaps explicating a thread endlessly does leave yawns... posted by picopebbles at 4:25 PM on August 5, 2003
Yet another wanker nearly stalls. posted by jpburns at 5:42 PM on August 5, 2003
My answer? Nonsense!
Unequivocal response:
Exasperation! posted by MrMoonPie at 6:47 AM on August 7, 2003
Excepting "x," all spelling permeations, even rarities, allowed. That irritates other nincompoops. posted by transient at 7:57 AM on August 7, 2003
Not I, nincompoop! Comrade, only my phrasing occludes other popular sayings. posted by jpburns at 12:25 PM on August 7, 2003
NEWS - - - Incessant nonsense ceasing on Metafilter - - - Posting obsession over, poster says - - - posted by Blue Stone at 12:29 PM on August 7, 2003
[I don't believe it, Burns.... nothing for ages and then you come along and steal my thunder while I'm waiting for preview.... grrrr...] posted by Blue Stone at 12:33 PM on August 7, 2003
Great. Really, really, really, really. posted by MrMoonPie at 1:37 PM on August 7, 2003
So, are you infandous nitwits gonna stop ?! posted by Masi at 3:12 AM on August 8, 2003
"Swifties?!?" Tom overstated pedantically. posted by wendell at 4:19 AM on August 8, 2003
Pooh! Enough dumb antics! No "Toms" involved, altering long, layered yammerings. posted by jpburns at 4:23 AM on August 8, 2003
Yes, and more monkeybusiness ensures repartee is not going south. posted by transient at 8:33 AM on August 8, 2003
Sounding off usually takes hours! posted by biffa at 9:20 AM on August 8, 2003
Hardly; our usual routine's shorter. posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:02 PM on August 8, 2003
Hundreds of unusual responses! Staggering! posted by jpburns at 12:02 PM on August 8, 2003
Dang!
So to append glib Gigli-isms, each response is nearly golden? posted by jpburns at 12:13 PM on August 8, 2003
Gigli? Oh Lord. Damn entertainment narcissists! posted by DrJohnEvans at 12:32 PM on August 8, 2003
Not a real cinematic ideal, so say innumerable stigmatizing typists. Stinky! posted by transient at 1:34 PM on August 8, 2003
Shoot! That insertion necessitated Kafkaesque yelling. posted by jpburns at 1:40 PM on August 8, 2003
You each leave London in new garments.
Yesterday, every loose lady investigated new games.
Yonder east, leaves looping, indigo necklaces glowing.
Yup, efts lend-lease it nice gear. posted by Mo Nickels at 2:39 PM on August 8, 2003
Go ahead, read my eight-hundredth note to StopBlog. posted by rory at 2:53 PM on August 8, 2003
So to others: Please be lazy or go. posted by jpburns at 2:56 PM on August 8, 2003
Glowering oracle posted by Fezboy! at 3:43 PM on August 8, 2003
Others: resist advice, combine language energetically. posted by none at 4:37 PM on August 8, 2003
Emphatically no! Eventually replies get even terser! I can't abide later linguists yielding! posted by jpburns at 5:46 PM on August 8, 2003
Yet I expect lurking devotees instigate noteworthy germinations. posted by Fezboy! at 5:58 PM on August 8, 2003
Growth emerging, readily mutating into new aliveness; toward infinity, oh new shoot!
[apronym] posted by Fezboy! at 7:57 AM on August 9, 2003
So keep inputting epigrammatic responses, sucka! posted by jpburns at 10:46 AM on August 9, 2003
Serious understanding communicates knowledge, asshat. posted by wendell at 4:45 PM on August 9, 2003
Asshat seems subpar; have another try. posted by jpburns at 5:02 PM on August 9, 2003
Take rest y'all. posted by caddis at 7:35 PM on August 9, 2003
Yokels and local lowlifes.
