Comments on: Amazon's A9 Launches

Amazon's A9 Launches

kokogiak — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:57:42 -0800

Amazon's A9 Launches - Amazon.com's Entry into the Search Engine World launches today (in Beta). [via BoingBoing]

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:02:53 -0800

Actually, the via should also point to John Battelle's longer post about this.

By: jeremias

jeremias — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:12:22 -0800

Hmm, interesting. A relatively obscure search I just did for "wfmu chris ware t-shirt" gives me the exact same matches for the first 4 listings. Amazon Google Not quite sure what to make of that . . .

By: elwoodwiles

elwoodwiles — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:18:54 -0800

jeremias, A9 is built on top of Google and uses its results. Read Kokogiak's second link in the comments there for a full explaination of the service and its implications. Interesting post, though.

By: Witty

Witty — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:20:27 -0800

Amazon A9 is much more awesomer than google.

By: falconred

falconred — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:21:44 -0800

So it sounds like A9 combines google search results with Amazon's inside-the-book search they released a couple months ago. Could be handy, but not exactly earth-shattering.

By: McBain

McBain — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:23:11 -0800

Yes, the first thing I did was compare Google and A9 results. They are very similar. The "miserable failure" googlebomb is on A9 as well.

By: rusty

rusty — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:23:54 -0800

Hm. So that's what it'd be like if Google was cluttered.

By: Rob1855

Rob1855 — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:59:13 -0800

Google by any other name..... Take all of google's evil privacy practices. Add your Amazon history. Mix well with all of your search results & web page hits -- your Amazon ID will keep track of all of this as well. Nice work, Bezos.

By: reklaw

reklaw — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:08:55 -0800

Yeah, there doesn't seem much point to this. It's just a Google search with a search history, some extra UI cruft, some "inside the book" results (which are completely seperate from the other results -- you need to click the 'open book results' bar on the right) -- oh, and a slightly better URL scheme. I'm still waiting for someone to build a web search to at least compete with Google. If it gets left much longer then it might not even be possible.

By: Satapher

Satapher — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:09:56 -0800

its really ugly

By: jeremias

jeremias — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:19:16 -0800

jeremias, A9 is built on top of Google and uses its results Doh! Didn't see that. But only the first 4 were the same . .oh well, not going to worry about it. Something else, at least in Mozilla Firefox for Windows, after I search for something, the back button seems to be broken. Clicking on the back button returns me to the same page. Is that just browser weirdness? Haven't tried on IE.

By: Jairus

Jairus — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:25:24 -0800

Anytime Google-Watch is linked, I feel a moral obligation to link to Google-Watch Watch. It provides some much-needed context.

By: swank6

swank6 — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:32:23 -0800

Rob, that link about Google's privacy exploits is pretty savage. Is this something to be concerned about, or is it a bit conspiracy-theoryish to be taken too seriously?

By: Robot Johnny

Robot Johnny — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:35:10 -0800

I disagree, Satapher... compared to the hideous Google, it's lovely!

By: massless

massless — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:35:29 -0800

One thing I like very much about A9 is having search results saved out thar on the interweb and associated to my user identity. I find my past searches very valuable and would love for them to be available from any computer, anywhere, anytime.

By: reklaw

reklaw — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:56:47 -0800

That Google Watch link cracks me up. Oh no, the evil cookies are coming to get us! Seriously, there's nothing scary about cookies. You can disable them quite easily if it really bothers you. Just look at the diagram on this page, and read some of the ranting about Google hiring "spooks". The guy's quite obviously a few slices short of a loaf.

By: billpena

billpena — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:58:39 -0800

Hey, for a niche site, I think it's great. I love the idea of Search Inside The Book (tm), and putting it in this context, hopefully keeping the project scanning more books, is quite useful. Sure, I won't stop doing most searches through my trusty Google bar in Firefox, but I will probably come back to this when doing writing research, for example. Crafty crafty.

By: geoff.

geoff. — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:03:15 -0800

Still no results on what mimimomomizolalilamialomuelamironoriminos means. Help metafilter.

