<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 3473</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3473//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 3473</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:36:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 3473</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3473/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=wpni/print&amp;articleid=A48146-2000Sep29"&gt;FBI focuses on McKinnon staffer Lozano in the debate tape probe.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;A federal source said the label on the Express Mail package received by Downey also directly corresponds to the date and time Lozano was filmed by a security camera mailing a package in the Austin post office.&quot; (via Washington Post)

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3473</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:28:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tamim</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>WashingtonPost</category>		<category>WaPo</category>		<category>Election2000</category>		<category>AlGore</category>		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>		<category>debates</category>		<category>tapes</category>		<category>campaign</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3473/#21695</link>	
		<description>McKinnon is going way out on a limb in defending his assistant (the &quot;Gap pants&quot; alibi). If the FBI has fingerprints, it&apos;s all over. The only question is whether they&apos;ll find anything like e-mail on Lozano&apos;s computer. Maybe she WAS friends with somebody in the Gore campaign. If it was on the order of &quot;I have some information I can send you guys, who should I address it to?&quot; it&apos;s pretty clear this is no mole. On the other hand, that could provide pretty convincing evidence the other way, too. If somebody as high as Gore&apos;s inner circle was involved, I&apos;ll hurl.

See also articles in &lt;a href=&quot;http://austin360.com/statesman/editions/today/news_4.html&quot;&gt;Austin American Statesman&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasnews.com/campaign/181285_tapefolo_30pol.html&quot;&gt;Dallas Morning News&lt;/a&gt;, neither of which is quite so quick to exonerate Gore &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3473-21695</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