[aprogram?] posted by wendell at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2003
Let ol' wendell lampoon. I find everything splendiferous! posted by jpburns at 6:35 AM on August 10, 2003
Simply perfect, lusciously elegant, notably, delightfully, indupitably fabulous; even rousingly, orgasmically, un-stintingly superb! posted by Blue Stone at 8:48 AM on August 10, 2003
Suddenly, unfamiliar poster enters, relishing Blogstopishness posted by buzzv at 10:51 AM on August 10, 2003
Being last online goads some tardy outlandish posters into silly, harebrained nonsense entries, serving silliness. posted by jpburns at 12:00 PM on August 10, 2003
Sauntering in late leads into never-ending sporting shenanigans. posted by transient at 1:47 PM on August 10, 2003
Sneaky henchmen engage nefariously and nimbly instigate gambolling antics--namely supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
[exemplary apronym] posted by Fezboy! at 2:02 PM on August 10, 2003
So unfair! Please elicit realistic comments. Avoid libelous inferences for real and genuine interesting linguistics. I shudder to interpret cinematic examples.
"X" persists in annals likewise.
I digress... only cinematic idiots offer unfair spellings. posted by jpburns at 2:18 PM on August 10, 2003
Such pristine edicts lie low in nowadays' ghastly setting! posted by DrJohnEvans at 2:47 PM on August 10, 2003
Spelling equality treatise tires 'idiot'. Nagging grouch. posted by Fezboy! at 4:16 PM on August 10, 2003
Grumbling rumbling ogre undergoing cranky hacking. posted by wendell at 5:56 PM on August 10, 2003
Hardly. A consistent kvetching is not grumbling. posted by jpburns at 6:24 PM on August 10, 2003
Good reasoning undermines my bumbling literary imagery, not ghoulishness. posted by wendell at 7:55 PM on August 10, 2003
Good hearted onslaught underlies last interjection. So happy not enduring shit sandwich. posted by jpburns at 4:06 AM on August 11, 2003
Sandwiches are not described without including contents holder.
So how could I do an apronym for 'sandwich' when the word contains no 'b' as in bread, bun or bagel, or even an 'r' as in roll?
or am I just taking this all way too seriously? posted by wendell at 4:20 AM on August 11, 2003
Hold onion, lettuce, (doing entire routine...) posted by jpburns at 5:34 AM on August 11, 2003
Regular occurence, unambiguous tasks inferring nominal effort. posted by Fezboy! at 6:17 AM on August 11, 2003
For wendell:
stuff and nice dressing wedged inside content holders?
There is no such thing as too serious! posted by Fezboy! at 6:22 AM on August 11, 2003
Easy for Fezboy! Others require trying... posted by jpburns at 6:58 AM on August 11, 2003
Triumph recognises your investment, not grousing. posted by Blue Stone at 7:44 AM on August 11, 2003
Gee, roundly ostracizing usual suspects. I need group-hug. posted by jpburns at 8:09 AM on August 11, 2003
Gaydar reacts on unknown people hugging unseemly groups. posted by taumeson at 11:47 AM on August 11, 2003
Golly... relieved others understand puny syntax. posted by jpburns at 12:06 PM on August 11, 2003
Sweaty young nubile twirls abominably: X-Tina. posted by none at 1:57 PM on August 11, 2003
"X-men Three" is nearly approved! posted by jpburns at 2:41 PM on August 11, 2003
All party people rely on very exciting...
choose one
...decor.
...dances.
...drugs.
...dexterity.
...dementia.
...downbeats.
...drama.
...dialogue.
...desperation. posted by wendell at 7:28 PM on August 11, 2003
...duly enticing, cannot ominvores roast?
...Damocles and Neptune cornered enduring stories.
...dense rugs under gangly soiree.
...dimples empty, xylophone tinkling, empty rooms into tunes yonder.
...damn enterprising, Minutemen enjoin new thousand in Azzarello.
...donuts oval, wind never bates empty, a tired sun.
...demanding recherche and much ado
...drowning in a lager, o gristy undertow embark!
...dinner exits stomach, pancreas entitles regular acids, tasting it often negates. posted by ed at 7:38 PM on August 11, 2003
Resting on a Sunday table.
Solemn tales--orally remembered--inform egotistical scholars.
Sweet ozou inspires refined evening entertainment.
