<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: wackier and wacker</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post wackier and wacker</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:25:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>wackier and wacker</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/08/01/hustler/index.html"&gt;Larry Flynt will run in the California recall election&lt;/a&gt; And he&apos;s serious too.  Could he get the plurality needed to win?  Oh and Arnold has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/08/01/arnold/index.html&quot;&gt;anounced... that he&apos;ll anounce his decision on the 6th&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:22:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>		<category>california</category>		<category>election</category>		<category>governor</category>		<category>larryflynt</category>		<category>larry</category>		<category>flynt</category>		<category>arnold</category>		<category>schwarzenegger</category>		<category>arnoldschwarzenegger</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530979</link>	
		<description>Go Larry Go!!!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530979</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jpoulos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530983</link>	
		<description>Just when you thought this thing couldn&apos;t be more embarrassing for California...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530983</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:32:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpoulos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530986</link>	
		<description>... Jenna Jameson as California Attorney General</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530986</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:35:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: callmejay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530987</link>	
		<description>Hehe.  Heh.  That&apos;ll learn those republicans.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530987</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>callmejay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530996</link>	
		<description>No, matteo, Jenna Jameson would be Secretary Of The ...[&lt;i&gt;ahem&lt;/i&gt;] Interior</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530996</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:44:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ufez Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#530997</link>	
		<description>Is there a Secretary of the Posterior?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-530997</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:45:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wsg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531003</link>	
		<description>Arnold is saying he isn&apos;t going to run according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Entertainment/Schwarzenegger030730.html&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531003</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:58:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wsg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: HTuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531005</link>	
		<description>Haha. California. What country is that in again?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531005</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HTuttle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: machaus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531006</link>	
		<description>I love the fact that a couple of shmos also named Gray Davis have paid the fee to be on the ballot.  This will make the butterfly ballot look like child&apos;s play.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531006</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mrgrimm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531008</link>	
		<description>Camejo or Flynt? i may have to flip a coin, though i&apos;d lean toward Flynt cuz i think he&apos;s more electable. that&apos;s a laugh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531008</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:01:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrgrimm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jragon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531009</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Haha. California. What country is that in again?&lt;/i&gt;

That one that gives a whole heap of electoral votes to it due to California&apos;s massive population.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531009</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jragon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aacheson</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531011</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m so proud to live here. Really. 

jragon: ...that we deserve because of our massive population, by the way. 

I wish Richard Riorden and Dianne Feinstein would run and give people some real choices. What a mess.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531011</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aacheson</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eyebeam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531013</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t think &quot;Larry Flynt, Governor of California&quot; sounds all that much wierder than &quot;Jesse Ventura, Governor of Michigan&quot;.

My country &apos;tis of thee, sweet land of self-parody, of thee I sing...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531013</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eyebeam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eyebeam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531015</link>	
		<description>Oops, I mean &quot;Jesse Ventura, Governor of Minnesota&quot;. Damn.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531015</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eyebeam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eas98</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531019</link>	
		<description>What is the big deal?  I&apos;d rather see someone like that in there than some greedy, corrupt politician who whores himself for votes and sells his soul to special interest.

I have no doubt Flynt would be a better politican than 90% of what is out there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531019</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:17:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eas98</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pjgulliver</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531021</link>	
		<description>Hey, Italy has (or had) a female pornstar in its parliament.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531021</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:18:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pjgulliver</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mrgrimm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531022</link>	
		<description>Feinstein is an idiot. and *Riordan* is a bigger idiot. so there. ;)

i expect to see them both in the race, however, further proving what idiots they are.

i can only hope that this free-for-all puts the Green Party (or the Smut Peddler party) into its first major office.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531022</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:20:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrgrimm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: goneill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531026</link>	
		<description>Sorry about the parade raining, but...

Uh, Larry Flynt is a misogynistic toad.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531026</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goneill</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531029</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Uh, Larry Flynt is a misogynistic toad.&lt;/em&gt;

He&apos;s a pig, but not a misogynist. Plus the cartoons in &lt;i&gt;Hustler&lt;/i&gt; are sometimes hilarious. And he took on Jerry Fallwell and won.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531029</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:31:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: briank</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531032</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m looking forward to the Arianna vs Michael Huffington race.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531032</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:32:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briank</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: goneill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531034</link>	
		<description>is too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531034</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:35:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goneill</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: majcher</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531046</link>	
		<description>is not.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531046</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:46:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majcher</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531050</link>	
		<description>is not.