By: tippiedog

tippiedog — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:18:36 -0800

So, using Google's web services and Amazon's web services, couldn't any competent web programmer create something similar fairly easily? Doesn't seem like that big a deal. I'm sure there must already be sites out there that combine search results from the two in one search.

By: chunking express

chunking express — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:23:06 -0800

Well, searching for porno turns up nothing. I don't see this thing lasting.

By: me3dia

me3dia — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:46:56 -0800

A search for porn turns up plenty.

By: paulrockNJ

paulrockNJ — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:02:51 -0800

Anyone know why it's called a9 -- what's the significance of the 9?

By: chunking express

chunking express — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:05:17 -0800

There's hope yet I suppose. (It is strange though, that both porn and pornography return results, while porno does not.)

By: stbalbach

stbalbach — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:16:59 -0800

May be the "9" is a tip of the hat to Plan 9 From Outerspace the worst movie ever made.

By: Orange Goblin

Orange Goblin — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:17:48 -0800

Search for my blog (which is a made up word, so all instances of it refer to me) brings up the actual blog as the 4th result, compared to Google having it first. No thanks Amazon.

By: adamrice

adamrice — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:39:35 -0800

I seem to remember reading that Googlewatch was started by a disgruntled "search-engine optimizer" guy or something like that--someone who wasn't getting the kind of google ranking he thought he deserved. Why A9? Pure speculation, but 1. It's the A from amazon, plus 9 for the number of letters that follows in amazon.com (except for the period, of course)--sort of on the model of i18n for "internationalization." 2. It's short.

By: kokogiak

kokogiak — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:21:45 -0800

adamrice got part of it I think, that and A9 = A + the 9 letters "lgorithms", also A9 = A + the 9 letters "lexandria", or Alexandria, (as in the Library of). Got that from the Wired Interview with Udi Manber a while back.

By: D.C.

D.C. — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:03:19 -0800

Any search done from my computer (including others using it) potentially recorded and associated with my name, address, etc. (from Amazon account info)? A marketer's dream and a huge privacy problem. No thanks.

By: normy

normy — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:02:04 -0800

D.C. nails it for me, too. A search engine I have to log into? Huh? And that can match me to personally identifying information? A marketers wet dream (or nightmare, depending on your POV). Ok, I know I don't have to log in if I don't want to, but it seems I do if I want to benefit from the supposed advantages of A9 over Google. So, what problem does this solve, again? If you want to be super-paranoid, there's no reason a less robust match couldn't also be made just from ip address, of course - were A9 to share their logs with Amazon and write the appropriate filters - not difficult to do... I can see some utility in having a search history, I suppose, for curiosity's sake. But if a search is successful, doesn't one bookmark the results, or immediately consume them? If it's unsuccessful, why would one want to remember it?

By: normy

normy — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:10:10 -0800

And they've broken the back button between search result pages. Yuk.

By: nthdegx

nthdegx — Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:11:43 -0800

"Hm. So that's what it'd be like if Google was cluttered." Agreed!

By: Eekacat

Eekacat — Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:49:16 -0800

Now, if they could bring back the Library of Alexandria so I could search it from my computer, I'd be impressed.

By: BigCalm

BigCalm — Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:49:07 -0800

Hmmm. The internet search is google, and the problem is the book search is complete rubbish(!). e.g. Searching for "clocks were striking thirteen" should surely come up with 1984? Ok, so direct quotations don't work, let's try a couple of main characters: Searching for "Bernard Marx Helmoltz Watson" should surely come up with Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, but it's nowhere to be seen. concepts? "Big Brother"? Nope, "Ministry of Truth"? Nope. Even slightly obscure searches on extremely popular titles result - e.g. "Hermione Ron Harry" doesn't bring up one of the Harry Potter books in the first page of results. Amazon need to sort their Page Rank out!!!!!!

By: catchmurray

catchmurray — Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:00:47 -0800

> Hmmm. The internet search is google, and the problem is the book search is complete rubbish(!). Bloody Nora. This is a beta! Chill out.