Y'all over near Denton? East Lincoln? Roca?
A zany, zero appropriate results effort. Leastaways, looking online.
Setting up nova.
A dizzying ordeal.
Exciting mission begins anew. Ride, kinsmen!
'Not equal' gets at the essential semantics. posted by Fezboy! at 9:51 PM on August 11, 2003
Threads are badly layered, ed.
Scholarly collegiates have often learned all reasonable science.
Everybody notices that enjoyment relates to an important new meme, except novice troubadours.
Residents of California alarmed.
Oh no! Looking into net excites.
Near Orion, Via Andromeda.
Obviously, really dumb entrepreneurs are losers.
Knowledge is not sufficient, meaning everything now.
So every MetaFilter anagram now tires in cold seriousness. posted by wendell at 12:23 AM on August 12, 2003
[err... Wendel, Fezboy, Ed... you, seriously need to get lives.]
Engorged daipers. posted by Blue Stone at 4:40 AM on August 12, 2003
[I'm guessing that was "diapers."]
Disgusting infant absorbing paper, effectively reservoiring shit. posted by jpburns at 4:54 AM on August 12, 2003
See, I think it's more adventuresome to try to make sense, and attempt to connect to the previous sentence, but what do I know... posted by jpburns at 4:55 AM on August 18, 2003
Sorry, even non-topical entries never cease entertaining some. posted by transient at 7:38 AM on August 18, 2003
Some obtain merriment easily... posted by jpburns at 8:39 AM on August 18, 2003
Eliciting associated submissions is like... yaks. posted by transient at 9:17 AM on August 18, 2003
Yes... a kinetic science. posted by jpburns at 9:19 AM on August 18, 2003
Segueing cleverly into every nerds choice entertainment. posted by biffa at 12:17 PM on August 18, 2003
Every nerd tries entries related to anagrams. I naturally maintain equilibrium, not transubstantiation. posted by jpburns at 12:59 PM on August 18, 2003
Truculent rhesus! A new swing unfurled. Bananas shower, throbbing a nifty tree. Into a torrent: idiosynchratic, otiose, Netherlands. posted by ed at 2:15 PM on August 18, 2003
Not even trying hard. Effortless reply. Lame attempt. Not done swell. posted by jpburns at 7:36 PM on August 18, 2003
So weak ed, language laboured. posted by biffa at 1:41 AM on August 19, 2003
Let's attempt better ones. Unusual responses elicit disharmony. posted by jpburns at 4:17 AM on August 19, 2003
Done, I say! Haiku
are really meaningful ones,
Nullify yahoos. posted by MrMoonPie at 5:45 AM on August 19, 2003
You are heroes! One's on-topic submission. posted by biffa at 6:41 AM on August 19, 2003
So underutilized, brevity. Maybe I should stop inputting other nonsense? posted by jpburns at 9:22 AM on August 19, 2003
Nitwits offer narrow swords, entreating nuisances. Stomach epigrams? posted by ed at 9:39 PM on August 19, 2003
Ed perceivably isnt good regarding anagrams. Minimally scholastic? posted by biffa at 2:15 AM on August 20, 2003
So, comment-hungry overachievers, let's all savour this incredible centenary.
Nine-hundredth! posted by rory at 2:54 AM on August 20, 2003
Crap! Each new threshold elapses nightly, as Rory yippees! posted by jpburns at 4:16 AM on August 20, 2003
Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively! Supercalif... Superlative. posted by transient at 8:48 AM on August 20, 2003
Some users play enthusiastically, repeatedly logging acronyms to incite victorious elation.
Thanks for the restraint, transient... posted by jpburns at 9:46 AM on August 20, 2003
Erudite loonies
attempt this iteration.
