<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Canada decides to revamp its Copyright Act</title>
      <link>http://www.metafilter.com/32461/Canada-decides-to-revamp-its-Copyright-Act/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaFilter post Canada decides to revamp its Copyright Act</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:33:41 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:33:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Canada decides to revamp its Copyright Act</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32461/Canada-decides-to-revamp-its-Copyright-Act</link>	
    <description>Alan McLeod, Canadian Lawyer, writes &lt;em&gt;&quot;Make sure you are heard as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/arts/stories/scherrer20040413&quot;&gt;Canada decides to revamp its Copyright Act&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; He goes on to encourage Canadians to contact the Heritage Minister and weigh in as the Copyright rules in Canada may be about to change. </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.32461</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>stevengarrity</dc:creator>
	
	<category>canada</category>
	
	<category>copyright</category>
	
	<category>law</category>
	
	<category>copyrightact</category>
	
	<category>alanmcleod</category>
	
	<category>heritageminister</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: loquax</title>
  	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32461/Canada-decides-to-revamp-its-Copyright-Act#654976</link>	
    <description>I have a question. Why is it that we have a Heritage minister if all they do is grandstand about copyright law? Shouldn&apos;t this be a matter for the courts, or AG? I say this as a Canadian taxpayer outraged that I&apos;m paying for H&#xe9;l&#xe8;ne Scherrer to have a staff and issue press releases.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.32461-654976</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:33:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
