<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The Wingnut Debate Dictionary</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The Wingnut Debate Dictionary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:16:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The Wingnut Debate Dictionary</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://stommel.tamu.edu/~baum/ethel/atrios-dictionary.html"&gt;The Wingnut Debate Dictionary&lt;/a&gt; - spice up your political screeds with some colorful new terms like &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Colmestrato&lt;/b&gt; (n.) - an emasculated, harmless &quot;liberal&quot; stand-in included for purposes of fairness and balance&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Condiment&lt;/b&gt; - a statement that needs to be taken with a heavy pinch of salt&lt;/i&gt;. I am &lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; adding &lt;b&gt;Deus ex rectum&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Stepford Democrat&lt;/b&gt; to my vocabulary. And how is it that  &lt;b&gt;fucksimilie&lt;/b&gt; hasn&apos;t found it&apos;s way here long before now? &lt;br&gt;
This is a game that MeFi wags of all political persuasions can play...anyone have any terms to add to the lexicon? &lt;small&gt;(compiled by &lt;a href=&quot;http://stommel.tamu.edu/~baum/ethel/blogger.html&quot;&gt;Ethel the Blog&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:56:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>		<category>politics</category>		<category>debate</category>		<category>dictionary</category>		<category>words</category>		<category>republicans</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jamsterdam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581432</link>	
		<description>How about &lt;i&gt;europlexy&lt;/i&gt;, i.e.,  the condition of a conservative being worked up into a froth about what Europeans think of the U.S. while simultaneously insisting that he/she &quot;doesn&apos;t care at all&quot; what the Europeans think of the U.S.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581432</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamsterdam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madamjujujive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581434</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;neoconsternation&lt;/i&gt; - the flapping of wingnuts at lucianne.com every time someone mentions Hillary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581434</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stavrosthewonderchicken</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581435</link>	
		<description>I was thinking of posting this, but I didn&apos;t. So it&apos;s good that you did, I think.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581435</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:49:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The God Complex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581446</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m partial to &quot;Republican Jackal.&quot;

The second meaning of jackal being (according to dictionary.com, in the interest of being accurate) &quot;an accomplice or a lackey who aids in the commission of base or disreputable acts,&quot; or &quot;One who performs menial tasks for another.&quot;

I use it to refer to republicans acting in the interest of big business. So, you know, most of them.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581446</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 22:39:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The God Complex</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The God Complex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581449</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;False DickChenomy: The arguer offers only two options in a situation, one of which is objectively pro-saddam. &lt;/i&gt;

Hah!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581449</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 22:55:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The God Complex</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Space Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581453</link>	
		<description>Shooting for the moon: An attempt to tire an opponent into even partially accepting a patently ridiculous argument and then declaring yourself the winner in perpetuity.

e.g., America is a Christian nation because the word &apos;Lord&apos; appears in the declaration of independence.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581453</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:01:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madamjujujive</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581455</link>	
		<description>ok, not to go all &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/3452&quot;&gt;brad&lt;/a&gt; on y&apos;all, but I thought of two more potential additions: 

&lt;i&gt;Odd Lott Theory&lt;/i&gt; - concept that a fall guy can be culled from a political peer group and turned into a pillar of salt thereby deflecting criticism for a widely shared belief. 

&lt;i&gt;Harrisment&lt;/i&gt; - purging the black vote from election results to achieve a desired effect.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581455</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:10:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Space Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581457</link>	
		<description>The Time Warp: failing to realize that communists are not the biggest threat to your freedom or existance.

I don&apos;t read enough blogs to attribute these to any particular internet writer, but they are things that I notice fairly often.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581457</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: RavinDave</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581459</link>	
		<description>&lt;u&gt;&lt;b&gt;luskin&lt;/b&gt; (v.)&lt;/u&gt;: 1. to secretly desire the status and intelligence of one&apos;s opponent while engaging in a systematic misrepresentation of him/her. 2. to &lt;i&gt;stalk&lt;/i&gt; 

Bwahhaha ... I&apos;m dyin&apos; here ...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581459</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RavinDave</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: neuroshred</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581509</link>	
		<description>I love Harrisment!  The term, not the action.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581509</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 09:11:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neuroshred</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: XQUZYPHYR</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581511</link>	
		<description>I already submitted my own two suggestions:

&lt;i&gt;Going Dennis Miller&lt;/i&gt; -  using 9/11 as one&apos;s excuse to support the entire GOP agenda because you endorse George W. Bush&apos;s to rid the world of the godless, Judeo-Christian-hating mud people but in a way that doesn&apos;t sound racist because 9/11 hurt you a lot

&lt;i&gt;Involuntary Rallaction&lt;/i&gt; - the immediate disapproval of anything said or done by Ted Rall on the grounds that he is, in fact, Ted Rall. (See also &quot;Moore&apos;s Code&quot; or &quot;Treachering&quot;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581511</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 09:29:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581544</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Involuntary Rallaction - the immediate disapproval of anything said or done by Ted Rall on the grounds that he is, in fact, Ted Rall. &lt;/em&gt;

Shouldn&apos;t this also be known as &lt;em&gt;Getting Your Lileks In&lt;/em&gt;?

