<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Harold and Maude</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Harold and Maude</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:43:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:43:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Harold and Maude</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://home.online.no/~bhundlan/scripts/Harold-and-Maude.htm"&gt;Harold and Maude.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;We hold on his wretched face as his mother&apos;s hysterical cries are heard in the background. Harold moves his head and listens. He breaks into a sly, satisfied grin.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>		<category>movie</category>		<category>script</category>		<category>humor</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625426</link>	
		<description>[I just saw this today, but I can&apos;t for the life of me remember how I got there (I have a tendency to open up lots of tabs and then go back to read them later when I have time).  It might have been inside a MeFi thread (can&apos;t find it though) or somewhere else in my daily traversal of the web.  Doesn&apos;t seem like a dupe though, and sorry I can&apos;t give credit where credit is due.]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625426</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:43:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: moonbird</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625428</link>	
		<description>nice find.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625428</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moonbird</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: xmutex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625431</link>	
		<description>PSYCHIATRIST
And were they all done for your
mother&apos;s benefit?

HAROLD
(thoughtful pause)
I wouldn&apos;t say &quot;benefit.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625431</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:54:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xmutex</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Master 666</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625435</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/31269&quot;&gt; credit done &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625435</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:59:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Domain Master 666</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625445</link>	
		<description>Ah!  So it was in a MeFi thread.  Anyway, where&apos;d you originally find the link DM666?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625445</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ColdChef</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625448</link>	
		<description>He gives her the little piece of metal.

                                MAUDE
                Oh, a gift.

        She reads it.

                                MAUDE
                        (continuing)
                &quot;Harold loves Maude.&quot;

        She looks up. Harold is blushing.

                                MAUDE
                        (softly)
                And Maude loves Harold.

        They both smile at each other.

                                MAUDE
                Ohhhhh! This is the nicest
                present I&apos;ve received in years.

        She kisses it and tosses it happily into the ocean. She
        turns back to Harold. His face is one of disbelief. He
        looks out to the ocean and then back to Maude. He begins
        to form the word &quot;Why?&quot;

                                MAUDE
                So I&apos;ll always know where it is.

        Harold accepts that. Women, after all, are strange
        creatures. Maude smiles.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625448</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:26:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ColdChef</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625463</link>	
		<description>It strikes me that this is somewhat along the lines of &lt;i&gt;Amelie&lt;/i&gt;, although according to the date at the bottom, much older (AFAIK).  I absolutely loved &lt;i&gt;Amelie&lt;/i&gt;.  Anyone else see the similarities?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625463</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:59:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625464</link>	
		<description>Oops, seems like it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.norcalmovies.com/HaroldAndMaude/&quot;&gt;produced&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625464</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:03:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Hildago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625467</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m a little confused.  Is there an in-joke involved here?  Harold and Maude is a pretty well-known film, I thought.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625467</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:08:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BloodyWallet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625468</link>	
		<description>yeah I&apos;m confused too Hildago, in fact I would even say it&apos;s a &lt;i&gt;classic&lt;/i&gt; film.  What&apos;s the deal?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625468</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:10:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BloodyWallet</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625470</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll see your confusion, and add some extra confusion as to why a link to a movie script is considered a good post.  (The movie was OK, but I liked it better when I was younger.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625470</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:15:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625471</link>	
		<description>Well, when you were born 16 years after it was originally released (1971, I&apos;ve read), it doesn&apos;t dawn upon you that what you&apos;re reading might actually be a classic film.  Sorry about that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625471</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:15:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Master 666</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625474</link>	
		<description>Don&apos;t worry kid. I gotta million of &apos;em.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625474</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:27:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Domain Master 666</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wsg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625489</link>	
		<description>Harold and Maude is a great movie and an old favorite.  I recommend it highly.  It is a very funny, very dark comedy.  It also has a great soundtrack by Cat Stevens.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625489</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:34:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wsg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dmd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625493</link>	
		<description>Hmm... I was born in 1978, and first saw Harold and Maude in seventh grade or so...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625493</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmd</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tittergrrl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625501</link>	
		<description>Wow, great find. 

Thank you so much.  Harold and Maude and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.corky.net/scripts/network.html&quot;&gt;Network&lt;/a&gt; (link to the script, as well) are two of my favorite movies.  And both so very well written.

Time to do some rereading!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625501</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:14:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tittergrrl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crunchland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625503</link>	
		<description>youth is wasted on the young.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625503</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:26:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Hildago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625510</link>	
		<description>I was born ten years after it came out.  Netflix is the great leveler.  Good script though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625510</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:43:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625522</link>	
		<description>I can only hope that someday a studio will take a chance on adapting novels such as &lt;i&gt;The Godfather&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;The Exorcist&lt;/i&gt; for the screen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625522</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:16:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slagman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625563</link>	
		<description>The chick in this movie was way hot. Remember Nathan Hale!

