<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The world&apos;s second biggest supercomputer?</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The world&apos;s second biggest supercomputer?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:35:52 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:35:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The world&apos;s second biggest supercomputer?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer</link>	
		<description>It depends on how you look at their S-1 filing and estimate their buying patterns... any way you look at it there&apos;s some serious computing power there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clevershark</dc:creator>
		
			<category>google</category>
		
			<category>supercomputers</category>
		
			<category>computersystems</category>
		
			<category>arrays</category>
		
			<category>searchengines</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664011</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not sure I see any reason for assuming that these machines cluster in any meaningful way on such a large scale, and presumably many of these boxes are dedicated web or database nodes that don&apos;t participate in spidering or link analysis. I&apos;d hold off on the &quot;biggest supercomputer&quot; talk.

It&apos;s kind of interesting, though not really meaningful in this context, to note how geographically diverse Google&apos;s network is.  They have servers in ten data centers, spread across the US.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664011</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:35:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mote</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Sfving</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664018</link>	
		<description>Do ya think they&apos;re all PowerMac G5s?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664018</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:41:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sfving</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: dolface</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664024</link>	
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sfving&lt;/strong&gt;, the time i got to see their data center, back when they had a mere 10k servers, they were using &lt;a href=&quot;http://rackable.com/&quot;&gt;rackable&lt;/a&gt;  hardware.
the rackable website says they still are.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664024</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:56:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dolface</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Hildago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664029</link>	
		<description>LUCKY!  Give me one!!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664029</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:29:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hildago</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: George_Spiggott</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664461</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How many systems does Google have?&lt;/i&gt;

One.  It&apos;s just highly distributed and has a fuck of a lot of computers in it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664461</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 17:48:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George_Spiggott</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holloway</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664565</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/31/technology/31CND-GOOGLE.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;A month ago the NYTimes say that Google have 100,000 computers&lt;/a&gt; but it&apos;s not backed up.&lt;blockquote&gt;The company stopped giving updates on the size of its computing resources in 2001. But several people with knowledge of the system said it consists of more than 54,000 servers designed by Google engineers from basic components. It contains about 100,000 processors and 261,000 disks, these people said, making it what many consider the largest computing system in the world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664565</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2004 01:13:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holloway</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TNLNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664931</link>	
		<description>holloway: I followed the link but couldn&apos;t find the mention. Maybe there&apos;s a page 2 I&apos;m missing :) Either way, the more than 54k servers still fits within my estimates (yes, the fp link is to my site). 

What I was trying to arrive at was a good ballpark. I think there is general agreement now that it&apos;s more than 10k machines. All the figures I&apos;ve heard before have been between 10k and 100k. With the estimates, I was trying to figure out which figure is more real.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664931</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 06:43:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TNLNYC</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: crunchland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32832/The-worlds-second-biggest-supercomputer#664937</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/sad/30091481.html&quot;&gt;http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/sad/30091481.html&lt;/a&gt; classified ad for Google: Data Center Technician in Reston, VA, which says : &quot;Help Google build and maintain its Linux cluster consisting of more than 10,000 servers.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.32832-664937</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2004 06:55:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
