Comments on: Krugman on Media and Economics

Krugman on Media and Economics

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:41:33 -0800

If Bush said the earth is flat, of course Fox News would say "Yes, the earth is flat, and anyone who says different is unpatriotic." And mainstream media would have stories with the headline: "Shape of Earth: Views Differ; and would at most report that some Democrats say that it's round."

So said Paul Krugman during a recent interview in Boston with Chris Lydon, former host of NPR's 'The Connection.'

By: angry modem

angry modem — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:51:52 -0800

By: orange swan

orange swan — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:03:15 -0800

You just justified the whole in-line image thing for me, angry modem.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:05:44 -0800

Haha! Still, you judge without viewing.

By: jfuller

jfuller — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:10:29 -0800

Of course the current state of the economy is just exactly as obvious, well-determined and inarguable as the shape of the planet. If you're Krugman. Krugman stands or falls on his repeated (and repeated and repeated) prediction of a Japanese-style liquidity-trap deflation in the US. Since economics is his field of greatest expertise, if his economic prediction fails then he was talking out his ass about everything else too.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:28:50 -0800

You mean the Labor Department numbers are wrong? That year-over-year change in payrolls have been negative for 25 straight months, the longest stretch since 1944-46? Maybe you're refering to deficit spending which is the worst since forever. Krugman is not wrong when he says the Bush White House is feeding us a pack of lies about how well our economy is doing.

By: gd779

gd779 — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:31:30 -0800

As has often been said, Krugman should be an economist who is willing to occasionally embarrass the Democratic Party. Instead, he's a Democrat who's occasionally an embarrassment to economists.

By: orange swan

orange swan — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:42:34 -0800

ericrolph, I can't view this video now since I'm at work. But I do wish you'd used something other than a silly analogy from your linked material to create your FPP. I'm assuming there's better stuff in there.

By: George_Spiggott

George_Spiggott — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:47:53 -0800

Seconded. The video is 1 hour 14 minutes long. Though I agree with the sentiments in the FPP, I'd agree that it's very, very weak, probably even a candidate for deletion. ericrolph, is there some actual new information in there, something we couldn't see or hear somewhere else, and if so, what is it, and what timecode should we go to to see or hear it?

By: rocketman

rocketman — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:52:33 -0800

Yeah, and supersize that while you're at it!

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:59:50 -0800

The teaming masses are never satisfied. Krugman is often considered, "shrill" and I wanted to point out that while he may be shrill, he is also funny – those who enjoy Fox News, I concede, won't find that funny. He discounts blogs as primary news sources, discusses the distress of the U.S. economy, problems with budget deficits, what the Neo-Con Republicans are doing to our economy, why Democrats are failing, why Ralph Nader was not a good choice for presidential election, the state of journalism, economic problems with the war in Iraq, Alabama's tax problems, globalization, and the international press.

By: vaca

vaca — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:01:04 -0800

Don't you find it interesting that someone like Krugman, who 25 years ago would have been labelled a center-right republican, is now tarred and feathered as a "liberal?" Vaca

By: XQUZYPHYR

XQUZYPHYR — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:24:39 -0800

Your name wouldn't be Vaca by any chance, would it? Also, I think the term "worst since forever" is funny as hell.

By: goethean

goethean — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:27:02 -0800

...Krugman, who 25 years ago would have been labelled a center-right republican... It would be interesting, if it were true, and if his position hadn't changed. I'm not saying that it's not true--I don't know--but it would be nice to have an argument rather than just your statement that it is so. It seems like it would be a difficult statement to research, actually.

By: goethean

goethean — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:30:23 -0800

Hm. Or maybe not so difficult. He worked at the White House Council of Economic Advisers in 1982-3.

By: Witty

Witty — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:46:15 -0800

Alabama's tax problems Finally.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:59:47 -0800

Chris Lydon, on his blog, has the interview in MP3 audio format, broken into three parts: part 1, part 2 and part 3.

