<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The only problem was that there was two women for every man.</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The only problem was that there was two women for every man.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:50:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:50:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The only problem was that there was two women for every man.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.andmas.co.uk/womansworld/"&gt;50&apos;s Women and Their World&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;:: via &lt;a href=&quot;http://blort.meepzorp.com&quot;&gt;blort&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user.mefi/15971&quot;&gt;Madamjjj&lt;/a&gt; ::&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:18:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anastasiav</dc:creator>		<category>history</category>		<category>americana</category>		<category>feminism</category>		<category>advertising</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615400</link>	
		<description>When I see 50s women, or 40s women, or 60s women, or 18th Century women, I inevitably sigh and say &quot;For pity - I was born too late...&quot;  Then I think of 90s and 80s and 00s (noughties!) women; realize that I&apos;m reacting not to the decade but to the &quot;women&quot; part and I cheer up. Sort of.

Still... thanks anastasiav and Juju... I guess... *sigh*

Not that, after all the Douglas Sirk movies I&apos;ve watched, I think for a minute that American women in the 50s weren&apos;t as bright and sassy as they are now.  But those - how can I put this? - &lt;i&gt;aprons&lt;/i&gt;... 

&lt;small&gt;Who&apos;s Donna Reed?  She&apos;s mentioned here every time someone mentions the Fifties.  I know she was an actress - but what does she &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615400</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:50:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615408</link>	
		<description>donna reed means approximately what ward cleaver meant, only female.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615408</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:59:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615413</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Great help, quonsar! You really do have a privileged insight into the European mind, dontcha? WTF is Ward Cleaver when he&apos;s at home?  Or is it an ax used in hospital wards for emergency amputation purposes?  :)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615413</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:08:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615418</link>	
		<description>at home, ward mostly punishes the beaver. but that&apos;s beside the point. he was one of those impossibly wholesome 1950&apos;s american television characters. meanwhile, in the movies, donna reed mostly played a ditzy, wholesome female type who kept stumbling into vaguely naughty situations, usually with stunningly handsome men who were, in real life, busily making naughty with other men.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615418</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:16:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615431</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Oh, I see! We only got Lucille Ball, Doris Day, Rock Hudson and Dick Van Dyke here... Thanks!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615431</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615436</link>	
		<description>yeah, donna reed was sort of a doris day clone. but then again, i&apos;m just making all this shit up.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615436</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:37:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Oriole Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615437</link>	
		<description>Donna Reed was a TV mom in the 1950s...she wore pearls while dusting, baked a perfect apple pie, was always there for her family.  Always smiling, relentlessly wholesome, and forever the yardstick of mom perfection.

Ward Cleaver was the all-American dad on &quot;Leave It to Beaver&quot;, which actually aired in the early 1960s.  The Cleaver family was at least a bit more realistic - the two kids were forever getting themselves into trouble and being misled by neighborhood wiseguy Eddie Haskell.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615437</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oriole Adams</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615451</link>	
		<description>And before Donna Reed was a 1950s tele-mom icon, she was Mary Bailey in &lt;em&gt;It&apos;s a Wonderful Life &lt;/em&gt;in 1946.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615451</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:30:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scody</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615453</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Apologies, anastasiav, for this awful derailment, specially as the website you linked to is so much fun.  This was probably AskMe fodder.  Thanks for the explanations, though!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615453</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:33:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: orange swan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615505</link>	
		<description>This is really a presentation of fifties advertisements, which is probably about as representative of the fifties as our advertising is representative of us. That is - only somewhat. 

Fun to look at though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615505</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:54:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: amberglow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615512</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timvp.com/donna.html&quot;&gt;Donna Reed&lt;/a&gt; (the husband/father was gorgeous, and the son became a big advocate for child stars and runs some support foundation for them now)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615512</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:06:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: orange swan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615515</link>	
		<description>Did you notice that Bob Crane was on that cast list, amberglow? Very wholesome show, indeed.

