<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Aunt Jemima does the</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Aunt Jemima does the</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:53:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:53:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Aunt Jemima does the</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.howardhallis.com/bis/aub/index.html"&gt;The strange synchronicity of &lt;i&gt;The Last Breakfast&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; Two paintings, created by two different artists, in two different countries, four years apart, but with striking similarities.  (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sixdifferentways.com&quot;&gt;sdw&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>		<category>synchronicity</category>		<category>art</category>		<category>breakfast</category>		<category>davinci</category>		<category>lastsupper</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ufez Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640750</link>	
		<description>Personally, I like the latter better since it&apos;s got &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quisp.com/&quot;&gt;Quisp&lt;/a&gt;.

And damn, my title got snafued.  It did say &quot;Aunt Jemima does the &apos;big arms&apos; thing&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640750</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:53:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ufez Jones</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TuxHeDoh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640753</link>	
		<description>And from that page we get to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepictureofeverything.com/&quot;&gt;The Picture of Everything&lt;/a&gt;. Which is pretty cool.  Everything from Clifford the Big Red Dog to Burning Man to Ralph and Alice Kramden.... but I still haven&apos;t found what I&apos;m looking for.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640753</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TuxHeDoh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TuxHeDoh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640756</link>	
		<description>After taking another look. I didn&apos;t mention any interesting ones.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640756</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TuxHeDoh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ljubljana</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640768</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And damn, my title got snafued.&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;d be lying if I said &quot;Aunt Jemima does the Metafilter&quot; didn&apos;t bring a smile to my face.

There&apos;s also the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~tcgaeta/images/dcsupperbig.jpg&quot;&gt;Superhero Last Supper&lt;/a&gt;, from a recent Fark photoshop contest.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640768</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:23:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ljubljana</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: abcde</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640781</link>	
		<description>Ljyubljana: Wow, that guy did with Photoshop better than The Last Breakfast did from scratch (not that the latter is so bad).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640781</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:37:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abcde</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nasim</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640790</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t find it that surprising.  It really seems the most obvious pop culture parody you could do of that famous painting.  This idea seems like something my stupid little mind would have also come up with.  Credit to the two artists for actually executing their ideas rather than just joking about it and leaving it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640790</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:48:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nasim</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: beagle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640815</link>	
		<description>The writer on the link finds this just incredible, but it ain&apos;t.  What nasim said.  Also, look at the numbers of parodies of other iconic paintings like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONASV07.htm&quot;&gt;Mona Lisa&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://cc.ysu.edu/~satingle/AmSt%202601/parodies.htm&quot;&gt;American Gothic&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640815</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:04:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beagle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gwint</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640865</link>	
		<description>Picasso and Braque they ain&apos;t.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640865</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:43:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gwint</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640870</link>	
		<description>beagle, your links are munged. any chance of posting them correctly?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640870</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:46:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: beagle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640876</link>	
		<description>Other parodies of the Last Supper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fanzing.com/mag/fanzing40/artresults.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/product1017.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Then there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postershop.co.uk/Wackerbarth/Wackerbarth-Last-Supper-I-2303621.html&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; (NSFW).  (The latter is by a well-known art photographer, more &lt;a href=&quot;http://business-timestest.asia1.com.sg/storyprintfriendly/0,4568,48397,00.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640876</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:55:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beagle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: beagle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640880</link>	
		<description>Sorry, links corrected: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONASV07.htm&quot;&gt;Mona Lisa &lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cc.ysu.edu/~satingle/AmSt%202601/parodies.htm&quot;&gt;American Gothic&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640880</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:01:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beagle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Hildago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#640970</link>	
		<description>Although it&apos;s not that obscure an idea, it&apos;s still quite possible that the guy stole it.  Perhaps unintentionally.  Perhaps someone who had seen it mentioned it to him in passing.  Maybe he overheard a description of it at an art-people&apos;s thing, and subconsciously filed it away.  I&apos;ve done this myself in the past.  

I bring it up because, while the general idea is pretty obvious, specific things (like having a female syrup mascot as Jesus) seem less obvious, and rather unlikely coincidences.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-640970</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:49:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ciderwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641014</link>	
		<description>I once spent three months working on a script for a feature that was going to be an updating of the Odyssey, set in Glasgow with a man driving south home to London to see his wife again. All Homers characters were going to be there, the cyclops was going to be a fat Liverpudlian with an eye patch, etc.

Then I got the trade papers and read about how the Coen brothers were about to start shooting their new film, an adaptation of Homers Odyssey.

Now I&apos;d love to think that I was going on about my script to someone in a bar and one of the Coen&apos;s happened to overhear, but sadly I think it was just bad luck that two variations on this theme should come about at roughly the same time (I say roughly as they must have started on theirs a couple of years before I did).

Anyway, I&apos;m left broke but with the slight satisfaction that once, a little bit, I kind of had the same-ish idea for a film as the Coens.

