Comments on: Blogstop

Blogstop

coudal — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:07:04 -0800

Where the last word of an entry must be used as an acronym for the next entry. Simple.

By: coudal

coudal — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:07:33 -0800

So I must post light entertainments.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:22:28 -0800

Even note-taking early readers tracking assiduously, if not monotonously, express no truer sentiment.

By: ook

ook — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:25:38 -0800

Shouldn't each new thread in MetaFilter explicate news titles?

By: grum@work

grum@work — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:27:48 -0800

My response was: So, every new typist is meticulously entering nonsensical tripe? This is taking little effort, sadly.

By: sageleaf

sageleaf — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:29:55 -0800

Sensing a derail, lurker yawns.

By: jazon

jazon — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:30:58 -0800

You're always writing nifgy shit!

By: jazon

jazon — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:31:24 -0800

that's supposed to be NIFTY

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:32:34 -0800

Spelling here is terrible...

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:34:42 -0800

The errors really rile, I believe; less erroneousness!

By: samelborp

samelborp — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:37:52 -0800

Entertain rabid rabbits or nothing else on useful sarcastic notorious sober spiders!

By: terrapin

terrapin — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:39:41 -0800

Speedy pontificating is decidedly easier, rick says

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:41:31 -0800

erroneousness 6. Should a player make an error in his/her entry, do not accept the last word. ;)

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:42:23 -0800

Euphonious Rory regretfully originated not easily operative user simple name, exaggerated self sophistry.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:45:29 -0800

surely our posts have intrinsic substance to rally youth?

By: transient

transient — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:47:02 -0800

your ogreish undulations tire helicopters

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:49:45 -0800

How each licentious idiot can optimize personal tricky existing repeating syllables.

By: eyeballkid

eyeballkid — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:51:25 -0800

Still, you live like a big lazy elephant shit.

By: crazy finger

crazy finger — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:52:50 -0800

Silence, here I teach!

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:53:38 -0800

Touche. Every addition comes harder.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:54:39 -0800

Harder and radically different each recursion.

By: kfury

kfury — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:55:22 -0800

Really? Every comment uses rambling sentences. I orate neatly.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:57:20 -0800

Not every asshole types like yourself

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:59:18 -0800

Your own usage reveals self emulating lively fragrances.

By: thatothrgirl

thatothrgirl — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:02:45 -0800

First, you take underpants, then + ??? = Profits.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:03:13 -0800

Forget really apt graceful riffs, and no challenge exists, sir.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:03:57 -0800

So I responded?

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:06:07 -0800

Really, each such performance of naked determination eludes description.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:08:43 -0800

disparate emails serve cranky rowdy individuals perfectly through isolated optimistic notions.

By: walrus

walrus — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:09:17 -0800

Damn! Every success created really isn't pertinent: timing isn't overly nifty.

By: walrus

walrus — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:09:48 -0800

Oh pants. I'm not playing any more.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:10:34 -0800

Not only that, I opine; non sequiturs.

By: crazy finger

crazy finger — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:12:28 -0800

Surely even quick use internet thesaurus! Unbelievably rapid sequence!

By: clevershark

clevershark — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:14:18 -0800

Silly eponymous queries ultimately embitters nice crowing equalizers.

By: debralee

debralee — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:14:27 -0800

Stop everyone! Quit! Use every necessary control enabler!

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:16:16 -0800

clevershark - Speed engenders quasi-unintelligble extractions, not chewable, exactly. debralee - Eh? Not a briskly lively exception, right?

By: archimago

archimago — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:16:31 -0800

Even naughty academics blog like energetic rubes

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:17:54 -0800

Rats! Undermined by eveyone's sentences.

By: crazy finger

crazy finger — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:18:55 -0800

Derailed- the word is equalizers.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:18:57 -0800

'equalizers' was first! Every questioning user allows licence in zealously emitted ranting screeds. damn, too late...

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:21:30 -0800

Sorry, couldn't read every email. Demanded Speed!

By: mbd1mbd1

mbd1mbd1 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:21:33 -0800

Some crappy readers eventually enter decent stuff.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:23:28 -0800

someone please eliminate evil doers.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:24:33 -0800

Do other entries really suck?

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:26:11 -0800

Sometimes, unless created knowledgeably.

By: Frasermoo

Frasermoo — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:27:35 -0800

no way

By: twine42

twine42 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:30:26 -0800

*rofl @ fraser - my thoughts exactly*

By: crazy finger

crazy finger — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:30:36 -0800

Kids: never observe writers. Live each day greatly, erstwhile appearing boldly lyrical yahoos!

By: kfury

kfury — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:31:35 -0800

Yawn. Audience heads off, over stimulated.

By: Frasermoo

Frasermoo — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:34:33 -0800

mate, i'm 32, I just haven't got that sort of time

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:35:45 -0800

So try! I might understand living at thirty-eight, dammit.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:35:48 -0800

So this is metafilter's usual laugh against the employed dunderhead?

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:36:46 -0800

Take it from biffa's, seeing as how "dammit" isn't really a word. But then, neither is "dunderhead."

By: furiousthought

furiousthought — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:39:25 -0800

Dadgummit! Underemployed nerds defeat everyone! Real hardworking employees all despair. Up yours and your real words! Thppt.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:41:22 -0800

Should time include mania? Unnecessary. Lose a thesaurus, then enjoy doubly!lousy not typing as fast as other people--d'oh! Dictionaries use neologisms. Don't end rhetoric, help enjoy all day!

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:41:29 -0800

7. Your words, especially the last word, must appear in the dictionary Thanks Brownpau, but Dunderhead is in mine! (Not that I'd looked it up or anything)

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:42:11 -0800

Does every single poster argue in reality?

By: gravelshoes

gravelshoes — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:42:49 -0800

Done Acrochallenge yet?

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:47:23 -0800

Rory, every argument lives in time, yes?

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:48:59 -0800

You! Eat sausage!

By: rcade

rcade — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:49:00 -0800

Your ending's supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:53:11 -0800

Sad. An unworthy shot at grandiose exposition.

By: signal

signal — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:56:08 -0800

Surely under previous endeavours rest callous attempts lifted indiscriminately from remains among gargantuan indigenous livestock invited suddenly to intervene carefully, eventually xylophones participate in a lackluster inimical display of callousness in our unkown system.

By: jaronson

jaronson — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:56:57 -0800

rcade cannot always deal effectively!

By: transient

transient — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:59:27 -0800

So you see tones, even mixolydian?

By: beagle

beagle — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:59:50 -0800

An observation: This is a good illustration of community weblogging, versus what goes on at the linked site, BlogStop, where the entries rarely refer to prior ones.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:01:46 -0800

Signal, you slays them. Excellent metafiltering!

By: garyh

garyh — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:04:03 -0800

music is xylophonic only letting you drum in a nanosecond

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:07:48 -0800

Suspending understanding, perhaps enlisting rectal consciousness, a litigious infidel fragments rudimentary agricultural goods, instilling listlessness in society toward inexplicable cultural escapades, xeroxing platitudes in, and launching into duets of, classical incantations of unwritten symphonies.

By: The Michael The

The Michael The — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:09:23 -0800

Sure, you may pry hymns of near-intellectual exposition, Stone.

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:11:09 -0800

Stymied topographies over nefarious expostulations?

By: planetkyoto

planetkyoto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:15:39 -0800

Shut up, pedantic elf rcade! Couldn't anyone leak irksome, foul, rattling acronyms? God, if life is trying, if cancer-exhibiting X-rays portend insidious and looming infiltrative death, our creator indubitably owes us salvation.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:15:49 -0800

Eliminate "x," please. Or stymie this ultimately lame-ass, tension-inspiring, often nice, stumper.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:17:12 -0800

Evidently, 'X' protrudes ominously still. This useless letter aggravates, initiating only nothing. Shameful!

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:18:46 -0800

Seems that user, Moonpie, posted earlier. Regrettable.

By: mcsweetie

mcsweetie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:19:55 -0800

I'm a big ole chicken!!!!!!!!!!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:23:30 -0800

Responding earlier grates really egregiously. This time, arto begs leave. Entertaining!

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:25:36 -0800

Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's inevitable NSFW Internet news group.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:26:21 -0800

Oops. Exactly. Now, tell everyone regarding today's *awful*, inevitable NSFW Internet news group

By: thatothrgirl

thatothrgirl — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:28:01 -0800

Groping rude ogres utilitzes persistence.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:37:54 -0800

Please! Entry riles, since it's sad thatothrgirl's entry needlessly creates enmity.

By: carfilhiot

carfilhiot — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:40:12 -0800

Most. Boring. Thread. Ever

By: dmt

dmt — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:42:53 -0800

Every version egregiously reviled

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:43:04 -0800

Extend normal mitigation in thatothrgirl's yabber

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:46:58 -0800

You arse burger, Biffa: everything's redundant.

By: vacapinta

vacapinta — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:58:14 -0800

To hate is sublime i see, said this uninspired poster in defiance.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:05:22 -0800

rory exits, disturbingly undone, now doomsayers are nearly triumphant.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:12:07 -0800

Truly repentant, I understand my purile harassment, and nolonger type.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:19:23 -0800

Thread's young, pathetic ending.

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:23:41 -0800

Except new dunderheads insistently negate grievances.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:26:36 -0800

Good riddance, I exclaim, villifying addictive nonsensical crap everywhere, Soyjoy!

By: gravelshoes

gravelshoes — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:37:58 -0800

Stop! or you'll just obfuscate yourselves

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:42:02 -0800

You obdurate users really should elevate levity. Vainglorious epigrams striate!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:45:41 -0800

Shoot! That rankles individualistic apathy. The end.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:47:55 -0800

'Striate'? That's really inappropriate at the end.

By: VulcanMike

VulcanMike — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:49:11 -0800

Enough negativity, dudes.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:51:56 -0800

Don't unnecessarily discount ending statement.

By: jdroth

jdroth — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:52:50 -0800

Enough nerdy discussion!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:56:28 -0800

Statistically, the acronym that ends, must enliven no thought.

By: salmacis

salmacis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:58:55 -0800

Do I stop commenting upon sir's statement in our newsgroup?

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:59:36 -0800

Talk haughty or undermine glorious hinterland throughways.

By: grabbingsand

grabbingsand — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:01:59 -0800

Thrilling how one unique germ herds them.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:02:46 -0800

through halting responses, our unending game hastens. we're at your service.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:08:15 -0800

Shit. Everytime ready, victimized in checking efficiency.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:11:28 -0800

Seriously, everyone's really vapulating infectious conversational embers.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:17:32 -0800

expediency forces faults. If checking is effrontery, never callout yammerers..

By: thomcatspike

thomcatspike — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:21:49 -0800

Yawn at my meager efficient rough extremity rhyme-less sentence.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:24:34 -0800

Seems endless, not tractable. Ending nears countless epigrams.

By: grabbingsand

grabbingsand — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:30:31 -0800

Even pedantic imbeciles get rare amusement most Sundays.

By: djspicerack

djspicerack — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:34:44 -0800

SARS undermines nuclear destruction and your SATs

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:35:37 -0800

somebody understand, nobody desires a yokel's starter.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:36:54 -0800

Sophistry attenuates terrible spam.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:42:26 -0800

sparkly purple auroa, master

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:43:19 -0800

meet another stupid trick: enter recur!

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:44:09 -0800

recurrence emminating continuously. Useless recur!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:48:20 -0800

Recur eternally, ceaseless, unending recurrence!

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:49:31 -0800

recurrence echoing constantly. Useless recur!

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:49:43 -0800

recurring every chance. useless recur

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:52:03 -0800

**Damn dial-up! I coulda flooded this thread.**

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:03:23 -0800

4. Build on other members' last word; not your own.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:10:41 -0800

Oh, whining now!

By: brownpau

brownpau — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:16:12 -0800

Not on Wednesday.

By: terrapin

terrapin — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:27:12 -0800

Wishing every diatribe never ended such discussions as yesterday's

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:41:11 -0800

Young enmity saps the entries. Really, doesn't anyone yammer struts?

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:49:08 -0800

Such threading really upsets terrible spellers.

By: romakimmy

romakimmy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:52:59 -0800

Shit, these really use thesaurus speak.

By: nickmark

nickmark — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:56:06 -0800

Some people enjoy arcane knowledge.

By: romakimmy

romakimmy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:03:06 -0800

stupid provider electricity lack - latin efficiency really sucks. knowledge never overrated- lets erudite dowagers get edgy

By: nickmark

nickmark — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:10:30 -0800

(Stupid putz - excessive laziness! Last entry reduces status.)

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:13:56 -0800

Enlarging, dilating, growing—yow!

