July 15, 2004 1:01 PM Subscribe
Steve Jobs wants to tear down his home.
But there's a problem. It's a George Washington Smith
-designed 1926 Spanish Colonial Revival house (mansion?) in Woodside, California, and preservationists feel it has historical significance. Jobs replies that he'll build something that will eventually become "more historically interesting" than the present property. (Given his penchant for the steel and glass of I.M. Pei
, that seems questionable.) But should he not have the right to do what he wants with his property? Tear it down, paint it purple, or fill it to the roof with Jell-O; whose business is it other than the homeowner? note: first link leads to NYT, registration required
posted by emptyage (35 comments total)
« Older Al-Jazeera,... | Iraqi women beg to be killed a... Newer »