Where will we get the Congresscritters?
February 5, 2004 8:18 PM
Subscribe
The Quorum AfterRicin, anthrax, plane crashing into the Capital--there've been several serious threats to our Congresspeople in the last couple of years and, despite having a couple of bills introduced to rectify the matter, we still have no program in place to manage an emergency that deprives us of a quorum. Norman Ornstein explains (and though link is NYT, no babies required as payment). I know, I know, but it really does matter.
posted by billsaysthis (16 comments total)
« Older
Remember Dooce who lost her job for her blog? She'...
| Man short on funds, mails hims...
Newer »
If there are a bunch dead, all that the House and Senate have to do is interpret the "majority" required for a quorum to exclude dead people, so they'd only need 111 of the 220 left, or whatever.
If a bunch are sick, all the chamber has to do is avoid taking official notice of the fact that there's no quorum, which mostly means not overly pissing off members of the minority. You can't shout down from the galleries that there's no quorum -- there's a quorum unless and until a member doubts the presence of a quorum, and a quorum is not found. You probably couldn't use this to get controversial legislation unrelated to whatever the crisis was passed, since then someone would have every incentive to notice the absence of a quorum, but it could easily suffice for legislation that's actually relevant to the emergency and that's not stupidly one-sided.
Certainly there's no pressing reason to go monkeying with the principle that there's only one way to become a member of the US House, and that's being elected by the people.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 9:14 PM on February 5, 2004