By: Eloquence

Eloquence — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:23:27 -0800

Yoko Ono's warning:

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:27:06 -0800

Wailing audio recurring! Never invite nasty glower!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:30:22 -0800

White Album requires no interference--no girlfriends!

By: Eloquence

Eloquence — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:33:54 -0800

Guaranteed larger orifices with every repetition.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:41:16 -0800

Really? Every pathetic excursion toward iteration traumatizes incisions? Or not?

By: myopicman

myopicman — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:42:33 -0800

Never on Thursdays...

By: geneablogy

geneablogy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:49:59 -0800

Though hardly underwhelmed, really, so daring address your subject

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:58:41 -0800

Students underestimate blathering jisms. Enjoin cutaneous torrents!

By: ewwgene

ewwgene — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:02:20 -0800

Together our rivers run endlessly narrow towards space.

By: djspicerack

djspicerack — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:04:40 -0800

Stars Pass Around Cars Easily

By: coudal

coudal — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:09:57 -0800

Enough already Sally, I love you.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:29:38 -0800

You oughta unite!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:35:46 -0800

Unfortunately, nobody is terribly excited about your plan, jpburns.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:38:36 -0800

uniteaypj?

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:39:54 -0800

Jpburns proudly burnishes understated rococo. Nature scintillates!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:46:06 -0800

Unbelievable! Now I've taken excessive acronyming, per jpburns. *blush*

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:46:35 -0800

Shithead causes intellectual nonsense. The initial legal letter apparently threw every scumbag!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:55:16 -0800

Seriously, consider uproar made by Acrophobia gaming!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:58:38 -0800

Good advice! My intent not gloating...

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:01:28 -0800

Gadzooks! Look out at this internet name, gone!

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:04:42 -0800

Gamboling oddballs nurture eczema.

By: sailoreagle

sailoreagle — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:06:44 -0800

Excellent! Cunning, zany, entertaining metafilter acticity.

By: sailoreagle

sailoreagle — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:07:31 -0800

Err... actiVity. typical of me to notice spelling mistake AFTER hitting the post button. And yes, I even previewed. Shame on me.

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:10:42 -0800

All creation tactfully indicated complete incredulity to you

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:16:54 -0800

Yes. Obviously understandable.

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:21:37 -0800

Unbelievably no diatribes ever remain so targetted at new denizens around because love endures

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:23:21 -0800

Even now, doesn't understanding rule, ending snarkiness?

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:25:59 -0800

Snarkiness needs a rodent king. Into network, escapism spawns sarcasm.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:28:53 -0800

So always review comments and save Metafilter!

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:28:58 -0800

Sometimes a rat can also a smile make.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:32:23 -0800

Meaning every time a flame infiltrates, let trolls eat reason?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:34:41 -0800

Right. Enough already! Silly, ornery nitwits.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:42:03 -0800

Never irritate the wizards--increases their sogginess.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:48:44 -0800

Simply overstated. Genuinely - great imps never evolve. So sad.

By: arto

arto — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:49:53 -0800

Sorry. Almost done.

By: ~rschram

~rschram — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:51:29 -0800

Damnit, one's never early! (that is, I was shooting for SOGGINESS.)

By: wantwit

wantwit — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:56:17 -0800

Even a Raelian loves you.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:58:40 -0800

Yeah, only unnaturally.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:03:21 -0800

Uninvited neophytes now are truly understanding rationality! Let's leave, yo!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:05:51 -0800

Unfortunately, now nature and time undoes reasonable acronym, leaving lapses, Yikes.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:18:02 -0800

Your insipid knowledgebase eschews sensibility.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:24:18 -0800

Stop encouraging nonsensical scrutiny. Inane bumbling isn't ludicrous if talented, y'all.

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:26:33 -0800

You 'ave lovely legerdemain.

By: MUD

MUD — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:37:01 -0800

Leave ed gurning. Every reader doesn't express my actions in notes.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:38:38 -0800

No other treats, else sarcasm!

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:42:28 -0800

So always review comments and save Metafilter!

By: MUD

MUD — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:42:31 -0800

Surely all reading causes a stuttered mumbling.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:46:08 -0800

Maybe elicit true acronym. filching initial lame try exacts retribution.

By: grum@work

grum@work — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:56:33 -0800

Returning entry tries really intently, but understands that it's only nonsense. I'm back!

By: wanderingmind

wanderingmind — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:00:00 -0800

Not only nonsense - something else: nonsense, structured elegantly.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:16:44 -0800

Even lame efforts get a "nice try!". Lovely, y'all.

By: ed

ed — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:23:09 -0800

Yeast 'as lovely louvres.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:23:13 -0800

Yeah, awfully lame. Losers.

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:35:28 -0800

Leave out some easily-riled sesquipedalians.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:00:17 -0800

stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically deny all linguistically impossible actions. new sentences!

By: myopicman

myopicman — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:02:50 -0800

*ugh* stop eliciting silly questions! undermined individuals periodically eject damanged and linguistically impossible actions. new sentences!

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:12:12 -0800

Since every new trick evinces nuttiness, consider evading same.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:19:11 -0800

Such ambling might excite.

By: jeremias

jeremias — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:39:05 -0800

Egads! Xerxes could intelligently trash e-commerce.

By: romakimmy

romakimmy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:47:27 -0800

. Enough- continuous onanism mittens might entail rueful chapped epidermis.

By: wanderingmind

wanderingmind — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:57:42 -0800

Even people in denial elicit responses? MetaFilter is strange.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:03:40 -0800

So to recap, acronyms necessitate goofy English.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:05:48 -0800

Essentially; never getting laid is some help.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:11:44 -0800

Hey, everyone likes psychopharmacology.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:55:25 -0800

Please stop, Yankee charlatans. Hours of posting horrible anecdotes, rarely making any clear observations, like opiated German yodellers.

By: riviera

riviera — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:02:20 -0800

You offend dilettetantte emailers' laborious likings. Resist suppression!

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:19:15 -0800

Something underhanded purposely perpetrated? Riviera, everyone says such incidents only nag.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:35:47 -0800

Not another gallimaufry!

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:42:51 -0800

Guys and lasses, less is more (and ultimately funnier, right y'all?)

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:43:41 -0800

Great at lexical linkages, I manfully attempt undercutting Faulkner's real Yoknapatawpha.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:56:31 -0800

Yowza! One knows now adamgreenfield plays acronyms to always win! (Plus, he's attractive!)

By: Fourmyle

Fourmyle — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:01:39 -0800

Your obfuscation kills natural answers, pal. Avoid these aggravating words. Please heed, adamgreenfield.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:04:48 -0800

At this time real assholes can try IRC in vigorous enthusiasm.

By: Fourmyle

Fourmyle — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:10:09 -0800

After trying to reprimand adamgreenfield, crash_davis's treachery is very excruciating.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:11:27 -0800

Enter not! Thou hast used soap in a sexy manner!

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:14:51 -0800

man, and now nearly everyone rinses!

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:16:01 -0800

Meaculpas aside, never "no" elegant reminders.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:18:40 -0800

Eeek! Xenotransplantation causes replication concerns. In alleles there is no guessing.

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:50:57 -0800

guilefully, un-egressed social sauntering in native gargantuas

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:03:33 -0800

Gee, and really good answers never take up any space.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:09:08 -0800

Score! People, adamgreenfield's champion. Exeunt.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:14:08 -0800

Eccentric xenophobes exude unworthy nasal trappings.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:14:19 -0800

Eventually, Xeroxed efforts underimpress new talent...

By: aws17576

aws17576 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:16:51 -0800

Every X-Day ends up not taking.@y

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:20:20 -0800

talking asses, kingship inferred. not good.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:23:40 -0800

Grant others' obvious delight.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:25:32 -0800

D'oh! Evening light is gone. Happy trails!

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:27:06 -0800

take responses and insert life support.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:31:10 -0800

shouldn't underestimate people playing on remote systems.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:32:27 -0800

oops.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:33:27 -0800

shouldn't underestimate people playing on remote transrormers! ;)

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:34:17 -0800

um, transformers...

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:34:47 -0800

or- shouldn't underestimate people playing, only retarded taz.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:40:24 -0800

Those real and newly sanctioned fucking old retired men ever read Sartre?

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:40:48 -0800

transformers, rare and not safe for oral redress. Mentioning entertains racy SnM'ers

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:44:15 -0800

Seemingly, angsty retirees talk rabid existentialism.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:47:42 -0800

Enough! Xanax is something that everyone needs to ingest (at least in some measure).

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:52:31 -0800

Met every apolitical soul? Use reinformencement examples.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:54:18 -0800

mr_crash_davis! Excellent answer! Super usage - really evolved!

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:56:00 -0800

Easy, xylophones and mellow pieces leave everyone soothed.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:00:06 -0800

Some obligated Oolongs take hotcakes extra-dermitorily.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:07:29 -0800

Every xeriscaped tract really attracts dulled Eaterners rolling mightily into the Occident, riding interstates, living young.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:09:19 -0800

Youthful occupants undualte needing ganja.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:11:02 -0800

get another nappy joint, asshole

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:13:00 -0800

Gleefully, aiming narrow, Jones acronyms!

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:14:42 -0800

Asshole? So somebody has only limited expressions?

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:18:15 -0800

Even Xanadu provided rational esoteric songs. Some insinuated obliging Nigerian Spammers!

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:20:33 -0800

Stop posting and making me evermore ravishingly sexual.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:25:36 -0800

Some emit Xenon. Usual American lexicon.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:27:16 -0800

let's expel "x". It cramps our nonsense.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:29:59 -0800

Now others need seeing every nonsense submittal erased.

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:32:03 -0800

Every random acronym solves everyone's dilemmas.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:34:04 -0800

damn! I'm late every minute! Modem always slow.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:35:56 -0800

stop law-offending warfarers.

By: Ufez Jones

Ufez Jones — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:38:08 -0800

Warfaring assholes reap fictional additional respect. Erstwhile, reality secedes.

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:41:06 -0800

Snarky effects can elicit duldrums, everyone savvy?

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:41:28 -0800

seemingly endless, crazy eggheads determine extra-legal scenarios

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:43:06 -0800

Suck a vibrant , vacuant Yemeni.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:45:22 -0800

Your extremely menacing entry needs intervention

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:48:59 -0800

I noticed that even righteous verbalists entertain not truisms, if only nonego.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:49:04 -0800

it's not the execution really; verbalization entered non-commitally threads its own noose.

By: trondant

trondant — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:51:48 -0800

not only oafs spell erroneously.

By: taz

taz — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:56:04 -0800

errors repeatedly rendered on nonsensensical entries only underscore severe limitations. Yet...

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:56:13 -0800

Everlongingly, red-faced readers only now explain, ousting users so lovingly. Y'knowwhaddamean?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:15 -0800

Yippee, easy thinking.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:02:35 -0800

(Sorry, jazzkat11, you almost had it)

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:04:39 -0800

I tried. :]

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:05:01 -0800

terribly haughty. Indifferently nuanced kvetching is not good.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:11:14 -0800

Gee, overly obtrusive. Damn!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:12:47 -0800

Destroyed all my nuances...

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:13:52 -0800

Thought hobbles intuition, nitwit. Knowing involves nuanced gropings!.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:16:14 -0800

nothing undoes a nubile collaborator except synonyms.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:17:21 -0800

now unappealingly acronomized neologisms corrupt every statement!

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:20:00 -0800

so you're now ontologically neutered? You're my slave!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:20:17 -0800

Gracious! Rude overhead play ignored numerous go-between submissions!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:24:46 -0800

so troutfishing's attempting to effect multiple expresions, numerous threads?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:25:56 -0800

Shit, lost all valid enthusiasm.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:37:03 -0800

everybody notices that hapless unordered submissions interrupt all sequential motion.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:41:19 -0800

Move on the immediate object, Nimrod!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:42:42 -0800

thank you for the opportunity to use the word nimrod

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:44:48 -0800

every noteworthy thread has unexpected slumps, indeed. a serendipitious moment?

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:46:40 -0800

Natch! I must remit offerings directly....

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:55:50 -0800

Don't interrupt reasonably edited crap to lay yours.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:58:58 -0800

Yikes! Overly ugly response, sir!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:00:59 -0800

So I reply...

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:17:06 -0800

Reverse-engineered pancakes lost yumminess.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:23:44 -0800

yes, untimely mess makes it not even slightly sensational.

By: arto

arto — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:39:08 -0800

Since everyone now seems a touch irritable, order nachos and liquor!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:41:40 -0800

let's invite quonsar! Unmitigated orneriness required.

By: Opus Dark

Opus Dark — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:16:13 -0800

Really, encouraging quonsar's unique impudence risks enkindling disequilibrium.