Poor Bud Cort never amounted to much, did he.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625563</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:30:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slagman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scarabic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625566</link>	
		<description>I found a paperback version of this, in English, in a little bookseller in Spain some years back. It had less stage direction, presented almost like a play. But it made fod good reading, especially on the road, where you never know what you&apos;ll be able to get.

Incidentally, I don&apos;t feel that linking to the full text of a much-beloved script does much to honor it (unless it&apos;s in the public domain or something). Definitely a weird post, but thanks anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625566</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scarabic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625567</link>	
		<description>?! Finding the script of &lt;cite&gt;Harold &#38; Maude&lt;/cite&gt; on the internet is really your first encounter with it? My mind is now blown.

And poor Bud Cort ammounted to plenty &#8212; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001069/&quot;&gt;see&lt;/a&gt;? Brother Jacques in &lt;cite&gt;The Chocolate War&lt;/cite&gt;&#8230;The Toyman&#8217;s voice on the Paul Dini &lt;cite&gt;Superman&lt;/cite&gt;&#8230;I could go on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625567</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:49:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sherman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: teg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625582</link>	
		<description>And Bud Cort is in Wes Anderson&apos;s next film, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362270/&quot;&gt;The Life Aquatic&lt;/a&gt;, coming out some time this year. If you like Wes Anderson&apos;s stuff (Royal Tenenbaums, Rushmore), and you haven&apos;t seen Harold and Maude, you really must.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625582</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:19:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>teg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625600</link>	
		<description>Yes, sherman, it is.  I don&apos;t really watch that many movies, even if I should see some of the &quot;classics.&quot;  (Still haven&apos;t seen Bonnie and Clyde, for instance.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625600</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crunchland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625601</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Well, when you were born 16 years after it was originally released (1971, I&apos;ve read), &lt;/em&gt;

so, wait... you&apos;re 17? 

who let you in here?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625601</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:41:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625614</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m 16 right now.  And I snuck in the back.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625614</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JanetLand</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625616</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Well, when you were born 16 years after it was originally released (1971, I&apos;ve read), &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.douglasadams.com/dna/bio.html&quot;&gt;The Hitch Hiker&apos;s Guide to the Galaxy &lt;/a&gt;predates you too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625616</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JanetLand</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: grabbingsand</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625623</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m sorry....

But who didn&apos;t know that &lt;i&gt;Harold and Maude&lt;/i&gt; was a film?  Raise your hands.  High.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625623</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grabbingsand</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mkultra</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625624</link>	
		<description>Uh, isn&apos;t this pretty blatant copyright infringement? If so, [this is very, very bad]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625624</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dantien</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625634</link>	
		<description>Geez.  I was born in 71 (didnt see H&amp;amp;M until my 20s though).  I must be the oldest MeFi here.  How friggin depressing.  To think you were born AFTER Star Wars.  And weren&apos;t alive during Wham!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:02:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dantien</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slagman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625637</link>	
		<description>I was born in the early 60&apos;s. I&apos;ve seen Howard and Maude dozens of times. Grew out of it sometime in the late 80s. An interesting front page link, as opposed to this one, might be about the practice of &quot;Harolding.&quot; Hanging out in cemeteries. Maybe people don&apos;t do it anymore. So I imagine this kid at home coming across the screenplay and thinking...what, exactly. Google, dude. Google.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625637</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:05:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slagman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625680</link>	
		<description>mkultra, screenplays are all over the internet. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.script-o-rama.com/&quot;&gt;Drew&apos;s Scriptorama&lt;/a&gt; has tons. Studios/writers don&apos;t seem to mind unless the script is still in print in book form and therefore taking money out of someone&apos;s pocket. I think most screenwriters are happy that people are able to read what they wrote rather than judge them based on the dreck most directors make out of their words (H&amp;amp;M excepted, of course). 

Oh, and thebabblefish... Harold and Maude is nothing like Amelie, except that they&apos;re both off-kilter love stories.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625680</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:21:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Hildago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625735</link>	
		<description>And they both star totally hot chicks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625735</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crunchland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625749</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;m 16 right now. And I snuck in the back.&lt;/em&gt;

A good point for all of us to remember, next time we read something that gets us riled up and a flamewar erupts.

Your adversary may still be wet behind the ears.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625749</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:45:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aine42</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625825</link>	
		<description>Slagman -- your mention of Harolding sent me off searching for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://membres.lycos.fr/coupland/nr3.html&quot;&gt;Douglas Coupland piece&lt;/a&gt; on the subject.

