<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Journalism Net Picks of 2003</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30472/Journalism-Net-Picks-of-2003/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Journalism Net Picks of 2003</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:02:54 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:02:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Journalism Net Picks of 2003</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30472/Journalism-Net-Picks-of-2003</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.journalismnet.com/picks/picks03.htm"&gt;JNet&apos;s Top Picks of 2003&lt;/a&gt; : &lt;i&gt;a random selection of some of the best, most topical or just plain fun sites for journalists.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30472</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boost ventilator</dc:creator>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>2003</category>		<category>web</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thanotopsis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30472/Journalism-Net-Picks-of-2003#606349</link>	
		<description>Random is right.

The selection of the Geektools Whois seems a bit naive.  Why go to Geektools over any other Whois tool out there.  I personally find samspade.org&apos;s version more comprehensive, and certainly the windows client version is handier.

Likewise, using Alexa as a measure of credibility is a bit ignorant, as Alexa measures traffic by the usage of their toolbar.  This is the very same toolbar that any self-respecting Spyware detection &apos;bot will wipe off your system in a heartbeat.  All you can really tell through the Alexa statistics is how popular a site is with Alexa users, which are understandably a much small subset than the internet as a whole.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30472-606349</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:02:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thanotopsis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Vidiot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30472/Journalism-Net-Picks-of-2003#606359</link>	
		<description>Yeah, these are good resources, but pretty far from &quot;the best&quot; out there.

(And I like samspade.org&apos;s or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coolwhois.com&quot;&gt;CoolWhois&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2003:site.30472-606359</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:27:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vidiot</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