By: arto

arto — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:25:28 -0800

Doesn't it seem evident quonsar'll unleash intense laughter in bar rooms, introducing unusual mayhem?

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:26:12 -0800

Did I sleep enough? Quality usually is lost in between runs in using metafilter.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:27:04 -0800

My apologies. Your haste eludes me!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:42:03 -0800

marvelous explication!

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:46:21 -0800

Extraordinary XP litigation incurred, correcting all the input/output nonsense.

By: talos

talos — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:59:31 -0800

Not one nonsensical sentence exists! Note: some exceptions.

By: Opus Dark

Opus Dark — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:17:24 -0800

Every xenophobic colon examiner posits tenuous interrelations - obviously, neoclassicists scream.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:26:32 -0800

still, classic rejoinders exemplify anal metafiltering.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:39:00 -0800

Must everyone take a faux intellectual line to express rather inferior new gags?

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:44:37 -0800

...Great as gags seem.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:49:09 -0800

Screams emanating... except muted.

By: planetkyoto

planetkyoto — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:52:37 -0800

Metafilter: unending threads eclipse daylight

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:58:23 -0800

Duly angered: you lurched infront - going home tersely.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:07:30 -0800

To elevate rhymes, search every line yesterday.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:17:04 -0800

You expect someone to explore rhymes denounced as yabber?

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:17:34 -0800

yet, everyone says that elevating rhymes drives a yearning

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:19:21 -0800

You answer bravely, biffa, even righteously.

By: twine42

twine42 — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:23:47 -0800

Metafilter: unending threads eclipse daylight - heh... ;)

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:33:55 -0800

rotfl. I glimpse haiku! That excellent oriental user segued laudably, y'all!

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:36:53 -0800

You art lovers lament?

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:42:32 -0800

Listen. Any muppet eventually needs teaching

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:44:02 -0800

To each a choice helpful intrinsic new goodness.

By: blogenstock

blogenstock — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:44:23 -0800

long acronyms mean extended neuronal torment

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:45:21 -0800

{Dang! Missed 300!}

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:52:08 -0800

Gawking over one delightfully nubile, elegant sapphist, shuffling.

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:52:48 -0800

gets off on dirty nipples, even sloppy seconds

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:53:41 -0800

[over 300 posts and barely a double-entendre, letalone a little sexual innuendo... appaling.]

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 04:55:12 -0800

[...and then two, er, come along at once. LoL]

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:02:41 -0800

Late again! May eventually need treatment. Sequential efforts contain one naughty disgrace. Shame!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:03:36 -0800

Shuffling hellenic? Unusually free form lesbian? It's notably Greek.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:07:48 -0800

Gregarious rectal escapades, elucidate knowledge.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:09:30 -0800

Granted. Really, every 'Ellenic knows.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:10:50 -0800

Know-it-all not only worrisome, leaves education directly guttered, eh?

By: cup

cup — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:11:44 -0800

Education helps.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:12:42 -0800

Has everyone loved poor syntax?

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:13:04 -0800

'Kinell! Naughty onanists wank. Look - entertaining dirty girls express!

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:13:50 -0800

way too slow!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:14:39 -0800

Seriously: you need to avoid "x"

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:16:17 -0800

xerox!

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:16:30 -0800

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:16:55 -0800

Simple yammering not taken as xerophilic.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:20:18 -0800

xenophiles enter rectums of Xhosans

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:22:41 -0800

Xeric humidity: oxymoron? Suffers awful night's sleep

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:24:11 -0800

Cheaters! So let everyone exempt propriety!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:26:19 -0800

Please refer origin postulating resonant insinuation, elderly tyrant you!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:30:43 -0800

young ogres unleashed?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:33:55 -0800

Unless neither lets either appear so haphazard, ensuing destruction.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:38:15 -0800

Don't evaluate syntax, toward rear ugly typing: it's overtly nonsensical.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:41:57 -0800

Not only nonsensical, seems even nonparsable. Some iterations cause anagram lockdown.

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:43:23 -0800

not only nonsensical, syntax expresses nothing sensible in certainly any language

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:44:04 -0800

damn! too slow again!

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:45:47 -0800

Lets all not gang up and gabble eternally!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:48:48 -0800

Eventually terrible entries reappear nauseatingly, as lucid learned yearnings.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:50:36 -0800

(the word was lockdown, btw...)

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:50:41 -0800

Echoing the entirety re: nouns adumbrated liberally last year...

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:51:14 -0800

Yearning even again? Really, now I need greater suggestions.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:51:22 -0800

Lovely oration, comes keenly, divested of wordy nonsense.

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:51:24 -0800

Yow! 'E's ahead, righteously.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:54:34 -0800

9. In case two members coincidently post a sentence using the same last word from the previous post, the later post will be deleted.[disregarded]

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:56:46 -0800

New orator not serious. Eluding natural semiotics expressly!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:00:36 -0800

eh? x-rated posts retreated? electronic shame superimposed? Let's yodel!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:00:37 -0800

Emphatically xeroxed, previous rascal; everyone seriously should listen, yeah!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:03:25 -0800

Yet others don't encourage legality.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:04:59 -0800

Yikes - one's delivery effortlessly levelled.

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:05:55 -0800

lawyers expectedly get a legal insight to you

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:07:49 -0800

You orate unendingly!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:10:57 -0800

Unfortunately necessary. Even new didactics infer noble grumblings. Later, y'all!

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:11:42 -0800

Using nouns, even now, distresses I. No good letters yatter.

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:12:06 -0800

Y'all again!! Low lexicography!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:16:37 -0800

Lovely.... expect xerox included co-correspondent, or garyh; resist alphabetical perversity, help youngsters!

By: tr33hggr

tr33hggr — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:20:58 -0800

Your old units numb. Go south, take early rum shots!

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:23:26 -0800

some hgger over there, sipping.

By: garyh

garyh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:25:01 -0800

Say I, please post innuendo, not gabble

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:27:33 -0800

Get a blog! Be less egotistical.

By: wobh

wobh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:32:52 -0800

Ere go other tittlilating insights. Then in come alluring losers.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:35:44 -0800

laughing outloud since entry replied Spake.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:38:18 -0800

wish I could have said "laughing outloud since james spake"

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:38:46 -0800

"Spake" ponderous archaic. Keep edgy!

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:38:50 -0800

silly postings always kill ennui

By: wobh

wobh — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:41:04 -0800

with the benefit of hindsight: s/insights/ingenues/; s/losers/latecomers/

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:43:18 -0800

Enough now! No Unix incantations.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:45:19 -0800

Indeed; none can assay no temptation aggravating that instinct on new suggestions.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:48:06 -0800

Error! Doggerel goes yawwy.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:49:57 -0800

Seriously, uber geeks, give every sequential text, insightful omission... now scram!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:51:47 -0800

Yes! A writer who yields!

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:53:39 -0800

Stone clearly requires a methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:57:22 -0800

...waiting to see who wins this tongue of war

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:58:18 -0800

The word is "yields", from Spake|edgy|yawwy... but nice try...

By: furiousthought

furiousthought — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:00:43 -0800

You're insane. Everyone. Look! DSM-IV says.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:02:30 -0800

MetaFilter easily trumps his yellow long epithet. Nearly every day I overuse 'x', yet not 'm'—even twice hourly. You'd like all my purple hearts, even though a morphine injector needs ecstasy.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:02:33 -0800

Sure. Are you surprised?

By: jazzkat11

jazzkat11 — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:04:09 -0800

"Murder, Ethel. The henchman you let enter named everyone." "Dog! I only xeroxed ying-ying, now.." "Murder, Ethel. Taken haughtingly, you laugh and mock. Please. However Ethel, treachery and murder, its nonsense? Ethel..."

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:07:02 -0800

So, unfortunate Rory played retrospectively, I'm sorry 'e' denied.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:09:22 -0800

Don't encourage noncompliance! I eschew disobedience.

By: Nothing

Nothing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:11:28 -0800

Discussion is saved only by ending dumb incoherent efforts. Notice clear entry.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:12:13 -0800

Dudes, it's so objectionable, but easily done. If everyone non-complied: expulsion!

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:13:41 -0800

Dammit, preview on a near-400 thread is a killer!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:15:09 -0800

Even newbies try responding. Yes.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:15:16 -0800

Dude, I'm sorry. One bloody error! Damn, I'm experiencing non-complance everywhere! (the word is entry)

By: Nothing

Nothing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:19:28 -0800

Your efforts: sustained.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:21:26 -0800

Susceptible unto subthreads tis, and - I note - entertaining diversity.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:24:24 -0800

devilishly invidious versions excite real scorn; it's the yardstick.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:26:57 -0800

You're all really demanding. So tara! I'm cooking Kedgeree.

By: spandex

spandex — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:28:35 -0800

(yuck, acting really damn slowly -- this ISP sucks kangaroos.)

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:29:50 -0800

Knowing elusive diversions gets excessive. Really earns expulsion.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:30:06 -0800

(Kids, 'e's digesting gluggy edible rice - easily eaten.)

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:40:59 -0800

Even exylophone playing underwater lacks something. I'm off now!

By: rory

rory — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:42:29 -0800

Now, or whenever?

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:45:56 -0800

What his entry noted elicited voice earnestly, righteously.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:49:56 -0800

fuck. i've had rejoinders for like, the past 10, yet i miss my time slot by about 1 minute on preview.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:52:46 -0800

Rejoinders indeed-- gotta hurry to enter one, unless something licks you! _{Replied to my own, yes, but I plead context.}

By: Nothing

Nothing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:54:50 -0800

Righteousness is great, however this end, or "unsubscription," seems less yeomanly.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:59:34 -0800

Yeah? Everyone offers me advice-- not like yourself.

By: Nothing

Nothing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:00:22 -0800

You oughtn't upstage.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:01:35 -0800

You only useful reply sours everyone's lovely fun.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:09:00 -0800

Feh. Uninteresting nerds.

By: grum@work

grum@work — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:19:25 -0800

Now everyone reuses dictionary selections.

By: Nothing

Nothing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:24:39 -0800

Slanderer! Excepting limited events, choosing the indefectible's only natural speech.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:29:43 -0800

So presumably everyone enunciates clear hokum?

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:33:38 -0800

hoary opinion, kept unduly modest.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:38:33 -0800

Many oppose dumb exclamations, says themselves.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:39:10 -0800

Magnanimous of dependably excellent speller trharlan.

By: fuzz

fuzz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:13:42 -0800

Thread really hasn't any reason/logic, arrives nowhere

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:21:19 -0800

Nowhere? Or we have earnestly reigned exigency?

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:27:50 -0800

Tut! - Righteously heaped anarchic rejoinders liberate avalanching nonsense (excepting xenophobic inserts generating exceptionaly nasty, curt yips).

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:32:09 -0800

Enter "x" in Guattari's elder nephew's college yearbook.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:32:50 -0800

Yikes, imagine poor sesquipedalophobiacs!

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:42:44 -0800

Some erratic Seinfeld quote underlined instinctively potent expressions-- damn, all lost over petty haggling. Oh, be intelligent, all curators stuck!

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:46:44 -0800

(Drat! "Reined", not "reigned"! Dependably excellent speller, my arse. Drat!)

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:51:20 -0800

So, this ugliness continues, kids?

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:51:46 -0800

Superb! That used cunning knowledge.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:53:55 -0800

Kids? Is Davis superior?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:56:34 -0800

Sure. Underlings protest equivocally - restlessness is obviously right.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:59:59 -0800

Righteousness inherent gives him tipsiness.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:04:00 -0800

Today, I'll possibly succeed in nothing except stupid sentences.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:06:52 -0800

Superior editing needs to end nerds, creating essential speed.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:09:12 -0800

Shit. Previewed, expecting entertaining dialogue.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:14:38 -0800

Davis, if a link offends go unwind elsewhere.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:17:47 -0800

...else little symbolic effect will haunt everybody replying entirely.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:20:55 -0800

^{Damn you!: Everyone loves such elegant wordplay here-- egos run elsewhere!} Every notion that intellectuals reason entirely logically yodels.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:22:45 -0800

Yet others defend essentially limp sarcasms.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:25:23 -0800

Sometimes attitudes reverse, causing a serious MetaFilter situation.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:30:36 -0800

Sometimes I take umbrage at thematically iniquitous old nonsense.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:34:51 -0800

Not only nonsense— sometimes everyone nullifies statements extraordinary.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:58:12 -0800

Emperor Xerxes tried razing Athens once. Roughly defended, it's now a ruined yesteryear.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:00:50 -0800

Especially, x's test readers attempting otherwise reasonable discourse in nascent aureate recorded yammering.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:01:08 -0800

Yeah, everyone says that. Everywhere, ridiculous yarns eat away reality.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:04:29 -0800

Ridiculing effrontery? Anterior lunacy is truly yours.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:07:18 -0800

Your only use remains secret.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:19:35 -0800

Secluded egomaniacs can't ramrod extraordinary threads.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:34:05 -0800

This has ruinous effects, as do secrets.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:49:53 -0800

sometimes, even croutons really enhance the salad.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:52:07 -0800

Sadly, all lettuces are droopy.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:53:58 -0800

Delightful radishes only open possibilities yonder.

