<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 3077</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 3077</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:13:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:13:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 3077</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000831/wr/quackdotcom_aol_dc_1.html"&gt;AOL Buys Quack.com That Enables Access with Voice&lt;/a&gt;  &#160; &lt;&#8212; this is the worst headline I have ever seen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3077</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 17:20:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylloge</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>Yahoo</category>		<category>AOL</category>		<category>Quack.com</category>		<category>headlines</category>		<category>editing</category>		<category>EditorialOversight</category>		<category>copywriting</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tomorama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/#17963</link>	
		<description>Geez.  I&apos;d think yahoo would have editors for this sort of thing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3077-17963</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:13:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/#17967</link>	
		<description>Well, it&apos;s repurposed Reuters, and a repackaged press release, so whatever: in previous years, it would have found its true function in the recycling bin or as a fish and chip wrapper. Probably better to worry about crimes against the language when production values get involved.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3077-17967</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 21:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/#17982</link>	
		<description>If a headline&apos;s function is to draw attention to itself, maybe this worked. We could see more criminally garbled English, just because it stands out.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3077-17982</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2000 06:09:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scum</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3077/#17998</link>	
		<description>What? There was a Quack.com that did NOT enable access with voice?!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3077-17998</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2000 09:56:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
