Science
October 13, 2004 8:55 AM
Subscribe
In terms of our genes, we humans are all the same -- except
for the ways in which we're different. Pharmacogenomics has for years been touted as the ultimate benefit of the genomics revolution. But to many, this revolution has a troubling side.
posted by semmi (6 comments total)
« Older
Kartenfalthelme....
| Counter-Strike technical suppo...
Newer »
Suppose a given drug (A) is found to work well in people carrying gene X, but not that well in people lacking gene X. (This is the essence of pharmacogenomics.) Someday, it will be both possible and economically feasible for people to be tested in a doctor's office to see whether they carry the gene, get back results in a few hours, and get a prescription either for drug A or drug B, depending on the results. But we're not there yet.
So in the meantime, race might sometimes be used as a heuristic. If we know 80% of persons of African descent carry gene X, but only 20% of persons of European descent do, then it might make sense to prescribe drug A to the former, but not to the latter.
Yes, this is fraught with ethical implications. But my point is that it's a temporary measure, until the technology to test directly for the relevant gene(s) becomes common, and it's important not to condemn all of pharmacogenomics for issues which are ultimately not central to it.
posted by DevilsAdvocate at 11:55 AM on October 13, 2004