By: amery

amery — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:54:29 -0800

delicious ratatouille or oranges pervaded yesteryear.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:55:05 -0800

yowsers! only nincompoops deny eating right.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:58:05 -0800

Raddichio is good, healthy, tasty.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:01:40 -0800

Try a slightly toasted yam.

By: fletchmuy

fletchmuy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:02:09 -0800

to all "stoppers": thank you.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:03:47 -0800

Yes, always munchable.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:09:48 -0800

Make us nice cheese ham and bread - lovely eatables.

By: Songdog

Songdog — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:20:34 -0800

Each aspirer's try at blogstopping leaves exponents stupefied.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:23:06 -0800

Eggs added to a breakfast look extra scrumptious.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:26:03 -0800

Songdog, the usual pranks ended. Forward: interesting eatables discussion.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:32:02 -0800

dissuading individuals simply can't undermine serious sophistry, including our newest.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:33:42 -0800

Noble engaging words. Eat something today?

By: amery

amery — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:41:24 -0800

Tureens of delicious, aged Y'Quem.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:42:05 -0800

Two over done arugula, yes.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:46:12 -0800

Yammer enthusiastically, Songdog.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:50:12 -0800

Your quail's underdone, even moldy!

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:56:30 -0800

Moldy?! Oh lecherous, deformed yaweh!

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:57:07 -0800

Moldy oldy ldy dy y! Just kidding. My! Our lad does yell!

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:57:24 -0800

You're aware we're English here?

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:58:39 -0800

You are way eager, 'homes.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:00:08 -0800

'homes...eh...really eloquent...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:03:15 -0800

English lasses offered quaint, unique enjoyments, newly tasted.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:06:24 -0800

Taut and strong, the enchanting damsels.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:10:52 -0800

Damn. A mighty stimulation end longing suddenly.

By: arto

arto — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:19:05 -0800

Late-but-sorta-haiku: Delightful angelic Mistresses seem enticing Leaving Saskatoon Since Ursula dropped drawers, Ernest needed lotsa yohimbe.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:19:55 -0800

Such unneeded desires do exist— no loud yelling!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:22:38 -0800

Yeah, or his impotence meter be erroneous.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:32 -0800

Entertaining ribald entries often need exacting obvious unstable suggestibility.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:28:28 -0800

{dang! Can't spell...} Entertaining ribald response entries often need exacting obvious unstable suggestibility.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:33:14 -0800

So, unstability gets grins? Egads, seems there I've been idiotic. Looked into, yesterday.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:39:10 -0800

Yes, even star typists embarrass relatives. Dunderheads appear yonder.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:43:26 -0800

Yet onerous nincompoops downsize English remainders.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:53:16 -0800

*robs ed, makes an incredible naked dash, exits right stage*

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:53:51 -0800

Really, even morons are innocuous now; dilettantes engender real scorn!

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:58:03 -0800

*Suddenly trembles and gazes elsewhere*

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:06:34 -0800

Everyone, let's stop enshrining willies here, else randiness ensue!

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:19:45 -0800

Even newbees should use exactitude

By: zpousman

zpousman — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:29:28 -0800

Exactly x-ray ace, crybaby, toothless infants try uttering deft elocutions. [dammit, I thought elocutions was spelled with a "q" to keep up the hard streak.]

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:35:16 -0800

Eluctating logic only causes unctuous types introducing onanism. Now stop.

By: caddis

caddis — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:38:18 -0800

Stiff touch overly pleasurable.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:41:47 -0800

Please let's end amourous, stirring undertones and become less erect.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:45:52 -0800

Examining rows effects coupled testicles!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:48:07 -0800

Erections rarely elicit comment, truly.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:57:35 -0800

Too risque. Uncouth, licentious youngsters!

By: transient

transient — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:14:53 -0800

Your organs upset numerous grandfather's sensibilities; their erections require surgery!

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:25:11 -0800

Some, unfortunately, require groin extraction - randy yobs!

By: CountZero

CountZero — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:30:36 -0800

Yet, orderlies bruise schlongs.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:31:30 -0800

You're obliterating boys' serenity.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:34:40 -0800

Such churlish handling leaves one's nob godawfully sore.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:35:43 -0800

Such entertainment rarely exists near internet these years.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:37:14 -0800

So, open redundency exists.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:48:30 -0800

Every Xmas, I scribble to Santa.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:53:00 -0800

Satan anagram nearly tricks all.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:58:23 -0800

A latent Lucifer?

By: brownpau

brownpau — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:05:38 -0800

Looks uncommonly creative, I fear evil results.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:11:42 -0800

Redundancy exists somewhere under 'Lifter's tacky subsystem

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:11:59 -0800

Rejoice, everyone! Says undertext: Legendary thread status.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:17:25 -0800

Status thread ain't terribly useful, seemingly.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:23:58 -0800

Should exceptions exist, may ignite notoriously ghastly lustful yearnings.

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:24:30 -0800

So even elephants might indicate no gulibility living youthfully?

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:26:16 -0800

'Subsystem' - up before 'status', you sidetracked thread, endlessly meandering!

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:30:27 -0800

My error! Apologies notwithstanding, departing ere rory insists! Now going!

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:02 -0800

Go on! I'll never grovel.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:49:16 -0800

Grinning recidivist opens vault, elucidating language.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:53:50 -0800

Yet everyone's angst, resplendent, nullifies innocence (now groped, supine).

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:56:32 -0800

Less angush, no gain. Upset aphorisms growing everywhere.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:12:18 -0800

Everywhere? - vaingloriously exultative rhyming youth wordsmiths hirsutely. "Enough!" - Rimbaud eructs.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:26:14 -0800

Even Rimbaud upholders can talk sense.

By: moonbird

moonbird — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:15:32 -0800

Similar enthusiasm now sneaks everywhere.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:54:25 -0800

Each variation ends really yucky. Why has everyone relegated ending?

By: Frank Grimes

Frank Grimes — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:58:47 -0800

End now, dammit, it's now golden.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:08:04 -0800

Go on, live! Death earns nothing.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:01:09 -0800

nor other things have i noticed gaminely.

By: WolfDaddy

WolfDaddy — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:32:29 -0800

Gay aging male is now enduring lost youthfulness.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:11:04 -0800

you ought understand the hard fact...ultimately loss necessitates extremely sudden situations.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:53:14 -0800

Suddenly it trickles! Underneath a thread, inside out, near splendor!

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:15:17 -0800

Still posting lovely endwords? No doubt of repetition.

By: taz

taz — Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:39:50 -0800

Really early, post-day (extraordinarily) three: I toddle in, obssessed. Numbskull.

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:07:53 -0800

Never underestimate Metafilter's basic standards killer utility link, Lamebrain.

By: arto

arto — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 01:07:59 -0800

Later, at midnight Entertaining by ranting And it's negative Language and meaning Enchanting beauty returns As if nirvana ok, it's cheating. dammit! I can't choose! we'll never reach 600!

By: nath

nath — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 01:43:03 -0800

Gotta go with one of 'em... how to choose... let's try this: Now I'm really vexed, arto. No alternates!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 02:19:20 -0800

Are late text entries really notced at this exaggerated silliness?

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 02:57:14 -0800

Should I link 'Lifter's incidental network efforts subverting six-hundred? Yes, it's kinda pathetic, but do you have a better way to avoid waiting half the night for the thread to re-load?

By: arto

arto — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 04:16:50 -0800

Secluded in X a n a d u Held under nightfall Dreamlike, reaching Ere daybreak

By: jamespake

jamespake — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 04:53:44 -0800

Drowsy apple year, Becoming reality, Emerge, all knowing. (It's come to Haiku)

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 04:56:44 -0800

Kuru now onset, We instigate nonsense, gleefully.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:03:17 -0800

Giants lack enthusiasm, Eagles fairly unsettled, Lions lose youngster.

By: dash_slot-

dash_slot- — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:13:09 -0800

You often underesimate neologisms, guys! Singing terrific english rhymes...

By: garyh

garyh — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:20:57 -0800

rubbish haikus, yet mysteriously eclectic sentences.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:35:52 -0800

summer elides now the entries number countless endure subsumption

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:56:26 -0800

So, understanding blooms; Sending undulating Metafilterian prose toward infinity, Outages notwithstanding.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 05:59:07 -0800

[Prose? Prose?.... Poetry, obviously.]

By: garyh

garyh — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:06:56 -0800

Never obscure, the words I type have superficial, transitory allure. Need decision in neural game.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:20:49 -0800

Going and making escape.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:30:46 -0800

Escape? Seriously - chained are people, 'ere.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:40:52 -0800

encapsulations reconstitutionalize elaborations

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:43:49 -0800

okay, you have to give me a small break on this one: 5-7-5 in only 3 letters? c'mon! And now you want pith, too? - by the way, just consider "reconstitutionalize" a metaphor for spring, and we have a seasonal reference too!)

By: transient

transient — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:57:08 -0800

ever late as big orange, red august, taking over new seasons

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:58:43 -0800

Excuses! Leave (at best) or recieve aptly terse invective over namby-pamby strategies!

By: transient

transient — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 06:59:32 -0800

oops, missed an i ever late as big orange, red august, thread is over, new season

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:03:25 -0800

So enraging! Another sentence obscures new screed. - Aha! So your entry is invalid! Take that, transient!

By: transient

transient — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:14:30 -0800

slacking -- carefully reading, editing; entry's debilitated

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:17:18 -0800

Sons take revenge, amongst the godless. I eschew sermons.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:18:07 -0800

oops, missed an I

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:24:20 -0800

Demurred elloquently; by instigating long investigations, transient, a timely entry's dismissed! [Biffa, dude, you're seriously late!]

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:26:47 -0800

[Oh, I'm in error... Biffa's entry was correct... (((embarrassment)))]

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:51:56 -0800

demure indigo slaves masturbate in sweet sperm... ...huh? what? and... where do we go from here

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:09:11 -0800

Some posts emphasize raunchy memories.

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:32:09 -0800

My endearing memories of raunchy insertions excite self.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:40:23 -0800

self excitement leavens 'filter.

By: transient

transient — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:46:35 -0800

Further iterations leave taz excited, really!

By: brownpau

brownpau — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:16:01 -0800

Risky expectations and lavish lewdness. Yuck.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:16:52 -0800

Remarkably, entries aphrodesiacal! Love! Love! .... Yesss!

By: Bonzai

Bonzai — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:26:59 -0800

Yaks enjoy surf sun sourkraut

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:36:34 -0800

You undervalue cock kisses.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:44:40 -0800

knockwurst images seduce Stone, elicit surrender.

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:44:50 -0800

Keep is simple silly. Eat sourkraut.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:04:50 -0800

Stone usually regards raising raging erections necessary, despite every rejoinder.

By: taz

taz — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:14:36 -0800

reconsider extreme judgment: only in nunneries do erections repel.

By: waxpancake

waxpancake — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:44:56 -0800

Really entertaining posts. Exceedingly loquacious.

By: fidelity

fidelity — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:50:20 -0800

Some utterances, really risque, egregiously now disrupt elevated repartee.

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:51:21 -0800

Lame! On quick updraft, am crestfallen: initial (original) underwriting superseded. (Or, in English: Rgh! Beaten to the Really? Even Priests Emulate Logs answer by waxpancake.)

By: beagle

beagle — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:13:14 -0800

At 556 comments, this thread now exceeds BlogStop's 553. (Membership over there is closed at 19.)

By: magnetbox

magnetbox — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:27:24 -0800

Some users pontificate every reply, some exercise deviant ending denotations.

By: eastlakestandard

eastlakestandard — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:47:17 -0800

Despite each naysayer, our teachers all traffic in obnoxious non sequiturs.

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:52:08 -0800

Seriously, every quonsar user input takes us reeling sideways.

By: Bootcut

Bootcut — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:53:37 -0800

Simple enjambment -- qualities used in two unlikely rows-- splendid!

By: Seth

Seth — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:10:12 -0800

Such preening leads everyone nilly-willy; dare i digress?

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:16:52 -0800

Didn't I give redundant entries some seriousness?