Allow me to make my case for ol&apos; Larry. Putting aside the whole &quot;all porn is misogynistic&quot; argument, he has a few factors which raise him above say Hefner or Bob Guccione.

Yes, he shows women in degrading shots, but he shows men in degrading shots too, for those who are into that sort of thing. Plus his &quot;Asshole Of The Month,&quot; choices are usually pretty accurate.

In a way, porn is the ultimate democracy. If someone will pay to look at, the pornmeisters will make it: Gay, Straight, Vanilla, kinky whatever. So it&apos;s not like it&apos;s some massive conspiracy to degrade womanhood, it&apos;s all about the $$.

Plus politically, he seems to veer to the left mostly, so he&apos;s gotta be better than Ah-nold, right?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531050</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:48:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: caddis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531063</link>	
		<description>Everybody in Florida gives a great sigh of relief, &quot;It&apos;s not us this time.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531063</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: elwoodwiles</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531065</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I love the fact that a couple of shmos also named Gray Davis have paid the fee to be on the ballot. This will make the butterfly ballot look like child&apos;s play.&lt;/i&gt;

Somewhat common election fraud ploy. The idea is to split the vote away from Davis in order to assure he loses. I can&apos;t find the links right now but this has been used, mostly by republicans (though they have no monopoly on electoral assholerly,) to defeat opposing canidates.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531065</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:17:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elwoodwiles</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mr_crash_davis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531068</link>	
		<description>Porn != misogynistic.

Next?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531068</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:23:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mr_crash_davis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: COBRA!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531073</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I love the fact that a couple of shmos also named Gray Davis have paid the fee to be on the ballot. This will make the butterfly ballot look like child&apos;s play.

Somewhat common election fraud ploy. The idea is to split the vote away from Davis in order to assure he loses. I can&apos;t find the links right now but this has been used, mostly by republicans (though they have no monopoly on electoral assholerly,) to defeat opposing canidates.&lt;/em&gt;

Something sort of like that was done in a recent congressional election in MN.  Some guy registered as a candidate under the &quot;No New Taxes&quot; party to try to siphon votes off from the Republican.  As tactics go, it failed pretty spectacularly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531073</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:30:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>COBRA!</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: transona5</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531077</link>	
		<description>Hustler != garden-variety porn.  We&apos;re talking about women being raped on pool tables and put through meat grinders.  You don&apos;t have to be a &quot;pictures of naked chicks bad&quot; feminist to have a problem with that.

But hey, the Nazis who marched in Skokie won a substantial victory for the First Amendment too.  Illinois governor?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531077</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:40:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>transona5</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: machaus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531090</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Somewhat common election fraud ploy.&lt;/i&gt;

It is my understanding that the ballot will be a two part process.  The first will ask if you support the recall.  If you vote no, you are voting support for Davis.  If you vote yes, you will proceed to the second step, choosing a candidate.  I may be wrong, but I believe that the REAL Davis will not be among the choices.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531090</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nath</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531093</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It is my understanding that the ballot will be a two part process. The first will ask if you support the recall. If you vote no, you are voting support for Davis. If you vote yes, you will proceed to the second step, choosing a candidate. I may be wrong, but I believe that the REAL Davis will not be among the choices&lt;/em&gt;

As I understand it, the real Gray Davis will not be on the second part of the ballot.  Also, anyone who votes &quot;no&quot; to recalling Davis can still vote for another candidate they want to support if he is recalled, and, in a decision handed down a couple days ago, you do not even have to vote to recall Davis to vote for another candidate.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531093</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:11:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nath</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homunculus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531104</link>	
		<description>Supposedly &lt;a href=http://www.angelyne.com/&gt;Angelyne&lt;/a&gt; is going to run, but she hasn&apos;t updated her website.  If she wants to be a serious candidate, she needs to get with it.  We need some &quot;Angelyne for Governor&quot; billboards, especially in Daryl Isa&apos;s district.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531104</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:33:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cinderful</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531112</link>	
		<description>Interesting, considering Penthouse is supposedly in dire financial straits at the moment . . .