And on that note, what would be the term for simultaneously loving Lileks&apos; kooky pop culture writing (I genuinely believe his Institute for Official Cheer is altogether one of the great delights of the internet) and loathing his special &lt;em&gt;shouldn&apos;t-his-head-be-spinning-around-now?&lt;/em&gt; brand of neo-con blather?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581544</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 11:10:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scody</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: alumshubby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581550</link>	
		<description>For years now I&apos;ve described various mentally and emotionally draining group procedures, like committee meetings, contract negotiations, closing a house mortgage, etc., &lt;em&gt;the Death of a Thousand Buts&lt;/em&gt;. 

&lt;em&gt;I&apos;m partial to &quot;Republican Jackal.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

In college, my dormmate used &quot;Republiclones&quot; as an answering epithet to the Reagan &lt;em&gt;Zeitgeist&lt;/em&gt;.  In retrospect, I&apos;ve thought of myself as a onetime &lt;em&gt;REMocrat &lt;/em&gt;who listened to a lot of Michael Stipe and voted Democrat basically because all my friends did.

I&apos;ve used &lt;em&gt;Stepford&lt;/em&gt; as an adjective to describe just about any kind of mindless conformist I&apos;ve come across.   Damned few people get the reference, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581550</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 11:57:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alumshubby</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Eekacat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581555</link>	
		<description>This one is amazingly spot-on : Clenis Syndrome: An uncontrollable urge to blurt out &quot;Clinton did it!&quot; or &quot;Oh yeah? What about Clinton?&quot; rather than using logic and reason to make one&apos;s point. 

I can&apos;t tell you HOW many times when discussing a policy of President Bush, and the response is &quot;Well Clinton....&quot;  Uhh I thought we were discussing Bush????</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581555</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 12:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eekacat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kavasa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581568</link>	
		<description>&quot;And on that note, what would be the term for simultaneously loving Lileks&apos; kooky pop culture writing (I genuinely believe his Institute for Official Cheer is altogether one of the great delights of the internet) and loathing his special shouldn&apos;t-his-head-be-spinning-around-now? brand of neo-con blather?&quot;

This is why I hate this sort of shit.  No one on either side is ever willing to have a principled disagreement.  It&apos;s the bed-wetting liberals vs. the monstrous neocons, 24-7 and 365.  Not only is everyone right, they know they&apos;re right, and everyone that disagrees is both evil and an idiot, and of course we then need special pejoratives to describe them.  In fact, we need a whole pejorative &lt;i&gt;lexicon&lt;/i&gt; so we can distinguish those in our clubhouse from those outside.  God it&apos;s frustrating.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581568</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 13:28:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kavasa</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: clavdivs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581589</link>	
		<description>&apos;&lt;em&gt;den Beste ex machina &lt;/em&gt;- The creation of a fake political movement, such as Transnational Progressivism, that has virtually no basis in reality in order to disparage ideological opponents.&apos;

Steve needs the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fluebird.com/chim_scan.html&quot;&gt;Chim Cam&lt;/a&gt;
HA. great link Madam.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581589</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 14:38:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clavdivs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Space Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581601</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not so much a prejoritive lexicon as it is a more area-specific list of logical fallacies.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581601</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 15:14:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mossy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581636</link>	
		<description>Ahh.. My vocabulary has several excellent new additions now. My verbose rambles will make even less sense now. Fantastic ^_^</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581636</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 18:00:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mossy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plep</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581651</link>	
		<description>It made me chuckle - thanks mjjj. Jamsterdam - &apos;europlexy&apos; is brilliant. ;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581651</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:13:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mosch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581658</link>	
		<description>Very novel...  somebody should put together the search and replaces neccessary for this to work for the right wing.

I guess we&apos;d start by replacing Anne Coulter with Michael Moore, and Reagan with Clinton?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581658</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:24:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mosch</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Space Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581669</link>	
		<description>Now, mosch, getting your own entry will take more effort than that. The &quot;x is bad, but the left has y, and they&apos;re exactly the same because... well because I repeat the two names together enough times that it becomes true&quot; move is so common it doesn&apos;t even deserve a name.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581669</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:34:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: soyjoy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581674</link>	
		<description>mjjj. thanks. And especially for Harrisment. That&apos;s gold.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581674</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:53:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dejah420</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581678</link>	
		<description>Pure genius.  Great linking as always, MJ&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581678</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 22:41:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: taz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581685</link>	
		<description>Applepiety: A &quot;holier (and more patriotic) than thou&quot; attitude

Behemotheism: The belief that my God is bigger than your God.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581685</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 23:15:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>taz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZenMasterThis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29446/The-Wingnut-Debate-Dictionary#581771</link>	
		<description>Republicrat: A member of the USA&apos;s current one-party system.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.29446-581771</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
