<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Next - A patch for stupidity ?</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Next - A patch for stupidity ?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 08:39:51 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 08:39:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Next - A patch for stupidity ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3689185.stm"&gt;Testosterone patch &apos;boosts women&apos;s sex drive&apos;&lt;/a&gt; but, warn researchers, &quot;If a couple doesn&apos;t like each other then no patch will improve their sex life.&quot; (BBC)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 08:38:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>		<category>testosterone</category>		<category>sexdrives</category>		<category>women</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: troutfishing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685171</link>	
		<description>Soon, we&apos;ll all be covered with patches.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685171</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 08:39:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685229</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;A recent study suggested as many as one in three women who have had hysterectomies have low sexual desire. One in five said they were distressed about it.&lt;/em&gt;

So, if I&apos;m reading this correctly, this isn&apos;t 20% of women being distressed, it&apos;s more like 20% of the ones who have low desire as the result of hysterectomies (33%), or 1/15th overall. Percentagewise, this is like 6-7%. Not that being distressed about your low sexual desire should be pooh-poohed, but it&apos;s by no means an epidemic. In fact, the &quot;disorder&quot; that this article refers to is actually the woman&apos;s distress over her lack of desire, not the lack of desire itself. Seems like there may be better [and cheaper] ways of treating distress than with a walloping dose of testosterone. Say, by &lt;a href=&quot;http://cms.psychologytoday.com/conditions/sexdesire.html&quot;&gt;talking to your partner more&lt;/a&gt;...

&lt;em&gt;One major way of preventing ISD is to reserve time for nonsexual intimacy with one&apos;s partner. Couples who reserve weekly talk time and time for a weekly date alone without the kids, will maintain a closer relationship and are more likely to feel sexual interest. Couples should also detach sex and affection, so that neither one is afraid to be affectionate on a daily basis, fearing that it will be interpreted as an invitation to proceed to intercourse.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685229</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:56:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jozxyqk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685257</link>	
		<description>Must. .. resist..

Patches?  We don&apos;t need no stinking patches!

OK, I said it.  I&apos;m sorry.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685257</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:10:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jozxyqk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Potsy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685260</link>	
		<description>A friend who is studying anthropology told me the use of plant estrogens in modern agriculture has reduced overall testicle size in men. I wonder if the same cause is repsonsible for lowered testosterone levels in men and women, which might contribute to this problem, and other problems such as reduced fertility rates.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685260</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Potsy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Rastafari</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685272</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;but, warn researchers, &quot;If a couple doesn&apos;t like each other then no patch will improve their sex life.&quot; (BBC)&lt;/i&gt;

Roofies patch, anyone.......?

/&lt;small font&gt;just kidding, of course......please no flames&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685272</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:37:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ulotrichous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685278</link>	
		<description>I assume that Procter &amp;amp; Gamble has already approached Pfizer about a marketing partnership.  The top of that patch may very well be some of the most valuable advertising space in existence.  At the very least, they could upsell to a version bearing sassy, empowering slogans, such as &quot;Me first.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685278</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ulotrichous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Satapher</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685364</link>	
		<description>i say we run this by Phil first</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685364</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 17:11:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Satapher</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: abcde</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685641</link>	
		<description>Potsy: So am I becoming less of a man because I have about a pound of soy products a day?  ;)

Anyway, I get the sense that female sex drive is mostly a mental (emotional etc.) desire, compared to men&apos;s which is mostly a physical impulse.  Women have like a tenth of men&apos;s testosterone (which really does drive almost all desire, sexual or otherwise), and while maybe they&apos;re more sensitive to it, I think that&apos;s definitely a sign.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685641</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abcde</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Potsy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685933</link>	
		<description>adcde: You could have low testosterone, seriously. Maybe some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=zinc+testosterone&quot; title=&quot;surprisingly high percentages of people in developed countires are deficient in zinc, which among other things, can cause low testosterone levels&quot;&gt;zinc supplements&lt;/a&gt; are in order.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685933</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:47:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Potsy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wackybrit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#685997</link>	
		<description>Surely there is some benefit in taking something to reduce sex drive too. After all, having a sex drive when you&apos;re not the sort of person who wants to go steady with someone, nor have some one night stand, is pretty annoying :-D</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-685997</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:50:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wackybrit</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: troutfishing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33654/Next-A-patch-for-stupidity#686189</link>	
		<description>abcde - I have heard that, among Buddhist male monks - in certain traditions, the eating of soy products has been long recommended to reduce sexual desires.

I&apos;d disagree with your assertion that female sexual desire is largely mental.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.33654-686189</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:27:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