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:23:49 -0800

Serious entries rarely intrude our unbelievably silly new entertainment. Such savoriness.

By: me3dia

me3dia — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:46:17 -0800

Such a voracious operation requires intense niggling every seven syllables.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:50:36 -0800

Sounds yucky. Let lovely alphabet beauty live every second.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:30:33 -0800

slamming each comment, offering no definitiveness.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:30:38 -0800

Sigh. Every comment originates needless disdain.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:39:24 -0800

Disappointed in sarcasm? Demand affectionate interpersonal napping.

By: terrapin

terrapin — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:39:35 -0800

Desist! It shall die as individuals nullify!

By: terrapin

terrapin — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:41:51 -0800

Not applying post possibly is nullifying gratification

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:42:42 -0800

Not a proper post! It's not good.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:45:30 -0800

Great... ranging all topics in fickle interchanges. Can't all those interested operate nicely?

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:50:57 -0800

Ninth innings collapse Extraordinarily Lambasted Yankees

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:53:44 -0800

inning, not innings. D'oh!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:00:58 -0800

You answer nicely. Karma exponentially Expands. Stupendous!

By: richard m

richard m — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:42:32 -0800

Stop this. Users! please end now. Do observe ultimate silence.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:46:26 -0800

Slow tease unleashes priapic endowment: now drive on? un-sated?

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:53:32 -0800

So I leave, empty: Nullification's ceaseless empiricism.

By: me3dia

me3dia — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:53:55 -0800

Wow, y'all're doing it in haiku form now, too? Damn. Um, now satisfied, a triumphant emperor declines.

By: richard m

richard m — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:11:19 -0800

Desist! Everyone clear? Lawyers insist no extra sentences.

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:12:37 -0800

Dying ruler gasps out, "life illuminates nothing!....... .....excepting sublime."

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:25:15 -0800

Sensibly expressed notion, terminate!, except - nobody can expect sensibility.....

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:50:57 -0800

Some exist not so independently, but in life it's to yourself... life is easy, haiku is hard

By: Quinn

Quinn — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:04:29 -0800

Yet our undulating replies seem even less funny...

By: christophernaze

christophernaze — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:33:35 -0800

Friends unintentionally needle you. Yes?

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:39:47 -0800

Yikes! Electric Shock!

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:52:03 -0800

Somebody help out caddis, knuckleheads!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:55:57 -0800

Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry every haunting ecstatically apathetic despondent shudder.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:00:14 -0800

Oops. Knowing nothing, unfortunate caddis kneels, letting ether hurry ecstatic apathetic despondent shudder.

By: jragon

jragon — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:16:52 -0800

Should he understand dreadfully elaborate reading?

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:22:06 -0800

Really, electricity and drinking infer needless gloom.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:26:10 -0800

Good! Let's offend other Metafilterites.

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:49:17 -0800

Many entries tried, alas. Fortunately, inane language trickles entertainingly 'round in thread. Exceedingly satisfying.

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:02:53 -0800

Such a testiment I say, for your ingenuity needs gratification.

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:24:35 -0800

Geeky release at the intellectual filter. Its crushes "alt.english.usage's" testy intellectual onanistic nirvana.

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:37:07 -0800

Now I respond viciously at neoconservative asshats. sorry. some habits are hard to break

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:42:17 -0800

Ah sir, six hundred answers thence silence?

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:12:04 -0800

Should I license endearingly naive caddis' error?

By: ed

ed — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:41:45 -0800

Erroneous reads Rheumatic ostentation Raskolnikovesque

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:58:06 -0800

Run after silly kids. Open long neglected intellects. Know others' very essence. Secret: quietly unruffle ego.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 20:01:44 -0800

everything got old.

By: yhbc

yhbc — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 20:04:26 -0800

Obviously. Less demanding.

By: caddis

caddis — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 20:19:13 -0800

Deep entries might arise now. Dreamland I now greet.

By: yhbc

yhbc — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 20:40:58 -0800

Go, relax; everyone else - talk.

By: thatweirdguy2

thatweirdguy2 — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:09:08 -0800

Talk about linguistics... kudos!

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 01 Aug 2003 22:19:46 -0800

Kindly use Disney oeuvre: Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! I feel like I just killed Kenny...

By: taz

taz — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:46:01 -0800

So, um... perhaps everyone recalls comment #528532??. At last it's finally repeated. A good idea: let's invoke "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" to instigate closure. Envision "X" people incorporating all letters in determined observations, cancelling interminable output. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!

By: taz

taz — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:54:19 -0800

p.s., wendell: doesn't Kenny always come back?

By: betheon

betheon — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 01:55:12 -0800

Several upsized paintballs enter rear -- call ambulance!
Like, in February, really agnostic goobers in little insect-sized teapots ingested craniums!
Enormous x-rays pretentiously ingest aluminum liberally into Dallas, or could it open up SARS?

p.s.: this was a nightmare.

By: sailoreagle

sailoreagle — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 03:26:50 -0800

So, again repeat "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious". I'm asking to be smacked, aren't I?

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 04:36:42 -0800

Slapped unendingly, pesky 'eagle: remember clearly a lesson in fear; renounce all gargantuan indefensible linguistics; instead, supply terms in contraction (eschewing "x" please;) in addition, learn instructions, desperately observing conditions, outlawing using "supercalifragilisticexpialodocious."

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 05:06:59 -0800

Stupid users! People, even repeating cheap arduous linguistic iterations for ridiculous amusement (God I love it!) sacrifices their initial creativity. Extra x's probably (I assume) lay on difficulties others cannot integrate or use seriosly.

By: arto

arto — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 05:20:52 -0800

"Supercalifragillisticexpialidocious" enjoys renaissance? I'm offended. [understandably.] Suggest learning Yiddish.

By: jamespake

jamespake — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 05:49:57 -0800

You're in desperate danger if suffering Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.

By: ed

ed — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 06:07:21 -0800

Hie inward! Prepare portents or philters, ontological taboos, or muster oddball nerves. Shit! This really obviates sustained eccleisiastics. Sequined quipping underscored in preparing post. End? Damn. And logorrhea involved! Or perhaps habitues offer bartering instead? Alas!

By: sailoreagle

sailoreagle — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 06:38:56 -0800

Amazingly, long acronym's solved.

By: richard m

richard m — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 06:53:41 -0800

Sadly obtuse linguistics vanquished enduring denizens.

By: taz

taz — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 07:06:18 -0800

doesn't everybody need iterated zaniness, even nothwithstanding "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 08:26:32 -0800

Stop using putrid ersatz run-on calumny. A long irritating filmic response antagonizes general intelligence. Let's insert something truly interesting; certainly eluding "x-ray" (particularly insensitive...) and leaning instead democratic. Other crummy instances offer unusable sentences.

By: ginz

ginz — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 08:39:37 -0800

bis

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 09:21:03 -0800

Still endurance needs to end not continue else sunk

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 09:38:15 -0800

So unless negated; karmic.

By: ginz

ginz — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:23:10 -0800

Karma and reincarnation move in circles.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:43:05 -0800

Circles indicate roundness, chum. Let's embrace squares.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:53:27 -0800

So, quonsar, unheard, apparently responseless, embodies sanity?

By: MUD

MUD — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:20:47 -0800

Slightly. Although no-one's insane this year.

By: richard m

richard m — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:27:51 -0800

Yikes! Ever an resolution?

By: betheon

betheon — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:40:34 -0800

Richard: entertainingly, some other lads usurp their inate orwellian nature.

By: betheon

betheon — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:50:20 -0800

Northern Arkansas: the unfortunate rejects? Entertaining.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:55:54 -0800

Endless nattering treats each reply tersely. An insightful notion in normal gatherings.

By: ninthart

ninthart — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 16:41:45 -0800

Genial adults talk here. Entertaining resourceful intercourse normally gets squashed.

By: caddis

caddis — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 18:00:02 -0800

Six-hundered quickly used answers simply have ended discourse.

By: caddis

caddis — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 18:01:17 -0800

Oh... to have used the spell checker, alas.

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 18:27:56 -0800

Did I supercalifragilate? Cadenhead, outrageous unneccessary repetition sadly excuseless. rcade, I'm so sorry... taz, it didn't work

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 18:35:56 -0800

Entering "X" causes unnecessary stress, egghead! Less excessiveness supplies surprises.

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 19:41:11 -0800

So undue redundancy poorly represents itself? Seems extremely ~~supercalifragilisticexpialidocious~~ supercilious.

By: thatweirdguy2

thatweirdguy2 — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 20:46:34 -0800

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, understandably, pleases everyone's rather cocky inner linguist. I offer uncumbersome syllabary.

By: betheon

betheon — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 21:23:25 -0800

"Surrender, you loony lamentists and backstabbing artisans," rallied Yahoo!

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 21:26:24 -0800

Yet another hierarchically organized oracle.

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 02 Aug 2003 21:41:40 -0800

Oh, really, a copied lame example. (which, I believe, is the original acronym used by Oracle Corp.)

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 01:08:35 -0800

Entertaining xylophones are musically pretentious, like e-sitars.

By: arto

arto — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 04:01:44 -0800

Evil signage is taken away. Reasonable? Superstitious?

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 07:30:36 -0800

Sexy uber-babes pound erotic rodeo saddles, terrifically inciting the illicit oglers (understandably squirting.)

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 07:55:36 -0800

So quit using irrational replies. That's irritating, not goodly.

By: feelinglistless

feelinglistless — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 09:58:57 -0800

Good Orpheus, over dyke lead you

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 10:45:26 -0800

Yep, outta usages...

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0800

Until society accepts God, everyone's sinning.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:08:08 -0800

So insincere nincompoops negligent? I'm not godly...

By: ed

ed — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:25:36 -0800

Goodness. Overt diatonics lower yields.

By: eddydamascene

eddydamascene — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:43:52 -0800

You're incorrect, ed -- learn Dianetics (Scientology).

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 13:49:07 -0800

Some crank invented entire new theology offering losers other God-like yuckiness. that's an apronym

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 15:43:11 -0800

Yet, unlike Christianity, KRC is necessary -- even stable souls.

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 15:44:13 -0800

ahem: KRC stands for "knowledge-responsibility-control.

By: transient

transient — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 16:37:04 -0800

Supreme over universe lives... someone?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 17:11:21 -0800

Superstitious oligarchs may endanger our nihilistic exclamations.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 17:17:31 -0800

Existentialists 'xclaim causality, lacking active manifestations and theist inventions. Otherwise negates science...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 17:36:08 -0800

Can we stop this at 666, just to freak the fundies out?

By: thatweirdguy2

thatweirdguy2 — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:30:34 -0800

Sullen curmudgeons, investigating every nuance, create enlightenment?

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:32:37 -0800

Sorry. Couldn't I engage notorious criminals? Egads.

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:42:24 -0800

Exactly. Never let investigation get handed to evildoers. No monitors erase naysaying, though.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:54:30 -0800

Thou hearest obligatory, unseemly gnashing, hourly...

By: transient

transient — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:12:06 -0800

Hoary orations undermine regular luddite yogis.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:17:26 -0800

Yet our greatest impudences survive...

By: Jimbob

Jimbob — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:31:39 -0800

Shocking, unless real vitality integrates via endlessness.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:52:59 -0800

Every new decision leads ever so slowly nearer escaping stupid security.

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 20:55:39 -0800

Shite. Edible chocolate, unfortunately, regresses inner toxins. Yuck.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:51:44 -0800

You understand cosmological knowledge?

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:56:19 -0800

Sheesh... What a bore... How about... Yahoo! Unleash Commie Kamikazes!!!

By: NGnerd

NGnerd — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:56:39 -0800

YIPES! unbelievable, chaotic Know-it-alls

By: eriko

eriko — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:06:25 -0800

(hmm) Kept needing one will-intense test-any less, losing status.

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:32:54 -0800

wendell: Korn amazes many inside Kansas; are zany, eccentric sombodies!

By: betheon

betheon — Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:33:41 -0800

eriko: Surprising: the Agroclean® timber udder suite.

By: taz

taz — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:39:20 -0800

sanitary udder is terribly exciting!

By: arto

arto — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 01:44:58 -0800

Erotic X-rated cinema is the internet's next generation. no link, I trust you can find your own

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 04:24:02 -0800

Generally, electronic nudes elicit rigidly appropriate tumescence, I often note.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 04:33:50 -0800

Nasty onaism tempts ejaculations.

By: talos

talos — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:32:28 -0800

enough jokes already! can't undo lunatic addiction to insanity, ok? now stop!

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:34:51 -0800

So terminate, other people.