Oppressive nonsense! posted by MrMoonPie at 12:12 PM on August 20, 2003
Not only nonsense,
semi-haiku elicits
non segue essay posted by jpburns at 1:28 PM on August 20, 2003
exercising sentences still alive, yippee! posted by trharlan at 8:20 PM on August 20, 2003
Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively...
posted by transient at 8:48 AM PST on August 20
Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavours...
what can I say? I'm back from the near-dead posted by wendell at 3:26 AM on August 21, 2003
oh crap, forgot to spell-check
Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavors...
just think of it as my bumbling way to creep a little closer to one-thousand before the 30-day limit posted by wendell at 3:32 AM on August 21, 2003
English needs defending enthusiastically, and vanquishing our 'u' remains sacrilegious. posted by biffa at 4:00 AM on August 21, 2003
Such a clever response is literary elegance. I oughta utilize semiotics. posted by jpburns at 4:20 AM on August 21, 2003
Symbols evoking meaning is on topic in coding Saussure. posted by transient at 7:54 AM on August 21, 2003
(That's what you get for showing off.) posted by biffa at 9:16 AM on August 21, 2003
Examinations, x-rayed, excite great English students intaking signifiers. posted by transient at 9:31 AM on August 21, 2003
Sigh. I guess nobody is finding it edifying responding simplistically... posted by jpburns at 11:03 AM on August 21, 2003
Simply, in mulling philosophy, liasing in straightforward terms is counterindicated. Axiomatically, longer language yieldful. posted by biffa at 2:44 AM on August 22, 2003
Yow! I'm entering less dialog, fully using language. posted by jpburns at 4:31 AM on August 22, 2003
Linguistic acrobatics nimbly gain usage as graduates emerge. posted by transient at 7:17 AM on August 22, 2003
Eluded MFA; education related garbage excretal... posted by jpburns at 7:50 AM on August 22, 2003
Excise 'x,' cretin!
Ridiculous exercise --
Take a lexapro. posted by MrMoonPie at 9:04 AM on August 22, 2003
Liked "excising 'x';" a possible response option. posted by jpburns at 9:33 AM on August 22, 2003
Often prozac, taken intravenously, overcomes nervousness. posted by biffa at 11:36 AM on August 22, 2003
Now everyone relax! Videos only use some, not every signal submitted! posted by jasper411 at 12:43 PM on August 22, 2003
Sure, usually, but mostly I take two Excedrin daily... posted by jpburns at 1:27 PM on August 22, 2003
Do as I: lick yoghurt. posted by ginz at 6:30 AM on August 23, 2003
Yuck! Only gargantuan headaches urge real treatment. posted by transient at 6:59 AM on August 23, 2003
You sad fuckers :) posted by Blue Stone at 8:31 AM on August 23, 2003
. . . posted by bargle at 9:02 AM on August 23, 2003
Try realizing esoteric aroma therapeutic methods, even notice Tetrahydrocannabinol. posted by jpburns at 9:04 AM on August 23, 2003
punctuation is not a word, Ed...
Some homeboys oughta check known editorial demarkations. posted by jpburns at 3:16 PM on August 24, 2003
Demarkations? Ewww!
Most assuredly, restraining k's ascendancy throughout idioticons oughta never stop! posted by Masi at 8:53 PM on August 24, 2003
Spelling teacher overly pedagogic. posted by trharlan at 9:37 PM on August 24, 2003
Please... either designation applicable (gleaned off gargantuan internet content).
de·mar·ca·tion also de·mar·ka·tion posted by jpburns at 4:25 AM on August 25, 2003
Carry on, now that either notation thrives. posted by trharlan at 5:34 AM on August 25, 2003
Two have rightness; internet verification establishes spelling. posted by transient at 6:58 AM on August 25, 2003
Sorry, pertinent English lexicons lack indecorous nouns... greenhorn! posted by Masi at 11:30 AM on August 25, 2003
Go retrieve extra ether now, here only remain nincompoops posted by Birichini at 11:46 AM on August 25, 2003
Not interesting. No creativity or merit pisses off others pursuing substance. posted by obfusciatrist at 1:24 PM on August 25, 2003
Shut up, Birichini. Stop typing acerbic, needlessly cruel expressions. posted by trharlan at 4:06 PM on August 25, 2003
Especially "X."
