<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The search engine is dead! Long live the search agent!</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The search engine is dead! Long live the search agent!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:26:28 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:26:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The search engine is dead! Long live the search agent!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blinkx.com&quot;&gt;blinkx&lt;/a&gt; is a new contextual search agent that seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/06/17/blinkx-blinkx/&quot;&gt;causing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1260983,00.html&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,2020-9080-1176682,00.html&quot;&gt;excitement&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately, it is not available for Macintosh or Mozilla at present.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:02:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davehat</dc:creator>		<category>search</category>		<category>searchengine</category>		<category>searchagent</category>		<category>blinkx</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#701985</link>	
		<description>feh. Just did a vanity search and none of the 20 or so pages Google usually can find came up.

If this is their beta, better wait before going gold.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-701985</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:26:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: costas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#701991</link>	
		<description>I tried BlinkX about a month ago.  I was underwhelmed.  For me at least most of my documents and work are stored in one way or other in Outlook, and &lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.lookoutsoft.com/Lookout/&quot;&gt;Lookout&lt;/a&gt; does a much better job of searching through my email than BlinkX.  Highly recommended (just a happy user, I should by a license actually...)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-701991</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:34:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: birdherder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#701997</link>	
		<description>Since I&apos;m using a Mac, I&apos;ll have to wait to play with it, but it sounds like Spotlight [on the forthcoming  Mac OS X Tiger release] with web searching [It seems Apple will have a SDK for Spotlight so if Tiger doesn&apos;t ship with searching the web, someone will have an add-on].

I&apos;m excited about Spotlight&apos;s ability to search my local system but I guess I&apos;m missing something about needing to see both web searches and local content on the same results page. 

Since only we special few get the privilege of running Mac OS X, blinkx might be solution for the unwashed masses.

Now Google&apos;s version of this makes a little sense if gmail takes off and it really the &apos;next big thing&apos; since it can add local searches to your gmail/google search results. I&apos;m still on the fence on gmail since I&apos;m not a huge fan of webmail.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-701997</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:44:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>birdherder</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Lizc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702002</link>	
		<description>I just used it at school for some research, so far I kind of like it. It found me sources I hadn&apos;t found anywhere else.

I looked for a whole sentance though (question w/o the question mark) and it found me answers.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702002</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:58:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lizc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kerplunk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702058</link>	
		<description>Didn&apos;t Autonomy or someone like that have a program that did this exact same thing back in 1999?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702058</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:49:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kerplunk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Termite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702087</link>	
		<description>What I&apos;d like to see is a search engine that would let me choose to search certain categories of web pages &#8211; i. e. search only newspapers/magazine articles or only scientific/university web pages. That would be a great improvement. When you search for something now, you get all sorts of results mixed up. Search for &quot;Mars&quot; and you get scientific web pages as well as pages from amateur astronomers, and then there&apos;s a fan page of a band named Mars, and someone&apos;s cat named Mars etc...

What do you think? Perhaps this sort of thing already exists?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702087</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:23:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Termite</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: page404</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702088</link>	
		<description>Hmmm, I have a handful of people I always search for when testing a search engine, Blinkx is the first search engine to find one of them that no other engine finds.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>page404</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: NekulturnY</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702098</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You would be forgiven for thinking that Rittweger and her British business partner, Suranga Chanratillake, who used to &lt;strong&gt;work for the UK search engine company Autonomy&lt;/strong&gt;, ought to be locked up for even thinking of trying to take on the almighty Google... &lt;/em&gt; (from the second link)

I guess that&apos;s your answer, kerplunk.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702098</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:41:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NekulturnY</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grod</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702127</link>	
		<description>Termite, use the google advanced search page.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702127</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:22:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grod</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: reklaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702133</link>	
		<description>kerplunk and NekulturnY: that&apos;s pretty funny... I guess everything old is new again.

Anyone up for a second dotcom bubble?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702133</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:31:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: biffa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702182</link>	
		<description>Here&apos;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1158547,00.html&quot;&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;from the Observer (Feb 2004) about Google&apos;s vulnerability to new search engines. (Its from the Networker column that&apos;s usually in the business section - covers some aspect of web related news each week, can be quite interesting, though maybe not too those of you who keep up with this stuff professionally)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702182</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:09:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>biffa</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nyxxxx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702509</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s great, if spyware and adware gets you all hot and bothered.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702509</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:58:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nyxxxx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nyxxxx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34350/The-search-engine-is-dead-Long-live-the-search-agent#702517</link>	
		<description>Oh, and here&apos;s confirmation from slashdot,

&quot;During my usage of the software, I saw numerous pop-under banners being spawned by Internet Explorer, even when I was using Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock! It turns out that Blinkx actually creates a pseudo-proxy server and routes all traffic through it. Even historically secure browsers like Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock were foiled by it.&quot;

I had popups, too. Ran search and destroy to get rid of it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34350-702517</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:16:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nyxxxx</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