Who the hell am I kidding, those bastards ripped me off. I &lt;i&gt;knew&lt;/i&gt; I should have reinforced the tin foil hat.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641014</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ciderwoman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stbalbach</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641053</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;a female syrup mascot as Jesus&lt;/i&gt;

agreed. unlikely coincidence. as has been mentioned the meme is not new so the &quot;original&quot; is derivative as well. Certainly there are artists looking for ideas in lesser known channels and re-posting them, not unlike journalists searching MeFi for story ideas and trends.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641053</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:52:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dejah420</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641081</link>	
		<description>I dunno, maybe inspiration comes in sheets...but it splits off when it hits the atmosphere....and little bits of it float down...like celestial blotter acid.   

Like ciderwoman and the cyclops story,  I&apos;ve seen plenty of times when writers, artists, musicians, creative genius types will all start brainstorming on a similar theme, without access to each other.  It&apos;s like a namshub has been released, and it spreads through the creatives...but only a small percentage of those creatives can or will do anything with the idea.  

I do think it&apos;s possible that these artists had the idea at the same time and each implemented it in his own way.  Weirder stuff than that happens all the time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641081</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: anathema</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641084</link>	
		<description>My Sweet Lord/He&apos;s So Fine
Unconscious copying.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641084</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:01:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dabitch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641135</link>	
		<description>actually I&apos;d think of all the spokespeople to play Jesus, I&apos;d pick aunt Jemima too, since she is pretty much the exact opposite of the traditional view of Jesus. 
Ideas work on their own agenda.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641135</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dabitch</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mdn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641186</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I once spent three months working on a script for a feature that was going to be an updating of the Odyssey,&lt;/i&gt;

Using the odyssey as a basic story line is not a new idea.  I mean, to start with, there&apos;s James Joyce&apos;s Ulysses... but wasn&apos;t &quot;Oh Brother Where Art Thou&quot; based on the odyssey, too?  It&apos;s like using one of shakespeare&apos;s plays but updating or changing the context - what really matters is how well the script is written; it just gives you a story line to work off of.

Yeah, on this I&apos;m not sure, I could believe either.  Parodying the Last Supper = obvious; parodying it as a breakfast made of corporate breakfast icons is definitely less obvious, but two people could have come up with it independently.  It is always disappointing as a creative person to discover that so many other people have had the same ideas you have, that you think are genius, innovative, original, mind-blowing, and then you discover someone wrote basically the same thing 2500 years ago - or maybe just 3 years ago - or maybe both.  There are only so many ideas out there, I guess - and the good ones are the ones which will resonate - I think emerson said that we see in the work of genius our own rejected ideas, returning with a strange alien majesty - or something like that.  The point is, if it&apos;s good, it will very likely be the kind of thing someone else thought of already. 

On the other hand, Aunt Jemima seems like the best candidate for jesus, for many reasons, and the second artist chose mrs. butterworth, although he as aunt jemima right next to her, which almost strikes me as &quot;well, I can&apos;t just copy it &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt;&quot;... but of course that&apos;s reading a bit too much into things.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641186</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mdn</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: raygirvan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641242</link>	
		<description>A further example: how Leon Arden and Richard Lupoff separately came up with &quot;hero lives same day repeatedly&quot; plots, then both claimed their work had been ripped off for the plot of &lt;i&gt;Groundhog Day&lt;/i&gt; (more details &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raygirvan.co.uk/apoth/thought5.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  As &lt;b&gt;mdn&lt;/b&gt; says, writers very easily overestimate the originality of their ideas.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641242</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raygirvan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641243</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Using the odyssey as a basic story line is not a new idea. I mean, to start with, there&apos;s James Joyce&apos;s Ulysses... but wasn&apos;t &quot;Oh Brother Where Art Thou&quot; based on the odyssey, too?&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, that would be the Coen Brothers script that Ciderwoman heard about while she was working on hers!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641243</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:24:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: anathema</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641295</link>	
		<description>Applied to science, this concept is sort of what Thomas Kuhn was talking about in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhn.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Structure of Scientific Revolutions&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641295</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:48:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mdn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31862/Aunt-Jemima-does-the#641418</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yeah, that would be the Coen Brothers script that Ciderwoman heard about while she was working on hers!&lt;/i&gt; 

ahahhaha.  I&apos;m an idiot.

Sorry, I thought it was something forthcoming, as I thought I&apos;d heard of an adaptation of the odyssey coming out soon - maybe that was just &quot;troy&quot;.  Well, there was apparently a surfer movie based off the odyssey, and really post-joyce I&apos;m not sure it can be considered a new idea to adapt the story.  

Like I said, it has a lot more to do with the quality of the script itself.  Working off earlier texts or stories is a good way to begin with a resonant story (as Shakespeare did for nearly all of his writings) but what makes it work or not is the way it&apos;s done (that&apos;s what we remember Wm for, after all).  In other words, originality is not necessarily the most important factor, although simple copycat work is not inspiring either.  I think there is something to the idea that if you come to it on your own, you have a deeper sense of why you&apos;re doing it, what it&apos;s really about, than if you&apos;re just hopping onto a trend.  So if your script was good, fuck the coen brothers, and finish it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.31862-641418</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:04:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mdn</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
