when I was in school we called these "states" of matter. Did something change? posted by scarabic at 5:25 PM on January 28, 2004
What about semi-solids? (Example: toothpaste) Not unique enough for its own category? posted by banished at 6:41 PM on January 28, 2004
MatterFilter. posted by iamck at 6:47 PM on January 28, 2004
banished: pastes are a mixture of solids and liquids, not a state of matter. posted by RylandDotNet at 6:49 PM on January 28, 2004
Toothpaste, at the molecular level, is just a mix of solids and liquids. You can suspend a solid in a liquid (a "colloid"), which is squishy like jelly for instance. I think tooth paste contains glycerine which makes it non-fluid. Vague memory though, corrections welcome. posted by fvw at 6:55 PM on January 28, 2004
So now my pagan circle consecrations have to have six points? I'll be here all night! posted by kfury at 6:58 PM on January 28, 2004
Toothpaste flows, given enough time. Other substances are also less easily classified.
I don't see how a fermionic condensate would have much to do with high-Tc superconductivity. The former involves entire atoms, while the latter, since it takes place in a solid, involves only electrons and phonons. posted by starkeffect at 8:12 PM on January 28, 2004
I'm just a grad-school dropout but, don't the He3 nuclei pair up to form pseudo-bosons in the superfluid? posted by Octaviuz at 12:03 AM on January 29, 2004
starkeffect, i believe this was the first creation of a superfluid using in this case magnetic resonance to induce the atoms into Cooper pairs (BCS) and then observing the transition to a bose-einstein condensate like state (actually, pseudo-bosons or fermion pairs as octaviuz states)
So, the big news here is the creation and the observation of this transition phase. Offhand, its really not all that exciting outside of the superconductivity field.
The first creation of a BE condensate however was a stunning confirmation of some deep principles in quantum physics.
posted by stbalbach at 5:12 PM on January 28, 2004