<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 365</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/365//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 365</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 365</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/365/</link>	
		<description>The Attorney General&apos;s Office just released the results of it&apos;s &lt;a href=&apos;http://167.240.254.37/AGWebSite/press_release/pr10153.htm&apos;&gt;sixth annual holiday scanner accuracy survey&lt;/a&gt; (betcha didn&apos;t know you already missed five of these puppies, eh?) The survey unearthed an overall scanner error rate of 16.8 per cent, of which 85 per cent of the errors were overcharges. I always thought those cashiers at Sears looked shifty.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,1999:site.365</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1999 21:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>		<category>barcodes</category>		<category>scanners</category>		<category>shopping</category>		<category>technology</category>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
