<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: We&apos;re overdue for a big disaster.</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3318/Were-overdue-for-a-big-disaster/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post We&apos;re overdue for a big disaster.</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>We&apos;re overdue for a big disaster.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3318/Were-overdue-for-a-big-disaster</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4064231,00.html"&gt;We&apos;re overdue for a big disaster.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Two years without a harvest? It would probably bust civilisation.  People would survive all right. It really would cut us back, and that is the sort of thing nobody really prepares for. It&apos;s not some ecological poison or GM foods or nuclear that is going to get us, it is going to be some perfectly ordinary natural event.&quot;

Almost enough to make me stock canned goods again. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3318</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 08:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>norm</dc:creator>		<category>JamesLovelock</category>		<category>Gaia</category>		<category>environment</category>		<category>ecology</category>		<category>disaster</category>		<category>food</category>		<category>farming</category>		<category>Guardian</category>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
