<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 3066</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3066//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 3066</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:36:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:36:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 3066</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3066/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.creativetime.org/dnaid/copyright.html"&gt;copyright your DNA&lt;/a&gt; and do it now... before it&apos;s too late!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3066</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:57:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raedyn</dc:creator>		<category>DNA</category>		<category>copyright</category>		<category>cloning</category>		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: capt.crackpipe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3066/#17909</link>	
		<description>Harper&apos;s August issue (the one with the &quot;Eggers Rant&quot;) has a British poet/waitress&apos; patent application for her DNA. It&apos;s billiant. This is the point where technology and philosophy collide. How do we qualitatively define self when it&apos;s been quantitated? Are you more than your DNA? Will the business and governement worlds care?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3066-17909</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:36:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>capt.crackpipe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: karaleah</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3066/#17949</link>	
		<description>What happens if a twin copyrights his own DNA before the other twin gets to it?  Does that mean that the non-copyrighted twin (who was BORN with his own DNA) can&apos;t clone himself without paying his twin?  That&apos;s kinda crummy.  I&apos;d sue my parents for taking all that Clomid, if I were in that situation.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3066-17949</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karaleah</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