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:55:48 -0800

Prurient entries often, perhaps, lack excitement.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:08:44 -0800

Every x-rated comment, in this entity (me) elicits noticable titilation.

By: biffa

biffa — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:17:04 -0800

Trouble is, thread is lapping at time I once needed.

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:21:26 -0800

Now enter extra new entry detoxification.

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:23:30 -0800

(oops that was supposed to be:) Now enter extra devilish entry detoxification. (proof reading needed by me.)

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:46:07 -0800

Don't erode this (omitting "x") infantile, fawnishly illicit conversation: are thee impotent, oh naysayer?

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:04:02 -0800

Never asked you... should anyone you eat react?

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:08:54 -0800

Rally Everyone! Another catchy tintinnabulation!

By: ed

ed — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:10:51 -0800

Really, eating? Awkward cater-cornered transition.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:17:33 -0800

typically random adage....no smooth incantation to introduce other newsworthiness.

By: eddydamascene

eddydamascene — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:40:45 -0800

Now, every word's smooth when other readers take heed! Incant effortlessly; syllabic somnambulism.

By: eddydamascene

eddydamascene — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:42:18 -0800

(incant now, effortlessly)

By: transient

transient — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:59:13 -0800

Spelling on metafilter never adds much, but under-lying inherent symbolism matters.

By: talos

talos — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:12:26 -0800

metafilter achievement: this thread effortlessly rates superb!

By: taumeson

taumeson — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:17:52 -0800

surely unpossible...perhaps even rates blogstop?

By: ginz

ginz — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:20:06 -0800

Silly useless people eating ripe bananas.

By: darsh

darsh — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:21:32 -0800

but all newbies are now adding sense

By: taumeson

taumeson — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:28:29 -0800

the word is "blogstop", not "sense".

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:35:00 -0800

Stop entering non-sensical elucidations.

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:47:43 -0800

Entering lively umbrages civilly drives a thread into occultist numerology: six-hundred-sixty-six.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:17:12 -0800

Sinful insertion: x

By: me3dia

me3dia — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:21:53 -0800

*points at MrMoonPie* Xenophobe.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:52:37 -0800

xanthic enemas notwithstanding, only pooh's honey obviates belly epidemics

By: ed

ed — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:12:09 -0800

Extraordinary pandering isn't delectable. Ebullient mimickry is continuously suggestive.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:17:16 -0800

Shit! Ungainly ghoulish grammar edifies some transgendered inhuman vampirish elusives.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:30:44 -0800

eh? language usage suffering. (i vent enough steam.)

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:42:40 -0800

Sheesh! Take eleven aspirins, myopicman.

By: gravelshoes

gravelshoes — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:55:01 -0800

madness! you over-post!! I can't manage another nonsequitur

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:02:04 -0800

Nonsense, only nobodies say endless quonsar-like ubiquitous invectives, transpiring under responses.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:07:45 -0800

Really? Everybody says posting only nattering signifies endless serendipity.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:21:59 -0800

Such "everybody" references elicit nominal doubt. I prefer implied traducement. Yinyang.

By: DragonBoy

DragonBoy — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:28:28 -0800

You insinuate nothing; your argument needs gimmicks.

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:41:01 -0800

Glibness in matters most inane creates kudos supreme.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:42:04 -0800

Gimmicks? Instead, may MrMoonPie interject comic kungfu? Sweet!

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:57:05 -0800

So well elocuted. Excellent taste.

By: CunningLinguist

CunningLinguist — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:07:45 -0800

This assholery still tortures everyone?

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:13:34 -0800

Empty, vacuous entries regress, yawn; onto new extemporaneousness.

By: ed

ed — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:54:12 -0800

Enter X-ray. Thread endures? Metatalk. Pore on, readers. Artistry nibbles. Enough? Old? Ugly? Something new? Endearing? Sexy? Serendipitious?

By: CountZero

CountZero — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:50:06 -0800

So eventually, renegade eavesdroppers nullify declarative injustices, possibly impairing the idiosyncratic observations unintentionally. Sacrilege!

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:11:22 -0800

Silly acronym creation results in low indulgence, grave entries.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:32:02 -0800

Umm, Sacrilege ;)

By: caddis

caddis — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:41:21 -0800

Silly acronym creation results in lamentable earnestness, grave entries.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:47:49 -0800

entire nest tries. rest? insert? [enter siren.]

By: CountZero

CountZero — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:55:35 -0800

Sounds interesting. Regroup, eccentric narcissists!

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:54:37 -0800

Not another regrouping call. I say such invocations sap the strength.

By: the fire you left me

the fire you left me — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:04:57 -0800

Suddenly then, remembering Elizabeth's new grave - tepid, and hewn.

By: sgt.serenity

sgt.serenity — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:13:17 -0800

how easily wanderers notice.

By: cohappy

cohappy — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:25:59 -0800

Nearly oval trolls insidiously celebrating ennui.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 19:41:29 -0800

Elephantitis Naked nads undulating Inconceivable!

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:05:15 -0800

Inconsiderate newbies, consistently offtopic, not caring! Excite interested viewers— attempt binding logical and entertaining.

By: squirrel

squirrel — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:13:43 -0800

Evans needs time. Tell everyone returning that another interesting nugget is nearly garnered.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:14:03 -0800

Entries not terse enough? Rhapsodic thread additions invite nice interpersonal nattering. Geeze. . .

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:19:57 -0800

Gah! <-- Alarmed reaction. Numerous epistles registered. Entry deleted.

By: scody

scody — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:39:22 -0800

Late addition to energize troops? Oh, to have entered parsing activities rather thoughtfully, yesterday!

By: scody

scody — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:42:08 -0800

I know, I know, it only follows the acronym bit, not the "last word of the previous entry" rule rule... just wanted to express my irritation at somehow missing this for all these days! argh. carry on.

By: humuhumu

humuhumu — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:05:36 -0800

Yachting events stand tall, eventually running down all yankees.

By: cohappy

cohappy — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:12:34 -0800

Yon! Eleven slow trains embarking righteously! Droll anticipation yellowing. Yakutskian ankle-baiters need knowledge, especially envious simpletons.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 04:11:33 -0800

Seven impious maidens, ponder lengthy elephant tusks; observe: nymphomaniac speculation!

By: garyh

garyh — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 05:09:58 -0800

Stone's prose: extemporaneus, clever. Uses lesbianism and titillation incorporating overt nymphomania!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 05:19:49 -0800

Nubile, yearningly maleable, pheremonal hussies, open moist apetures, now inviting auditions!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 05:25:51 -0800

Audacious! Unless distracted, I think I oughta need stopping.

By: arto

arto — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 05:53:34 -0800

Stymied? The only possibility--post innuendos, incite nonstop gossip.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 06:13:52 -0800

Gratuitous observation: sexual statements inflate passion.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 06:41:55 -0800

Post away, soldiers! Stunning intellectuals! Onward, netizens!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:39:57 -0800

Now enlightened, The insightful Zennist, Experiences noble samadhi.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:01:11 -0800

Stone and MrMoon, Assaulting dying horses. Inspirational.

By: CountZero

CountZero — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:19:20 -0800

Intellectual neanderthals (some possibly Irish) revisit a tavern, inspiring obscure names as Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:45:17 -0800

Look... listen, all. Normally, free and intelligent readers provoke with lousy linguistics, grating wisdom -- your normal, gratuitous yelling. Lately, long galling or grating examples really yank chains. Hell, we (you) realize no damned ruse or brash words languidly, listlessly (laughingly!) lodged allow nice threads. Your stupid, ignorant, lazy ideas only give one gross or gangrenous oral cavity headaches.

By: Dipsomaniac

Dipsomaniac — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 10:05:51 -0800

Hell, eating all day actually could help ease sciatica.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 11:41:24 -0800

Some clueless interlopers always try inserting complaints. Appalling.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:47:39 -0800

amazing! pretty powerful anagram, llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch...likely i need grousing.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:50:30 -0800

anagram? what the hell am i smoking? i meant acronym.

By: myopicman

myopicman — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:07:18 -0800

getting really obvious, using stones in newborn gizzards.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:40:20 -0800

Geez! It's zany zoophilies antics, really damn scary...

By: myopicman

myopicman — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:50:29 -0800

sacred cattle are readily yours.

By: Quinn

Quinn — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 14:09:00 -0800

Yacht owners unavoidably reply superciliously.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 14:35:27 -0800

"Superciliously" uncomfortably proximate, uh... really close in linquistical inheritance of uber-painful "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" last year. It was that long ago, wasn't it?

By: none

none — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 15:30:03 -0800

Your expressions appear repeatedly

By: picopebbles

picopebbles — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:25:10 -0800

Repetition, eh? Perhaps explicating a thread endlessly does leave yawns...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:42:42 -0800

Yet another wanker nearly stalls.

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 19:30:36 -0800

Soon this all long liturgy stops.

By: Vetinari

Vetinari — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 23:50:35 -0800

Seriously, thread's ordinality painfully streches...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 05:33:28 -0800

So the replies exhibit certain hour-long empty stretches...

By: taumeson

taumeson — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 06:30:08 -0800

suchas this. really easy to contemplate hideously errant sentences.

By: caddis

caddis — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 06:48:34 -0800

Swift entries now & then exhibited nontrivial creativity, engaging semantics.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:07:58 -0800

Soaring eagles; Mountain aerobatics. Near to infinity; Ceaslessly swift.

By: Civil_Disobedient

Civil_Disobedient — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:48:19 -0800

Slowly we ignore festering threads...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:24:49 -0800

The horrible recent entries are deadly stupefying.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:42:05 -0800

Stilted, truculent, unedifying prose examples for your intense, narcissistic grumbling.

By: bonaldi

bonaldi — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:03:39 -0800

God. Rumblings under metatalk's banner led into nosing ... grim.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:09:10 -0800

Grousing reviewers infest Metafilter!

By: none

none — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:16:50 -0800

Metatalk expresses terrible anger, for it loathes titillation (even rarely).

By: squirrel

squirrel — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:19:06 -0800

Must everyone take all f*cking insults like they enjoy ridicule?!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 12:57:38 -0800

Random ideas, Decorating in cyan. Uncoil line's end?

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:10:53 -0800

Existence necessitates destruction.

By: none

none — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:28:40 -0800

Destruction evolves stronger types (radically updated creatures), tailored intensively, obviously nuanced.

By: lazaruslong

lazaruslong — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:29:09 -0800

Never underestimate a new creature, evolved deliberately.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 17:17:57 -0800

Darwin explained lively invertebrates. But even recent atrocities trick evangelists, losing Yaweh.

By: Yelling At Nothing

Yelling At Nothing — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:15:44 -0800

Yet another weary embroilment? Hell.

By: lazaruslong

lazaruslong — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:35:38 -0800

How easily loudmouths lampoon.

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:36:36 -0800

Let a million poppies open orifices naturally! homage to the Winer?

By: arto

arto — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 03:50:00 -0800

"Nats and ticks urge randiness?" asked Larry, licentiously. Yuck! two wordplay memes for the price of one, get 'em while they're hot. the memes, that is, not the guy with the insect fetish.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 04:18:41 -0800

You use certain knowledge. (and) Fuck everyone that isn't schlepping horse-manure.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 06:47:31 -0800

My answer? Nonsense! Unequivocal response: Exasperation!

By: transient

transient — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:57:25 -0800

Excepting "x," all spelling permeations, even rarities, allowed. That irritates other nincompoops.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:25:40 -0800

Not I, nincompoop! Comrade, only my phrasing occludes other popular sayings.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:29:34 -0800

NEWS - - - Incessant nonsense ceasing on Metafilter - - - Posting obsession over, poster says - - -

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:33:55 -0800

[I don't believe it, Burns.... nothing for ages and then you come along and steal my thunder while I'm waiting for preview.... grrrr...]

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:37:28 -0800

Great. Really, really, really, really.

By: Masi

Masi — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 03:12:00 -0800

So, are you infandous nitwits gonna stop ?!

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 04:19:12 -0800

"Swifties?!?" Tom overstated pedantically.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 04:23:50 -0800

Pooh! Enough dumb antics! No "Toms" involved, altering long, layered yammerings.

By: transient

transient — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:33:08 -0800

Yes, and more monkeybusiness ensures repartee is not going south.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:20:10 -0800

Sounding off usually takes hours!

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:02:01 -0800

Hardly; our usual routine's shorter.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:02:07 -0800

Hundreds of unusual responses! Staggering!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:13:56 -0800

Dang! So to append glib Gigli-isms, each response is nearly golden?

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:32:59 -0800

Gigli? Oh Lord. Damn entertainment narcissists!