By: jfuller

jfuller — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:16:38 -0800

> It seems like it would be a difficult statement to research, actually. It's not that what counts as the "center" has drifted rightward. It's that two or three decades ago Republicans/conservatives were against deficit spending and Democrats/liberals thought deficits were OK. Now the opposite is true: the Bush admin, Republican though it be, seems intent on spending out the wazoo, which co-opts the former liberal position and leaves the Dems with the choice of either flipping to the opposite view or else ceasing to oppose. Not a rightward drift of the center so much as an end for end flip-flop.

By: dness2

dness2 — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:04:00 -0800

The teaming masses are never satisfied. Krugman is often considered, "shrill" and I wanted to point out that while he may be shrill, he is also funny – those who enjoy Fox News, I concede, won't find that funny. This part of the teaming masses doesn't enjoy Fox News or find Krugman funny. He makes a hyperbolic analogy about a subtle trend that smacks of soundbite-ism, not pithy insight. His statements about economics are ironically just as "with us or against us" as other over-simplifying blowhards (who will remain nameless). His opinions are no richer than the average enthusiastic first year economics student who is learning the principles for the first time and mistakenly thinking they are rules. Tediouser and tediouser, said the White Rabbit.

By: moonbiter

moonbiter — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:39:02 -0800

Krugman stands or falls on his repeated (and repeated and repeated) prediction of a Japanese-style liquidity-trap deflation in the US. This is a ridiculous standard, as ridiculous as saying that "jfuller stands or falls on his assertion about Paul Krugman's prediction." Just because an individual is wrong about one thing does not mean that he or she is wrong about everything (assuming he is wrong about this -- we shall see).

By: JackFlash

JackFlash — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:09:25 -0800

Krugman stands or falls on his repeated (and repeated and repeated) prediction of a Japanese-style liquidity-trap deflation in the US. Krugman made no such prediction. He did bring to people's attention the well known fact (among economists) that very low inflation rates accompanied by very low interest rates lie very close to a cliff from which there is no easy return. A shrill Alan Greenspan made the very same "prediction" earlier this summer.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:20:59 -0800

[Krugmans] opinions are no richer than the average enthusiastic first year economics student who is learning the principles for the first time and mistakenly thinking they are rules. He writes essays for non-economists that are clear, effective, and entertaining – of course, he is equally effective at writing in-depth economics text books and other academic scholar from his years a professor of economics at MIT and Stanford. Krugman is primarily concerned with stupid economic policies and outing those who attempt to tell the public otherwise. He is one of the best at analyzing and exposing the stupidity of the Bush administration for the general public. I'm willing to take suggestions on opinion writers doing a better job than Krugman.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:27:14 -0800

+ Yale and Princeton

By: troutfishing

troutfishing — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:22:24 -0800

Is one hour of Paul Krugman better than five minutes of clenching? * clench clench *

By: y2karl

y2karl — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:40:22 -0800

So what's up with the dness2, dness? You get transmigrated, transfigured or is this some sort of new model avatar?

By: dness2

dness2 — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:12:43 -0800

The original dness imploded from the pressure of Kantian malaperts. I am now new and improved, practicing equanimity, but I still have flashbacks every once in awhile.

By: trharlan

trharlan — Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:14:53 -0800

ericrolph-- Fine job of self-moderation. So you like Krugman? I'm willing to take suggestions on opinion writers doing a better job than Krugman. Do you mean people who write about the markets and economics? Arnold Kling Doug Noland Gary North Steven Roach James Picerno to name a few. And it's a diverse group.

By: skallas

skallas — Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:49:25 -0800

Previous Krugman post by me here for those interested. Yeah, audio and video aren't as nice as text. Maybe NPR will release a transcript. Personally, I don't have the time to watch this, even though I really want to. That's the nice part of the web, reading is much faster and easier to digest than video, plus things like "is that a piece of ham on his moustache" don't seem to matter as much. May the web never degenerate into TV.

By: ericrolph

ericrolph — Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:09:45 -0800

Thanks for the list of authors trharlan – some heady stuff there – I noticed a few of them comment on Krugman's writing. As for the web degenerating into TV, never fear, audio and video merely add depth of information and meaning – on the web, text will always be king due to your stated reasons; however, transcripts skip the richness of laughter and the rolling-of-eyes that provide further context to speech. Watching the chipmunk-like Krugman is a treasure for those who enjoy Krugman (me).