Pornographic, repugnant, execrative, shit-laced, stool-ridden, insulting, offensive, niggardly, stuff-and-nonsense. posted by jpburns at 5:37 PM on August 25, 2003
Such tirades! Understand, forget foolishness and negative distempers. No one needs semiotic enlightenment? No sweat, eh? posted by transient at 7:02 PM on August 25, 2003
you put de lime in de markation and drink it on up...
Effortless? Hardly! posted by arto at 10:45 PM on August 25, 2003
Have acronyms ready. Don't lack yearning! posted by jpburns at 4:18 AM on August 26, 2003
You each are reading
Nine-fifty-three images;
Nine-fifty-three goobs. posted by MrMoonPie at 7:30 AM on August 26, 2003
Goobs? Oh, oh. Bastard semantics... posted by jpburns at 1:13 PM on August 26, 2003
Shameful event MrMoonPie, a neologism! Thousand in clear sight... posted by biffa at 2:27 AM on August 27, 2003
Such intense goobisticly high turnout... posted by jpburns at 4:12 AM on August 27, 2003
Totally unwarranted responses! Now onward until triumph! posted by Birichini at 5:18 AM on August 27, 2003
... toward responses involving ultimate multiple postings, hurrah! posted by jpburns at 5:45 AM on August 27, 2003
Having understood rising resolution, all hurry. posted by transient at 7:31 AM on August 27, 2003
Here's useless reply registering yep. posted by jpburns at 8:19 AM on August 27, 2003
Your exclamation's pertinent. posted by transient at 8:26 AM on August 27, 2003
Proving even really thoughtful individuals never exit neverending threads. posted by rory at 9:33 AM on August 27, 2003
That's heartwarming reply. Everyone appreciates decent sentences. posted by jpburns at 10:23 AM on August 27, 2003
singlemindedly entering new text; every new comment equals success. posted by crunchland at 10:32 AM on August 27, 2003
Some unusual cognitive consciousness enables sequential sentences. posted by jpburns at 11:53 AM on August 27, 2003
Such easy nonsense
(this entry notwithstanding)
can't end silently posted by MrMoonPie at 12:15 PM on August 27, 2003
Some individuals let entropy negate triumphant learned yearnings. posted by jpburns at 12:22 PM on August 27, 2003
Shout it loudly everyone! Noble thread lingers yet. posted by biffa at 12:22 PM on August 27, 2003
Yowser! Even after repeated nights I need greater speed. posted by biffa at 12:24 PM on August 27, 2003
Some posts exceed Einsteinian doctrine. posted by jpburns at 12:48 PM on August 27, 2003
Definitely. Often 'c' tardy. Reams in new expressions posted by biffa at 1:05 PM on August 27, 2003
Dual offerings cause trouble; rate increases near end. posted by transient at 1:05 PM on August 27, 2003
Egads! 'X' prevents reply -- emerging so soon, ironically; our nominations synchronized. posted by transient at 1:12 PM on August 27, 2003
rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch...
So you nastily create havoc, replying onerously, needlessly inflicting "z", entirely dastardly. posted by jpburns at 2:02 PM on August 27, 2003
Do alternative spellings, that allow reposed discourse, lengthen yammering? posted by trharlan at 5:54 PM on August 27, 2003
rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch...
You assume my most electrifying response is nigh, governor? posted by rory at 1:52 AM on August 28, 2003
Gentlemen, our vying ends? (No one responds.) posted by planetkyoto at 2:11 AM on August 28, 2003
(oops, clipped it)
Gentlemen, our vying ends respectably? (No one responds.) posted by planetkyoto at 2:18 AM on August 28, 2003
Replying ere saddening planetkyoto on near deadline sussurusses. posted by biffa at 2:49 AM on August 28, 2003
"sussurusses?" I can't find that defined anywhere, or even make sense of it in a sentence... Going back one...
Really enthused seeing penultimate onslaught. Nearly done soon. posted by jpburns at 4:09 AM on August 28, 2003
You're right, it should have been 'susuruses', which describes the collective buzz of a whispering crowd, as one might get in a crowded theatre, and which will teach me to use a dictionary over my aging memory.