By: transient

transient — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:34:36 -0800

Not a real cinematic ideal, so say innumerable stigmatizing typists. Stinky!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:40:19 -0800

Shoot! That insertion necessitated Kafkaesque yelling.

By: Mo Nickels

Mo Nickels — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:39:22 -0800

You each leave London in new garments. Yesterday, every loose lady investigated new games. Yonder east, leaves looping, indigo necklaces glowing. Yup, efts lend-lease it nice gear.

By: rory

rory — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:53:37 -0800

Go ahead, read my eight-hundredth note to StopBlog.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:56:38 -0800

So to others: Please be lazy or go.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:43:12 -0800

Glowering oracle

By: none

none — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:37:07 -0800

Others: resist advice, combine language energetically.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:46:02 -0800

Emphatically no! Eventually replies get even terser! I can't abide later linguists yielding!

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:58:42 -0800

Yet I expect lurking devotees instigate noteworthy germinations.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 03:20:50 -0800

Growth emerging, readily mutating into new aliveness; toward infinity, oh new shoot! [apronym]

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 04:17:22 -0800

Send hurling object outward, terrifyingly. semi-apronym

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 04:41:45 -0800

To end responses, reply in frequent, yammering invocations. Not glowing lithe yodelings.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 07:57:11 -0800

Yield! Octave-drifting exclamatory lyrics inform nearby galavanting skiers. [apronym]

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 10:46:09 -0800

So keep inputting epigrammatic responses, sucka!

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 16:45:36 -0800

Serious understanding communicates knowledge, asshat.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 17:02:25 -0800

Asshat seems subpar; have another try.

By: caddis

caddis — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 19:35:04 -0800

Take rest y'all.

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 09 Aug 2003 20:00:01 -0800

Yokels and local lowlifes. [aprogram?]

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 06:35:05 -0800

Let ol' wendell lampoon. I find everything splendiferous!

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 08:48:19 -0800

Simply perfect, lusciously elegant, notably, delightfully, indupitably fabulous; even rousingly, orgasmically, un-stintingly superb!

By: buzzv

buzzv — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:51:04 -0800

Suddenly, unfamiliar poster enters, relishing Blogstopishness

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:00:40 -0800

Being last online goads some tardy outlandish posters into silly, harebrained nonsense entries, serving silliness.

By: transient

transient — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:47:35 -0800

Sauntering in late leads into never-ending sporting shenanigans.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:02:56 -0800

Sneaky henchmen engage nefariously and nimbly instigate gambolling antics--namely supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. [exemplary apronym]

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:18:59 -0800

So unfair! Please elicit realistic comments. Avoid libelous inferences for real and genuine interesting linguistics. I shudder to interpret cinematic examples. "X" persists in annals likewise. I digress... only cinematic idiots offer unfair spellings.

By: DrJohnEvans

DrJohnEvans — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:47:48 -0800

Such pristine edicts lie low in nowadays' ghastly setting!

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:16:39 -0800

Spelling equality treatise tires 'idiot'. Nagging grouch.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:56:28 -0800

Grumbling rumbling ogre undergoing cranky hacking.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:24:11 -0800

Hardly. A consistent kvetching is not grumbling.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:55:57 -0800

Good reasoning undermines my bumbling literary imagery, not ghoulishness.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 04:06:37 -0800

Good hearted onslaught underlies last interjection. So happy not enduring shit sandwich.

By: wendell

wendell — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 04:20:57 -0800

Sandwiches are not described without including contents holder. So how could I do an apronym for 'sandwich' when the word contains no 'b' as in bread, bun or bagel, or even an 'r' as in roll? or am I just taking this all way too seriously?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 05:34:51 -0800

Hold onion, lettuce, (doing entire routine...)

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:17:59 -0800

Regular occurence, unambiguous tasks inferring nominal effort.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:22:58 -0800

For wendell: stuff and nice dressing wedged inside content holders? There is no such thing as too serious!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:58:27 -0800

Easy for Fezboy! Others require trying...

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:44:26 -0800

Triumph recognises your investment, not grousing.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:09:59 -0800

Gee, roundly ostracizing usual suspects. I need group-hug.

By: taumeson

taumeson — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:47:15 -0800

Gaydar reacts on unknown people hugging unseemly groups.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:06:40 -0800

Golly... relieved others understand puny syntax.

By: none

none — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:57:57 -0800

Sweaty young nubile twirls abominably: X-Tina.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:41:45 -0800

"X-men Three" is nearly approved!

By: wendell

wendell — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:28:55 -0800

All party people rely on very exciting... choose one ...decor. ...dances. ...drugs. ...dexterity. ...dementia. ...downbeats. ...drama. ...dialogue. ...desperation.

By: ed

ed — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:38:28 -0800

...duly enticing, cannot ominvores roast? ...Damocles and Neptune cornered enduring stories. ...dense rugs under gangly soiree. ...dimples empty, xylophone tinkling, empty rooms into tunes yonder. ...damn enterprising, Minutemen enjoin new thousand in Azzarello. ...donuts oval, wind never bates empty, a tired sun. ...demanding recherche and much ado ...drowning in a lager, o gristy undertow embark! ...dinner exits stomach, pancreas entitles regular acids, tasting it often negates.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:51:48 -0800

Resting on a Sunday table. Solemn tales--orally remembered--inform egotistical scholars. Sweet ozou inspires refined evening entertainment. Y'all over near Denton? East Lincoln? Roca? A zany, zero appropriate results effort. Leastaways, looking online. Setting up nova. A dizzying ordeal. Exciting mission begins anew. Ride, kinsmen! 'Not equal' gets at the essential semantics.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:56:22 -0800

East—Lincoln

By: wendell

wendell — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:23:51 -0800

Threads are badly layered, ed. Scholarly collegiates have often learned all reasonable science. Everybody notices that enjoyment relates to an important new meme, except novice troubadours. Residents of California alarmed. Oh no! Looking into net excites. Near Orion, Via Andromeda. Obviously, really dumb entrepreneurs are losers. Knowledge is not sufficient, meaning everything now. So every MetaFilter anagram now tires in cold seriousness.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:40:08 -0800

[err... Wendel, Fezboy, Ed... you, seriously need to get lives.] Engorged daipers.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:54:04 -0800

[I'm guessing that was "diapers."] Disgusting infant absorbing paper, effectively reservoiring shit.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:21:10 -0800

[eek! yes.] Secretions having interesting taste. [barf]

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:47:34 -0800

That allusion stymied the establishment.

By: biffa

biffa — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:07:36 -0800

Ew! Some tastes and best loved indulgences simply have me eschewing new things.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:43:20 -0800

The horrible imagery is not getting subtler.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:44:48 -0800

This haiku is not going successfully...

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:00:29 -0800

So unsuccessful! Bad timing! Likemindedness elicits repost.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:47:10 -0800

Regret effrontery, possible obfuscation. Silly Troglodyte! 1st attempt at Haiku in years.

By: wendell

wendell — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:03:49 -0800

"Tricks rely on getting lots of delights, yes?" Tom entreated. Haiku good, Tom Swifties gooder.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:15:53 -0800

Each new trickery relegates every acronym to enthusiastic disregard.

By: wendell

wendell — Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:13:04 -0800

Didn't I seriously respect every good acronym recently displayed?

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 02:29:14 -0800

Do I sense people leaving? Are you ever disappointing.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 04:30:54 -0800

Don't infer some apt posting people opted in neglect. That is negative gestalt.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:04:40 -0800

Granted; every sentence takes a long time.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:37:40 -0800

Time is metaphysically enduring.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:20:38 -0800

Every nanosecond, dilating universes undermine reality in numberless galaxies.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:51:45 -0800

Gosh! And lithe analogies x-out innumerable explanatory systems!

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:56:16 -0800

So you're suggesting temporally engulfed matter streams?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:30:21 -0800

Star Trek realism espouses audible mid-space sounds.

By: Fezboy!

Fezboy! — Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:27:09 -0800

Shatner: Obviously.Unskilled.Naff. Diction.Stilted.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 04:00:44 -0800

Star Trek is likable television, excruciating drama.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 04:47:18 -0800

Dependably reliant about made-up aliens

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 05:28:17 -0800

Aliens look inelegant; eerie nose structures.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:40:47 -0800

Star Trek rarely uses correct terms, usually repeating execrable science.

By: Masi

Masi — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:27:22 -0800

Science currently is exaggerated. Nobody credits evolutionism.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:21:33 -0800

Each victim only laments useless tedious idealism. Others nay-say incorrect scientific methods.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:15:33 -0800

Might evangelism take hold over darwins suggestions?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:39:54 -0800

Science urges group gestalt; everyone should try it over neochristian sophistry.

By: Danf

Danf — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:13:35 -0800

Science otherwise posits historically icky shit towards retro yetis.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:32:21 -0800

You eschew terse intelligible sentences...

By: squirrel

squirrel — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:34:55 -0800

say, everyone's needless thread evidently nears centennial eight soon.

By: squirrel

squirrel — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:45:04 -0800

so, okay... oops... nine.

By: arto

arto — Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:18:19 -0800

Nine is not eight! Encourage its growth higher--Thousand!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 15 Aug 2003 03:54:24 -0800

Hey, one per customer, buddy! Each individual gets his/her turn!

By: arto

arto — Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:51:05 -0800

That's understood. Regret noncompliance. it was either that, or break the x'th commandment with a "right, next!"

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 16 Aug 2003 07:24:25 -0800

Now only nerds continue on; making phrases linked in acronyms, never ceasing efforts.

By: ginz

ginz — Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:42:25 -0800

Eating fruity figs offered randomly to squirrel.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 16 Aug 2003 14:33:23 -0800

Some quit, using irrational random responses, eliciting laughter.

By: azazello

azazello — Sun, 17 Aug 2003 18:40:06 -0800

Lurkers adventurously use gobbledygook, harassing timid endeavouring recalcitrants.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:55:41 -0800

Responding ever callously, azazello likens chaotic input to replies advocating natural, terser sentences. See, I think it's more adventuresome to try to make sense, and attempt to connect to the previous sentence, but what do I know...

By: transient

transient — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:38:54 -0800

Sorry, even non-topical entries never cease entertaining some.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:39:07 -0800

Some obtain merriment easily...

By: transient

transient — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:17:37 -0800

Eliciting associated submissions is like... yaks.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:19:42 -0800

Yes... a kinetic science.

By: biffa

biffa — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:17:10 -0800

Segueing cleverly into every nerds choice entertainment.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:31 -0800

Every nerd tries entries related to anagrams. I naturally maintain equilibrium, not transubstantiation.

By: ed

ed — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:15:02 -0800

Truculent rhesus! A new swing unfurled. Bananas shower, throbbing a nifty tree. Into a torrent: idiosynchratic, otiose, Netherlands.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:36:18 -0800

Not even trying hard. Effortless reply. Lame attempt. Not done swell.

By: biffa

biffa — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:41:55 -0800

So weak ed, language laboured.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 04:17:12 -0800

Let's attempt better ones. Unusual responses elicit disharmony.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 05:45:15 -0800

Done, I say! Haiku are really meaningful ones, Nullify yahoos.

By: biffa

biffa — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 06:41:40 -0800

You are heroes! One's on-topic submission.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:22:32 -0800

So underutilized, brevity. Maybe I should stop inputting other nonsense?

By: ed

ed — Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:39:21 -0800

Nitwits offer narrow swords, entreating nuisances. Stomach epigrams?

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 02:15:58 -0800

Ed perceivably isnt good regarding anagrams. Minimally scholastic?

By: rory

rory — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 02:54:47 -0800

So, comment-hungry overachievers, let's all savour this incredible centenary. Nine-hundredth!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:16:21 -0800

Crap! Each new threshold elapses nightly, as Rory yippees!

By: transient

transient — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:48:08 -0800

Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively! ~~Supercalif...~~ Superlative.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:46:07 -0800

Some users play enthusiastically, repeatedly logging acronyms to incite victorious elation. Thanks for the restraint, transient...

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:12:44 -0800

Erudite loonies attempt this iteration. Oppressive nonsense!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:28:20 -0800

Not only nonsense, semi-haiku elicits non segue essay

By: trharlan

trharlan — Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:20:23 -0800

exercising sentences still alive, yippee!

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 03:26:40 -0800

Yikes! I predict players enumerate extensively... posted by transient at 8:48 AM PST on August 20 Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavours... what can I say? I'm back from the near-dead

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 03:32:37 -0800

oh crap, forgot to spell-check Yes, I perform pathetically extraneous endeavors... just think of it as my bumbling way to creep a little closer to one-thousand before the 30-day limit

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 04:00:11 -0800

English needs defending enthusiastically, and vanquishing our 'u' remains sacrilegious.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 04:20:22 -0800

Such a clever response is literary elegance. I oughta utilize semiotics.