I mean, if you can&apos;t keep a multi-million dollar porn company afloat in a multi billion dollar industry . . .
Well, you&apos;ve got problems . . .

Maybe he just pulled all the $ out of the PH bank to fund his campaign.

Plus, has anyone heard the dude talk?
Might need a speech-giver in addition to a speech-writer.

Or real life subtitles.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531112</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:51:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cinderful</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Wulfgar!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531122</link>	
		<description>cinderful, Larry Flint runs Hustler, not Penthouse.  Just clarifying ...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531122</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar!</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mrgrimm</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531153</link>	
		<description>yeah, Penthouse is in deep trouble. Hustler is still doing OK. both will eventually get screwed by the Net.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531153</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrgrimm</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: interrobang</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531163</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hustler != garden-variety porn. We&apos;re talking about women being raped on pool tables and put through meat grinders. You don&apos;t have to be a &quot;pictures of naked chicks bad&quot; feminist to have a problem with that.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, the meat-grinder cover happened while Paul Krassner was editing the magazine.

I can&apos;t find a link to confirm it, but Krassner admits it in &quot;Re:Search Pranks&quot;.

Not to defend it or anything.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531163</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:25:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interrobang</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ph00dz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531172</link>	
		<description>The California elections are going to be the best thing ever.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531172</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ph00dz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: benjh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531191</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;...but I believe that the REAL Davis will not be among the choices&lt;/i&gt;

Would the real Gray Davis please stand up, please stand up, please stand up. Yeah, I&apos;m the real Gray Davis, the only Gray Davis. Would the real Gray Davis please stand up...

Seriously, being from Cincinnati, which is Larry Flynt central, I have to say Go Larry. People in Hustler are not being forced to be in Hustler, it is a voluntary act. And maybe Larry has some good ideas, like additional slots and gambling to shore up state revenues from some addicted gamblers. (Is William Bennet coming to California any time soon?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531191</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:23:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: interrobang</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531196</link>	
		<description>I heard on NPR yesterday that Gray Davis will definitely not be on the ballot.  The first question is something like:

&quot;Should Gray Davis be recalled?&quot;
_yes    _no

The second question is:

&quot;If you said &quot;yes&quot; to the first question, who should replace him?&quot;

Which is followed by a list of other candidates.  The &quot;Gray Davis&quot; in question is not mentioned on the ballot after the first question.  The whole ballot is intended to ask whether or not Davis should be taken out of office,  and if so, who should be his successor.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531196</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:30:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interrobang</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: insomnia_lj</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531233</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I wish Richard Riorden and Dianne Feinstein would run and give people some real choices. What a mess.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Feinstein?! Are you crazy? There&apos;s not a day that passes where I wish she didn&apos;t take the bullet for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/time100/heroes/profile/milk01.html&quot;&gt;Harvey Milk&lt;/a&gt;, instead of opportunistically milking the tragedy into a career. She&apos;s thouroughly owned by the RIAA and by Hollywood, and her behavior was probably the basis for the character of the mayor in South Park.

Oh... and Richard Riordan is a Dick, both literally and figuratively. Really, can&apos;t you suggest someone better? Mineta? Boxer? Anyone other than these two?!

Larry Flynt is sounding better and better all the time...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531233</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 20:26:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pejamo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531244</link>	
		<description>California = NSFW</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531244</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:17:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pejamo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ramakrishna</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27413/wackier-and-wacker#531520</link>	
		<description>Nobody seems to remember that the meat grinder pic was accompanied by text along the lines of &quot;Hustler promises to stop treating women like pieces of meat!&quot; It wasn&apos;t the centerfold, it was a joke; one in poor taste even by Flynt&apos;s standards, but still a joke. It isn&apos;t in any way characteristic of Hustler&apos;s usual fare.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.27413-531520</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2003 22:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ramakrishna</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
