Do we file this under "boobies", "stupid", or "suprisingly conservative"? posted by interrobang at 10:14 PM on March 31, 2004
That's the same bloody thing that they did last year. I mean, the same images, same HTML, etc.
That's really lame. posted by waldo at 10:26 PM on March 31, 2004
Let the snarks begin. Oh wait. posted by Space Coyote at 10:31 PM on March 31, 2004
Did you guys see that part where they made jokes about beer? ROFL!! posted by The God Complex at 10:52 PM on March 31, 2004
But, you know, hampsters! Typing! posted by onlyconnect at 10:57 PM on March 31, 2004
oh man a snark feeding and here i am without my screen shoRts.
As for fark.com and its crappy low brow humor, some days metafilter is ROUGH, not so much in a low brow way, but in a good god there is nothing on here at all today sort of way. Fark at least generally has one good article for every 30 bad ones.
In other news I'm eagerly awaiting a context checker to avoid future typos.
definitely some april fools humor, i still can't believe i wrote shorts... posted by sourbrew at 11:01 PM on March 31, 2004
strange.. view source in firebird just gives matching sets of html and body tags... posted by twine42 at 11:05 PM on March 31, 2004
Oooh... do I detect some FARK envy? Fortunately, you can now enlarge your Metafilter by over 50% using these new pills I read about. posted by Krrrlson at 11:31 PM on March 31, 2004
look carefully twine42, the URL's that show up for the images are:
http://img.fark.com/aprilfools04/farkboobies.jpg posted by escher at 11:57 PM on March 31, 2004
Awwwww, the hacking guinea pigs are really cute. I want some. posted by chrismear at 12:01 AM on April 1, 2004
I want some commemorative screen shorts.
Err, preferably uneaten. posted by loquacious at 12:17 AM on April 1, 2004
posted by sourbrew at 9:55 PM on March 31, 2004