By: transient

transient — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:54:19 -0800

Symbols evoking meaning is on topic in coding Saussure.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:13:28 -0800

Structural analysis as unitary signifying system using rulebased exegesis?

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:16:39 -0800

Oops. Structurally analysing unitary signifying system using rulebased exegesis? (That's what you get for showing off.)

By: transient

transient — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:31:34 -0800

Examinations, x-rayed, excite great English students intaking signifiers.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:03:06 -0800

Sigh. I guess nobody is finding it edifying responding simplistically...

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 02:44:15 -0800

Simply, in mulling philosophy, liasing in straightforward terms is counterindicated. Axiomatically, longer language yieldful.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 04:31:48 -0800

Yow! I'm entering less dialog, fully using language.

By: transient

transient — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:17:12 -0800

Linguistic acrobatics nimbly gain usage as graduates emerge.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:50:54 -0800

Eluded MFA; education related garbage excretal...

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:04:57 -0800

Excise 'x,' cretin! Ridiculous exercise -- Take a lexapro.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:33:27 -0800

Liked "excising 'x';" a possible response option.

By: biffa

biffa — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:36:24 -0800

Often prozac, taken intravenously, overcomes nervousness.

By: jasper411

jasper411 — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:43:03 -0800

Now everyone relax! Videos only use some, not every signal submitted!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:27:16 -0800

Sure, usually, but mostly I take two Excedrin daily...

By: ginz

ginz — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 06:30:29 -0800

Do as I: lick yoghurt.

By: transient

transient — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 06:59:29 -0800

Yuck! Only gargantuan headaches urge real treatment.

By: Blue Stone

Blue Stone — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 08:31:10 -0800

You sad fuckers :)

By: bargle

bargle — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:02:03 -0800

. . .

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:04:13 -0800

Try realizing esoteric aroma therapeutic methods, even notice Tetrahydrocannabinol.

By: ginz

ginz — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:04:18 -0800

tomatoes eggs tuna radish asparagus ham yoghurt dates rice olives cloves anchovies nuts noodles alfalfa beer ice-cream nougat oregano lettuce shopping list :-P *runs and hides behind the door*

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:48:07 -0800

Lame effort, tovarich (though unfair, complex entry...).

By: arto

arto — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 01:31:58 -0800

anchovies? has the j. geils band taught you nothing? Eat not those. Really yucky. damned blogstop thread, making me talk like yoda and all. grumble blarg foo.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 06:08:07 -0800

You're unusually cosmic, knowing Yoda...

By: ginz

ginz — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:32:55 -0800

Yesterday's olives, delicious appetizers.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:44:29 -0800

a perfect place-- enabling these interesting, zany, erudite, reactive screeds.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:06:19 -0800

Some crazed replies exceed erudite desires, seems.

By: Masi

Masi — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:44:39 -0800

So, erudition evades Metafilter. Shocked ?!

By: ed

ed — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:33:08 -0800

! 4 (how?) explanation Jason knockoff laws.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:16:20 -0800

punctuation is not a word, Ed... Some homeboys oughta check known editorial demarkations.

By: Masi

Masi — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:53:04 -0800

Demarkations? Ewww! Most assuredly, restraining k's ascendancy throughout idioticons oughta never stop!

By: trharlan

trharlan — Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:37:27 -0800

Spelling teacher overly pedagogic.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:25:03 -0800

Please... either designation applicable (gleaned off gargantuan internet content). de·mar·ca·tion also de·mar·ka·tion

By: trharlan

trharlan — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 05:34:20 -0800

Carry on, now that either notation thrives.

By: transient

transient — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 06:58:56 -0800

Two have rightness; internet verification establishes spelling.

By: Masi

Masi — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:30:15 -0800

Sorry, pertinent English lexicons lack indecorous nouns... greenhorn!

By: Birichini

Birichini — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:46:52 -0800

Go retrieve extra ether now, here only remain nincompoops

By: obfusciatrist

obfusciatrist — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:24:11 -0800

Not interesting. No creativity or merit pisses off others pursuing substance.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:06:21 -0800

Shut up, Birichini. Stop typing acerbic, needlessly cruel expressions.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:37:49 -0800

Especially "X." Pornographic, repugnant, execrative, shit-laced, stool-ridden, insulting, offensive, niggardly, stuff-and-nonsense.

By: transient

transient — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:02:44 -0800

Such tirades! Understand, forget foolishness and negative distempers. No one needs semiotic enlightenment? No sweat, eh?

By: arto

arto — Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:45:18 -0800

you put de lime in de markation and drink it on up... Effortless? Hardly!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:18:13 -0800

Have acronyms ready. Don't lack yearning!

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:30:43 -0800

You each are reading Nine-fifty-three images; Nine-fifty-three goobs.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:13:32 -0800

Goobs? Oh, oh. Bastard semantics...

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 02:27:53 -0800

Shameful event MrMoonPie, a neologism! Thousand in clear sight...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 04:12:53 -0800

Such intense goobisticly high turnout...

By: Birichini

Birichini — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:18:17 -0800

Totally unwarranted responses! Now onward until triumph!

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:45:22 -0800

... toward responses involving ultimate multiple postings, hurrah!

By: transient

transient — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:31:07 -0800

Having understood rising resolution, all hurry.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:19:46 -0800

Here's useless reply registering yep.

By: transient

transient — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:26:43 -0800

Your exclamation's pertinent.

By: rory

rory — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:33:52 -0800

Proving even really thoughtful individuals never exit neverending threads.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:23:01 -0800

That's heartwarming reply. Everyone appreciates decent sentences.

By: crunchland

crunchland — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:32:52 -0800

singlemindedly entering new text; every new comment equals success.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:53:36 -0800

Some unusual cognitive consciousness enables sequential sentences.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:15:14 -0800

Such easy nonsense (this entry notwithstanding) can't end silently

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:22:08 -0800

Some individuals let entropy negate triumphant learned yearnings.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:22:48 -0800

Shout it loudly everyone! Noble thread lingers yet.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:24:26 -0800

Yowser! Even after repeated nights I need greater speed.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:48:55 -0800

Some posts exceed Einsteinian doctrine.

By: biffa

biffa — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:05:14 -0800

Definitely. Often 'c' tardy. Reams in new expressions

By: transient

transient — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:05:15 -0800

Dual offerings cause trouble; rate increases near end.

By: transient

transient — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:12:59 -0800

Egads! 'X' prevents reply -- emerging so soon, ironically; our nominations synchronized.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:02:42 -0800

rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch... So you nastily create havoc, replying onerously, needlessly inflicting "z", entirely dastardly.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:54:31 -0800

Do alternative spellings, that allow reposed discourse, lengthen yammering?

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:52:19 -0800

rory will swoop in and claim the big one, you just watch... You assume my most electrifying response is nigh, governor?

By: planetkyoto

planetkyoto — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:11:18 -0800

Gentlemen, our vying ends? (No one responds.)

By: planetkyoto

planetkyoto — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:18:35 -0800

(oops, clipped it) Gentlemen, our vying ends respectably? (No one responds.)

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:49:26 -0800

Replying ere saddening planetkyoto on near deadline sussurusses.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:09:19 -0800

"sussurusses?" I can't find that defined anywhere, or even make sense of it in a sentence... Going back one... Really enthused seeing penultimate onslaught. Nearly done soon.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:25:18 -0800

You're right, it should have been 'susuruses', which describes the collective buzz of a whispering crowd, as one might get in a crowded theatre, and which will teach me to use a dictionary over my aging memory. Carrying on from your word; Spelling outlaws onerous entry.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:27:23 -0800

Jeez, what am I on this morning, make that: Spelling outlaws onerous nincompoop.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:44:10 -0800

Nice inclusion; nincompoop. Certainly one made poignant over other possibles.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:01:27 -0800

Please! One shames self in bashing language egregiously. Seppuku?

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:09:00 -0800

Slicing entrails, purportedly... Pretty uncomfortable, knifing underbelly.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:25:52 -0800

Understatement! No disprin effectively removes bellyslicing effects. Lamentable looking yukata.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:39:13 -0800

You're using knowledge a typist abhors.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:53:48 -0800

Acknowledged: Blatantly heaping obscure references steadily.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:00:09 -0800

So, the end approaches. Do I leave yet?

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:01:56 -0800

You've emerged then?

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:03:47 -0800

True, hovering eagerly now.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:09:44 -0800

Nearly over with.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:12:44 -0800

Well, it's thankfully here.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:12:48 -0800

Well, I try. Heroically.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:13:45 -0800

Hey! 'E's responding early!

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:18:03 -0800

Each action remains legitimate, yaar.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:19:39 -0800

Yet another agonizing response.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:19:39 -0800

'Yaar'? An amusing response.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:25:13 -0800

Rory ends, surprisingly playing only nine-hundred-and-ninety-ninth sequential entry. Go for it, you two!

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:27:05 -0800

Entry number: Thousand. Retiring. Yeehaw.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:27:41 -0800

Easy now that rory yields.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:29:55 -0800

poo!

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:30:17 -0800

Yes, excellent entry hails a winner.

By: biffa

biffa — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:34:15 -0800

Sorry jp. Good thread, will have to find something else to do with my working hours now.

By: rory

rory — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:40:29 -0800

I'm glad we made it before the 30 days were up. All the best cult threads break the four-figure barrier... Oh no! We've broken the fourth wall! It's all gone pear-shaped!

By: transient

transient — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:14:32 -0800

Waking, I nonpunctually nod. Early risers!

By: ginz

ginz — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:58:10 -0800

Reckless individuals seek ravishing substitutes.

By: ginz

ginz — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:59:48 -0800

shit. Reckless individuals seek everlasting ravishing substitutes.

By: talos

talos — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:54:26 -0800

So, unless boredom strikes, this is the uber-thread. Excellent Show!

By: transient

transient — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:23:10 -0800

Such hubris overwhelms wordsmiths.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:41:15 -0800

Whoa, or resultant destruction smites many in the hubric sphere...

By: trharlan

trharlan — Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:20:33 -0800

such premonitions harm earnest repartee, eh? It was either "eh" or "exorbitantly", and the letter x is for pricks

By: arto

arto — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:55:36 -0800

Eh? Hosers.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 04:32:13 -0800

Hundreds outputed sentences evidence respectable semiotics.

By: Masi

Masi — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 04:47:34 -0800

Such extent! Marvel incessantly, our thread is completely sequoia-like!

By: transient

transient — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:52:07 -0800

Such expansive quantities underscore our inventive abundance -- like I know excellence...

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:40:27 -0800

Exclude "x", clown, else learned leprechauns exist near collegiate environs... I have no idea what that means, but that damn "x" rattled me...

By: trharlan

trharlan — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:08:57 -0800

Easy, now. Vindictive irritability ruins our nice station!

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:19:19 -0800

Still thread allows textual input? Oh, nuts! shoulda shut down by now; damn thread'll probably outlive me

By: transient

transient — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:41:58 -0800

Never underestimate thread's strength. (no x, jp!)

By: jpburns

jpburns — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:15:15 -0800

Still time... rally everyone near... group thread hugs!

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:25:44 -0800

Hugs? Unseemly. Group Shout-outs!

By: transient

transient — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:50:57 -0800

Still holding out under time -- our uber thread's senescencing.

By: transient

transient — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:54:37 -0800

er, senescing.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:37:02 -0800

Showoff egotist needs elementary spelling check. Inaccuracy not graceful.

By: Masi

Masi — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:18:04 -0800

Gobbledygook requires artfully commanding English! Fear unnecessary lexiphanicism ! I fear a shrewish response, reminding of Socrates' wife, for including the x.

By: wendell

wendell — Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:35:46 -0800

Let's emit x-rated irate pedantic half-assed non-sequiturs in commentary, if Socrates minds.

By: Masi

Masi — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 00:11:01 -0800

Me, inscribing non-sequiturs? Do summarize!

By: wendell

wendell — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 00:39:49 -0800

Seriously underwhelmed, Mr. Masi, ascribing redundancy in zero exuberance. I don't have the foggiest idea what I just said, but it's got an "x" in it...

By: Masi

Masi — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:10:27 -0800

I'm sorry if my post appeared unconnected, I wanted it to be relevant regarding trasient's post; I considered it fairly obvious. Peccavi, and I apologise. Eliciting x's underscores babyish expectations; ridicule also not cultured. Creep!

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:14:55 -0800

Clearly realistic expectations exceed posts...

By: ashbury

ashbury — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 05:32:49 -0800

Proof of something that smells.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Sat, 30 Aug 2003 05:55:20 -0800

Some may elicit long-winded lessons, surely.