And I still like hanging out in cemetaries. Just don&apos;t get as much time to do it as I did in my teens and twenties.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625825</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:30:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aine42</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JanetLand</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625842</link>	
		<description>The film, by the way, is different in some areas than this script. For example, there&apos;s much more dialogue here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625842</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:47:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JanetLand</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625870</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Harold and Maude is a great movie and an old favorite. I recommend it highly. It is a very funny, very dark comedy. It also has a great soundtrack by Cat Stevens.&lt;/em&gt;

I disagree  vehemently with all four statements. I think it is an abomination on all counts.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625870</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:32:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JollyWanker</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625880</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I found a paperback version of this, in English, in a little bookseller in Spain some years back. It had less stage direction, presented almost like a play.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;The film, by the way, is different in some areas than this script. For example, there&apos;s much more dialogue here.&lt;/i&gt;

Oddly enough, Colin Higgins did turn &lt;i&gt;Harold and Maude&lt;/i&gt; into a stage play in 1980 with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibdb.com/production.asp?ID=3682&quot;&gt;a Broadway production&lt;/a&gt; starring Hollywood ancient Janet Gaynor. It closed after four performances, and deservedly so. The reviews were, as I recall, particularly savage. It was among the most humorless comedies I&apos;d ever seen onstage.

Skimming through this treatment reminds me of some of the changes I noticed at the time in the play - it&apos;s possible, even probable, that Higgins had additional material in the screenplay that didn&apos;t make it into the final print that he then re-purposed for the staged version. Higgins also published the material in novel-form at one point, but it&apos;s hardly great literature.

Not having learned from either of those experiences, the material is once again apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://namt.net/festival2003info.html&quot;&gt;in development&lt;/a&gt;, this time as a musical, with book and lyrics by Tom &quot;I Should Know Better&quot; Jones.

(How odd - I&apos;ve always used one&apos;s feelings about &lt;i&gt;Harold and Maude&lt;/i&gt; as a sort of predictor for other personality traits, and whether you&apos;d be someone I find amiable to be around. On preview, y2karl has just confirmed much of what I already thought of him based on his postings here...)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625880</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:46:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JollyWanker</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625927</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;ve always used one&apos;s feelings about Harold and Maude as a sort of predictor for other personality traits, and whether you&apos;d be someone I find amiable to be around. &lt;/em&gt; 

hahahahaha lol! hahahahahaha... zzzzzzz.....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625927</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:34:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625963</link>	
		<description>Ruth Gordon will always be more remembered for her part in a truly classic movie--number 22 on the American Film Institute&apos;s list of America&apos;s 100 Funniest Movies--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmnight.org/adamsrib.htm&quot; title=&gt;Adam&apos;s Rib&lt;/a&gt;, for which she and Garson Kanin wrote the Oscar nominated script. Nothing twee about that film, nosiree.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625963</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:10:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thebabelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#625987</link>	
		<description>JanetLand, yeah, Hitchhiker&apos;s was, but that&apos;s different; my parents have a pretty decent amount of books that I can browse through and read at my leisure.  Same doesn&apos;t go for films, and no one recommended it, unlike other older films.  Honestly, my first thought was that it was some unknown writer who put their script up.  That&apos;s when I submitted the FPP.  Then I saw it wasn&apos;t.  Then I realized that the other scripts in the directory were from common films.  Then I realized I could buy it off Amazon.  Then I realize I kinda screwed up.  Still, I greatly enjoyed reading it, and hopefully at least a few people have enjoyed that as well (and judging from the trackbacks it seems like that is so).

Ok, I&apos;ll stop now.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-625987</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:43:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thebabelfish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31281/Harold-and-Maude#626124</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt; I got to work with Ruth Gordon, and one of the seminal directors of the &apos;70&apos;s, Hal Ashby. But when I first looked at the cut of this movie, it was horrifying, it was a disaster. All the delicious moments were on the floor. Anything moving between me and Ruth was on the floor; the reason I go to bed with her was on the floor. Ashby said: &quot;I totally agree with you. But they won&apos;t listen to me.&quot; Shortly after that they asked me to come to New York, to the top floor of the Gulf and Western building. There&apos;s a huge conference table, and I looked like I was about 4 in those days, and they sat me down at the head of the table and said, &quot;Bud, we&apos;ve got eight pages in Vogue, we&apos;ve got the cover of Rolling Stone, we&apos;ve got this, we&apos;ve got that, blah, blah, blah.&quot; And I said: &quot;Gentleman, until this film is recut, not only to my specifications, but to Ms. Gordon&apos;s and to Mr. Ashby&apos;s, I am not available for any publicity on this film. Thank you very much. Good day.&quot; And from that moment on I&apos;ve been persona non grata over at Paramount. I was in Paris a couple of years later, sitting in a cafe, and this woman stopped dead in her tracks and said: &quot;Oh, my God, we&apos;ve been looking for you. You&apos;ve won our French academy award. Didn&apos;t Paramount give you the information?&quot; I don&apos;t even receive--well, I receive a residual check maybe once every two years for $11 made out to Bob Cort for &quot;Harold and Maude.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/budcortfanclub/Dec1700.html&quot;&gt;Bud Cort&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31281-626124</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
