<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: hackers</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post hackers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:53:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:53:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>hackers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20040812S0003"&gt;Hacker Pleads Guilty.&lt;/a&gt; The Minnesota man who spread a modified version of the MSBlast worm over the Internet last summer pleaded guilty on Wednesday and faces 18 to 37 months in prison.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:25:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>		<category>hacker</category>		<category>msblast</category>		<category>internet</category>		<category>guilty</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: shepd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717374</link>	
		<description>ARGH!  He&apos;s a &lt;b&gt;cracker&lt;/b&gt;, not a &lt;i&gt;hacker&lt;/i&gt;.

Ok, ok, ok, so noboy uses the english language properly anymore.  I don&apos;t blame you.  :-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717374</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:53:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shepd</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: COBRA!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717380</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt; ARGH! He&apos;s a cracker, not a hacker.&lt;/em&gt;

Hey, who&apos;re you calling a cracker, honkie?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717380</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:58:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>COBRA!</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sonofsamiam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717415</link>	
		<description>The &quot;cracker&quot; terminology sucks too, since it has been used to describe people who crack software protections long before it was used to describe people who &quot;crack&quot; into websites. 

And this guy spread a worm. What did he &quot;crack&quot;?

More importantly, though it&apos;s a word that&apos;s used to demonize.
Promoting the use of the term &quot;cracker&quot; to describe anyone who uses a computer maliciously (&quot;some cracker phished my credit card number!&quot;) is just as bad as the use of the word &quot;hacker.&quot; It&apos;s like characterizing someone as a &quot;terrorist.&quot; Are mercenaries &quot;terrorists&quot;? What about rebels against dictatorial states?

He&apos;s not a cracker. He&apos;s a guy who spread a malicious worm.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717415</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:31:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sonofsamiam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Bonzai</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717483</link>	
		<description>He&apos;s a guy that took some code he didn&apos;t write combined it with some other code he didn&apos;t write and used that to try and take control of other peoples computers.

He&apos;s not a hacker, he&apos;s an asshole.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717483</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:40:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bonzai</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: HTuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717492</link>	
		<description>He should get life. Screw&apos;im. Gotta start sending messages sooner that later.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717492</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:54:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HTuttle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: reklaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717506</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ARGH! He&apos;s a cracker, not a hacker.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, fuck off. If I ever meet ESR, I&apos;m going to kick his ass for introducing this particular knee-jerk reaction. It&apos;s as bad as RMS and his bloody GNU/Linux.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717506</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:19:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: substrate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34950/hackers#717671</link>	
		<description>reklaw,

there&apos;s some history behind it. Originally &apos;hacker&apos; was applied to people who could apply technology, possibly in unintended manners, to solve a problem. There&apos;s a deeper meaning too, not all engineers or computer scientists are hackers. Hacker wasn&apos;t a word applied to anybody who did something illegal or questionable with computers. That meaning was introduced by the media. 

Hacker wasn&apos;t a word that described good guys or bad guys, it was a word that described a particular type of technical expertise. Some people ESR would label crackers were also hackers. This guy in Minnesota is just a putz.

ESR is guilty of trying to sanitize the word, the media is guilty of trying to stigmatize the word.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.34950-717671</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:28:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>substrate</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
