<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The Best of Hubble</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The Best of Hubble</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:03:58 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:03:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The Best of Hubble</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm"&gt;The Best of Hubble&lt;/a&gt; Its mission will end in 2010. Four years later it will re-enter the atmosphere and burn up. Many astronomers are calling for Hubble to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/994737.asp&quot;&gt;refurbished&lt;/a&gt; and its mission extended to 2020. &lt;a href=&quot;http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; are some of it&apos;s best pictures.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reverendX</dc:creator>		<category>space</category>		<category>hubble</category>		<category>telescope</category>		<category>science</category>		<category>astronomy</category>		<category>photography</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: reverendX</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599006</link>	
		<description>[warning... Flash]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599006</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:03:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reverendX</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Songdog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599017</link>	
		<description>Particularly stunning pictures, though! There are many more pictures, sans Flash, at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hubblesite.org/gallery/&quot;&gt;HubbleSite Gallery&lt;/a&gt;, an official presentation of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stsci.edu/&quot;&gt;Space Telescope Science Institute&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599017</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:26:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Songdog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mygoditsbob</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599038</link>	
		<description>Absolutely amazing!!!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599038</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mygoditsbob</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pressed Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599052</link>	
		<description>Buurrp!  Um, very tasty, thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599052</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pressed Rat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kablam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599058</link>	
		<description>I wonder if it has crossed anyone&apos;s mind to rig Hubble for a &quot;protective mode&quot;, cover it with protective material, then blast it out *further* into space.  Even if they can&apos;t think of anything to do with it *now*, it will still be there, with known technology fit for upgrade, for a long, long time.

Hell, with an upgrade of an external propulsion system, a protective shell, and boosting of its communications equipment, it could be used as a deep space probe.

There is an enormous number of possibilities here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:53:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kablam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Orange Goblin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599071</link>	
		<description>The picture of 1500 galaxies is particularly &apos;wow&apos;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599071</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Orange Goblin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: badstone</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599074</link>	
		<description>Don&apos;t worry about running out of pretty pictures (and spectacular science.)  Hubble&apos;s very capable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/webb_ngst_030108.html&quot;&gt;successor &lt;/a&gt; should be going up just as Hubble is coming down.  Although, there is some concern in the astronomy community that there might not be overlap between the two missions (can&apos;t find a good article right now), meaning that we might be stuck without a space telescope for some period of time.  It all depends on how well the JWST people can keep to their schedule.  (Proposed launch: August 2011)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599074</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:27:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badstone</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: badstone</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599081</link>	
		<description>Besides HubbleSite, STScI also has the older &lt;a href=&quot;http://heritage.stsci.edu/gallery/galindex.html&quot;&gt;Hubble Heritage&lt;/a&gt; gallery.  There are links to full res images there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599081</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badstone</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scarabic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599083</link>	
		<description>Fantastic presentation, thanks. I wish it went a little more slowly, though, so I could read the captions and enjoy the photos. At least it&apos;s pausable/rewindable.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599083</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scarabic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: magullo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599108</link>	
		<description>... and this is so just the first peek ...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599108</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:15:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: zanpo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599226</link>	
		<description>I got a refurbished Hubble from Dell and it burned up in the atmosphere!  WTF?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599226</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:06:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zanpo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: golo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599258</link>	
		<description>With the use of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eso.org/projects/aot/introduction.html&quot;&gt;adaptive optics &lt;/a&gt; (originally developed for photographing soviet satellites) earthbound telescopes can now supposedly produce &lt;a href=&quot;http://cfao.ucolick.org/pgallery/&quot;&gt;results&lt;/a&gt; that were previously possible only with space based telescopes. (more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/ao/images/solarsys/solarsys.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599258</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:08:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>golo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nelleish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599267</link>	
		<description>Oye, the problem with photos like these is they are so &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; beautiful and mysterious and fascinating that I get immediately upset I wasn&apos;t born 3000 years from now when maybe I would actually go out and see them for myself. As magullo put it, this is just the beginning, we can only hope this isn&apos;t the only peek we&apos;ll get (Arthur C. Clarke has had my hopes up since I was eleven, even though 2001 didn&apos;t pan out).

*watches again*</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599267</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nelleish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aznblader</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30151/The-Best-of-Hubble#599775</link>	
		<description>Well, the pictures aren&apos;t actually what the nebulae and such really look like in real life. You wouldn&apos;t be able to see such a panopoly of color. The Los Angeles Times did an article about this. The images were created by assigning a single color to signatures that certain chemicals (I think) reflect, and compositing it together so that it&apos;s aesthetically pleasing.

I was pretty disappointed too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30151-599775</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:59:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aznblader</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