And the father figure was indeed quite yummy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615515</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: amberglow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615518</link>	
		<description>i was surprised by that too--Hogan! (I bet he played the wacky doctor-neighbor or something) Did they ever figure out the whole death/sexfilms thing with him?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615518</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:25:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615525</link>	
		<description>isn&apos;t crane&apos;s kid capitalizing on the films? did the punishing the beaver crack whoosh over miguel&apos;s head? inquiring minds etc etc</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615525</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:36:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: amberglow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615528</link>	
		<description>is he? and yup ; &amp;gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615528</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:41:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615572</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bobcrane.com/XXX.html&quot;&gt;yup&lt;/a&gt;. and, too bad for migs :-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615572</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:03:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: joedan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615584</link>	
		<description>do you mean to tell me that people actuall had &lt;em&gt;sex&lt;/em&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;fifties&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615584</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:04:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joedan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Goofyy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615585</link>	
		<description>On a more serious note, an old female friend of mine tells me as recent as the early 60&apos;s a woman working in the office still had to wear gloves to work. Mind you, she was also wearing a girdle (nasty tight rubber thing worn like underwear, but it kept the tummy in) and tons of makeup--While working for less than a man doing the same work.

The crack about punishing the beaver was rich.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615585</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:31:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goofyy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Katemonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615596</link>	
		<description>On the site, there are some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andmas.co.uk/womansworld/food/recipes/list.htm&quot;&gt;interesting recipes&lt;/a&gt;, if you want to take your life in your hands.

Although the apple tea sounds like something I will try to make...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615596</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:06:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: geekyguy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615629</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://magnetplace.com/RETRO/&quot;&gt;Fifties Boulevard&lt;/a&gt; and the aptly named &lt;a href=&quot;http://ephemeranow.com/enow01.htm&quot;&gt;EphemeraNow&lt;/a&gt; that even contains an ad for &lt;a href=&quot;http://ephemeranow.com/cars/cars098.htm&quot;&gt;my car&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615629</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:20:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geekyguy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dreama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615710</link>	
		<description>Ah, the idealized fifties.  One day, since I am mainly a housewife these days, I am going to run the vacuum in pearls and go grocery shopping in a dress and heels in the middle of the afternoon.  Maybe I&apos;ll &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andmas.co.uk/womansworld/fashion/underwear/images/Flexee.jpg&quot;&gt;wear something like this&lt;/a&gt; so that I&apos;ll have a pleasing hourglass figure beneath my dress.  Hmmm.

Okay, maybe not, but when I watch &lt;em&gt;Far From Heaven&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;The Hours&lt;/em&gt; I do want desperately to look like (but not feel like!) Julianne Moore. I mean really, why wouldn&apos;t anyone?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://movieweb.com/media/news/11_02/farfromheaven/5.jpg&quot;&gt;Gorgeous dresses&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://movieweb.com/media/news/11_02/farfromheaven/8.jpg&quot;&gt;faboo hair and accessories&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.everythingoscar.com/JULIE.jpg&quot;&gt;the steely demeanor&lt;/a&gt; (okay, that may be more the actress than the period), it was such a put-together sort of time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615710</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dreama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: orange swan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615755</link>	
		<description>Maybe someday, dreama, people will look back on our advertising and say, hey, they looked perfect in the naughties! 

My dad says the fifties are his favourite decade for women&apos;s fashion, but my mother says the fashions were awful. Skirts with five yards of fabric in them weren&apos;t flattering. Girdles were very uncomfortable and probably unhealthy - although they were flattering. The pointy-toed shoes were murder on one&apos;s feet. They didn&apos;t have the comfortable stretch fabrics they have now. And garters were nasty little inventions - you&apos;d sit down, feel a *ping* *ping* and then wonder how you&apos;d get to the bathroom to fix them without your stockings falling down.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615755</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:05:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>orange swan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: carter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#615817</link>	
		<description>Made me laugh. Thanks, anastasiav!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-615817</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:03:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plep</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#616118</link>	
		<description>[this is good]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-616118</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:47:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hipnerd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30872/The-only-problem-was-that-there-was-two-women-for-every-man#616995</link>	
		<description>I have a lovely little article I found in an old Reader&apos;s Digest from the fifties titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badmouth.net/archives/000013.php&quot;&gt;Why Women Act That Way&lt;/a&gt;. Answered all my questions about the weaker sex.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.30872-616995</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:26:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hipnerd</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
