<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: eh?</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post eh?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:15:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:15:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>eh?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/index.html"&gt;Words: Woe &amp; Wonder&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=http://www.cbc.ca&gt;CBC&lt;/a&gt; explains and debates usage from a Canadian-journalism standpoint - for example, why &lt;a href=http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/saddam_hussein.html&gt;the Iraqi ex-leader is referred to by his first name&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/internet_i.html&gt;whether to capitalize this place&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>casarkos</dc:creator>		<category>CBC</category>		<category>WordsWoeAndWonder</category>		<category>WordsWoeWonder</category>		<category>style</category>		<category>writing</category>		<category>words</category>		<category>editorial</category>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>Saddam</category>		<category>Web</category>		<category>Internet</category>		<category>etymology</category>		<category>WordChoice</category>		<category>usage</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Space Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#701980</link>	
		<description>Are any other news orgs as obsessive about pronunciation and word usage as the CBC?  Chancing to hear a segment where CBC reporters and producers start talking about the subject on the air is jaw-droppingly dull, but compelling in an obsessive nerd sort of way.  They&apos;ve actually done a quiz where the on-air people compete on who is the most consistently correct word ... guys.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-701980</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:15:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: silusGROK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#701995</link>	
		<description>Wow... that is, perhaps, one of the best arguments I&apos;ve seen for using &quot;Saddam&quot; by itself. Very cool.

Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-701995</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:43:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: t r a c y</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702000</link>	
		<description>haha, that&apos;s great.  i heart the cbc nerds.  thanks casarkos !</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702000</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:52:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t r a c y</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wackybrit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702009</link>	
		<description>Eugh. This mangling of the rules of the English language is grotesque. &apos;internet&apos;?

There&apos;s only one Internet in common use, therefore the word should remain capitalised, much like we capitalise &apos;Rome&apos;, &apos;Paris&apos;, or the &apos;Pentagon&apos;. If the BBC and the CBC want to drop the rule of capitalising proper nouns, then I&apos;d encourage them to follow through on this ridiculousness and drop capitalisation on every proper noun.

I know consistency is not English&apos;s strong point, but seeing as these people &lt;em&gt;used&lt;/em&gt; to get it right, why can&apos;t they stick to the rules?(!)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702009</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wackybrit</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bonehead</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702011</link>	
		<description>The BBC has the grandmother of all &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbctraining.com/onlineCourse.asp?tID=5487&amp;cat=3&quot;&gt;style guides&lt;/a&gt;, but I think the CBC&apos;s is the more interesting. Not that I&apos;m biased or anything.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702011</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:18:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bonehead</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jacquilynne</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702021</link>	
		<description>This is very cool, thanks. 

I didn&apos;t want to work this afternoon, anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702021</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:52:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jacquilynne</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DrJohnEvans</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702085</link>	
		<description>Time to dive into the nerdy archive.  Splash!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702085</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DrJohnEvans</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kirkaracha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34349/eh#702114</link>	
		<description>The writers of the what-to-call-him piece (&quot;...uses both versions on its &lt;em&gt;Web site&lt;/em&gt;&quot;) should read the should-we-capitalize piece (&quot;...we&apos;ve made a few changes around here, and now it&apos;s a &apos;&lt;em&gt;web page&lt;/em&gt;&apos;&quot;). [My emphasis.]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34349-702114</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:07:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