Carrying on from your word;
Spelling outlaws onerous entry. posted by biffa at 4:25 AM on August 28, 2003
Jeez, what am I on this morning, make that:
Spelling outlaws onerous nincompoop. posted by biffa at 4:27 AM on August 28, 2003
Nice inclusion; nincompoop. Certainly one made poignant over other possibles. posted by jpburns at 4:44 AM on August 28, 2003
Please! One shames self in bashing language egregiously. Seppuku? posted by biffa at 5:01 AM on August 28, 2003
Slicing entrails, purportedly... Pretty uncomfortable, knifing underbelly. posted by jpburns at 5:09 AM on August 28, 2003
Understatement! No disprin effectively removes bellyslicing effects. Lamentable looking yukata. posted by biffa at 5:25 AM on August 28, 2003
You're using knowledge a typist abhors. posted by jpburns at 5:39 AM on August 28, 2003
Acknowledged: Blatantly heaping obscure references steadily. posted by biffa at 5:53 AM on August 28, 2003
So, the end approaches. Do I leave yet? posted by rory at 6:00 AM on August 28, 2003
You've emerged then? posted by biffa at 6:01 AM on August 28, 2003
True, hovering eagerly now. posted by rory at 6:03 AM on August 28, 2003
Nearly over with. posted by biffa at 6:09 AM on August 28, 2003
Well, it's thankfully here. posted by jpburns at 6:12 AM on August 28, 2003
Well, I try. Heroically. posted by rory at 6:12 AM on August 28, 2003
Hey! 'E's responding early! posted by rory at 6:13 AM on August 28, 2003
Each action remains legitimate, yaar. posted by biffa at 6:18 AM on August 28, 2003
Yet another agonizing response. posted by jpburns at 6:19 AM on August 28, 2003
'Yaar'? An amusing response. posted by rory at 6:19 AM on August 28, 2003
Rory ends, surprisingly playing only nine-hundred-and-ninety-ninth sequential entry.
Go for it, you two! posted by rory at 6:25 AM on August 28, 2003
Entry number: Thousand. Retiring. Yeehaw. posted by biffa at 6:27 AM on August 28, 2003
Easy now that rory yields. posted by jpburns at 6:27 AM on August 28, 2003
Still time... rally everyone near... group thread hugs! posted by jpburns at 6:15 PM on August 29, 2003
Hugs? Unseemly. Group Shout-outs! posted by wendell at 6:25 PM on August 29, 2003
Still holding out under time -- our uber thread's senescencing. posted by transient at 7:50 PM on August 29, 2003
er, senescing. posted by transient at 7:54 PM on August 29, 2003
Showoff egotist needs elementary spelling check. Inaccuracy not graceful. posted by trharlan at 9:37 PM on August 29, 2003
Gobbledygook requires artfully commanding English! Fear unnecessary lexiphanicism !
I fear a shrewish response, reminding of Socrates' wife, for including the x. posted by Masi at 11:18 PM on August 29, 2003
Let's emit x-rated irate pedantic half-assed non-sequiturs in commentary, if Socrates minds. posted by wendell at 11:35 PM on August 29, 2003
Me, inscribing non-sequiturs? Do summarize! posted by Masi at 12:11 AM on August 30, 2003
Seriously underwhelmed, Mr. Masi, ascribing redundancy in zero exuberance.
I don't have the foggiest idea what I just said, but it's got an "x" in it... posted by wendell at 12:39 AM on August 30, 2003
I'm sorry if my post appeared unconnected, I wanted it to be relevant regarding trasient's post; I considered it fairly obvious. Peccavi, and I apologise.
Eliciting x's underscores babyish expectations; ridicule also not cultured. Creep! posted by Masi at 3:10 AM on August 30, 2003
Clearly realistic expectations exceed posts... posted by adrianhon at 3:14 AM on August 30, 2003
Proof of something that smells. posted by ashbury at 5:32 AM on August 30, 2003
Some may elicit long-winded lessons, surely. posted by jpburns at 5:55 AM on August 30, 2003
« Older Toronto is expecting 450,000 to attend today's Tor... | Roman Cosmetics Found at Templ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by coudal at 7:07 AM on July 30, 2003