<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 3107</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 3107</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2000 22:42:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2000 22:42:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 3107</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hreoc.gov.au/cgi-bin/textonly.cgi/disability_rights/Maguire_v_SOCOG2.htm"&gt;Sydney Olympics found to discriminate against blind complainant&lt;/a&gt; Bruce Maguire defeats the mighty Olympics. The Australians are requiring SOCOG to take three basic accessibility steps on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olympics.com&quot;&gt;Olympics.com&lt;/a&gt; by September 15. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contenu.nu/socog.html&quot; title=&quot;Reader&apos;s guide to Sydney Olympics accessibility decision&quot;&gt;Reader&apos;s guide to the decision&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3107</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2000 15:32:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>		<category>olympipcs</category>		<category>australia</category>		<category>brucemaguire</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107/#18207</link>	
		<description>OK, the obvious question is... why should they comply?  This is a situation where a delay of 2 weeks would be as good as not doing it at all.  And it&apos;s not like the SOCOG even needs to exist after the end of September.  And this is IBM&apos;s last Olympics I believe, so what do they care?  They&apos;re just the contractor anyway.  So while it&apos;s great that this guy won, what&apos;s the chance that those accessibility steps are actually gonna get done?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3107-18207</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2000 22:42:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: m.polo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107/#18219</link>	
		<description>This past week - in a news story I can no longer find on Yahoo! - the SOCOG said exactly that: the expense was enormous and the time it would take would exceed that actual running the Games; therefore, they&apos;d do nothing, since Maguire had proved his point in court.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3107-18219</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:46:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>m.polo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: joeclark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107/#18225</link>	
		<description>The reason why SOCOG has no big impulse to comply with the ruling is because They&apos;re the Olympics and They&apos;re a Law Unto Themselves. 
 
M.Polo: SOCOG&apos;s claims of enormous cost outlays (A$2.2 million, exactly) and time requirements were rejected by the inquiry after testimony from expert witnesses. And SOCOG never bothered to tell anyone how much &lt;EM&gt;else&lt;/em&gt; they&apos;re spending on the Web site. For all we know, $2.2 million may be a drop in the bucket. 
 
And anyway, M.Polo, the inquiry did not merely state that Maguire was right, so we can all go home. There is always the remedy component of a legal action. The inquiry ordered a remedy, which of course SOCOG will now ignore. 
 
Finally, keep in mind that one of the tasks they&apos;re required to do is add ALT texts. Now, compared to IBM&apos;s real-time results system or even online ticketing, just how difficult will that be?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3107-18225</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 10:49:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: joeclark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3107/#18226</link>	
		<description>Oopsy. Forgot something.Maguire&apos;s complaint was lodged in June &lt;EM&gt;1999&lt;/em&gt;, and the inquiry noted that SOCOG did everything possible to delay the hearing so that SOCOG could then claim compliance could not be accomplished within the remaining time. 
 
It don&apos;t take 15 months to add ALT texts.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3107-18226</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 10:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
