<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Octothorpe, not hash!</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Octothorpe, not hash!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:08:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:08:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Octothorpe, not hash!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash</link>	
		<description>The real source of the word &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sigtel.com/tel_tech_octothorpe.html&quot;&gt;Octothorpe&lt;/a&gt;&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>		<category>octothorpe</category>		<category>pound</category>		<category>#</category>		<category>symbol</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: carter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597251</link>	
		<description>####ing excellent!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597251</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:08:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cortex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597265</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t think I can pound that word into my vocabulary.  Cute link, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597265</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Nickels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597270</link>	
		<description>I like the story about octothorpe (also &lt;i&gt;octathorpe&lt;/i&gt; and originally &lt;i&gt;octalthorpe&lt;/i&gt;), but it lacks supporting documentation. 

The American Heritage Dictionary says &lt;a href=http://www.bartleby.com/61/88/O0028850.html&gt;something different&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;probably humorous blend of octal, an eight-point pin used in electronic connections (from the eight points of the symbol) and the name of James Edward Oglethorpe.&quot;

&lt;a href=http://www.idly.org/2003/10/08/octothorpe.php&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt;, taken from Wordsmith.org, considers both Oglethorpe and Jim Thorpe. 

This is from the New York Times, Oct. 6, 1986: &lt;b&gt;Name That Button.&lt;/b&gt; &quot;Three months ago Privacy Journal, a Washington newsletter often concerned with computers, invited readers to submit names for the # symbol of the lower right-hand corner of the telephone button panel. Among two dozen reponses, the editor, Robert Ellis Smith, has determined Octothorpe to be the &apos;most authentic&apos; and Gridlet to be the most intriguing.&quot;
-30-

If we could get ahold of that issue of Privacy Journal, perhaps it will have information to substantiate the McPherson claim. Or any of those old Bell Labs documents using the word mentioned in Riffola&apos;s origina link. &lt;a href=http://groups.google.com/groups?q=octothorpe&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;as_drrb=b&amp;as_mind=12&amp;as_minm=5&amp;as_miny=1981&amp;as_maxd=7&amp;as_maxm=12&amp;as_maxy=1993&amp;selm=gilbertd.746785864%40cs.man.ac.uk&amp;rnum=10&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; from Sept. 1993 mentions a document called &lt;i&gt;The Pronouncation guide V2.2&lt;/i&gt;, apparently from Steve Hayman at Indiana U., which tells the Bell story of the octathorpe.

The earliest cite is could find is a June 1983 &lt;a href=http://groups.google.com/groups?q=octothorpe&amp;start=160&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;as_drrb=b&amp;as_mind=12&amp;as_minm=5&amp;as_miny=1981&amp;as_maxd=7&amp;as_maxm=12&amp;as_maxy=1993&amp;selm=278%405941ux.UUCP&amp;rnum=161&gt;Usenet post&lt;/a&gt;. Octothorpe and variants do not appear prior to that in any of the historical newspaper archives I have searched.

Note that there are &lt;a href=http://groups.google.com/groups?q=octalthorpe&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;as_drrb=b&amp;as_mind=12&amp;as_minm=5&amp;as_miny=1981&amp;as_maxd=7&amp;as_maxm=12&amp;as_maxy=1993&amp;selm=910305150856.25e01876%40FNALA.FNAL.GOV&amp;rnum=2&gt;other words&lt;/a&gt; using -thorpe: Bithorpe, half a quadrathorpe (or a hyphen). Quadrathorpe, half an octathorpe. Also, &lt;a href=http://groups.google.com/groups?q=octalthorpe&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;scoring=d&amp;as_drrb=b&amp;as_mind=12&amp;as_minm=5&amp;as_miny=1981&amp;as_maxd=7&amp;as_maxm=12&amp;as_maxy=1993&amp;selm=40441%40iuvax.cs.indiana.edu&amp;rnum=4&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, an equal sign is shown with quadrathorpe as a synonym, which makes sense if you think of it as two hyphens.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597270</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:22:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: teferi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597274</link>	
		<description>Though you&apos;d probably make a hash of it trying.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597274</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>teferi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dorian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597275</link>	
		<description>oddly enough, the asterisk in &lt;a href=&quot;http://asterisk.org&quot; title=&quot;possibly the most useful software every written&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://store2.yimg.com/I/asteriskpbx_1739_42763&quot; title=&quot;five?!&quot;&gt;five&lt;/a&gt;-pointed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597275</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dorian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: filmgoerjuan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597283</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m sorry, riffola, but how is this related to kittens?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597283</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>filmgoerjuan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plep</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597292</link>	
		<description>[this is good]

Mo Nickels :- Small world; I used to live within walking distance of James Oglethorpe&apos;s magnificent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.godalming-museum.org.uk/westbrook1.html&quot;&gt;house&lt;/a&gt; in Godalming, Surrey, which has an interesting history itself apart from the connection to the founder of the State of Georgia.... (Godalming is probably most famous for the story of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/aug02b.shtml&quot;&gt;woman who claimed to have given birth to rabbits&lt;/a&gt;, immortalised by Hogarth).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597292</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:32:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crunchburger</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597312</link>	
		<description>Being from Georgis, I&apos;m all for the Oglethorpe theory...but &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt;  is the word  &apos;probably&apos; a humorous blend of octal with James Edward Oglethorpe? The American Heritage Dictionary editors raise new questions with their inscrutable lexigraphegery.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597312</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:15:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchburger</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: LeLiLo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597337</link>	
		<description>This is a terrific link no matter who&apos;s right. Thanks, riffola. However, I still prefer the &lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/10/04/history_of_the_tilde&quot;&gt;tilde&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597337</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:56:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeLiLo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZenMasterThis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597379</link>	
		<description>Just a bunch of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;q=floobydust&quot;&gt;floobydust&lt;/a&gt; if you ask me.

And you &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; have asked me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597379</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 17:00:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597380</link>	
		<description>[this is good]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597380</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 17:03:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Galvatron</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597462</link>	
		<description>The &apos;star&apos; on my keyboard is not TU-T E.161 3.2.2 compliant.  I feel robbed.  &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;gypped?&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597462</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 20:47:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Galvatron</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: soyjoy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30071/Octothorpe-not-hash#597661</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The * is to be known as &quot;star&quot; or equivalent in other languages. It is a six pointed star, with 60 degree angles, and orientated such as to have a horizontal line.&lt;/i&gt;

WTF? On my phone, AND on my keyboard, the asterisk is as described, with the horizontal line, but not on the page with this sentence, or my MeFi screen. I&apos;ve generated asterisks in several different applications on two different computers (both keyboards show it with the correct horizontal line), and it&apos;s &lt;i&gt;usually&lt;/i&gt; &quot;orientated&quot; to have a &lt;i&gt;vertical&lt;/i&gt; line! What&apos;s going on here? The one in Notepad is the only one I&apos;ve found so far that&apos;s compliant.

Somebody should look into this, dammit!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30071-597661</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soyjoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
