<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How India is saving capitalism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32149/How-India-is-saving-capitalism/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post How India is saving capitalism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:33:40 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:33:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>How India is saving capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32149/How-India-is-saving-capitalism</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/04/01/collabnet/index.html"&gt;How India is saving capitalism.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;For one Silicon Valley company, hiring Indian programmers wasn&apos;t about greed, it was about survival. A special report from Chennai, globalization&apos;s ground zero.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32149</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:01:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>		<category>India</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: troutfishing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32149/How-India-is-saving-capitalism#647861</link>	
		<description>The title of this piece tells me about as much as the jabbering of crows or the patter of rain on my roof - or even less, perhaps. 

The text tells me more, but only in the way (as the story goes) of the blind men touching an elephant - &quot;globalization is like....a tusk!&quot; - &quot;No, it&apos;s like a pillar!&quot; - &quot;No, it&apos;s like....&quot; 

A meta-perspective is sadly lacking. 

Define capitalism within the perspective of Globalization - what does Capitalism mean within this context?  And are there any possible motives to oppose the process of Globalization or to challenge it&apos;s pace and ground rules? 

From such glosses (for shame, Salon!), one learns little to nothing about the ongoing struggles over Globalization - over the WTO&apos;s aggressive promotion of privatization (even of water) or it&apos;s insistence on running roughshod over local  regulations  on worker&apos;s rights and the environment.  

Will Globalization proceed? Of course. Short of a global catastrophe - a major comet impact or the next world war, for example - the process is now unstoppable.  

But the terms of the process are being hotly contested : to ignore that fact is antidemocratic, foolhardy, or disingenuous. 

The current rapid pace of job outsourcing, combined with far more powerful (in terms of job elimination) process of production efficiency gains  -  the combined effect of which seems to be an accelerating loss of American jobs -  will likely produce, sooner or later, a political backlash in the US, as American living standards decline.  

This backlash could be quite ugly, and it could lead in many unpredictable directions - but few of these are apt to be good either for the US or for the world at large.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32149-647861</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:33:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
